Tag: size

Posted on

IT Services Market size to grow by USD 402.79 billion from 2022 to 2027, IT consulting and other services segment to be significant for the market growth -Technavio

IT Services Market size to grow by USD 402.79 billion from 2022 to 2027, IT consulting and other services segment to be significant for the market growth -Technavio

NEW YORK, April 19, 2023 /PRNewswire/ — The IT services market is estimated to grow by USD 402.79 billion from 2022 to 2027. However, the growth momentum will be progressing at a CAGR of 5.57{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} during the forecast period. The market is segmented by service (IT consulting and other services, internet services and infrastructure, and data processing and outsources services), end-user (technology and telecommunication, BFSI, travel and hospitality, healthcare, and others), and geography (APAC, North America, Europe, South America, and Middle East and Africa). 

Technavio has announced its latest market research report titled Global IT Services Market 2023-2027
Technavio has announced its latest market research report titled Global IT Services Market 2023-2027

The market share growth by the IT consulting and other services segment will be significant for the market growth during the forecast period. The segment primarily consists of services such as consulting, systems integration, information management, and education and training. Consulting services are advisory services that help clients evaluate different technology and methodology strategies. This helps clients in making it easier for their network strategies to be aligned with their business or process strategies. Consulting services provide strategic, architectural, operational, and implementation planning for customers’ networks in support of their IT initiatives. Moreover, the developments in IT consulting services made by significant vendors like Microsoft aids the adoption of IT consulting service operating models. The growing adoption of edge data centers notably drives market growth. The rapid adoption of cloud service as well as an increase in the volume, accuracy, variety, and velocity of data generated by businesses are driving up demand for edge data centers. 

The report comprises of various segments as well as analysis of the trends and factors that are playing a substantial role in the market. Click & get Latest Sample Report within minutes! 

Information Technology Services Market Insights –

  • Vendors: 15+, Including Accenture Plc, Cognizant Technology Solutions Corp., Dell Technologies Inc., DXC Technology Co., Fujitsu Ltd., HCL Technologies Ltd., Hewlett Packard Enterprise Co., Huawei Technologies Co. Ltd., Infosys Ltd., International Business Machines Corp., LTIMindtree Ltd., Microsoft Corp., Nokia Corp., Oracle Corp., Tata Consultancy Services Ltd., Tech Mahindra Ltd., Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson, Toshiba Corp., Wipro Ltd., and Zunesis Inc., among others
  • Coverage: Parent market analysis; key drivers, major trends, and challenges; customer and vendor landscape; vendor product insights and recent developments; key vendors; and market positioning of vendors
  • Segments: Service (IT consulting and other services, Internet services and infrastructure, and Data processing and outsources services), End-user (Technology and telecommunication, BFSI, Travel and hospitality, Healthcare, and Others), and Geography (APAC, North America, Europe, South America, and Middle East and Africa)

To understand more about the information services market, request a sample report

IT services market – Vendor Insights

The growing competition in the market is compelling vendors to adopt various growth strategies such as promotional activities and spending on advertisements to improve the visibility of their services. Technavio report analyzes the market’s competitive landscape and offers information on several market vendors including Accenture Plc, Cognizant Technology Solutions Corp., Dell Technologies Inc., DXC Technology Co., Fujitsu Ltd., HCL Technologies Ltd., Hewlett Packard Enterprise Co., Huawei Technologies Co. Ltd., Infosys Ltd., International Business Machines Corp., LTIMindtree Ltd., Microsoft Corp., Nokia Corp., Oracle Corp., Tata Consultancy Services Ltd., Tech Mahindra Ltd., Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson, Toshiba Corp., Wipro Ltd., and Zunesis Inc.

IT Services Market – Market Dynamics

Major Trends – 

  • An emerging trend in the IT services market that is expected to drive market growth is the emergence of AI in information management. 
  • Globally, various businesses incorporate AI in order to develop and utilize IT service data. The integration of AI in information services makes it easier to automate numerous processes and increases process effectiveness.
  • Additionally, administrative duties account for half of the work done by employees in businesses, which raises business expenses and lowers Return on Investment (ROI). This results in companies choosing IT services that use cutting-edge technologies like AI.
  • AI is also used to tag and categorize data, in turn making it simpler to find data or information in the future. Some other advantages include applying structure to unstructured data, streamlining information, enhancing information security, and improving data quality.
  • Hence, these benefits of AI are expected to boost the global market growth during the forecast period. 

Key challenges – 

  • A major challenge hindering the growth of the IT services market are the risks involved in outsourcing. 
  • Businesses outsourcing front, middle, or back-office tasks become overly reliant on the contracted firm, which results in a loss of control because the contracted company might place unreasonable demands or change the company’s operating procedures. The most likely outcome for this would be high levels of organizational dissatisfaction. 
  • Another major risk is the loss of sensitive data, lose of control over their financial and supply chain operations because they may no longer be able to function independently.
  • To deliver the required service on time, effective customer communication is essential for service providers. Clients and vendors must stay in touch in order to reduce outsourcing risks and establish trust for the duration of a procurement contract.
  • Thus, such factors can pose a challenge to the growth of the market during the forecast period.

The IT services market report provides critical information and factual data, with a qualitative and quantitative study of the market based on market drivers and limitations as well as future prospects. Drivers, & Challenges have an impact on market dynamics and can impact businesses. Find some insights from a sample report!

Why Buy?

  • Add credibility to strategy
  • Analyzes competitor’s offerings 
  • Get a holistic view of the market

What are the key data covered in this IT services market report?

  • CAGR of the market during the forecast period
  • Detailed information on factors that will drive the growth of the IT services market between 2023 and 2027
  • Precise estimation of the size of the IT services market and its contribution to the market with a focus on the parent market
  • Accurate predictions about upcoming trends and changes in consumer behavior
  • Growth of the IT Services Market across APAC, North America, Europe, South America, and Middle East and Africa
  • A thorough analysis of the market’s competitive landscape and detailed information about vendors
  • Comprehensive analysis of factors that will challenge the growth of IT Services Market vendors

Gain instant access to 17,000+ market research reports. 

Technavio’s SUBSCRIPTION platform

Related Reports:

The IT Market In Oman is projected to grow by USD 2.21 billion with a CAGR of 8.27{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} during the forecast period 2021 to 2026. Furthermore, this report extensively covers the IT market in Oman segmentation by type (hardware, software, and IT services) and end-user (BFSI, telecommunication, industrial, and others). Increased adoption of mobility solutions is one of the major drivers impacting the IT market growth. 

The managed IT infrastructure services market size is expected to increase to USD 64.51 billion from 2021 to 2026, and the market’s growth momentum will accelerate at a CAGR of 10.34{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}. Furthermore, this report extensively covers managed IT infrastructure services market segmentation by end-user (small and medium enterprise and large enterprise) and geography (North America, Europe, APAC, South America, and Middle East and Africa). The rising adoption of cloud-based managed security services (MSS) is notably driving the managed IT infrastructure services market growth.

IT Services Market Scope

Report Coverage

Details

Base year

2022

Historic period

2017-2021

Forecast period

2023-2027

Growth momentum & CAGR

Accelerate at a CAGR of 5.57{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Market growth 2023-2027

USD 402.79 billion

Market structure

Fragmented

YoY growth 2022-2023 ({b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1})

5.02

Regional analysis

APAC, North America, Europe, South America, and Middle East and Africa

Performing market contribution

APAC at 49{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Key countries

US, China, Japan, UK, and Germany

Competitive landscape

Leading Vendors, Market Positioning of Vendors, Competitive Strategies, and Industry Risks

Key companies profiled

Accenture Plc, Cognizant Technology Solutions Corp., Dell Technologies Inc., DXC Technology Co., Fujitsu Ltd., HCL Technologies Ltd., Hewlett Packard Enterprise Co., Huawei Technologies Co. Ltd., Infosys Ltd., International Business Machines Corp., LTIMindtree Ltd., Microsoft Corp., Nokia Corp., Oracle Corp., Tata Consultancy Services Ltd., Tech Mahindra Ltd., Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson, Toshiba Corp., Wipro Ltd., and Zunesis Inc.

Market dynamics

Parent market analysis, Market growth inducers and obstacles, Fast-growing and slow-growing segment analysis, COVID-19 impact and recovery analysis and future consumer dynamics, Market condition analysis for forecast period

Customization purview

If our report has not included the data that you are looking for, you can reach out to our analysts and get segments customized.

