RTX Archives - Page 4 of 7 - Technology News

March 5, 2023

Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3 laptop with RTX 4050 and Ryzen 7 7735HS gets first notable discount

The RTX 4050-powered Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3 has received a modest 14{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} discount (Image: Lenovo)

The just recently released Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3 sports Nvidia’s latest entry level gaming GPU in the form of the RTX 4050, but the 15-inch gaming laptop also comes with a rather cheap 120Hz display that may not be the ideal choice for some prospective buyers.

After their official announcement at CES 2023 back in January, Ada Lovelace-powered gaming laptops are finally hitting the market. Although the majority of these machines are launching at rather inflated prices, one of the more affordable RTX 4050 options from the Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3 series has now received a noteworthy discount.

In this case, the reputable retailer antonline is selling the Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3 configuration with the AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS octa-core processor and the aforementioned Nvidia GeForce RTX 4050 dGPU with 6GB of GDDR6 VRAM and an efficient TGP of 85 watts for US$1,099 including free shipping. This deal offers US$177 or 14 percent in savings, which certainly isn’t much in comparison to other recent gaming laptop offers, but it constitutes one of the very first decent discounts for the brand-new Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3.

In addition to the specs mentioned above, this Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3 configuration sports 16GB of DDR5-4800 memory as well as a 512GB PCIe 4.0 NVMe SSD. As expected, gaming laptops in this price range still feature rather basic displays, in this case it’s a 120Hz 1080p IPS display with a peak brightness of 250 nits and just 45{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} of NTSC color space coverage. Therefore, this deal is best suited for gamers who definitely want to try out one of the latest CPU and GPU combinations, but can live with a rather dim and colorless screen due to the primary usage of an external monitor.

Order the Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3 with an RTX 4050 on sale for US$1,099 at eBay

Enrico Frahn – Tech Writer – 1659 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2021

My fascination for technology goes back a long way to the Pentium II era. Modding, overclocking and treasuring computer hardware has since become an integral part of my life. As a student, I further developed a keen interest in mobile technologies that can make the stressful college life so much easier. After I fell in love with the creation of digital content while working in a marketing position, I now scour the web to bring you the most exciting topics in the world of tech. Outside the office, I’m particularly passionate about motorsports and mountain biking.

Please share our article, every link counts!

.170

Posted on March 4, 2023
Dell gaming laptop with an RTX 3050 is surprisingly cheap

If you are in the market for a new notebook, there is often a excellent lower price to uncover among the current notebook promotions. But if you’re searching for a gaming laptop specially, 1 of the finest gaming laptop bargains is at Dell currently. There you can get the Dell G15 for just $650, which is an remarkable $200 discounts from its typical price of $850 as designed for this deal. It has some spectacular components for a notebook that will come in at a lower price than several of the most effective spending plan laptops. Absolutely free delivery is involved with your purchase of the Dell G15 gaming laptop.

Why you should get the Dell G15 gaming laptop computer

Dell is a single of the much more familiar names in computing. It has a great deal of wonderful laptop computer solutions obtainable for taking on the best Laptop game titles, with one particular of the far more well-liked options getting the G15 gaming laptop computer. This is in section mainly because of its affordability, but the quantity of capability which is packed into its rate level is a huge market as effectively. Like all of the ideal gaming laptops, the G15 packs large stage overall performance that’s equipped to go any where with its transportable sort variable. As it’s built for this offer, the G15 has a 12-main Intel i5 processor and 8GB of RAM. These function with each other to make a snappy, responsive practical experience irrespective of whether you’re gaming or sorting by way of your digital content.

This construct of the Dell G15 gaming laptop computer also contains the popular NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 graphics card. This effective GPU has 4GB of focused RAM and results in a lag-cost-free, tear-free, and stable gaming expertise even for the duration of the most rigorous and fast-paced gaming cases. It also powers the Comprehensive Hd show, which comes in at an impressive and immersive 15.6 inches. This display screen is a little bit on the greater sizing as laptops go these days, offering you plenty of area to sink into visuals and settle into your games. An additional extraordinary attribute of the RTX 3050 graphics card is performance. It permits for for a longer period battery lifetime and enhanced thermals, permitting you to enjoy for a longer time unplugged and without having processor throttling because of to substantial temperatures.

For just $650 you can consider house the Dell G15 gaming laptop. Dell has it marked down from its regular cost of $850, which helps make this deal worth a whole savings of $200. Totally free shipping is involved with your acquire.

