RTX Archives - Page 2 of 7 - Technology News

April 12, 2023

GIGABYTE’s AORUS 17H Gaming Laptop With An RTX 4080 Continues To Be The Best Price-To-Performance Machine You Can Get

Everywhere you go you glimpse, RTX 4080 gaming laptops are priced excessively high, but thankfully, GIGABYTE’s AORUS 17H bucks that craze by supplying a stable device for a ‘not so ridiculous’ selling price of $2,299.99 on Amazon. For some, even that inquiring rate is preposterous, but there have been times in which we noticed RTX 3080 gaming laptops for $2,000, and when you are obtaining the ideal of the very best, paying out a minimal extra will not glimpse lousy at all.

Generally, we do not advise 17-inch gaming laptops thanks to their sheer sizing, but the pricing and configuration of the AORUS 17H definitely caught us off guard. The screen is an IPS Lcd panel with a 1080p resolution that supports up to a 360Hz refresh rate. It appears that this certain design was geared toward esports fanatics.

GIGABYTE AORUS 17H gaming laptop with an RTX 4080 GPU — The gaming notebook just oozes worth thanks to its outstanding hardware and pricing

However, you can also enjoy AAA titles at the greatest top quality options as the RTX 4080 not only supports DLSS 3. and Frame Generation, but its 12GB GDDR6 VRAM buffer will allow you to continue to keep the device for a significantly extended period for immersing you in individuals visually spectacular games. Also, the GPU is operating at the greatest 175W electrical power restrict that NVIDIA has specified, so GIGABYTE has not slice any corners in this regard.

For the CPU, you get a 14-main Core Intel 13th-generation Main i7-13700H, which can run at 5.00GHz when essential, so it is not likely that the processor will get limited. Apart from that, you get 16GB of DDR5 RAM, together with a 1TB M.2 PCIe NVMe 4. SSD, the two of which can be upgraded down the road and at your discretion. Given that the AORUS 17H attributes an Intel processor, the 99.9WHr battery will very last you for a few hrs, but do not expect an ‘all day’ endurance from this gaming laptop.

The port collection is stacked on this RTX 4080 device, and for utmost throughput, GIGABYTE has involved a Thunderbolt 4 port, if that matters to you. Possibly the only downside to the AORUS 17H is that 1080p display, and we say this because RTX 4080 can easily push out ample frames at 1440p or even 4K in most games. What future end users can do is increase the rendered resolution when they are actively playing a AAA video game. Regrettably, this alternative is not offered in each and every game, so your experience will fluctuate.

Then all over again, for $2,299.99, you are getting best-tier elements, so we see no reason to complain if GIGABYTE made a decision to use a 1080p display screen on a 17.3-inch gaming laptop computer. Personally, we would have liked to see the same components on a 15.6-inch or even a 16-inch laptop, but potentially the business will have equivalent options in the foreseeable future.

April 7, 2023

Aorus 15X ASF review: Gaming laptop with RTX 4070 power and stamina

Acer Predator Helios 300 (i7-12700H, RTX 3070 Ti)
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR

4272 (1951.61^min – 4271.9^max) MB/s ∼100{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +25{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR

3564 (3515.46^min – 3563.69^max) MB/s ∼83{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +4{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Average Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
(2519 – 4117, n=6) Aorus 15X ASF
Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10

3419 (3322.79^min – 3419.41^max) MB/s ∼80{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00

3377 (3319.03^min – 3377.04^max) MB/s ∼79{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -1{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Average of class Gaming
(834 – 5676, n=191, last 2 years) MSI Katana 17 B13VFK
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM

2578 (2552.79^min – 2578.03^max) MB/s ∼60{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -25{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Acer Predator Helios 300 (i7-12700H, RTX 3070 Ti)
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR

4394 (4343.95^min – 4393.95^max) MB/s ∼100{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +34{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR

3531 (3391.93^min – 3530.77^max) MB/s ∼80{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +8{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Average Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
(2200 – 4236, n=6) Average of class Gaming
(399 – 7889, n=190, last 2 years) Aorus 15X ASF
Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10

