Grab ASUS’ Zephyrus Duo 16 RTX 3060 Gaming Laptop with a new all-time low at $800 off

Grab ASUS’ Zephyrus Duo 16 RTX 3060 Gaming Laptop with a new all-time low at 0 off

Amazon is now offering the ASUS ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 Ryzen 7/16GB/1TB/RTX 3060 Gaming Laptop computer for $1,699.99 shipped. Usually going for $2,500, this 32{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} lower price or strong $800 cost fall marks a new all-time lower price we’ve tracked and beats our earlier mention by $300. The ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 will arrive functioning Microsoft’s flagship operating process, Home windows 11, and will be powered by its Ryzen 7 6800H octa-core processor and RTX 3060 graphics. The 16-inch 1920x1200p 165Hz IPS-amount exhibit is PANTONE-licensed for imaginative do the job and is accompanied by what ASUS calls the ScreenPad Plus, a 14-inch matte touchscreen over the keyboard for enhanced multitasking. Wi-Fi 6E, Dolby Atmos guidance, two USB-C 3.2 Gen 2 ports, two USB-A 3.2 Gen 2 ports, and HDMI output round out this gaming equipment. Head underneath for additional.

On a tighter spending budget? Look at out the Acer Nitro 5 i7/8GB/512GB/RTX 3050 Ti Gaming Notebook for $811 as a substitute. In this article you’ll be utilizing the 11th gen Intel i7 processor with RTX 3050 Ti graphics, which is a move down from the 3060 present with the ASUS choice higher than. The screen is marginally smaller at 15.6-inches but retains a similar 1080p 144Hz resolution and refresh rate. The overall quantity of RAM out there in this article is also lower in half to 8GB though that is however plenty for most contemporary online games to run effectively. Wi-Fi 6 support is also existing listed here. 1 exceptional characteristic of the Nitro 5 that is not in lots of laptops is the Alexa Exhibit Manner which permits you to use the device as a Display-like gadget when you’re not chaotic enjoying games.

Be sure to swing by our Computer gaming hub for extra offers on components and peripherals. Want to seize a secondary watch to go with your new gaming notebook? We’re at the moment monitoring the Acer Nitro 31.5-inch 1440p 170Hz Gaming Observe marked down to $266, the new second-greatest value. his gaming watch from Acer arrives outfitted with a widescreen 1440p IPS panel that has a foundation refresh charge of 144Hz with the ability to overclock it to 170Hz. AMD FreeSync Top quality Pro guidance and NVIDIA G-SYNC compatibility are existing here to eliminate screen tearing from game titles that detract from immersion. You will also obtain HDR10 assistance so you can view movies and participate in games with superior distinction and richer colors. In phrases of display screen inputs, you’ll have entry to a single DisplayPort 1.4 and twin HDMI 2. inputs.

ASUS ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 Ryzen 7/16GB/1TB/RTX 3060 Laptop computer features:

Grow your artistic and gaming horizons with the groundbreaking Zephyrus Duo 16, which attributes a ROG ScreenPad Plus secondary display screen that usually takes the Windows 11 encounter to new heights. Modern cooling with liquid metal and a groundbreaking thermal layout unleashes peak ability from the most recent AMD Ryzen 7 6800H CPU and NVIDIA® GeForce® RTX GPU. Supremely moveable with a high-capacity 90Wh battery, you can create, perform, and keep effective anyplace.


Subscribe to the 9to5Toys YouTube Channel for all of the latest video clips, assessments, and more!

ASUS’ Strix Scar 15 Gaming Laptop With An RTX 3080 Continues Its Incredible-Value Run Thanks To A ‘No Nonsense’ $500 Discount

ASUS’ Strix Scar 15 Gaming Laptop With An RTX 3080 Continues Its Incredible-Value Run Thanks To A ‘No Nonsense’ 0 Discount

The cost of the ASUS ROG Strix Scar 15 gaming laptop computer has remained reliable for a while now, and those people that want a blend of performance and prolonged battery daily life can go to Amazon suitable now and get this beast of a device for $1,499.99. For a laptop that is geared up with an 8GB GDDR6 RTX 3080 GPU jogging at a energy restrict of 130W, this cost could be too very good to be real, but the listing on the on the web retailer is as appropriate as items can be.