Browse for Technavio’s Information Technology Reports

Table of Contents

1 Executive Summary

  • 1.1 Market overview
    • Exhibit 01: Executive Summary – Chart on Market Overview
    • Exhibit 02: Executive Summary – Data Table on Market Overview
    • Exhibit 03: Executive Summary – Chart on Global Market Characteristics
    • Exhibit 04: Executive Summary – Chart on Market by Geography
    • Exhibit 05: Executive Summary – Chart on Market Segmentation by Service
    • Exhibit 06: Executive Summary – Chart on Market Segmentation by End-user
    • Exhibit 07: Executive Summary – Chart on Incremental Growth
    • Exhibit 08: Executive Summary – Data Table on Incremental Growth
    • Exhibit 09: Executive Summary – Chart on Vendor Market Positioning

2 Market Landscape

  • 2.1 Market ecosystem
    • Exhibit 10: Parent market
    • Exhibit 11: Market Characteristics

3 Market Sizing

  • 3.1 Market definition
    • Exhibit 12: Offerings of vendors included in the market definition
  • 3.2 Market segment analysis 
    • Exhibit 13: Market segments
  • 3.4 Market outlook: Forecast for 2022-2027 
    • Exhibit 14: Chart on Global – Market size and forecast 2022-2027 ($ billion)
    • Exhibit 15: Data Table on Global – Market size and forecast 2022-2027 ($ billion)
    • Exhibit 16: Chart on Global Market: Year-over-year growth 2022-2027 ({b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1})
    • Exhibit 17: Data Table on Global Market: Year-over-year growth 2022-2027 ({b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1})

4 Historic Market Size

  • 4.1 Global IT services market 2017 – 2021 
    • Exhibit 18: Historic Market Size – Data Table on Global IT services market 2017 – 2021 ($ billion)
  • 4.2 Service Segment Analysis 2017 – 2021 
    • Exhibit 19: Historic Market Size – Service Segment 2017 – 2021 ($ billion)
  • 4.3 Product Segment Analysis 2017 – 2021 
    • Exhibit 20: Historic Market Size – Product Segment 2017 – 2021 ($ billion)
  • 4.4 Geography Segment Analysis 2017 – 2021 
    • Exhibit 21: Historic Market Size – Geography Segment 2017 – 2021 ($ billion)
  • 4.5 Country Segment Analysis 2017 – 2021 
    • Exhibit 22: Historic Market Size – Country Segment 2017 – 2021 ($ billion)

5 Five Forces Analysis

  • 5.1 Five forces summary
    • Exhibit 23: Five forces analysis – Comparison between 2022 and 2027
  • 5.2 Bargaining power of buyers 
    • Exhibit 24: Chart on Bargaining power of buyers – Impact of key factors 2022 and 2027
  • 5.3 Bargaining power of suppliers 
    • Exhibit 25: Bargaining power of suppliers – Impact of key factors in 2022 and 2027
  • 5.4 Threat of new entrants 
    • Exhibit 26: Threat of new entrants – Impact of key factors in 2022 and 2027
  • 5.5 Threat of substitutes 
    • Exhibit 27: Threat of substitutes – Impact of key factors in 2022 and 2027
  • 5.6 Threat of rivalry
    • Exhibit 28: Threat of rivalry – Impact of key factors in 2022 and 2027
  • 5.7 Market condition
    • Exhibit 29: Chart on Market condition – Five forces 2022 and 2027

6 Market Segmentation by Service

  • 6.1 Market segments
    • Exhibit 30: Chart on Service – Market share 2022-2027 ({b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1})
    • Exhibit 31: Data Table on Service – Market share 2022-2027 ({b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1})
  • 6.2 Comparison by Service 
    • Exhibit 32: Chart on Comparison by Service
    • Exhibit 33: Data Table on Comparison by Service
  • 6.3 IT consulting and other services – Market size and forecast 2022-2027 
    • Exhibit 34: Chart on IT consulting and other services – Market size and forecast 2022-2027 ($ billion)
    • Exhibit 35: Data Table on IT consulting and other services – Market size and forecast 2022-2027 ($ billion)
    • Exhibit 36: Chart on IT consulting and other services – Year-over-year growth 2022-2027 ({b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1})
    • Exhibit 37: Data Table on IT consulting and other services – Year-over-year growth 2022-2027 ({b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1})
  • 6.4 Internet services and infrastructure – Market size and forecast 2022-2027 
    • Exhibit 38: Chart on Internet services and infrastructure – Market size and forecast 2022-2027 ($ billion)
    • Exhibit 39: Data Table on Internet services and infrastructure – Market size and forecast 2022-2027 ($ billion)
    • Exhibit 40: Chart on Internet services and infrastructure – Year-over-year growth 2022-2027 ({b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1})
    • Exhibit 41: Data Table on Internet services and infrastructure – Year-over-year growth 2022-2027 ({b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1})
  • 6.5 Data processing and outsources services – Market size and forecast 2022-2027
    • Exhibit 42: Chart on Data processing and outsources services – Market size and forecast 2022-2027 ($ billion)
    • Exhibit 43: Data Table on Data processing and outsources services – Market size and forecast 2022-2027 ($ billion)
    • Exhibit 44: Chart on Data processing and outsources services – Year-over-year growth 2022-2027 ({b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1})
    • Exhibit 45: Data Table on Data processing and outsources services – Year-over-year growth 2022-2027 ({b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1})
  • 6.6 Market opportunity by Service 
    • Exhibit 46: Market opportunity by Service ($ billion)
    • Exhibit 47: Data Table on Market opportunity by Service ($ billion)

7 Market Segmentation by End-user

  • 7.1 Market segments
    • Exhibit 48: Chart on End-user – Market share 2022-2027 ({b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1})
    • Exhibit 49: Data Table on End-user – Market share 2022-2027 ({b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1})
  • 7.2 Comparison by End-user 
    • Exhibit 50: Chart on Comparison by End-user
    • Exhibit 51: Data Table on Comparison by End-user
  • 7.3 Technology and telecommunication – Market size and forecast 2022-2027 
    • Exhibit 52: Chart on Technology and telecommunication – Market size and forecast 2022-2027 ($ billion)
    • Exhibit 53: Data Table on Technology and telecommunication – Market size and forecast 2022-2027 ($ billion)
    • Exhibit 54: Chart on Technology and telecommunication – Year-over-year growth 2022-2027 ({b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1})
    • Exhibit 55: Data Table on Technology and telecommunication – Year-over-year growth 2022-2027 ({b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1})
  • 7.4 BFSI – Market size and forecast 2022-2027 
    • Exhibit 56: Chart on BFSI – Market size and forecast 2022-2027 ($ billion)
    • Exhibit 57: Data Table on BFSI – Market size and forecast 2022-2027 ($ billion)
    • Exhibit 58: Chart on BFSI – Year-over-year growth 2022-2027 ({b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1})
    • Exhibit 59: Data Table on BFSI – Year-over-year growth 2022-2027 ({b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1})
  • 7.5 Travel and hospitality – Market size and forecast 2022-2027 
    • Exhibit 60: Chart on Travel and hospitality – Market size and forecast 2022-2027 ($ billion)
    • Exhibit 61: Data Table on Travel and hospitality – Market size and forecast 2022-2027 ($ billion)
    • Exhibit 62: Chart on Travel and hospitality – Year-over-year growth 2022-2027 ({b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1})
    • Exhibit 63: Data Table on Travel and hospitality – Year-over-year growth 2022-2027 ({b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1})
  • 7.6 Healthcare – Market size and forecast 2022-2027 
    • Exhibit 64: Chart on Healthcare – Market size and forecast 2022-2027 ($ billion)
    • Exhibit 65: Data Table on Healthcare – Market size and forecast 2022-2027 ($ billion)
    • Exhibit 66: Chart on Healthcare – Year-over-year growth 2022-2027 ({b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1})
    • Exhibit 67: Data Table on Healthcare – Year-over-year growth 2022-2027 ({b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1})
  • 7.7 Others – Market size and forecast 2022-2027 
    • Exhibit 68: Chart on Others – Market size and forecast 2022-2027 ($ billion)
    • Exhibit 69: Data Table on Others – Market size and forecast 2022-2027 ($ billion)
    • Exhibit 70: Chart on Others – Year-over-year growth 2022-2027 ({b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1})
    • Exhibit 71: Data Table on Others – Year-over-year growth 2022-2027 ({b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1})
  • 7.8 Market opportunity by End-user 
    • Exhibit 72: Market opportunity by End-user ($ billion)
    • Exhibit 73: Data Table on Market opportunity by End-user ($ billion)

8 Customer Landscape

  • 8.1 Customer landscape overview 
    • Exhibit 74: Analysis of price sensitivity, lifecycle, customer purchase basket, adoption rates, and purchase criteria