Present-day tech news, curated and condensed for your inbox

Check your inbox!

Be sure to deliver a valid email handle to carry on.

This email tackle is currently on file. If you are not receiving newsletters, remember to test your spam folder.

Sorry, an mistake happened through subscription. You should try once again later on.

Editors’ Suggestions

Posted on February 27, 2023
Razer Blade 14 gaming laptop with RTX 3080 gets 35{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} price cut

The Razer Blade 14 configuration with an RTX 3080 has been put on sale for US$1,000 off MSRP (Image: Razer)

The powerful 14-inch gaming laptop originally carried a price tag of way above US$2,500, but thanks to a new clearance sale, the RTX 3080-powered model variant of the Razer Blade 14 has now dropped below the US$2,000 threshold.

With the emergence of the mobile RTX 4090, RTX 3080 Ti-powered gaming laptops no longer find themselves in the top spots of most performance charts and benchmarks. However, as most their successors debut at insanely high prices, previous generation models such as the Razer Blade 14 are getting significant price cuts which arguably make them worth a look from a price-performance perspective.

For example, the reputable American gaming specialist has now put the aforementioned Razer Blade 14 with the AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX and Nvidia GeForce RTX 3080 with 8GB of VRAM on sale for US$1,799, which is a whopping 35 percent or US$1,000 discount relative to the original list price of US$2,799. The 14-inch gaming laptop is further equipped with 16GB of DDR4 memory, a large 1TB SSD and a beautiful 165Hz QHD display. At just 3.92 lbs, the Razer Blade 14 is also surprisingly light considering its powerful components.

We recommend prospective buyers check out our detailed written and video review of a slightly different configuration of the Razer Blade 14. Among other strong suits, we were impressed by the high-end gaming laptop’s colorful IPS display and the well-built aluminium chassis, while the cooling system of our RTX 3070-equipped test unit was surprisingly quiet under load. Assumably, this RTX 3080 configuration of the Razer Blade 14 offers even a bit more performance, and considering the steeply discounted deal price, it may be worth a look for gaming enthusiasts who value the portability of a 14-inch machine and don’t want to exceed a budget of US$2,000.

Working For Notebookcheck
Are you a techie who knows how to translate? Then join our Team!
Details here

Disclaimer: Notebookcheck is not responsible for price changes carried out by retailers. The discounted price or deal mentioned in this item was available at the time of writing and may be subject to time restrictions and/or limited unit availability.

Top 10 Laptops
Multimedia, Budget Multimedia, Gaming, Budget Gaming, Lightweight Gaming, Business, Budget Office, Workstation, Subnotebooks, Ultrabooks, Chromebooks

under 300 USD/Euros, under 500 USD/Euros, 1,000 USD/Euros, for University Students, Best Displays

Top 10 Smartphones
Smartphones, Phablets, ≤6-inch, Camera Smartphones

Enrico Frahn – Tech Writer – 1629 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2021

My fascination for technology goes back a long way to the Pentium II era. Modding, overclocking and treasuring computer hardware has since become an integral part of my life. As a student, I further developed a keen interest in mobile technologies that can make the stressful college life so much easier. After I fell in love with the creation of digital content while working in a marketing position, I now scour the web to bring you the most exciting topics in the world of tech. Outside the office, I’m particularly passionate about motorsports and mountain biking.

Please share our article, every link counts!

.170

Posted on February 26, 2023
MSI Katana 17 B13V laptop review: Nvidia GeForce RTX 4060 makes its debut

MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB

5598 (5462.22^min – 5597.85^max) MB/s ∼100{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +117{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB

5568 (5541.55^min – 5568.34^max) MB/s ∼99{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +116{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Acer Predator Helios 300 (i7-12700H, RTX 3070 Ti)
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR

4272 (1951.61^min – 4271.9^max) MB/s ∼76{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +66{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

MSI Pulse GL76 12UGK
Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH

3889 (3772.15^min – 3889.15^max) MB/s ∼69{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +51{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Gigabyte G7 KE
Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10

3101 (2775.37^min – 3100.52^max) MB/s ∼55{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +20{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Average of class Gaming
(834 – 5598, n=174, last 2 years) MSI Katana 17 B13VFK
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM

2578 (2552.79^min – 2578.03^max) MB/s ∼46{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Average Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
(2460 – 2578, n=2) MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB

7533 (7482.85^min – 7532.79^max) MB/s ∼100{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +142{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB

7531 (7479^min – 7530.7^max) MB/s ∼100{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +142{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