The 15.6-inch 1080p 300Hz IPS Lcd panel is catered to esports title lovers, but you can easily run AAA video games at large framerates many thanks to the RTX 3080. The establish high quality for a gaming laptop is top rated-notch, with reviewers complimenting the good hinges, absence of display wobble, and a robust keyboard deck. Aside from the impressive GPU, you get an 8-main, 16-thread AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX CPU, alongside with 16GB of DDR4 RAM and a 1TB of PCIe NVMe 3. SSD. Equally the RAM and storage can be upgraded at any time you want, so that is a as well as.

A couple of specifications of the gaming screen

You must know that this distinct model lacks a webcam, so if you are lifeless-set on obtaining the Strix Scar 15 as your day-to-day driver, recall to obtain a individual digital camera for your Zoom calls. The keyboard attributes RGB lighting, with all the keys that includes opti-mechanical switches for an enhanced typing and gaming experience. The gaming laptop operates Windows 11 right off the bat, but you can also set up Windows 10 if you operate into computer software-associated complications.

How the gaming notebook manages to preserve its thermals below management

The battery capacity is 90WHr, and given that ASUS has incorporated an AMD Ryzen CPU in the Scar 15, you can get numerous several hours of juice when the gaming laptop computer is not plugged in. Speaking of plugged in, the machine’s battery can be charged with the integrated barrel plug, or you can swap to a USB-C power brick, even though we will not suggest employing the latter when gaming as you will not get the comprehensive wattage, which will outcome in reduced general performance.

RGB lighting on the keyboard is included, if that matters to you

Aside from the absence of a webcam, the $1,499.99 rate tag tends to make the ASUS ROG Strix Scar 15 an amazing price proposition. There was a time when even RTX 3070 gaming laptops have been not available at this value, so this is absolutely a steal. Absolutely sure, the CPU is a pair of generations previous, but this deal is undoubtedly greater than what you are receiving with newer items in phrases of pricing, so hurry when you can.

Share this story

Fb

Twitter

Asus ROG Flow Z13 ACRONYM review: it’s a lot

Asus ROG Flow Z13 ACRONYM review: it’s a lot

Every so often I receive one of these bizarre little computers that Asus has done in collaboration with someone or other, and my senses are ever so slightly overwhelmed. They made one with an animated exploding head on the lid. There was one that turned into a DJ deck. There was one covered in dogs.

But this latest release — the ROG Flow Z13 ACRNM — might be the wackiest one yet to cross my desk. There is no discernible theme, rhyme, or reason to it. It is pure chaos, top to bottom. Which, you know what, fine. It’s 2023. Fair enough.

The Flow Z13 is the second collaboration between ROG and ACRONYM, an apparel brand that sells pieces like this $1,800…dress, I think? It’s a 13.4-inch gaming tablet with a kickstand and detachable keyboard — a gaming Surface Pro, for lack of a better descriptor.

With a price of $2,499.99, our Core i9 13900H/RTX 4070/16GB RAM/1TB SSD/2560 x 1600 test unit targets a fairly niche audience — on-the-go gamers with deep pockets and a deeper desire to project an edgily chaotic aesthetic. Most people should not be spending this much. If it’s the convertible tablet you’re after, you can trick out a Surface Pro 9 for $500 less. If it’s gaming power and portability you’re after, a very comparable Zephyrus G14 is even cheaper. But the Z13 serves its particular, specific niche about as well as a laptop can.

How we rate and review products

Any idea which of these keys changes the volume? I sure don’t know.

The Form

Here are some phrases that Asus uses in its press materials to sum up the aesthetic it’s going for here:

  • “A redefinition of mobile computing”
  • “Beautifully refined yet raw”
  • “Truly unique machine”
  • “A hands-free dream machine”
  • “A functional yet striking work of art”

They are quite nice keys, though.

It’s avant garde, that’s for sure. Every time I look at this thing, I spot something else. The bottom is covered in logos and typography (and they’re not just stickers; they’re laser-etched into the metal). The dark leather cover sports a funky-looking shape as well. I can’t say I really know what any of them are. If any of you regularly take ayahuasca and expect that you’re aware of their deeper spiritual meaning, feel free to let me know in the comments.

The rear is dotted with rubber pads, which do look a little bit funny, but will also do a solid job of keeping the device in place if you’re trying to lie it down on a table. The corners have “drop-resistant crashworthy bumpers”. There’s also a strap that you can attach to the corners in order to sling the thing over your shoulder like a briefcase. Let’s just say I’m very glad this didn’t come out while I was in college, because I absolutely would’ve traipsed around campus with this dangling around my front like a fanny pack. The cool kids would’ve bullied me, and rightly so.