3270 (3004.03^min – 3269.84^max) MB/s ∼74{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

MSI Katana 17 B13VFK
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM

3115 (2904.62^min – 3115.38^max) MB/s ∼71{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -5{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00

2743 (2563.98^min – 2742.87^max) MB/s ∼62{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -16{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Aorus 15X ASF
Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10

7018 (6152.48^min – 7017.7^max) MB/s ∼100{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Average Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
(6921 – 7034, n=6) Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR

6663 (6017.91^min – 6663.07^max) MB/s ∼95{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -5{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Acer Predator Helios 300 (i7-12700H, RTX 3070 Ti)
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR

6319 (1848.3^min – 6318.66^max) MB/s ∼90{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -10{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Average of class Gaming
(1620 – 13195, n=191, last 2 years) Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00

5018 (4382.25^min – 5017.89^max) MB/s ∼72{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -28{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

MSI Katana 17 B13VFK
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM

4719 (4052.12^min – 4719.01^max) MB/s ∼67{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -33{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Acer Predator Helios 300 (i7-12700H, RTX 3070 Ti)
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR

5259 (5245.4^min – 5258.61^max) MB/s ∼100{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +20{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR

4980 (4904.66^min – 4979.58^max) MB/s ∼95{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +13{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Aorus 15X ASF
Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10

4398 (3867.15^min – 4398.16^max) MB/s ∼84{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Average Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
(3611 – 4926, n=6) Average of class Gaming
(86.2 – 10261, n=191, last 2 years) MSI Katana 17 B13VFK
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00

3125 (3099.17^min – 3124.97^max) MB/s ∼59{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -29{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Acer Predator Helios 300 (i7-12700H, RTX 3070 Ti)
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR

86.5 (85.74^min – 86.52^max) MB/s ∼100{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +18{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR

81.2 (79.58^min – 81.23^max) MB/s ∼94{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +10{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Average Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
(66.9 – 88.8, n=6) Aorus 15X ASF
Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10

73.5 (69.87^min – 73.51^max) MB/s ∼85{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Average of class Gaming
(23.3 – 97.4, n=191, last 2 years) Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00

53.7 (52.37^min – 53.65^max) MB/s ∼62{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -27{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

MSI Katana 17 B13VFK
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM

37.7 (37.23^min – 37.65^max) MB/s ∼44{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -49{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Aorus 15X ASF
Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10

346 (334.68^min – 346.11^max) MB/s ∼100{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Average Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
(313 – 391, n=6) MSI Katana 17 B13VFK
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM

286 (269.48^min – 285.84^max) MB/s ∼83{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -17{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Acer Predator Helios 300 (i7-12700H, RTX 3070 Ti)
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR

213 (195.99^min – 212.69^max) MB/s ∼62{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -38{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR

212 (209.62^min – 211.78^max) MB/s ∼61{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -39{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Average of class Gaming
(66.6 – 421, n=190, last 2 years) Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00

163.8 (162.54^min – 163.76^max) MB/s ∼47{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -53{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR

4152 (4133.05^min – 4152.1^max) MB/s ∼100{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +17{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Average Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
(3523 – 3582, n=6) Aorus 15X ASF
Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10

3552 (3501.51^min – 3552.08^max) MB/s ∼86{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Acer Predator Helios 300 (i7-12700H, RTX 3070 Ti)
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR

3222 (3204.74^min – 3221.65^max) MB/s ∼78{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -9{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

MSI Katana 17 B13VFK
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM Average of class Gaming
(310 – 5829, n=190, last 2 years) Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00

857 (717.83^min – 857.03^max) MB/s ∼21{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -76{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Aorus 15X ASF
Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10

3610 (3279.33^min – 3609.84^max) MB/s ∼100{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Average Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
(3570 – 3610, n=6) Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR

3512 (3421.77^min – 3511.78^max) MB/s ∼97{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -3{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

MSI Katana 17 B13VFK
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM

2635 (2459.5^min – 2634.95^max) MB/s ∼73{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -27{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Acer Predator Helios 300 (i7-12700H, RTX 3070 Ti)
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR

2623 (2563.77^min – 2622.75^max) MB/s ∼73{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -27{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Average of class Gaming
(288 – 4383, n=190, last 2 years) Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00

305 (269.91^min – 305.05^max) MB/s ∼8{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -92{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Aorus 15X ASF
Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10 Average Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
(5636 – 9279, n=6) Acer Predator Helios 300 (i7-12700H, RTX 3070 Ti)
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR MSI Katana 17 B13VFK
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM Average of class Gaming
(910 – 10562, n=180, last 2 years) Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00 Aorus 15X ASF
Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10 Average Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
(1805 – 3629, n=6) Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR Acer Predator Helios 300 (i7-12700H, RTX 3070 Ti)
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR MSI Katana 17 B13VFK
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM Average of class Gaming
(389 – 3629, n=180, last 2 years) Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00 Aorus 15X ASF
Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10 Average Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
(3012 – 3996, n=6) Acer Predator Helios 300 (i7-12700H, RTX 3070 Ti)
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR Average of class Gaming
(338 – 5157, n=180, last 2 years) MSI Katana 17 B13VFK
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00 Average Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
(4541 – 5715, n=6) Aorus 15X ASF
Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10 Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR Average of class Gaming
(925 – 9971, n=180, last 2 years) MSI Katana 17 B13VFK
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00 Acer Predator Helios 300 (i7-12700H, RTX 3070 Ti)
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR Acer Predator Helios 300 (i7-12700H, RTX 3070 Ti)
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR Aorus 15X ASF
Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10 Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR Average Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
(2310 – 3810, n=6) Average of class Gaming
(308 – 8590, n=180, last 2 years) MSI Katana 17 B13VFK
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00 Aorus 15X ASF
Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10 Average Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
(61.3 – 108, n=6) Acer Predator Helios 300 (i7-12700H, RTX 3070 Ti)
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR Average of class Gaming
(20 – 108, n=180, last 2 years) Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR MSI Katana 17 B13VFK
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00 Aorus 15X ASF
Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10 Average Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
(256 – 325, n=6) MSI Katana 17 B13VFK
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00 Acer Predator Helios 300 (i7-12700H, RTX 3070 Ti)
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR Average of class Gaming
(18 – 364, n=180, last 2 years) Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR Aorus 15X ASF
Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10 Average Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
(1285 – 2964, n=6) Acer Predator Helios 300 (i7-12700H, RTX 3070 Ti)
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR MSI Katana 17 B13VFK
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM Average of class Gaming
(216 – 2967, n=180, last 2 years) Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00 Aorus 15X ASF
Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10 Average Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
(2493 – 3371, n=6) Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR Acer Predator Helios 300 (i7-12700H, RTX 3070 Ti)
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR Average of class Gaming
(243 – 4381, n=180, last 2 years) MSI Katana 17 B13VFK
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00 Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00 MSI Katana 17 B13VFK
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR Aorus 15X ASF
Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10 Average Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
(0.041 – 0.094, n=6) Average of class Gaming
(0.02 – 0.23, n=175, last 2 years) Acer Predator Helios 300 (i7-12700H, RTX 3070 Ti)
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR MSI Katana 17 B13VFK
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM Average of class Gaming
(0.012 – 0.425, n=180, last 2 years)

0.05596 ms * ∼58{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -366{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Acer Predator Helios 300 (i7-12700H, RTX 3070 Ti)
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00 Average Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
(0.012 – 0.014, n=6) Aorus 15X ASF
Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10

* … smaller is better

April 6, 2023

2023 HP Omen 17 gaming laptop with RTX 4080 and Core i7-13700HX gets notable discount in Easter sale

HP is selling the new Omen 17 gaming laptop with an Intel Core i7-13700HX at a 16{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} discount (Image: HP)

A 10-percent coupon code brings the powerful configuration of the HP Omen 17 with an i7-13700HX and RTX 4080 very close to the US$2,000 mark, which is a more or less reasonable price considering the sky-high MSRPs for the 2023 models of most gaming laptops.