9 Geographic Landscape

  • 9.1 Geographic segmentation 
    • Exhibit 75: Chart on Market share by geography 2022-2027 ({b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1})
    • Exhibit 76: Data Table on Market share by geography 2022-2027 ({b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1})
  • 9.2 Geographic comparison 
    • Exhibit 77: Chart on Geographic comparison
    • Exhibit 78: Data Table on Geographic comparison
  • 9.3 APAC – Market size and forecast 2022-2027 
    • Exhibit 79: Chart on APAC – Market size and forecast 2022-2027 ($ billion)
    • Exhibit 80: Data Table on APAC – Market size and forecast 2022-2027 ($ billion)
    • Exhibit 81: Chart on APAC – Year-over-year growth 2022-2027 ({b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1})
    • Exhibit 82: Data Table on APAC – Year-over-year growth 2022-2027 ({b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1})
  • 9.4 North America – Market size and forecast 2022-2027 
    • Exhibit 83: Chart on North America – Market size and forecast 2022-2027 ($ billion)
    • Exhibit 84: Data Table on North America – Market size and forecast 2022-2027 ($ billion)
    • Exhibit 85: Chart on North America – Year-over-year growth 2022-2027 ({b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1})
    • Exhibit 86: Data Table on North America – Year-over-year growth 2022-2027 ({b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1})
  • 9.5 Europe – Market size and forecast 2022-2027 
    • Exhibit 87: Chart on Europe – Market size and forecast 2022-2027 ($ billion)
    • Exhibit 88: Data Table on Europe – Market size and forecast 2022-2027 ($ billion)
    • Exhibit 89: Chart on Europe – Year-over-year growth 2022-2027 ({b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1})
    • Exhibit 90: Data Table on Europe – Year-over-year growth 2022-2027 ({b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1})
  • 9.6 South America – Market size and forecast 2022-2027 
    • Exhibit 91: Chart on South America – Market size and forecast 2022-2027 ($ billion)
    • Exhibit 92: Data Table on South America – Market size and forecast 2022-2027 ($ billion)
    • Exhibit 93: Chart on South America – Year-over-year growth 2022-2027 ({b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1})
    • Exhibit 94: Data Table on South America – Year-over-year growth 2022-2027 ({b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1})
  • 9.7 Middle East and Africa – Market size and forecast 2022-2027 
    • Exhibit 95: Chart on Middle East and Africa – Market size and forecast 2022-2027 ($ billion)
    • Exhibit 96: Data Table on Middle East and Africa – Market size and forecast 2022-2027 ($ billion)
    • Exhibit 97: Chart on Middle East and Africa – Year-over-year growth 2022-2027 ({b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1})
    • Exhibit 98: Data Table on Middle East and Africa – Year-over-year growth 2022-2027 ({b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1})
  • 9.8 US – Market size and forecast 2022-2027 
    • Exhibit 99: Chart on US – Market size and forecast 2022-2027 ($ billion)
    • Exhibit 100: Data Table on US – Market size and forecast 2022-2027 ($ billion)
    • Exhibit 101: Chart on US – Year-over-year growth 2022-2027 ({b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1})
    • Exhibit 102: Data Table on US – Year-over-year growth 2022-2027 ({b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1})
  • 9.9 China – Market size and forecast 2022-2027 
    • Exhibit 103: Chart on China – Market size and forecast 2022-2027 ($ billion)
    • Exhibit 104: Data Table on China – Market size and forecast 2022-2027 ($ billion)
    • Exhibit 105: Chart on China – Year-over-year growth 2022-2027 ({b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1})
    • Exhibit 106: Data Table on China – Year-over-year growth 2022-2027 ({b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1})
  • 9.10 UK – Market size and forecast 2022-2027 
    • Exhibit 107: Chart on UK – Market size and forecast 2022-2027 ($ billion)
    • Exhibit 108: Data Table on UK – Market size and forecast 2022-2027 ($ billion)
    • Exhibit 109: Chart on UK – Year-over-year growth 2022-2027 ({b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1})
    • Exhibit 110: Data Table on UK – Year-over-year growth 2022-2027 ({b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1})
  • 9.11 Germany – Market size and forecast 2022-2027 
    • Exhibit 111: Chart on Germany – Market size and forecast 2022-2027 ($ billion)
    • Exhibit 112: Data Table on Germany – Market size and forecast 2022-2027 ($ billion)
    • Exhibit 113: Chart on Germany – Year-over-year growth 2022-2027 ({b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1})
    • Exhibit 114: Data Table on Germany – Year-over-year growth 2022-2027 ({b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1})
  • 9.12 Japan – Market size and forecast 2022-2027 
    • Exhibit 115: Chart on Japan – Market size and forecast 2022-2027 ($ billion)
    • Exhibit 116: Data Table on Japan – Market size and forecast 2022-2027 ($ billion)
    • Exhibit 117: Chart on Japan – Year-over-year growth 2022-2027 ({b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1})
    • Exhibit 118: Data Table on Japan – Year-over-year growth 2022-2027 ({b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1})
  • 9.13 Market opportunity by geography 
    • Exhibit 119: Market opportunity by geography ($ billion)
    • Exhibit 120: Data Tables on Market opportunity by geography ($ billion)

10 Drivers, Challenges, and Trends

  • 10.3 Impact of drivers and challenges 
    • Exhibit 121: Impact of drivers and challenges in 2022 and 2027

11 Vendor Landscape

  • 11.2 Vendor landscape
    • Exhibit 122: Overview on Criticality of inputs and Factors of differentiation
  • 11.3 Landscape disruption
    • Exhibit 123: Overview on factors of disruption
  • 11.4 Industry risks
    • Exhibit 124: Impact of key risks on business

12 Vendor Analysis

  • 12.1 Vendors covered
    • Exhibit 125: Vendors covered
  • 12.2 Market positioning of vendors 
    • Exhibit 126: Matrix on vendor position and classification
  • 12.3 Accenture Plc
    • Exhibit 127: Accenture Plc – Overview
    • Exhibit 128: Accenture Plc – Business segments
    • Exhibit 129: Accenture Plc – Key offerings
    • Exhibit 130: Accenture Plc – Segment focus
  • 12.4 Cognizant Technology Solutions Corp. 
    • Exhibit 131: Cognizant Technology Solutions Corp. – Overview
    • Exhibit 132: Cognizant Technology Solutions Corp. – Business segments
    • Exhibit 133: Cognizant Technology Solutions Corp. – Key news
    • Exhibit 134: Cognizant Technology Solutions Corp. – Key offerings
    • Exhibit 135: Cognizant Technology Solutions Corp. – Segment focus
  • 12.5 DXC Technology Co.
    • Exhibit 136: DXC Technology Co. – Overview
    • Exhibit 137: DXC Technology Co. – Business segments
    • Exhibit 138: DXC Technology Co. – Key news
    • Exhibit 139: DXC Technology Co. – Key offerings
    • Exhibit 140: DXC Technology Co. – Segment focus
  • 12.6 Fujitsu Ltd.
    • Exhibit 141: Fujitsu Ltd. – Overview
    • Exhibit 142: Fujitsu Ltd. – Business segments
    • Exhibit 143: Fujitsu Ltd. – Key news
    • Exhibit 144: Fujitsu Ltd. – Key offerings
    • Exhibit 145: Fujitsu Ltd. – Segment focus
  • 12.7 HCL Technologies Ltd. 
    • Exhibit 146: HCL Technologies Ltd. – Overview
    • Exhibit 147: HCL Technologies Ltd. – Business segments
    • Exhibit 148: HCL Technologies Ltd. – Key news
    • Exhibit 149: HCL Technologies Ltd. – Key offerings
    • Exhibit 150: HCL Technologies Ltd. – Segment focus
  • 12.8 Hewlett Packard Enterprise Co. 
    • Exhibit 151: Hewlett Packard Enterprise Co. – Overview
    • Exhibit 152: Hewlett Packard Enterprise Co. – Business segments
    • Exhibit 153: Hewlett Packard Enterprise Co. – Key news
    • Exhibit 154: Hewlett Packard Enterprise Co. – Key offerings
    • Exhibit 155: Hewlett Packard Enterprise Co. – Segment focus
  • 12.9 Huawei Technologies Co. Ltd. 
    • Exhibit 156: Huawei Technologies Co. Ltd. – Overview
    • Exhibit 157: Huawei Technologies Co. Ltd. – Business segments
    • Exhibit 158: Huawei Technologies Co. Ltd. – Key news
    • Exhibit 159: Huawei Technologies Co. Ltd. – Key offerings
    • Exhibit 160: Huawei Technologies Co. Ltd. – Segment focus
  • 12.10 Infosys Ltd.
    • Exhibit 161: Infosys Ltd. – Overview
    • Exhibit 162: Infosys Ltd. – Business segments
    • Exhibit 163: Infosys Ltd. – Key news
    • Exhibit 164: Infosys Ltd. – Key offerings
    • Exhibit 165: Infosys Ltd. – Segment focus
  • 12.11 International Business Machines Corp. 
    • Exhibit 166: International Business Machines Corp. – Overview
    • Exhibit 167: International Business Machines Corp. – Business segments
    • Exhibit 168: International Business Machines Corp. – Key offerings
    • Exhibit 169: International Business Machines Corp. – Segment focus
  • 12.12 Microsoft Corp.
    • Exhibit 170: Microsoft Corp. – Overview
    • Exhibit 171: Microsoft Corp. – Business segments
    • Exhibit 172: Microsoft Corp. – Key news
    • Exhibit 173: Microsoft Corp. – Key offerings
    • Exhibit 174: Microsoft Corp. – Segment focus
  • 12.13 Nokia Corp.
    • Exhibit 175: Nokia Corp. – Overview
    • Exhibit 176: Nokia Corp. – Business segments
    • Exhibit 177: Nokia Corp. – Key offerings
    • Exhibit 178: Nokia Corp. – Segment focus
  • 12.14 Oracle Corp.
    • Exhibit 179: Oracle Corp. – Overview
    • Exhibit 180: Oracle Corp. – Business segments
    • Exhibit 181: Oracle Corp. – Key news
    • Exhibit 182: Oracle Corp. – Key offerings
    • Exhibit 183: Oracle Corp. – Segment focus
  • 12.15 Tata Consultancy Services Ltd. 
    • Exhibit 184: Tata Consultancy Services Ltd. – Overview
    • Exhibit 185: Tata Consultancy Services Ltd. – Business segments
    • Exhibit 186: Tata Consultancy Services Ltd. – Key news
    • Exhibit 187: Tata Consultancy Services Ltd. – Key offerings
    • Exhibit 188: Tata Consultancy Services Ltd. – Segment focus
  • 12.16 Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson 
    • Exhibit 189: Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson – Overview
    • Exhibit 190: Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson – Business segments
    • Exhibit 191: Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson – Key news
    • Exhibit 192: Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson – Key offerings
    • Exhibit 193: Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson – Segment focus
  • 12.17 Toshiba Corp.
    • Exhibit 194: Toshiba Corp. – Overview
    • Exhibit 195: Toshiba Corp. – Business segments
    • Exhibit 196: Toshiba Corp. – Key news
    • Exhibit 197: Toshiba Corp. – Key offerings
    • Exhibit 198: Toshiba Corp. – Segment focus