Don’t ask me what’s going on here; I haven’t the faintest.

But look, there’s a kickstand!

Eclectic design aside, this is a 13-inch tablet with an RTX 4070 and an H-Series Core i9 inside. That’s highly unusual — those are the types of chips you generally expect to see in much bigger gaming rigs. The keyboard is detachable; the kickstand is not. Said kickstand allows for both vertical and horizontal orientations, a feature Asus has long been convinced that people need. I have no use for a 16:10 Windows tablet in vertical orientation, but more power to you if you do.

A Surface Pro type of deal for gaming

Now, the Z13 is not particularly portable as tablets go. At 2.91 pounds and 0.61 inches thick, it’s hardly an iPad, and it’s not the type of thing I’d necessarily want to bring up for an hour-long presentation. Still, when choosing between carrying this thing in my backpack and carrying, say, a Titan GT77, I’d choose this one any day. I used this for some couch and cafe work, and could fit it onto those crowded surfaces with no problem.

One other thing to call out: the display. This model’s has a 165Hz refresh rate and 2560 x 1600 resolution. It’s quite vibrant. A number of different color modes were available for various different types of games, and I found that they improved the viewing experience. The 13.4-inch screen is a bit small for playing most games, and I had to squint at some windows here and there, but at least the QHD+ resolution delivers sharp details.

So those are the bells and whistles. Here’s what it’s like to use the thing.

That’s the power button there on the top.

The Function

The Z13, well, you know. It’s a 13.4-inch tablet. So, bearing that in mind, the frame rates were fine.

In particular, it had no problem running demanding titles at its native QHD resolution. I saw an average of 232fps on CS:GO and 55fps on Red Dead Redemption 2, with both titles at maximum settings. Those are both better results than we saw from last year’s Zephyrus G14 (which was a full-fledged traditional gaming laptop, not one of these tablet things). They’re not stunningly good to the point where they’re blowing other premium gaming laptops out of the water, and Asus has clearly had to kneecap the (it’s fed just 65W of power — yes, it can run that low) RTX 4070 to squeeze it into this chassis. It’s a bit like having packed an entire college dorm room into the trunk of a sedan. Sure, you did it, but at what cost?

But I digress. Throughout, I was pleasantly surprised by how well the device was able to keep its temperature down. I didn’t see many spikes above 70 degrees Celsius as I played. The nice thing about this form factor, too, is that regardless how hot the chassis gets, it’s generally not going to transfer to the keyboard or palm rests and impact your gaming experience.

For an additional fee, folks can also connect the device to the XG Mobile, a line of external GPUs that should deliver significantly higher frame rates. You can currently get one of these for around $1,000.

Oh, and the Z13 supports Nvidia’s Advanced Optimus. This essentially operates your MUX switch for you automatically — it will turn the integrated GPU off when you’re gaming and turn it back on (and turn the discrete GPU off) when you’re done gaming, which saves you from having to dig through your laptop’s settings to do that manually. Nice! Fun! Love to see it.

Ports include a combo audio jack, a Thunderbolt 4, a USB 3.2 Type-A, a USB 3.2 Gen 2 Type-C and a microSD card reader.

If you were expecting this device to have excellent battery life, bless your heart, but it has no such thing. I averaged four and a half hours of continuous work use, which involved bouncing around 20-ish Chrome tabs, streaming Spotify, Slacking, and such. I did get a better battery gaming result than I’d expected to, eking out about 48 minutes of Red Dead Redemption 2 play to one charge. The included 130W adapter can juice the device up to 50 percent in 30 minutes, per Asus’s estimates.

Regular readers of my reviews might expect a diatribe here about how excellent battery life should be a baseline expectation for a portable machine, but honestly, I don’t have it in me. I know that people aren’t buying this for excellent battery life or top-of-the-line frame rates; they’re buying this because it looks like it just fell down from outer space. As well they should.

It’s a sturdy, non-wobbly kickstand and keyboard.

I do need to complain about one thing

I’ve been an open-minded non-curmudgeon the whole way through this review, so I hope you’ll allow me to grump about one thing. I just can’t with the keyboard. It’s too much.

The keys contain what Asus refers to as “Acronym’s own custom alphabet”. I’m happy to learn that Acronym has an alphabet of its own. Unfortunately, it’s not the alphabet I need to type with for work.