Most gamers are probably aware of the painfully high prices of most gaming laptops that have recently hit the market, and RTX 4080-powered machines such as the brand-new 2023 HP Omen 17 probably remain out of reach for most buyers from a financial perspective. However, affluent enthusiasts with a large budget can finally save a few hard-earned dollars on the purchase of one of these new notebooks.

For example, a high-end configuration of the aforementioned HP Omen 17 with the fast Intel Core i7-13700HX and an Nvidia GeForce RTX 4080 with 12 GB of VRAM can now be ordered for US$2,033 in the manufacturer’s official online store. To get this price, please use the coupon code “GAMEAPRIL10” after the gaming laptop has been added to the shopping cart. This version of the HP Omen 17 also comes with the 17-inch QHD display, 16GB of RAM and a 512GB PCIe NVMe SSD, but the coupon code may also work for more budget-friendly configurations.

Before ordering, please check out our recent review of a slightly different model variant of the 2023 HP Omen 17. Among other things, we praised the gaming laptop for its decent 165Hz display as well as the quick SSD and the second available M.2 slot. Furthermore, we liked HP’s software that allows undervolting, although the machine’s battery life, noisy cooling system and underperforming RTX 4080 didn’t exactly impress us. But as it approaches the US$2,000 mark, the Core i7-13700HX-equipped notebook is a solid choice in this price range until other competitors receive similar discounts.

Order the 2023 HP Omen 17 on sale by applying “GAMEAPRIL10” during checkout

Disclaimer: Notebookcheck is not responsible for price changes carried out by retailers. The discounted price or deal mentioned in this item was available at the time of writing and may be subject to time restrictions and/or limited unit availability.

More Articles for this Device

HP Omen 17-ck2097ng (Omen 17 Series)

Related Articles

Enrico Frahn – Tech Writer – 1759 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2021

My fascination for technology goes back a long way to the Pentium II era. Modding, overclocking and treasuring computer hardware has since become an integral part of my life. As a student, I further developed a keen interest in mobile technologies that can make the stressful college life so much easier. After I fell in love with the creation of digital content while working in a marketing position, I now scour the web to bring you the most exciting topics in the world of tech. Outside the office, I’m particularly passionate about motorsports and mountain biking.

Please share our article, every link counts!

.170

Posted on April 2, 2023
Gigabyte’s AORUS 17H Gaming Laptop With An RTX 4080 Gets Stocked, And With A Lower Price Than Before

The final time the GIGABYTE AORUS 17H was outlined on Amazon, the RTX 4080-run gaming laptop computer was accessible for $2,389. Now, for $2,299, you get the exact very same requirements as previous time, but at a lessen value. We can realize if there is some apprehension pertaining to the cost, but if you browse the on-line retailer, you will uncover that most RTX 3080 Ti gaming laptops are much more high-priced than the equipment you are about to appear at.

Also, this notebook has a 17.3-inch screen, and although we advise versus purchasing these types of goods due to the fact of their sheer dimensions, the pricing caught our consideration, and it will catch yours way too. The establish high-quality of the AORUS 17H is best-tier, sporting a blend of metal and plastic, with the hinges currently being rigid as perfectly. The RTX 4080 attributes 12GB of GDDR6 VRAM and can operate up to 175W, the maximum restrict NVIDIA sets for GPUs functioning in gaming laptops.

The RTX 4080 is complemented by a 14-main Core Intel 13th-era Main i7-13700H, which can strengthen up to 5.00GHz. The exact configuration of the CPU includes six general performance cores and 8 ability-performance types. Other than that, the screen is a 1080p IPS Lcd and supports up to a 360Hz refresh charge, suggesting that this gaming notebook was intended with esports titles in brain.

The AORUS 17H also attributes 16GB of DDR5 RAM, alongside with a 1TB PCIe NVME Gen 4 SSD, and you will be pleased to understand that equally the storage and memory can be upgraded down the street. Supplied that this is a 17.3-inch gaming notebook, it is loaded to the brim with significant-speed USB and exhibit ports, alongside with a single Thunderbolt 4 input, which is terrific to see.