13 Appendix

  • 13.2 Inclusions and exclusions checklist 
    • Exhibit 199: Inclusions checklist
    • Exhibit 200: Exclusions checklist
  • 13.3 Currency conversion rates for US$ 
    • Exhibit 201: Currency conversion rates for US$
  • 13.4 Research methodology
    • Exhibit 202: Research methodology
    • Exhibit 203: Validation techniques employed for market sizing
    • Exhibit 204: Information sources
  • 13.5 List of abbreviations 
    • Exhibit 205: List of abbreviations 

About Us

Technavio is a leading global technology research and advisory company. Their research and analysis focuses on emerging market trends and provides actionable insights to help businesses identify market opportunities and develop effective strategies to optimize their market positions. With over 500 specialized analysts, Technavio’s report library consists of more than 17,000 reports and counting, covering 800 technologies, spanning across 50 countries. Their client base consists of enterprises of all sizes, including more than 100 Fortune 500 companies. This growing client base relies on Technavio’s comprehensive coverage, extensive research, and actionable market insights to identify opportunities in existing and potential markets and assess their competitive positions within changing market scenarios.

Contact
Technavio Research
Jesse Maida
Media & Marketing Executive
US: +1 844 364 1100
UK: +44 203 893 3200
Email: [email protected]
Website: www.technavio.com/

SOURCE Technavio

Posted on

IT services market size expands amid mixed economic signals

IT services market size expands amid mixed economic signals
&#13

The IT services outlook remains complicated: Market forecasts position to expending development, and federal government information reveals lower unemployment — even though layoffs and economic downturn fears continue on.

Combined signals are practically nothing new in a mercurial economy that defies uncomplicated investigation. Consider last week’s economic updates:

  • Gartner pegged the worldwide IT business sector sizing at $1.36 trillion for 2023, a 9.1{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} boost in excess of 2022. The sector investigate firm’s forecast phone calls for double-digit advancement in 2024, with a 10.2{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} uptick predicted.
  • The U.S. Section of Labor documented a March unemployment charge of 3.5{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}, a slight dip from 3.6{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} in February.
  • U.S. payrolls increased by 236,000 in March. The occupation improve demonstrates continued demand for staff, but falls beneath the regular regular gain of 334,000 more than the former six months, in accordance to the Office of Labor.
  • The skilled expert services and enterprise providers sector included far more than 39,000 careers in March, trending above the normal month-to-month growth over the earlier 6 months. That sector incorporates consulting and laptop-connected products and services, but also addresses a wider scope of providers these as accounting and legal.

Software program, IT expert services prime development spots

Gartner’s most recent IT paying forecast places program at the prime of the desk, with a projected 12.3{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} expansion amount in 2023. The market researcher reported enterprises will find to improve automation and enhance productivity by means of “application-driven transformation initiatives.”

IT companies arrives in as the 2nd fastest-developing segment, with Gartner citing the expanding infrastructure-as-a-service current market as a essential contributor.

Other industry watchers have also famous IT services’ being electricity. “IT providers resulting from software package and cloud investments will continue being powerful,” Forrester Research noted in a site post earlier this calendar year. “The toughness in application and cloud spend will even further speed up IT expert services invest as corporations tap companies to service provider essential help to initiatives and operations,” the corporation documented.

While the outlook seems promising, IT services firms have not too long ago trimmed their rosters. Accenture in March disclosed plans to slash 19,000 positions, or 2.5{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} of its workforce, above the next 18 months. Kyndryl and Rackspace Know-how are also laying off employees.

The pattern, or lack thereof, underscores the hit-or-skip character of the overall economy. For cloud consultancies, their choice of cloud associate influences gross sales. GlideFast Consulting, a ServiceNow Elite associate based mostly in Waltham, Mass., had its best revenue month at any time in February and its ideal earnings thirty day period in March, in accordance to Michael Lombardo, the company’s CEO. ServiceNow’s IT asset administration presenting plays effectively in the existing financial state.

“Which is big suitable now,” Lombardo reported. “There is challenging-greenback cost savings that ServiceNow is driving.”

ServiceNow’s automation abilities are yet another additionally. “[Customers] really don’t have as lots of people today to force the wheel and require automation to do that,” Lombardo mentioned. “They need some thing to decide on up the slack.”

Marketplace focus is an additional critical variable. Some vertical markets feel fairly secure, whilst other folks, this kind of as technologies, struggle. A support provider’s publicity to different market segments helps ascertain how it is faring.

Chris Barbin, CEO and founder at Tercera, a enterprise that invests in cloud specialist solutions corporations, said spending in the healthcare and manufacturing verticals has remained fairly powerful, when the substantial-technological innovation sector, earlier a significant spender, “has been crushed.”

Health care programs and suppliers, for instance, are aggressively shelling out on cybersecurity, which added benefits Tercera portfolio businesses these kinds of as BeyondID, a managed id expert services company. The healthcare sector’s interest in big facts, in the meantime, augurs effectively for Hakkoda, which specializes in Snowflake’s cloud data warehouse technology.

Cybersecurity skill gap: Why it exists and how to fix it.
Cybersecurity skills shortages make that field a development prospect for companies suppliers.

Labor shortages proceed inspite of layoffs

Cooling task growth could portend a slowing economic climate. But the labor market remains tight, primarily in sought-following cloud and cybersecurity techniques. Gartner’s forecast noted “a crucial shortage of competent IT labor,” a development that the enterprise said will continue right up until at least 2026, dependent on predicted IT paying out.

Some service suppliers are ramping up their in-home coaching to offer with choosing challenges. Some of Tercera’s portfolio providers, for example, concentrate on expertise growth through university interactions. Hakkoda partners with universities in Costa Rica to construct expertise, collaborating to produce a Snowflake curriculum and operating on systems to advertise women in information science.

In addition, Tercera maintains associations with enterprise university plans for internships.

GlideFast, considering that its founding in 2015, experienced generally centered on choosing expertise. But the company’s strategy shifted just after its 2021 acquisition of CloudPires, a ServiceNow Elite spouse in Cincinnati, Ohio. CloudPires emphasised employee education, and Lombardo determined to launch a coaching application, developing upon the acquired company’s encounter.

The GlideFast program, primarily based in Cincinnati and now increasing into Mexico, has educated about 150 staff due to the fact its inception, Lombardo reported.

Rationalization, workers augmentation in cybersecurity

Cybersecurity continues to be an place of expending in a tricky economic system. Speakers participating in a Cisco partner webinar final 7 days explained buyers are inquiring for support trimming their safety vendor lineups. Cisco, citing sector and seller reviews, stated smaller enterprises tend to use a few to six tools, whilst massive enterprises could possibly use 50 to 100 equipment.

The macroeconomic pressures are resulting in consumers to surely scrutinize their investments a very little a lot more intently.
Stephanie HagopianVice president of bodily and cybersecurity options, CDW

Talking at the webinar, Stephanie Hagopian, vice president of bodily and cybersecurity answers at CDW, an IT expert services provider in Lincolnshire, Unwell., explained engineering rationalization ranks amid the prime buyer requests. “The macroeconomic pressures are leading to consumers to surely scrutinize their investments a tiny much more closely,” she said.

Ryan Sheehan, senior vice president of sophisticated answers at SHI Global, an IT companies provider based in Somerset, N.J., also cited seller sprawl. He claimed the Cisco numbers are very low compared with the number of protection distributors and resources he encounters amid significant enterprises. Sheehan, who also spoke at the Cisco meeting, observed that some companies have been tasked with lowering their SaaS outlays by 20{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}.

The security workforce scarcity also contributes to the need for 3rd-party companies. TechTarget’s “IT Priorities Study” discovered cybersecurity as the No. 1 know-how investment decision probable to involve managed providers or other 3rd-party vendors.

Hagopian pointed to an uptick in stability staff members augmentation requests among the CDW’s clients. The need for augmentation differs by corporation size, with midmarket and compact organizations experience much more soreness than their greater counterparts, she included.

“They you should not have plenty of people in residence,” Hagopian mentioned.