I’m a very competent touch typist when it comes to words. But when I need to, for example, type a number on the Z13, it becomes a scavenger hunt. It’s not that the real numbers aren’t on the Z13’s keys, but they are buried in a dump of so many other symbols and colors and zany doodads that my eyes couldn’t find them instinctively. Other things just aren’t delineated. For example, the key that lowers the brightness is labeled “DARK” and has a little faint grid on it. I understand what you’re going for, Acronym, but I just want the regular brightness icon. You can jazz up the brightness icon. Just give me the brightness icon.

It looks like it fell down from outer space

Wacky designs are a wonderful thing until they begin to encroach on the everyday function of a device. Kooky laptops are laptops first. The Zephyrus G14 Acronym (which I raved about upon its release) labeled its keyboard keys in a storybook-esque font that made them easier, not harder, to read. It sprinkled other decorations around the keycaps, but they were clearly and obviously delineated from the keys’ real actual labels.

Eye-popping designs are great, and this device is a unique offering you won’t find anywhere else on the market. I admire products that are unapologetically themselves, whether movies or clothing or consumer technology. But the fundamentals cannot fall by the wayside. And I hope companies, as they continue to innovate, remember that.

ASUS’ Scar 15 Gaming Laptop Is A ‘No Brainer’ Purchase Thanks To Its RTX 3080 GPU And $500 Cheaper Price

ASUS’ Scar 15 Gaming Laptop Is A ‘No Brainer’ Purchase Thanks To Its RTX 3080 GPU And 0 Cheaper Price

Gaming laptops with RTX 4080 GPUs are a tiny much too highly-priced right now, and when you have strong devices outfitted with an RTX 3080 and available at these desirable bargains, there is definitely no just one that can overlook this variety of present. Indeed, we are speaking about the ASUS ROG Strix Scar 15, a 15.6-inch portable powerhouse that is offered for only $1,499.99 on Amazon right after a substantial $500 price cut.

At its existing value, the Scar 15 can be yours for the selling price of an RTX 3070 gaming laptop, and many thanks to the GPU’s 130W electrical power limit, you will get the best frames in graphically demanding game titles. Also, if you are a articles creator, the RTX 3080 with 8GB GDDR6 VRAM will help you in numerous workflows. The develop excellent of the machine is decent and includes a blend of metallic and plastic. The hinges are also rigid, so it is perfectly-manufactured to endure extended durations of use.

How the gaming laptop manages to retain its thermals beneath handle

However, this design does not function a webcam, so you will have to go all around this setback by obtaining a independent webcam if you even now want to invest in the Scar 15. The 1080p 300Hz IPS Lcd monitor is produced for aggressive titles, and the RTX 3080 will simply be in a position to churn out people frames. The GPU is complemented by the 8-core, 16-thread Ryzen 9 5900HX CPU, which is highly effective and productive, granting the consumer a number of hrs of battery lifetime when the device is not plugged in.

RGB lights on the keyboard is included, if that matters to you

Speaking of battery life, the gaming notebook options a big 90WHr cell, and when paired with the Ryzen 9 5900HX, ASUS statements that you can get up to 12 several hours of runtime on a solitary demand. You can also cost the laptop with the bundled electricity adapter or via a USB-C brick. The 16GB DDR4 RAM and 1TB of PCIe Gen 3 NVMe SSD can be upgraded when you experience that they have began limiting the full experience.

A number of specs of the gaming screen

For $1,499.99, there are a few issues that will place off the prospective buyer, inspite of that desirable pricing. Many thanks to its effective internals, the Scar 15 is quite thick, which adds pounds to the chassis, making it tricky to carry all over. Also, a lacking webcam can be a offer breaker for many. Even so, if your most important concentrate is gaming and undertaking productiveness-connected duties, ASUS’ RTX 3080-driven gaming laptop computer should really be your following purchase.

Share this tale

Facebook

Twitter

Asus ROG Strix G16 Gaming Laptop Review: Beauty and Brawn

Asus ROG Strix G16 Gaming Laptop Review: Beauty and Brawn

Among Asus’ esports-branded Strix laptop, the 16-inch ROG Strix G16 is the option for those who prefer something smaller. (The Strix G17 and Strix G18 sit above it in size). The ROG Strix G16 features a top-of-the-line Intel Core i9-13980HX Raptor Lake processor and Nvidia’s new GeForce RTX 4070. This marks the second laptop we’ve tested with Nvidia’s Ada Lovelace-based mainstream laptop GPU.