GIGABYTE went the total nine yards and included a 99.9WHr battery in this device, which is the greatest capability any laptop can have whilst however remaining authorized to be boarded on a aircraft. Our only gripe about the AORUS 17H is its 1080p display. With an RTX 4080, it should be authorized to flex its muscle groups at a 1440p resolution, as it will not just give a large framerate encounter to the consumer, but that higher resolution provides additional detail on a 17.3-inch screen.

The I/O of this gaming notebook is stacked

Thankfully, there is a workaround to this minimal dilemma, assuming you treatment about it. In some video games, you can increase the render resolution to 150 {b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}, so if you are gaming on a 1080p screen, the rendered resolution will go up to 1440p. If the render resolution benefit goes up to 200 p.c, then it will fairly a lot imply that you are gaming at 4K, and belief us, the notebook RTX 4080 GPU can deal with that load.

We do not know how several units are stocked on Amazon, but that $2,299 is a person of the most beautiful factors of the AORUS 17H. Gaming laptops with comparable specifications are about $400 to $500 a lot more high priced, so if it is an insane benefit that you look for, then appear no more than this.

Share this story

Facebook

Twitter

Posted on March 28, 2023
ASUS’ Scar 15 Gaming Laptop Is A ‘No Brainer’ Purchase Thanks To Its RTX 3080 GPU And $500 Cheaper Price

Gaming laptops with RTX 4080 GPUs are a tiny much too highly-priced right now, and when you have strong devices outfitted with an RTX 3080 and available at these desirable bargains, there is definitely no just one that can overlook this variety of present. Indeed, we are speaking about the ASUS ROG Strix Scar 15, a 15.6-inch portable powerhouse that is offered for only $1,499.99 on Amazon right after a substantial $500 price cut.

At its existing value, the Scar 15 can be yours for the selling price of an RTX 3070 gaming laptop, and many thanks to the GPU’s 130W electrical power limit, you will get the best frames in graphically demanding game titles. Also, if you are a articles creator, the RTX 3080 with 8GB GDDR6 VRAM will help you in numerous workflows. The develop excellent of the machine is decent and includes a blend of metallic and plastic. The hinges are also rigid, so it is perfectly-manufactured to endure extended durations of use.

How the gaming laptop manages to retain its thermals beneath handle

However, this design does not function a webcam, so you will have to go all around this setback by obtaining a independent webcam if you even now want to invest in the Scar 15. The 1080p 300Hz IPS Lcd monitor is produced for aggressive titles, and the RTX 3080 will simply be in a position to churn out people frames. The GPU is complemented by the 8-core, 16-thread Ryzen 9 5900HX CPU, which is highly effective and productive, granting the consumer a number of hrs of battery lifetime when the device is not plugged in.

RGB lights on the keyboard is included, if that matters to you

Speaking of battery life, the gaming notebook options a big 90WHr cell, and when paired with the Ryzen 9 5900HX, ASUS statements that you can get up to 12 several hours of runtime on a solitary demand. You can also cost the laptop with the bundled electricity adapter or via a USB-C brick. The 16GB DDR4 RAM and 1TB of PCIe Gen 3 NVMe SSD can be upgraded when you experience that they have began limiting the full experience.

A number of specs of the gaming screen

For $1,499.99, there are a few issues that will place off the prospective buyer, inspite of that desirable pricing. Many thanks to its effective internals, the Scar 15 is quite thick, which adds pounds to the chassis, making it tricky to carry all over. Also, a lacking webcam can be a offer breaker for many. Even so, if your most important concentrate is gaming and undertaking productiveness-connected duties, ASUS’ RTX 3080-driven gaming laptop computer should really be your following purchase.