MSI Pulse GL76 12UGK
Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH

4579 (4190.54^min – 4578.92^max) MB/s ∼61{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +47{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Acer Predator Helios 300 (i7-12700H, RTX 3070 Ti)
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR

4394 (4343.95^min – 4393.95^max) MB/s ∼58{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +41{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Average of class Gaming
(399 – 7889, n=173, last 2 years) MSI Katana 17 B13VFK
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM

3115 (2904.62^min – 3115.38^max) MB/s ∼41{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Average Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
(2991 – 3115, n=2) Gigabyte G7 KE
Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10

2749 (2612.84^min – 2749.11^max) MB/s ∼36{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -12{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB

12556 (4870.54^min – 12556.3^max) MB/s ∼100{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +166{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB

11242 (10740.3^min – 11242.2^max) MB/s ∼90{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +138{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Gigabyte G7 KE
Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10

7032 (6100.58^min – 7031.96^max) MB/s ∼56{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +49{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

MSI Pulse GL76 12UGK
Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH

6697 (5704.17^min – 6696.63^max) MB/s ∼53{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +42{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Acer Predator Helios 300 (i7-12700H, RTX 3070 Ti)
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR

6319 (1848.3^min – 6318.66^max) MB/s ∼50{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +34{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Average of class Gaming
(1620 – 13195, n=174, last 2 years) MSI Katana 17 B13VFK
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM

4719 (4052.12^min – 4719.01^max) MB/s ∼38{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Average Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
(4633 – 4719, n=2) Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB

10261 (10045.2^min – 10261.4^max) MB/s ∼100{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +183{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB

9942 (9912.92^min – 9941.76^max) MB/s ∼97{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +174{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Acer Predator Helios 300 (i7-12700H, RTX 3070 Ti)
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR

5259 (5245.4^min – 5258.61^max) MB/s ∼51{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +45{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

MSI Pulse GL76 12UGK
Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH

4956 (4523.11^min – 4956.35^max) MB/s ∼48{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +37{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Average of class Gaming
(86.2 – 10261, n=174, last 2 years) MSI Katana 17 B13VFK
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM

3629 (3402.12^min – 3628.58^max) MB/s ∼35{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Gigabyte G7 KE
Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10

3613 (3580.5^min – 3612.97^max) MB/s ∼35{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} 0{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Average Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
(3415 – 3629, n=2) Acer Predator Helios 300 (i7-12700H, RTX 3070 Ti)
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR

86.5 (85.74^min – 86.52^max) MB/s ∼100{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +129{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB

83.1 (79.37^min – 83.07^max) MB/s ∼96{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +120{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB

79 (77.42^min – 79.03^max) MB/s ∼91{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +110{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Gigabyte G7 KE
Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10

76.7 (73.36^min – 76.74^max) MB/s ∼89{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +103{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

MSI Pulse GL76 12UGK
Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH

69.8 (68.67^min – 69.84^max) MB/s ∼81{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +85{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Average of class Gaming
(23.3 – 97.4, n=174, last 2 years) MSI Katana 17 B13VFK
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM

37.7 (37.23^min – 37.65^max) MB/s ∼44{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Average Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
(35.5 – 37.7, n=2) Gigabyte G7 KE
Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10

391 (373.18^min – 391.21^max) MB/s ∼100{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +37{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

MSI Katana 17 B13VFK
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM

286 (269.48^min – 285.84^max) MB/s ∼73{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

MSI Pulse GL76 12UGK
Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH

263 (255.65^min – 263.15^max) MB/s ∼67{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -8{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Average Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
(181.3 – 286, n=2) Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB

221 (218.91^min – 220.66^max) MB/s ∼57{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -23{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Acer Predator Helios 300 (i7-12700H, RTX 3070 Ti)
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR

213 (195.99^min – 212.69^max) MB/s ∼54{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -26{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB

213 (205.52^min – 212.72^max) MB/s ∼54{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -26{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Average of class Gaming
(66.6 – 421, n=173, last 2 years) Gigabyte G7 KE
Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10

3551 (3544.16^min – 3551.38^max) MB/s ∼100{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +28{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Acer Predator Helios 300 (i7-12700H, RTX 3070 Ti)
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR

3222 (3204.74^min – 3221.65^max) MB/s ∼91{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +16{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

MSI Pulse GL76 12UGK
Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH

2861 (2814.76^min – 2861.3^max) MB/s ∼81{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +3{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

MSI Katana 17 B13VFK
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM Average Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
(2025 – 2769, n=2) Average of class Gaming
(310 – 4483, n=173, last 2 years) Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB

2148 (1952.04^min – 2148.3^max) MB/s ∼60{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -22{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB

1469 (1266.81^min – 1469.47^max) MB/s ∼41{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -47{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Gigabyte G7 KE
Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10

3576 (3480.8^min – 3575.55^max) MB/s ∼100{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +36{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

MSI Pulse GL76 12UGK
Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH

2700 (2613.77^min – 2699.68^max) MB/s ∼76{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +2{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

MSI Katana 17 B13VFK
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM

2635 (2459.5^min – 2634.95^max) MB/s ∼74{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Acer Predator Helios 300 (i7-12700H, RTX 3070 Ti)
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR

2623 (2563.77^min – 2622.75^max) MB/s ∼73{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} 0{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Average Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
(2291 – 2635, n=2) Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB

2101 (1969.73^min – 2101.4^max) MB/s ∼59{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -20{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Average of class Gaming
(288 – 4383, n=173, last 2 years) MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB

1424 (1251.47^min – 1423.75^max) MB/s ∼40{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -46{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Gigabyte G7 KE
Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10 Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB MSI Pulse GL76 12UGK
Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH Acer Predator Helios 300 (i7-12700H, RTX 3070 Ti)
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR MSI Katana 17 B13VFK
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM Average of class Gaming
(910 – 9510, n=165, last 2 years) Average Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
(5903 – 6311, n=2) MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB Gigabyte G7 KE
Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10 Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB Acer Predator Helios 300 (i7-12700H, RTX 3070 Ti)
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR MSI Pulse GL76 12UGK
Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH MSI Katana 17 B13VFK
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM Average Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
(2348 – 2446, n=2) Average of class Gaming
(389 – 3629, n=165, last 2 years) MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB Gigabyte G7 KE
Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10 MSI Pulse GL76 12UGK
Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB Acer Predator Helios 300 (i7-12700H, RTX 3070 Ti)
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR Average of class Gaming
(338 – 4522, n=165, last 2 years) MSI Katana 17 B13VFK
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM Average Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
(2404 – 2658, n=2) MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB MSI Pulse GL76 12UGK
Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH Gigabyte G7 KE
Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10 Average of class Gaming
(925 – 9971, n=165, last 2 years) Average Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
(3920 – 3977, n=2) MSI Katana 17 B13VFK
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM Acer Predator Helios 300 (i7-12700H, RTX 3070 Ti)
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB Acer Predator Helios 300 (i7-12700H, RTX 3070 Ti)
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR MSI Pulse GL76 12UGK
Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH Gigabyte G7 KE
Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10 Average of class Gaming
(308 – 8590, n=165, last 2 years) Average Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
(3007 – 3021, n=2) MSI Katana 17 B13VFK
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM Gigabyte G7 KE
Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10 Acer Predator Helios 300 (i7-12700H, RTX 3070 Ti)
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB MSI Pulse GL76 12UGK
Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH Average of class Gaming
(20 – 108, n=165, last 2 years) MSI Katana 17 B13VFK
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM Average Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
(49.3 – 58.8, n=2) Gigabyte G7 KE
Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10 MSI Katana 17 B13VFK
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM MSI Pulse GL76 12UGK
Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB Average Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
(152.8 – 249, n=2) Acer Predator Helios 300 (i7-12700H, RTX 3070 Ti)
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR Average of class Gaming
(18 – 364, n=165, last 2 years) MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB Gigabyte G7 KE
Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10

2914.54 MB/s ∼100{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +46{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Acer Predator Helios 300 (i7-12700H, RTX 3070 Ti)
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR MSI Pulse GL76 12UGK
Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH MSI Katana 17 B13VFK
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM Average Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
(1901 – 1995, n=2) Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB Average of class Gaming
(216 – 2963, n=165, last 2 years) MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB Gigabyte G7 KE
Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10

2915.33 MB/s ∼100{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +38{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

MSI Pulse GL76 12UGK
Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH Acer Predator Helios 300 (i7-12700H, RTX 3070 Ti)
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR Average of class Gaming
(243 – 4008, n=165, last 2 years) MSI Katana 17 B13VFK
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM Average Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
(1949 – 2108, n=2) Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB Gigabyte G7 KE
Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10 MSI Katana 17 B13VFK
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM Average Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
(0.05 – 0.094, n=2) Average of class Gaming
(0.022 – 0.23, n=160, last 2 years) MSI Pulse GL76 12UGK
Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB Acer Predator Helios 300 (i7-12700H, RTX 3070 Ti)
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR Average Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
(0.096 – 0.105, n=2) MSI Katana 17 B13VFK
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM MSI Pulse GL76 12UGK
Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH Average of class Gaming
(0.012 – 0.425, n=165, last 2 years) Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB Acer Predator Helios 300 (i7-12700H, RTX 3070 Ti)
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR Gigabyte G7 KE
Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10

* … smaller is better

Posted on February 24, 2023
Seriously, what’s the point in an RTX 4090 gaming laptop if a cheaper RTX 4080 can beat it?