Posted on

Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2 laptop review: MSI GT77 Titan performance without the size

Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2 laptop review: MSI GT77 Titan performance without the size
Schenker XMG SECTOR, i9 13900K, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-13900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU




191.1 (39.9min) fps ∼98{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
  (156 – 191.1, n=2) MSI Titan GT77 12UHS
Intel Core i9-12900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU




169.8 (31.6min) fps ∼87{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -11{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU




147.8 (73.8min) fps ∼76{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -23{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

HP Omen 16-n0033dx
AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, AMD Radeon RX 6650M




126.8 (56.9min) fps ∼65{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -34{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

MSI Pulse GL76 12UGK
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU




118.8 (57.2min) fps ∼61{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -38{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Schenker XMG SECTOR, i9 13900K, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-13900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU




178.6 (37.8min) fps ∼97{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
  (144 – 178.6, n=2) MSI Titan GT77 12UHS
Intel Core i9-12900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU




150.3 (46min) fps ∼81{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -16{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU




125.7 (28.9min) fps ∼68{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -30{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

HP Omen 16-n0033dx
AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, AMD Radeon RX 6650M




106.3 (58.3min) fps ∼57{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -40{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

MSI Pulse GL76 12UGK
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU




102.4 (45.2min) fps ∼55{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -43{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Schenker XMG SECTOR, i9 13900K, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-13900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU




166.9 (37.1min) fps ∼92{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
  (136 – 166.9, n=3) MSI Titan GT77 12UHS
Intel Core i9-12900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU




120.5 (53.2min) fps ∼66{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -28{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU




111.5 (25.4min) fps ∼61{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -33{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

MSI Pulse GL76 12UGK
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU




83.2 (41.6min) fps ∼46{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -50{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

HP Omen 16-n0033dx
AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, AMD Radeon RX 6650M




78.9 (54.2min) fps ∼43{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -53{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Schenker XMG SECTOR, i9 13900K, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-13900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
  (104.5 – 159.7, n=6) MSI Titan GT77 12UHS
Intel Core i9-12900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU




99.4 (40.7min) fps ∼55{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -38{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU




92.1 (17.3min) fps ∼51{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -42{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

MSI Katana 17 B13VFK
Intel Core i7-13620H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU




73.81 (36.7min) fps ∼41{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -54{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

MSI Pulse GL76 12UGK
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU




69.8 (41.8min) fps ∼39{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -56{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

HP Omen 16-n0033dx
AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, AMD Radeon RX 6650M




63.8 (42.9min) fps ∼35{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -60{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Schenker XMG SECTOR, i9 13900K, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-13900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
  (75.7 – 101.3, n=6) Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU




54 (35.6min) fps ∼32{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -47{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

MSI Katana 17 B13VFK
Intel Core i7-13620H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU




45.9 (34.7min) fps ∼27{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -55{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Schenker XMG SECTOR, i9 13900K, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-13900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
  (41.9 – 56, n=4) Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU




47.8 (24.6min) fps ∼60{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU




23.3 (15.6min) fps ∼29{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -51{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

MSI Katana 17 B13VFK
Intel Core i7-13620H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU




21.1 (17min) fps ∼26{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -56{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Schenker XMG SECTOR, i9 13900K, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-13900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU




717.7 (559min) fps ∼98{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Corsair One i300
Intel Core i9-12900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti




681 (29.2min, 290P0.1, 486P1) fps ∼93{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -5{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
  (586 – 718, n=3) Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU




617 (563min) fps ∼84{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -14{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

MSI Titan GT77 12UHS
Intel Core i9-12900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU




543 (483min, 483P1) fps ∼74{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -24{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

MSI Katana 17 B13VFK
Intel Core i7-13620H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU




435 (372min) fps ∼59{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -39{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Schenker XMG Neo 17 M22
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU




386 (65.3min, 192.6P0.1, 276P1) fps ∼53{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -46{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

MSI Pulse GL76 12UGK
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU




377.1 (364min) fps ∼52{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -47{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Schenker XMG Core 17 (Early 2021)
Intel Core i7-10870H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU




302 (11.9min, 37.1P0.1, 159P1) fps ∼41{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -58{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

HP Omen 16-n0033dx
AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, AMD Radeon RX 6650M




276.5 (260min) fps ∼38{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -61{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Schenker XMG SECTOR, i9 13900K, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-13900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU




617.3 (560min) fps ∼93{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
  (511 – 617, n=3) Corsair One i300
Intel Core i9-12900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti




554 (87.5min, 251P0.1, 376P1) fps ∼83{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -10{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

MSI Titan GT77 12UHS
Intel Core i9-12900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU




411 (335min, 342.98P1) fps ∼62{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -33{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU




405.9 (371min) fps ∼61{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -34{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Schenker XMG Neo 17 M22
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU




335 (19.8min, 152.7P0.1, 234P1) fps ∼50{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -46{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

MSI Katana 17 B13VFK
Intel Core i7-13620H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU




322 (271min) fps ∼48{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -48{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

MSI Pulse GL76 12UGK
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU




252.8 (224min) fps ∼38{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -59{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Schenker XMG Core 17 (Early 2021)
Intel Core i7-10870H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU




229 (68.3min, 99.8P0.1, 142P1) fps ∼34{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -63{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

HP Omen 16-n0033dx
AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, AMD Radeon RX 6650M




217.4 (196min) fps ∼33{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -65{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Schenker XMG SECTOR, i9 13900K, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-13900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
  (361 – 449, n=4) Corsair One i300
Intel Core i9-12900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti




365 (68.6min, 182P0.1, 288P1) fps ∼60{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -19{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

MSI Titan GT77 12UHS
Intel Core i9-12900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU




260 (213min, 216.3P1) fps ∼42{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -42{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU




240.9 (228min) fps ∼39{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -46{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Schenker XMG Neo 17 M22
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU




236 (30.3min, 70.5P0.1, 139.4P1) fps ∼38{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -47{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

MSI Katana 17 B13VFK
Intel Core i7-13620H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU




206 (166min) fps ∼34{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -54{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH
Intel Core i9-11900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU




174 (141min) fps ∼28{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -61{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

MSI Pulse GL76 12UGK
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU




170.5 (159min) fps ∼28{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -62{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

HP Omen 16-n0033dx
AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, AMD Radeon RX 6650M




167 (157min) fps ∼27{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -63{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Schenker XMG Core 17 (Early 2021)
Intel Core i7-10870H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU




144 (55.2min, 60.2P0.1, 99.7P1) fps ∼23{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -68{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Schenker XMG SECTOR, i9 13900K, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-13900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU




216.3 (204min) fps ∼69{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
  (178.6 – 216, n=6) Corsair One i300
Intel Core i9-12900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti




183 (62.1min, 107P0.1, 149P1) fps ∼58{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -15{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

MSI Titan GT77 12UHS
Intel Core i9-12900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU




129.3 (110min, 111.14P1) fps ∼41{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -40{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Schenker XMG Neo 17 M22
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU




121 (98min) fps ∼39{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -44{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU




113.9 (110min) fps ∼36{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -47{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

MSI Katana 17 B13VFK
Intel Core i7-13620H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU




104.7 (88min) fps ∼33{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -52{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH
Intel Core i9-11900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU




93.8 (75min) fps ∼30{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -57{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

MSI Pulse GL76 12UGK
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU




92.8 (88min) fps ∼30{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -57{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

HP Omen 16-n0033dx
AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, AMD Radeon RX 6650M




90.1 (84min) fps ∼29{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -58{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Schenker XMG Core 17 (Early 2021)
Intel Core i7-10870H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU




79.5 (30.1min, 37.6P0.1, 42.6P1) fps ∼25{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -63{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Schenker XMG SECTOR, i9 13900K, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-13900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU




167.6 (147min) fps ∼59{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
  (137.1 – 167.6, n=3) Corsair One i300
Intel Core i9-12900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti




149 (41.5min, 102P0.1, 127P1) fps ∼53{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -11{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Schenker XMG Neo 17 M22
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU




90.5 (49.5min, 57.8P0.1, 75.3P1) fps ∼32{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -46{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU




72.5 (66min) fps ∼26{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -57{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH
Intel Core i9-11900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU




66.7 (57min) fps ∼24{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -60{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

MSI Katana 17 B13VFK
Intel Core i7-13620H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU




62.6 (55min) fps ∼22{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -63{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Schenker XMG SECTOR, i9 13900K, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-13900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090




187.6 (4.6min, 200P1) fps ∼100{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} 0{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU




187.5 (3.95min, 200P1) fps ∼100{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
  (187.4 – 187.5, n=3) MSI Titan GT77 12UHS
Intel Core i9-12900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU




187.1 (1.532min, 200P1) fps ∼100{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} 0{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Corsair One i300
Intel Core i9-12900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti




187 (2.54min, 200P1) fps ∼100{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} 0{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU




186.1 (1.631min, 100P1) fps ∼99{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -1{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

MSI Katana 17 B13VFK
Intel Core i7-13620H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU




186.1 (1.899min, 100P1) fps ∼99{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -1{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

MSI Pulse GL76 12UGK
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU




185.7 (1.866min, 142.9P1) fps ∼99{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -1{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Schenker XMG Neo 17 M22
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU




181.2 (3.86min, 125P1) fps ∼97{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -3{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Schenker XMG Core 17 (Early 2021)
Intel Core i7-10870H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU




179 (4.7min, 143P1) fps ∼95{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -5{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Schenker XMG SECTOR, i9 13900K, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-13900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090




187.6 (10.7min, 200P1) fps ∼100{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} 0{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