The ROG Strix G16 also represents the latest laptop transitioning from a 16:9 to 16:10 aspect ratio, with a 16-inch 1920 x 1200 (WUXGA) 165 Hz IPS display. This laptop has the goods to contend with some of the best gaming laptops on the market and includes 16GB of DDR5-4800 memory, a 1TB SSD, and a high-quality chassis that we’ve come to expect from Asus ROG.

Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 (2023) laptop review: RTX 4090 with a super bright, Mini-LED display

Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 (2023) laptop review: RTX 4090 with a super bright, Mini-LED display
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB




5598 (5462.22min – 5597.85max) MB/s ∼100{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +43{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W
2x Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR (RAID 0)





4842 (4719.64min – 4842.11max) MB/s ∼86{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +24{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR





4525 (4498.41min – 4525.41max) MB/s ∼81{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +16{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
  (2376 – 5676, n=23) Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VY-NM042X
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB




3917 (3883.93min – 3916.78max) MB/s ∼70{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
SSSTC CA6-8D1024




3844 (3257.93min – 3843.87max) MB/s ∼69{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -2{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH




3764 (3540.2min – 3763.76max) MB/s ∼67{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -4{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Average of class Gaming
  (834 – 5676, n=187, last 2 years) MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB




7533 (7482.85min – 7532.79max) MB/s ∼100{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +124{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH




4767 (4365.51min – 4766.62max) MB/s ∼63{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +42{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR





4378 (4355.78min – 4378.43max) MB/s ∼58{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +30{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
  (2461 – 7628, n=23) Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W
2x Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR (RAID 0)





4199 (3998.61min – 4199.12max) MB/s ∼56{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +25{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VY-NM042X
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB





3365 (3321.68min – 3365.3max) MB/s ∼45{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Average of class Gaming
  (399 – 7889, n=186, last 2 years) Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
SSSTC CA6-8D1024




3242 (1498min – 3241.78max) MB/s ∼43{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -4{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB





11242 (10740.3min – 11242.2max) MB/s ∼100{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +61{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W
2x Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR (RAID 0)




10774 (9137.92min – 10774max) MB/s ∼96{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +54{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
  (3471 – 12556, n=23) Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VY-NM042X
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB




6988 (5851.89min – 6987.92max) MB/s ∼62{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
SSSTC CA6-8D1024





6872 (4963.33min – 6872.25max) MB/s ∼61{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -2{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR




6682 (5778.28min – 6681.95max) MB/s ∼59{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -4{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH




6550 (5497.59min – 6549.73max) MB/s ∼58{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -6{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Average of class Gaming
  (1620 – 13195, n=187, last 2 years) MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB




9942 (9912.92min – 9941.76max) MB/s ∼100{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +93{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W
2x Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR (RAID 0)




8404 (8165.05min – 8403.71max) MB/s ∼85{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +63{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
  (3537 – 10261, n=23) Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VY-NM042X
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB




5151 (5119.78min – 5150.82max) MB/s ∼52{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR





4943 (4923.06min – 4943.2max) MB/s ∼50{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -4{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH





4876 (4374.87min – 4876.3max) MB/s ∼49{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -5{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
SSSTC CA6-8D1024





4244 (427.59min – 4244.22max) MB/s ∼43{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -18{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Average of class Gaming
  (86.2 – 10261, n=187, last 2 years) Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR




95.3 (93.25min – 95.25max) MB/s ∼100{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +29{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB




83.1 (79.37min – 83.07max) MB/s ∼87{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +12{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
  (56.2 – 91.2, n=23) Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH





74.3 (71.59min – 74.33max) MB/s ∼78{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} 0{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VY-NM042X
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB




74.1 (72.59min – 74.06max) MB/s ∼78{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Average of class Gaming
  (23.3 – 97.4, n=187, last 2 years) Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W
2x Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR (RAID 0)





57.5 (57.09min – 57.53max) MB/s ∼60{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -22{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
SSSTC CA6-8D1024




56.5 (49.8min – 56.49max) MB/s ∼59{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -24{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH





264 (263.57min – 264.44max) MB/s ∼100{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +70{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR





255 (243.79min – 255.25max) MB/s ∼97{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +64{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
  (134 – 295, n=23) Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
SSSTC CA6-8D1024