Graphics cards are straightforward, right? You buy the bigger number, you spend more, you get higher gaming performance. That’s how it works on the desktop, but it’s not necessarily the way things work in gaming laptop land. It’s confusing, frustrating, and kinda disingenuous.

I’ve spent a lot of time recently checking out next-gen gaming laptops, and it’s been a trip. So far they’ve all been RTX 4090-based machines costing $4,000+, y’know that whole ultra-enthusiast schtick I so love (opens in new tab). And there’s only really been one that I liked (opens in new tab), and even then there’s no chance in hell I’d ever consider buying it at that price.

And now, having tested an RTX 4080-based machine I can say, with absolute, total clarity, no-one should.

Somehow there’s really not a lot in it. On paper, the RTX 4090 and RTX 4080 silicon is supremely different, with Nvidia using separate GPUs for each mobile graphics card, yet I’ve been surprised just how close the cheaper chip gets to the top of Nvidia’s gaming laptop stack.

Sometimes even beating it.

The mobile RTX 4090 isn’t really an RTX 4090 (opens in new tab) as we know it on the desktop; it’s sporting the exact same AD103 silicon as the desktop RTX 4080 (opens in new tab). Which still makes it a potentially very powerful GPU. Then the mobile RTX 4080 uses the same GPU as the RTX 4070 Ti (opens in new tab), but with a slightly different, lower specification.

Instead of 7,680 CUDA cores, you get two SMs fewer with a total of 7,424 CUDA cores. That means you’re also losing out on a couple of RT Cores and a bunch of Tensor Cores, too. You still get the full 12GB GDDR6 complement, and in the end actually a whole lot of speedy graphics processing silicon goodness.

And that speedy silicon means you’re getting gaming performance close to that of the $5,300 MSI Titan GT77 (opens in new tab) in something like the Lenovo Legion Pro 7i (opens in new tab) that comes in at just $2,750. Yes, I know, that’s still a huge amount of cash to drop on a gaming laptop, but it’s coming back down to a more reasonable high price. If that makes any sense.

1440p gaming performance

Image 1 of 5

(Image credit: Future)

And it’s all down to just how different mobile GPU performance can be between systems, in a way that you just don’t get on the desktop. Sure, you can get overclocked versions of graphics cards, but the performance differences are minimal, to say the least.

On a laptop, however, you’re talking about an entirely enclosed system. And with thermals being so intrinsically linked to GPU performance, the sort of cooling your wee notebook can offer will have a huge impact on your frame rates. That’s whether or not you’re rocking a 175W RTX 4090 or a 150W RTX 4080.

This is the situation I’m in here with this Lenovo machine that’s actually sometimes capable of beating a Razer Blade 16 (opens in new tab) that’s supposed to be using the most powerful mobile GPU known to humankind, using an entirely second-tier graphics chip.

System performance

Image 1 of 2

(Image credit: Future)

The Blade 16 is a relatively slim machine, though is certainly chunkier than its Blade 15 progenitor, but even so it’s holding back the top Nvidia silicon inside it. With an average clock speed, measured in Metro Exodus Enhanced Edition, of just 1,708MHz that’s a lot lower than the potential 2,040MHz peak Nvidia puts out in the RTX 4090 spec sheet.

That’s also a chunk lower than the 1,922MHz I measured the same 175W RTX 4090 averaging inside the even heftier MSI Titan. But neither can hold a candle to the clock speed the 150W RTX 4080 manages in the Lenovo I’m typing away on now. This machine is posting an average of 2,361MHz, which is actually higher than Nvidia rates this chip at.

That’s not an odd occurrence in desktop terms, but seemingly out of place here alongside the numbers the supposed top GeForce mobile GPU is offering in either of the most expensive gaming laptops I’ve ever tested.

The combination of higher clock speed and a slightly thicker chassis than the Blade 16 has allowed the Lenovo Legion Pro 7i to deliver RTX 4090-beating performance from a system that costs near $2,000 less than the Blade 16.