MSI Titan GT77 12UHS
Intel Core i9-12900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU




187.5 (6.33min, 200P1) fps ∼100{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} 0{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU




187.4 (5.08min, 200P1) fps ∼100{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
  (187 – 187.4, n=3) Corsair One i300
Intel Core i9-12900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti




187 (2.54min, 200P1) fps ∼100{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} 0{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU




187 (1.607min, 142.9P1) fps ∼100{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} 0{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

MSI Katana 17 B13VFK
Intel Core i7-13620H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU




187 (2.12min, 125P1) fps ∼100{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} 0{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

MSI Pulse GL76 12UGK
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU




184.2 (2.2min, 142.9P1) fps ∼98{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -2{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Schenker XMG Neo 17 M22
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU




180.6 (3.65min, 142.9P1) fps ∼96{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -4{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Schenker XMG Core 17 (Early 2021)
Intel Core i7-10870H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU




175 (5.02min, 125P1) fps ∼93{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -7{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Schenker XMG SECTOR, i9 13900K, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-13900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090




187.6 (6.52min, 200P1) fps ∼100{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} 0{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU




187.2 (2.33min, 200P1) fps ∼100{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Corsair One i300
Intel Core i9-12900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti




187 (2.6min, 167P1) fps ∼100{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} 0{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

MSI Titan GT77 12UHS
Intel Core i9-12900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU




186.8 (1.467min, 166.7P1) fps ∼100{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} 0{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
  (184.1 – 187.2, n=5) Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU




184.7 (1.535min, 111.1P1) fps ∼98{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -1{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

MSI Katana 17 B13VFK
Intel Core i7-13620H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU




184.7 (1.738min, 100P1) fps ∼98{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -1{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

MSI Pulse GL76 12UGK
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU




182.3 (2.68min, 142.9P1) fps ∼97{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -3{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Schenker XMG Neo 17 M22
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU




176.1 (4.27min, 125P1) fps ∼94{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -6{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Schenker XMG Core 17 (Early 2021)
Intel Core i7-10870H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU




172 (5.75min, 125P1) fps ∼92{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -8{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Schenker XMG SECTOR, i9 13900K, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-13900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090




187.6 (5.3min, 200P1) fps ∼100{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} 0{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU




187.4 (3.97min, 200P1) fps ∼100{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Corsair One i300
Intel Core i9-12900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti




187 (10.6min, 200P1) fps ∼100{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} 0{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
  (185.5 – 187.4, n=3) MSI Titan GT77 12UHS
Intel Core i9-12900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU




185.9 (2.14min, 166.7P1) fps ∼99{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -1{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

MSI Katana 17 B13VFK
Intel Core i7-13620H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU




185.7 (1.958min, 125P1) fps ∼99{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -1{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU




185.5 (1.486min, 125P1) fps ∼99{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -1{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

MSI Pulse GL76 12UGK
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU




180 (3.5min, 142.9P1) fps ∼96{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -4{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Schenker XMG Neo 17 M22
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU




175.8 (3.84min, 111.1P1) fps ∼94{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -6{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Schenker XMG Core 17 (Early 2021)
Intel Core i7-10870H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU




168 (6.37min, 100P1) fps ∼90{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -10{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Corsair One i300
Intel Core i9-12900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti




187 (2.5min, 167P1) fps ∼100{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} 0{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Schenker XMG SECTOR, i9 13900K, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-13900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090




187 (1.83min, 200P1) fps ∼100{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} 0{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU




186.5 (1.93min, 166.7P1) fps ∼100{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
  (182.4 – 186.5, n=5) MSI Titan GT77 12UHS
Intel Core i9-12900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU




182.7 (8.3min, 142.9P1) fps ∼98{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -2{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU




181.6 (1.674min, 125P1) fps ∼97{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -3{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

MSI Katana 17 B13VFK
Intel Core i7-13620H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU




180.2 (2.58min, 111.1P1) fps ∼96{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -3{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

MSI Pulse GL76 12UGK
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU




175.5 (3.74min, 125P1) fps ∼94{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -6{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH
Intel Core i9-11900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU




164 (5.22min, 100P1) fps ∼88{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -12{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Schenker XMG Neo 17 M22
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU




163.8 (4.96min, 100P1) fps ∼88{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -12{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Schenker XMG Core 17 (Early 2021)
Intel Core i7-10870H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU




150 (6.08min, 100P1) fps ∼80{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -20{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Schenker XMG SECTOR, i9 13900K, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-13900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090




165.9 (13.4min, 125P1) fps ∼100{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +11{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU




149.8 (3.08min, 111.1P1) fps ∼90{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Corsair One i300
Intel Core i9-12900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti




149 (8.57min, 100P1) fps ∼90{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -1{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
  (134 – 151.3, n=7) MSI Titan GT77 12UHS
Intel Core i9-12900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU




131.8 (6.21min, 90.9P1) fps ∼79{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -12{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU




121.4 (3.6min, 76.9P1) fps ∼73{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -19{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

MSI Katana 17 B13VFK
Intel Core i7-13620H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU




112.1 (8min, 62.5P1) fps ∼68{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -25{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

MSI Pulse GL76 12UGK
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU




108.1 (4.6min, 76.9P1) fps ∼65{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -28{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Schenker XMG Neo 17 M22
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU




101.8 (18.4min, 71.4P1) fps ∼61{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -32{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH
Intel Core i9-11900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU




98.5 (17.3min, 62.5P1) fps ∼59{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -34{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Schenker XMG Core 17 (Early 2021)
Intel Core i7-10870H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU




86.9 (19.6min, 58.8P1) fps ∼52{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -42{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Schenker XMG SECTOR, i9 13900K, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-13900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090




166.3 (2.62min, 125P1) fps ∼100{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +14{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Corsair One i300
Intel Core i9-12900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti




147 (3.77min, 111P1) fps ∼88{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} 0{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU




146.3 (5.49min, 111.1P1) fps ∼88{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
  (123.8 – 146.3, n=6) Schenker XMG Neo 17 M22
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU




101.1 (9.21min, 71.4P1) fps ∼61{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -31{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU




87.6 (4.62min, 55.6P1) fps ∼53{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -40{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

MSI Katana 17 B13VFK
Intel Core i7-13620H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU




83 (5.89min, 45.5P1) fps ∼50{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -43{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH
Intel Core i9-11900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU




82.3 (16.3min, 58.8P1) fps ∼49{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -44{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Schenker XMG Core 17 (Early 2021)
Intel Core i7-10870H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU




74.3 (18.9min, 50P1) fps ∼45{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -49{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Schenker XMG SECTOR, i9 13900K, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-13900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090




137.7 (8.31min, 90.9P1) fps ∼100{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +53{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Corsair One i300
Intel Core i9-12900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti




93.9 (4.79min, 71.4P1) fps ∼68{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +4{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU




90 (3.39min, 58.8P1) fps ∼65{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
  (84.8 – 90, n=5) Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU




38.2 (3.33min, 26.3P1) fps ∼28{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -58{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

MSI Katana 17 B13VFK
Intel Core i7-13620H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU




37.5 (6.01min, 25.6P1) fps ∼27{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -58{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Schenker XMG SECTOR, i9 13900K, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-13900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU




180.2 (2.04min, 125P1) fps ∼96{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Corsair One i300
Intel Core i9-12900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti




180 (2.49min, 143P1) fps ∼96{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} 0{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
  (88.9 – 180.2, n=4) Schenker XMG Neo 17 M22
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU




121 (5.84min, 100P1) fps ∼65{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -33{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU




88.5 (5.15min, 58.8P1) fps ∼47{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -51{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH
Intel Core i9-11900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU




86.5 (25.9min, 62.5P1) fps ∼46{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -52{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

MSI Katana 17 B13VFK
Intel Core i7-13620H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU




82.1 (5.63min, 50P1) fps ∼44{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -54{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Schenker XMG SECTOR, i9 13900K, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-13900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090




287.9 (250.6min) fps ∼100{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +18{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU




243 (209.5min) fps ∼84{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Corsair One i300
Intel Core i9-12900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti




240.3 (211.7min) fps ∼83{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -1{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
  (192.9 – 243, n=9) Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU




225 (190.1min) fps ∼78{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -7{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

MSI Titan GT77 12UHS
Intel Core i9-12900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU




204.5 (180.6min) fps ∼71{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -16{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

MSI Katana 17 B13VFK
Intel Core i7-13620H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU




184.6 (158.4min) fps ∼64{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -24{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH
Intel Core i9-11900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU




175 (138.4min) fps ∼61{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -28{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

MSI Pulse GL76 12UGK
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU




168.1 (149.3min) fps ∼58{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -31{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Schenker XMG Neo 17 M22
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU




146.5 (129.8min) fps ∼51{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -40{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Schenker XMG Core 17 (Early 2021)
Intel Core i7-10870H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU




146 (127.7min) fps ∼51{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -40{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

HP Omen 16-n0033dx
AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, AMD Radeon RX 6650M




141 (120min) fps ∼49{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -42{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Schenker XMG SECTOR, i9 13900K, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-13900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090




258.5 (226.5min) fps ∼100{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +20{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU




216 (187.8min) fps ∼84{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Corsair One i300
Intel Core i9-12900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti




214.8 (188.8min) fps ∼83{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -1{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
  (177.3 – 216, n=9) Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU




200 (151.8min) fps ∼77{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -7{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

MSI Titan GT77 12UHS
Intel Core i9-12900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU




184.5 (162.7min) fps ∼71{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -15{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

MSI Katana 17 B13VFK
Intel Core i7-13620H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU




171 (146.9min) fps ∼66{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -21{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH
Intel Core i9-11900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU




155 (134.6min) fps ∼60{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -28{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

MSI Pulse GL76 12UGK
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU




152.1 (134.4min) fps ∼59{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -30{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Schenker XMG Core 17 (Early 2021)
Intel Core i7-10870H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU




136 (116.3min) fps ∼53{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -37{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Schenker XMG Neo 17 M22
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU




133.9 (118.9min) fps ∼52{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -38{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

HP Omen 16-n0033dx
AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, AMD Radeon RX 6650M




130.7 (107.5min) fps ∼51{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -39{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Schenker XMG SECTOR, i9 13900K, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-13900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090




256.3 (217.1min) fps ∼100{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +25{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Corsair One i300
Intel Core i9-12900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti




207.6 (181.1min) fps ∼81{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +1{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
  (169.9 – 205, n=9) Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU




191 (165.9min) fps ∼75{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -7{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

MSI Titan GT77 12UHS
Intel Core i9-12900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU




179.8 (156.7min) fps ∼70{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -12{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

MSI Katana 17 B13VFK
Intel Core i7-13620H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU




164.1 (140.2min) fps ∼64{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -20{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH
Intel Core i9-11900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU




146 (120.5min) fps ∼57{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -29{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

MSI Pulse GL76 12UGK
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU




141.2 (123.5min) fps ∼55{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -31{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Schenker XMG Neo 17 M22
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU




129.3 (113min) fps ∼50{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -37{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Schenker XMG Core 17 (Early 2021)
Intel Core i7-10870H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU




124 (108min) fps ∼48{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -40{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

HP Omen 16-n0033dx
AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, AMD Radeon RX 6650M




118 (102.7min) fps ∼46{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -42{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Schenker XMG SECTOR, i9 13900K, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-13900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090




219.7 (186.7min) fps ∼100{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +14{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Corsair One i300
Intel Core i9-12900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti




196.1 (169.6min) fps ∼89{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +2{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU




192.5 (164.4min) fps ∼88{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
  (160.7 – 192.5, n=9) Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU




178.6 (153.9min) fps ∼81{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -7{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

MSI Titan GT77 12UHS
Intel Core i9-12900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU




170.5 (148.2min) fps ∼78{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -11{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

MSI Katana 17 B13VFK
Intel Core i7-13620H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU




156.3 (132.3min) fps ∼71{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -19{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

MSI Pulse GL76 12UGK
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU




132.8 (116.8min) fps ∼60{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -31{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH
Intel Core i9-11900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU




131 (113.6min) fps ∼60{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -32{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Schenker XMG Neo 17 M22
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU




121.4 (106.8min) fps ∼55{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -37{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Schenker XMG Core 17 (Early 2021)
Intel Core i7-10870H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU




118 (102.7min) fps ∼54{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -39{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

HP Omen 16-n0033dx
AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, AMD Radeon RX 6650M




100 (82.7min) fps ∼46{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -48{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Schenker XMG SECTOR, i9 13900K, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-13900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090




226.8 (185.7min) fps ∼100{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +21{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Corsair One i300
Intel Core i9-12900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti




191.5 (161.9min) fps ∼84{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +3{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU




186.7 (156.9min) fps ∼82{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
  (161.9 – 186.7, n=6) Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU




145.5 (109.1min) fps ∼64{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -22{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

MSI Katana 17 B13VFK
Intel Core i7-13620H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU




126 (105.9min) fps ∼56{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -33{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Schenker XMG Neo 17 M22
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU




122.7 (106.5min) fps ∼54{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -34{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH
Intel Core i9-11900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU




110 (8.5min) fps ∼49{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -41{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Schenker XMG SECTOR, i9 13900K, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-13900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU Corsair One i300
Intel Core i9-12900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
  (224 – 233, n=4) MSI Titan GT77 12UHS
Intel Core i9-12900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU MSI Katana 17 B13VFK
Intel Core i7-13620H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU Schenker XMG Neo 17 M22
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU MSI Pulse GL76 12UGK
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU HP Omen 16-n0033dx
AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, AMD Radeon RX 6650M Schenker XMG Core 17 (Early 2021)
Intel Core i7-10870H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU Schenker XMG SECTOR, i9 13900K, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-13900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU Corsair One i300
Intel Core i9-12900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
  (207 – 230, n=5) MSI Titan GT77 12UHS
Intel Core i9-12900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU Schenker XMG Neo 17 M22
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU MSI Katana 17 B13VFK
Intel Core i7-13620H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU MSI Pulse GL76 12UGK
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU HP Omen 16-n0033dx
AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, AMD Radeon RX 6650M Schenker XMG Core 17 (Early 2021)
Intel Core i7-10870H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU Schenker XMG SECTOR, i9 13900K, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-13900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
  (167.5 – 194.9, n=7) Corsair One i300
Intel Core i9-12900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti MSI Titan GT77 12UHS
Intel Core i9-12900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU Schenker XMG Neo 17 M22
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU MSI Katana 17 B13VFK
Intel Core i7-13620H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU MSI Pulse GL76 12UGK
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH
Intel Core i9-11900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU




88 (56min) fps ∼39{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -55{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

HP Omen 16-n0033dx
AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, AMD Radeon RX 6650M Schenker XMG Core 17 (Early 2021)
Intel Core i7-10870H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU Schenker XMG SECTOR, i9 13900K, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-13900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
  (136.8 – 162.9, n=7) Corsair One i300
Intel Core i9-12900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Schenker XMG Neo 17 M22
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH
Intel Core i9-11900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU




71.2 (44min) fps ∼32{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -55{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

MSI Katana 17 B13VFK
Intel Core i7-13620H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU Schenker XMG Core 17 (Early 2021)
Intel Core i7-10870H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU Schenker XMG SECTOR, i9 13900K, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-13900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
  (90.1 – 94.7, n=4) Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU Corsair One i300
Intel Core i9-12900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Schenker XMG Neo 17 M22
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH
Intel Core i9-11900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU




42.9 (27min) fps ∼28{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -53{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

MSI Katana 17 B13VFK
Intel Core i7-13620H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
Schenker XMG SECTOR, i9 13900K, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-13900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU Corsair One i300
Intel Core i9-12900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
  (168 – 212, n=13) MSI Titan GT77 12UHS
Intel Core i9-12900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU MSI Katana 17 B13VFK
Intel Core i7-13620H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU MSI Pulse GL76 12UGK
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH
Intel Core i9-11900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU Schenker XMG Neo 17 M22
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU Schenker XMG Core 17 (Early 2021)
Intel Core i7-10870H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU HP Omen 16-n0033dx
AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, AMD Radeon RX 6650M Schenker XMG SECTOR, i9 13900K, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-13900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU Corsair One i300
Intel Core i9-12900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
  (154.7 – 188.8, n=13) MSI Titan GT77 12UHS
Intel Core i9-12900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU MSI Katana 17 B13VFK
Intel Core i7-13620H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU MSI Pulse GL76 12UGK
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH
Intel Core i9-11900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU Schenker XMG Neo 17 M22
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU Schenker XMG Core 17 (Early 2021)
Intel Core i7-10870H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU HP Omen 16-n0033dx
AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, AMD Radeon RX 6650M Schenker XMG SECTOR, i9 13900K, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-13900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU Corsair One i300
Intel Core i9-12900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
  (116.4 – 146.4, n=13) MSI Titan GT77 12UHS
Intel Core i9-12900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU MSI Katana 17 B13VFK
Intel Core i7-13620H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU MSI Pulse GL76 12UGK
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH
Intel Core i9-11900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU Schenker XMG Neo 17 M22
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU Schenker XMG Core 17 (Early 2021)
Intel Core i7-10870H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU HP Omen 16-n0033dx
AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, AMD Radeon RX 6650M Schenker XMG SECTOR, i9 13900K, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-13900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
  (114.1 – 124.7, n=5) Corsair One i300
Intel Core i9-12900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU MSI Katana 17 B13VFK
Intel Core i7-13620H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU Schenker XMG Neo 17 M22
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH
Intel Core i9-11900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
Schenker XMG SECTOR, i9 13900K, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-13900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090




260 (113.43min) fps ∼100{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +8{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Corsair One i300
Intel Core i9-12900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti




258 (138.39min) fps ∼99{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +7{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU




240.1 (124.4min) fps ∼92{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
  (204 – 240, n=2) Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU




208.9 (108.8min) fps ∼80{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -13{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Schenker XMG Neo 17 M22
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU




172.4 (94.53min) fps ∼66{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -28{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

HP Omen 16-n0033dx
AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, AMD Radeon RX 6650M




138.8 (103.8min) fps ∼53{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -42{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Schenker XMG SECTOR, i9 13900K, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-13900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090




235 (112.44min) fps ∼100{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +13{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Corsair One i300
Intel Core i9-12900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti




212 (90.52min) fps ∼90{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +2{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU




207.1 (106.2min) fps ∼88{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
  (183 – 207, n=2) Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU




139.8 (62.8min) fps ∼59{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -32{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Schenker XMG Neo 17 M22
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU




134.4 (54.39min) fps ∼57{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -35{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

HP Omen 16-n0033dx
AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, AMD Radeon RX 6650M




111.5 (56min) fps ∼47{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -46{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Schenker XMG SECTOR, i9 13900K, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-13900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090




191.9 (91.79min) fps ∼100{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +10{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU Corsair One i300
Intel Core i9-12900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti




169 (76.59min) fps ∼88{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -3{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
  (153 – 173.8, n=2) Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU




109.7 (54.8min) fps ∼57{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -37{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Schenker XMG Neo 17 M22
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU




108.6 (48.9min) fps ∼57{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -38{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

HP Omen 16-n0033dx
AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, AMD Radeon RX 6650M




81 (43min) fps ∼42{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -53{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Schenker XMG SECTOR, i9 13900K, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-13900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090




177.3 (82.92min) fps ∼100{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +21{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU




146.5 (72.2min) fps ∼83{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Corsair One i300
Intel Core i9-12900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti




137 (66.86min) fps ∼77{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -6{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
  (131.5 – 146.5, n=3) Schenker XMG Neo 17 M22
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU




88.1 (42.14min) fps ∼50{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -40{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU




86.8 (45.8min) fps ∼49{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -41{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

MSI Katana 17 B13VFK
Intel Core i7-13620H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU




74.3 (37.14min) fps ∼42{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -49{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

HP Omen 16-n0033dx
AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, AMD Radeon RX 6650M




65.8 (37.7min) fps ∼37{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -55{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Schenker XMG SECTOR, i9 13900K, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-13900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090




165 (77.05min) fps ∼100{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +29{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU




127.7 (63.9min) fps ∼77{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
  (116 – 127.7, n=3) Corsair One i300
Intel Core i9-12900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti




113 (60.76min) fps ∼68{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -12{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Schenker XMG Neo 17 M22
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU




73.2 (39.18min) fps ∼44{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -43{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU




69 (39.5min) fps ∼42{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -46{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

MSI Katana 17 B13VFK
Intel Core i7-13620H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU




59 (32.33min) fps ∼36{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -54{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Schenker XMG SECTOR, i9 13900K, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-13900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090




136.3 (72.34min) fps ∼100{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +66{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
  (81 – 84, n=3) Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU




82.1 (51.4min) fps ∼60{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Corsair One i300
Intel Core i9-12900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti




75 (46.62min) fps ∼55{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -9{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Schenker XMG Neo 17 M22
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU




47.6 (28.52min) fps ∼35{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -42{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU




44 (27.9min) fps ∼32{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -46{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

MSI Katana 17 B13VFK
Intel Core i7-13620H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU




36.8 (22.74min) fps ∼27{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -55{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Schenker XMG SECTOR, i9 13900K, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-13900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090




129.6 (73.7min) fps ∼100{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +9{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU




118.8 (61.4min) fps ∼92{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Corsair One i300
Intel Core i9-12900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti




116 (60.79min) fps ∼90{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -2{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
  (101.3 – 118.8, n=3) Schenker XMG Neo 17 M22
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU




77.9 (40.97min) fps ∼60{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -34{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU




74.4 (41.8min) fps ∼57{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -37{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

MSI Katana 17 B13VFK
Intel Core i7-13620H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU




63.2 (32.95min) fps ∼49{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -47{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU Schenker XMG SECTOR, i9 13900K, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-13900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
  (201 – 284, n=2) Corsair One i300
Intel Core i9-12900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Schenker XMG Neo 17 M22
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU HP Omen 16-n0033dx
AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, AMD Radeon RX 6650M Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
  Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU Schenker XMG SECTOR, i9 13900K, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-13900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Schenker XMG Neo 17 M22
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU HP Omen 16-n0033dx
AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, AMD Radeon RX 6650M Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
  (176 – 270, n=2) Schenker XMG SECTOR, i9 13900K, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-13900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU Corsair One i300
Intel Core i9-12900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Schenker XMG Neo 17 M22
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU HP Omen 16-n0033dx
AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, AMD Radeon RX 6650M Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
  (162 – 239, n=2) Schenker XMG SECTOR, i9 13900K, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-13900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Corsair One i300
Intel Core i9-12900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU Schenker XMG Neo 17 M22
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU HP Omen 16-n0033dx
AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, AMD Radeon RX 6650M Schenker XMG SECTOR, i9 13900K, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-13900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
  (151 – 179.7, n=3) Corsair One i300
Intel Core i9-12900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU Schenker XMG Neo 17 M22
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU HP Omen 16-n0033dx
AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, AMD Radeon RX 6650M Schenker XMG SECTOR, i9 13900K, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-13900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
  (129.4 – 132.3, n=3) Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU Corsair One i300
Intel Core i9-12900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Schenker XMG Neo 17 M22
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU Schenker XMG SECTOR, i9 13900K, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-13900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
  (70.5 – 76, n=3) Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU Corsair One i300
Intel Core i9-12900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Schenker XMG Neo 17 M22
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
Schenker XMG SECTOR, i9 13900K, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-13900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090




466 (351min, 294P1) fps ∼100{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +6{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU




440 (321min, 272P1) fps ∼94{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
  (393 – 440, n=2) MSI Katana 17 B13VFK
Intel Core i7-13620H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU




317 (235min, 194P1) fps ∼68{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -28{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

MSI Titan GT77 12UHS
Intel Core i9-12900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU




283 (233min, 46P1) fps ∼61{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -36{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

HP Omen 16-n0033dx
AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, AMD Radeon RX 6650M




264 (193min, 169P1) fps ∼57{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -40{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Schenker XMG Neo 17 M22
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU Schenker XMG SECTOR, i9 13900K, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-13900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090




415 (291min, 220P1) fps ∼100{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +11{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU




375 (257min, 207P1) fps ∼90{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
  (303 – 375, n=4) MSI Katana 17 B13VFK
Intel Core i7-13620H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU




247 (179min, 135P1) fps ∼60{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -34{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

MSI Titan GT77 12UHS
Intel Core i9-12900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU




226 (185min, 61P1) fps ∼54{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -40{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

HP Omen 16-n0033dx
AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, AMD Radeon RX 6650M




217 (166min, 135P1) fps ∼52{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -42{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Schenker XMG Neo 17 M22
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU Schenker XMG SECTOR, i9 13900K, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-13900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090




377 (273min, 214P1) fps ∼100{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +5{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU




358 (243min, 204P1) fps ∼95{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
  (286 – 358, n=4) MSI Katana 17 B13VFK
Intel Core i7-13620H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU




240 (188min, 131P1) fps ∼64{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -33{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

MSI Titan GT77 12UHS
Intel Core i9-12900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU




227 (151min, 57P1) fps ∼60{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -37{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

HP Omen 16-n0033dx
AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, AMD Radeon RX 6650M




215 (159min, 131P1) fps ∼57{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -40{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Schenker XMG Neo 17 M22
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU Schenker XMG SECTOR, i9 13900K, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-13900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090




364 (262min, 204P1) fps ∼100{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +13{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU




322 (217min, 181P1) fps ∼88{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
  (265 – 322, n=4) MSI Titan GT77 12UHS
Intel Core i9-12900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU




196.5 (145min, 38P1) fps ∼54{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -39{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

MSI Katana 17 B13VFK
Intel Core i7-13620H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU




179.2 (145min, 66P1) fps ∼49{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -44{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

HP Omen 16-n0033dx
AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, AMD Radeon RX 6650M




178.2 (151min, 121P1) fps ∼49{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -45{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Schenker XMG Neo 17 M22
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU Schenker XMG SECTOR, i9 13900K, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-13900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090




195.4 (165min, 131P1) fps ∼100{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +39{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU




140.6 (123min, 97P1) fps ∼72{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
  (114.3 – 140.6, n=5) Schenker XMG Neo 17 M22
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU MSI Titan GT77 12UHS
Intel Core i9-12900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU




79.8 (65min, 29P1) fps ∼41{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -43{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

MSI Katana 17 B13VFK
Intel Core i7-13620H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU




65.4 (52min, 44P1) fps ∼33{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -53{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

HP Omen 16-n0033dx
AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, AMD Radeon RX 6650M




40.6 (31min, 31P1) fps ∼21{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -71{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Schenker XMG SECTOR, i9 13900K, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-13900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090




149.7 (129min, 104P1) fps ∼100{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +63{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU




91.8 (78min, 74P1) fps ∼61{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
  (75 – 91.8, n=5) Schenker XMG Neo 17 M22
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU MSI Katana 17 B13VFK
Intel Core i7-13620H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU




41 (35min, 33P1) fps ∼27{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -55{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Schenker XMG SECTOR, i9 13900K, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-13900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090




81.1 (71min, 70P1) fps ∼100{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +79{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU




45.3 (39min, 37P1) fps ∼56{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
  (42.4 – 45.3, n=4) Schenker XMG Neo 17 M22
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU MSI Katana 17 B13VFK
Intel Core i7-13620H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU




19.7 (17min, 16P1) fps ∼24{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -57{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}