220 (56.84min – 219.56max) MB/s ∼83{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +41{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB




213 (205.52min – 212.72max) MB/s ∼81{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +37{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Average of class Gaming
  (66.6 – 421, n=186, last 2 years) Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VY-NM042X
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB




155.5 (148.87min – 155.46max) MB/s ∼59{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W
2x Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR (RAID 0)





103.7 (103.17min – 103.74max) MB/s ∼39{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -33{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR





4100 (4085.58min – 4100.1max) MB/s ∼100{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +475{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
SSSTC CA6-8D1024





3111 (2388.54min – 3111.42max) MB/s ∼76{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +336{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
  (713 – 4075, n=23) Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH




2855 (2482.75min – 2854.87max) MB/s ∼70{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +300{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Average of class Gaming
  (310 – 5829, n=186, last 2 years) MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB





1469 (1266.81min – 1469.47max) MB/s ∼36{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +106{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VY-NM042X
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB




713 (705.93min – 712.59max) MB/s ∼17{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W
2x Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR (RAID 0)




711 (692.26min – 710.64max) MB/s ∼17{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} 0{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR




3537 (3519.01min – 3536.66max) MB/s ∼100{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +656{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH




2694 (2561.51min – 2693.92max) MB/s ∼76{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +476{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
  (422 – 3531, n=23) Average of class Gaming
  (288 – 4383, n=186, last 2 years) MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB




1424 (1251.47min – 1423.75max) MB/s ∼40{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +204{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
SSSTC CA6-8D1024




1282 (960.6min – 1281.78max) MB/s ∼36{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +174{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VY-NM042X
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB




468 (459.96min – 467.77max) MB/s ∼13{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W
2x Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR (RAID 0)





350 (343.49min – 350.45max) MB/s ∼10{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -25{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
  (4850 – 9031, n=23) Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
SSSTC CA6-8D1024 Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH Average of class Gaming
  (910 – 10330, n=176, last 2 years) Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VY-NM042X
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W
2x Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR (RAID 0) Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
SSSTC CA6-8D1024


3308 Points ∼100{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +110{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
  (1572 – 3399, n=23) Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH Average of class Gaming
  (389 – 3629, n=176, last 2 years) MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W
2x Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR (RAID 0) Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VY-NM042X
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
  (1081 – 3999, n=23) Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VY-NM042X
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH Average of class Gaming
  (338 – 5157, n=176, last 2 years) Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
SSSTC CA6-8D1024 MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W
2x Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR (RAID 0) MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W
2x Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR (RAID 0) Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
  (2591 – 9971, n=23) Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VY-NM042X
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
SSSTC CA6-8D1024 Average of class Gaming
  (925 – 9971, n=176, last 2 years) Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W
2x Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR (RAID 0) Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
  (1900 – 8590, n=23) Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR Average of class Gaming
  (308 – 8590, n=176, last 2 years) Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
SSSTC CA6-8D1024 Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VY-NM042X
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VY-NM042X
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
  (49.8 – 84.1, n=23) Average of class Gaming
  (20 – 108, n=176, last 2 years) Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W
2x Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR (RAID 0) Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
SSSTC CA6-8D1024 Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VY-NM042X
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
  (112.6 – 249, n=23) Average of class Gaming
  (18 – 364, n=176, last 2 years) MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
SSSTC CA6-8D1024 Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W
2x Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR (RAID 0) Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
SSSTC CA6-8D1024


2744.3 MB/s ∼100{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +186{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR


2558.72 MB/s ∼93{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +167{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
  (959 – 2811, n=23) Average of class Gaming
  (216 – 2963, n=176, last 2 years) MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W
2x Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR (RAID 0) Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VY-NM042X
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VY-NM042X
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
  (567 – 3414, n=23) Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH Average of class Gaming
  (243 – 4381, n=176, last 2 years) Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
SSSTC CA6-8D1024 Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W
2x Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR (RAID 0) MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB Average of class Gaming
  (0.02 – 0.23, n=171, last 2 years)





0.05665 ms * ∼100{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -183{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W
2x Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR (RAID 0) MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
  (0.018 – 0.078, n=23) Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
SSSTC CA6-8D1024 Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VY-NM042X
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
SSSTC CA6-8D1024 Average of class Gaming
  (0.012 – 0.425, n=176, last 2 years)





0.05613 ms * ∼68{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -181{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W
2x Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR (RAID 0) Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
  (0.017 – 0.076, n=23) MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VY-NM042X
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR

* … smaller is better