4K gaming performance

Image 1 of 5

(Image credit: Future)

This is but a 1600p machine, however, and doesn’t have the 4K panel of either the MSI or Razer RTX 4090 laptops. But if you thought the 16GB of the top card would deliver it a greater performance delta at 4K than the 12GB RTX 4080 can, you’d be mistaken. I plumbed the Lenovo into a 4K screen and I’m still seeing times where it beats the Blade 16’s RTX 4090.

(Image credit: Future)

There’s is one argument you could make, and that’s about professional usage. The core count of an RTX 4090 vs an RTX 4080 does actually make a difference when it comes to creation tasks, such as rendering in Blender. But when we’re talking specifically about gaming laptops the argument just isn’t there for the pricier GPU.

This is absolutely not a situation that you’d expect, or ever really want to happen. I get that performance isn’t the only reason you pay more for a high-end notebook, but it definitely is the reason you’d pick an RTX 4090 system over an RTX 4080 one.

But this time around you shouldn’t need to make that choice, because I guess you really don’t need an RTX 4090. So, er… do we call this a consumer win from Nvidia? Its second-tier GPU performs as well as its top one in actual retail units. Great, I guess.

Posted on February 22, 2023
The first RTX 4060 gaming laptop prices are… actually kind of okay

Early examples of laptops powered by Nvidia’s future RTX 4060 cell GPU are now surfacing on Newegg with selling prices kicking off at $1,100. For now, the laptops are only available to pre-purchase somewhat than becoming immediately offered.

Likewise, we’ve however to right sample the new RTX 4060 cell GPU. So, the jury continues to be out on particularly how it will look at with former-gen notebook graphics from Nvidia.

That mentioned, Nvidia has unveiled quite comprehensive requirements for the new chip. It’s going to operate 3,072 CUDA cores at up to 2,370MHz together with 8GB of GDDR6 memory more than a 128-bit bus.

For comparison, the previous RTX 3060 truly had more CUDA cores at 3,840 but a maximum improve clock of just 1,425MHz. In uncooked computational phrases, that implies a around 35{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} uplift for the new cell GPU.

But then CUDA cores are not solely similar across generations. What is a lot more, the RTX 4060 will come with niceties these as DLSS 3 and Body Generation, which will nearly unquestionably not be retroactively introduced for the aged RTX 3060. That could idea the equilibrium quite a little bit in favour of the newer GPU.

It is also worth noting that the RTX 4060 cellular may possibly in fact transform out to be far more powerful than the desktop variant, if the most current rumours are to be believed.

For the report, between the RTX 4060 laptops shown for that $1,100 determine is the MSI GF63 Collection (opens in new tab). It is truly jogging a previous-gen Intel Core i5 12500H CPU, furthermore 16GB of RAM and a 512GB SSD. The display is a 15.6-inch 1080p 144Hz product with purported “IPS level” panel tech.

Gigabyte’s G5 only comes with 8GB of RAM. Yuck. (Picture credit rating: Gigabyte)

The other $1,100 choice is the Gigabyte G5 (opens in new tab). It can be also managing past-gen CPU tech in the at any time so somewhat excellent Intel Core i5 12500H CPU, furthermore a 512GB SSD. It also sports primarily the exact 15.6-inch 1080p 144Hz screen tech. The capture with the Gigabyte solution is that it arrives with just 8GB of RAM. Yuck.

All of which usually means that you will be equipped to snag RTX 40-sequence technologies in a laptop for vaguely sensible cash quickly. Just do not expect the new GPUs to blow the aged RTX 30-series out of the drinking water absolutely.

With the feasible exception of DLSS 3 and its Frame Technology wizardry, all the indications are that the RTX 4060 will be a lot more of an iterative enhance instead than a general performance revolution. So, $1,100 for an RTX 4060 laptop computer likely is not a stellar offer, but it really is a whole lot much more acceptable than most items associated with subsequent-gen graphics.

Indeed, as we pointed out the other day, RTX 40-series laptops in standard seem to be shaping up to be comparatively respectable benefit up coming to their megabucks desktop counterparts, with RTX 4070 mobile laptops out there for a little in excess of $1,500, and RTX 4080 from $1,699 (opens in new tab). Perfectly, inspite of the $4,000 pricing of the to start with flush of RTX 4090 gaming laptops (opens in new tab) we’ve analyzed anyway.

Posts pagination

Previous page Page 1 … Page 3 Page 4 Page 5 … Page 7 Next page