Share this tale

Facebook

Twitter

Posted on March 23, 2023
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 (2023) laptop review: RTX 4090 with a super bright, Mini-LED display

MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB

5598 (5462.22^min – 5597.85^max) MB/s ∼100{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +43{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W
2x Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR (RAID 0)

4842 (4719.64^min – 4842.11^max) MB/s ∼86{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +24{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR

4525 (4498.41^min – 4525.41^max) MB/s ∼81{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +16{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
(2376 – 5676, n=23) Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VY-NM042X
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB

3917 (3883.93^min – 3916.78^max) MB/s ∼70{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
SSSTC CA6-8D1024

3844 (3257.93^min – 3843.87^max) MB/s ∼69{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -2{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH

3764 (3540.2^min – 3763.76^max) MB/s ∼67{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -4{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Average of class Gaming
(834 – 5676, n=187, last 2 years) MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB

7533 (7482.85^min – 7532.79^max) MB/s ∼100{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +124{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH

4767 (4365.51^min – 4766.62^max) MB/s ∼63{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +42{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR

4378 (4355.78^min – 4378.43^max) MB/s ∼58{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +30{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
(2461 – 7628, n=23) Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W
2x Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR (RAID 0)

4199 (3998.61^min – 4199.12^max) MB/s ∼56{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +25{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VY-NM042X
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB

3365 (3321.68^min – 3365.3^max) MB/s ∼45{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Average of class Gaming
(399 – 7889, n=186, last 2 years) Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
SSSTC CA6-8D1024

3242 (1498^min – 3241.78^max) MB/s ∼43{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -4{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB

11242 (10740.3^min – 11242.2^max) MB/s ∼100{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +61{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W
2x Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR (RAID 0)

10774 (9137.92^min – 10774^max) MB/s ∼96{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +54{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
(3471 – 12556, n=23) Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VY-NM042X
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB

6988 (5851.89^min – 6987.92^max) MB/s ∼62{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
SSSTC CA6-8D1024

6872 (4963.33^min – 6872.25^max) MB/s ∼61{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -2{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR

6682 (5778.28^min – 6681.95^max) MB/s ∼59{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -4{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH

6550 (5497.59^min – 6549.73^max) MB/s ∼58{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -6{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Average of class Gaming
(1620 – 13195, n=187, last 2 years) MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB

9942 (9912.92^min – 9941.76^max) MB/s ∼100{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +93{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W
2x Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR (RAID 0)

8404 (8165.05^min – 8403.71^max) MB/s ∼85{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +63{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
(3537 – 10261, n=23) Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VY-NM042X
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB

5151 (5119.78^min – 5150.82^max) MB/s ∼52{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR

4943 (4923.06^min – 4943.2^max) MB/s ∼50{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -4{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH

4876 (4374.87^min – 4876.3^max) MB/s ∼49{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -5{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
SSSTC CA6-8D1024

4244 (427.59^min – 4244.22^max) MB/s ∼43{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -18{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Average of class Gaming
(86.2 – 10261, n=187, last 2 years) Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR

95.3 (93.25^min – 95.25^max) MB/s ∼100{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +29{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB

83.1 (79.37^min – 83.07^max) MB/s ∼87{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +12{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
(56.2 – 91.2, n=23) Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH

74.3 (71.59^min – 74.33^max) MB/s ∼78{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} 0{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VY-NM042X
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB

74.1 (72.59^min – 74.06^max) MB/s ∼78{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Average of class Gaming
(23.3 – 97.4, n=187, last 2 years) Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W
2x Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR (RAID 0)

57.5 (57.09^min – 57.53^max) MB/s ∼60{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -22{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
SSSTC CA6-8D1024

56.5 (49.8^min – 56.49^max) MB/s ∼59{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -24{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH

264 (263.57^min – 264.44^max) MB/s ∼100{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +70{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR

255 (243.79^min – 255.25^max) MB/s ∼97{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +64{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
(134 – 295, n=23) Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
SSSTC CA6-8D1024

220 (56.84^min – 219.56^max) MB/s ∼83{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +41{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB

213 (205.52^min – 212.72^max) MB/s ∼81{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +37{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Average of class Gaming
(66.6 – 421, n=186, last 2 years) Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VY-NM042X
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB

155.5 (148.87^min – 155.46^max) MB/s ∼59{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W
2x Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR (RAID 0)

103.7 (103.17^min – 103.74^max) MB/s ∼39{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -33{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR

4100 (4085.58^min – 4100.1^max) MB/s ∼100{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +475{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
SSSTC CA6-8D1024

3111 (2388.54^min – 3111.42^max) MB/s ∼76{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +336{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
(713 – 4075, n=23) Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH

2855 (2482.75^min – 2854.87^max) MB/s ∼70{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +300{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Average of class Gaming
(310 – 5829, n=186, last 2 years) MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB

1469 (1266.81^min – 1469.47^max) MB/s ∼36{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +106{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VY-NM042X
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB

713 (705.93^min – 712.59^max) MB/s ∼17{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W
2x Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR (RAID 0)

711 (692.26^min – 710.64^max) MB/s ∼17{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} 0{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR

3537 (3519.01^min – 3536.66^max) MB/s ∼100{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +656{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH

2694 (2561.51^min – 2693.92^max) MB/s ∼76{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +476{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
(422 – 3531, n=23) Average of class Gaming
(288 – 4383, n=186, last 2 years) MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB

1424 (1251.47^min – 1423.75^max) MB/s ∼40{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +204{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
SSSTC CA6-8D1024

1282 (960.6^min – 1281.78^max) MB/s ∼36{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +174{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VY-NM042X
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB

468 (459.96^min – 467.77^max) MB/s ∼13{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W
2x Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR (RAID 0)

350 (343.49^min – 350.45^max) MB/s ∼10{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -25{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
(4850 – 9031, n=23) Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
SSSTC CA6-8D1024 Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH Average of class Gaming
(910 – 10330, n=176, last 2 years) Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VY-NM042X
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W
2x Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR (RAID 0) Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
SSSTC CA6-8D1024

3308 Points ∼100{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +110{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
(1572 – 3399, n=23) Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH Average of class Gaming
(389 – 3629, n=176, last 2 years) MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W
2x Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR (RAID 0) Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VY-NM042X
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
(1081 – 3999, n=23) Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VY-NM042X
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH Average of class Gaming
(338 – 5157, n=176, last 2 years) Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
SSSTC CA6-8D1024 MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W
2x Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR (RAID 0) MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W
2x Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR (RAID 0) Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
(2591 – 9971, n=23) Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VY-NM042X
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
SSSTC CA6-8D1024 Average of class Gaming
(925 – 9971, n=176, last 2 years) Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W
2x Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR (RAID 0) Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
(1900 – 8590, n=23) Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR Average of class Gaming
(308 – 8590, n=176, last 2 years) Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
SSSTC CA6-8D1024 Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VY-NM042X
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VY-NM042X
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
(49.8 – 84.1, n=23) Average of class Gaming
(20 – 108, n=176, last 2 years) Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W
2x Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR (RAID 0) Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
SSSTC CA6-8D1024 Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VY-NM042X
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
(112.6 – 249, n=23) Average of class Gaming
(18 – 364, n=176, last 2 years) MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
SSSTC CA6-8D1024 Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W
2x Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR (RAID 0) Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
SSSTC CA6-8D1024

2744.3 MB/s ∼100{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +186{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR

2558.72 MB/s ∼93{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +167{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
(959 – 2811, n=23) Average of class Gaming
(216 – 2963, n=176, last 2 years) MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W
2x Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR (RAID 0) Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VY-NM042X
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VY-NM042X
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
(567 – 3414, n=23) Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH Average of class Gaming
(243 – 4381, n=176, last 2 years) Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
SSSTC CA6-8D1024 Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W
2x Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR (RAID 0) MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB Average of class Gaming
(0.02 – 0.23, n=171, last 2 years)

0.05665 ms * ∼100{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -183{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W
2x Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR (RAID 0) MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
(0.018 – 0.078, n=23) Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
SSSTC CA6-8D1024 Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VY-NM042X
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
SSSTC CA6-8D1024 Average of class Gaming
(0.012 – 0.425, n=176, last 2 years)

0.05613 ms * ∼68{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -181{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W
2x Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR (RAID 0) Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
(0.017 – 0.076, n=23) MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VY-NM042X
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR

* … smaller is better

Posts pagination

Previous page Page 1 Page 2 Page 3 … Page 7 Next page