Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 (2023) laptop review: RTX 4090 with a super bright, Mini-LED display

Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 (2023) laptop review: RTX 4090 with a super bright, Mini-LED display
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB




5598 (5462.22min – 5597.85max) MB/s ∼100{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +43{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W
2x Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR (RAID 0)





4842 (4719.64min – 4842.11max) MB/s ∼86{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +24{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR





4525 (4498.41min – 4525.41max) MB/s ∼81{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +16{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
  (2376 – 5676, n=23) Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VY-NM042X
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB




3917 (3883.93min – 3916.78max) MB/s ∼70{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
SSSTC CA6-8D1024




3844 (3257.93min – 3843.87max) MB/s ∼69{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -2{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH




3764 (3540.2min – 3763.76max) MB/s ∼67{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -4{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Average of class Gaming
  (834 – 5676, n=187, last 2 years) MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB




7533 (7482.85min – 7532.79max) MB/s ∼100{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +124{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH




4767 (4365.51min – 4766.62max) MB/s ∼63{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +42{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR





4378 (4355.78min – 4378.43max) MB/s ∼58{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +30{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
  (2461 – 7628, n=23) Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W
2x Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR (RAID 0)





4199 (3998.61min – 4199.12max) MB/s ∼56{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +25{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VY-NM042X
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB





3365 (3321.68min – 3365.3max) MB/s ∼45{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Average of class Gaming
  (399 – 7889, n=186, last 2 years) Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
SSSTC CA6-8D1024




3242 (1498min – 3241.78max) MB/s ∼43{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -4{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB





11242 (10740.3min – 11242.2max) MB/s ∼100{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +61{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W
2x Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR (RAID 0)




10774 (9137.92min – 10774max) MB/s ∼96{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +54{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
  (3471 – 12556, n=23) Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VY-NM042X
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB




6988 (5851.89min – 6987.92max) MB/s ∼62{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
SSSTC CA6-8D1024





6872 (4963.33min – 6872.25max) MB/s ∼61{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -2{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR




6682 (5778.28min – 6681.95max) MB/s ∼59{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -4{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH




6550 (5497.59min – 6549.73max) MB/s ∼58{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -6{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Average of class Gaming
  (1620 – 13195, n=187, last 2 years) MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB




9942 (9912.92min – 9941.76max) MB/s ∼100{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +93{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W
2x Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR (RAID 0)




8404 (8165.05min – 8403.71max) MB/s ∼85{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +63{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
  (3537 – 10261, n=23) Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VY-NM042X
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB




5151 (5119.78min – 5150.82max) MB/s ∼52{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR





4943 (4923.06min – 4943.2max) MB/s ∼50{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -4{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH





4876 (4374.87min – 4876.3max) MB/s ∼49{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -5{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
SSSTC CA6-8D1024





4244 (427.59min – 4244.22max) MB/s ∼43{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -18{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Average of class Gaming
  (86.2 – 10261, n=187, last 2 years) Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR




95.3 (93.25min – 95.25max) MB/s ∼100{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +29{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB




83.1 (79.37min – 83.07max) MB/s ∼87{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +12{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
  (56.2 – 91.2, n=23) Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH





74.3 (71.59min – 74.33max) MB/s ∼78{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} 0{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VY-NM042X
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB




74.1 (72.59min – 74.06max) MB/s ∼78{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Average of class Gaming
  (23.3 – 97.4, n=187, last 2 years) Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W
2x Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR (RAID 0)





57.5 (57.09min – 57.53max) MB/s ∼60{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -22{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
SSSTC CA6-8D1024




56.5 (49.8min – 56.49max) MB/s ∼59{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -24{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH





264 (263.57min – 264.44max) MB/s ∼100{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +70{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR





255 (243.79min – 255.25max) MB/s ∼97{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +64{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
  (134 – 295, n=23) Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
SSSTC CA6-8D1024




220 (56.84min – 219.56max) MB/s ∼83{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +41{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB




213 (205.52min – 212.72max) MB/s ∼81{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +37{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Average of class Gaming
  (66.6 – 421, n=186, last 2 years) Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VY-NM042X
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB




155.5 (148.87min – 155.46max) MB/s ∼59{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W
2x Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR (RAID 0)





103.7 (103.17min – 103.74max) MB/s ∼39{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -33{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR





4100 (4085.58min – 4100.1max) MB/s ∼100{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +475{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
SSSTC CA6-8D1024





3111 (2388.54min – 3111.42max) MB/s ∼76{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +336{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
  (713 – 4075, n=23) Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH




2855 (2482.75min – 2854.87max) MB/s ∼70{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +300{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Average of class Gaming
  (310 – 5829, n=186, last 2 years) MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB





1469 (1266.81min – 1469.47max) MB/s ∼36{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +106{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VY-NM042X
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB




713 (705.93min – 712.59max) MB/s ∼17{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W
2x Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR (RAID 0)




711 (692.26min – 710.64max) MB/s ∼17{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} 0{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR




3537 (3519.01min – 3536.66max) MB/s ∼100{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +656{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH




2694 (2561.51min – 2693.92max) MB/s ∼76{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +476{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
  (422 – 3531, n=23) Average of class Gaming
  (288 – 4383, n=186, last 2 years) MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB




1424 (1251.47min – 1423.75max) MB/s ∼40{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +204{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
SSSTC CA6-8D1024




1282 (960.6min – 1281.78max) MB/s ∼36{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +174{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VY-NM042X
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB




468 (459.96min – 467.77max) MB/s ∼13{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W
2x Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR (RAID 0)





350 (343.49min – 350.45max) MB/s ∼10{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -25{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
  (4850 – 9031, n=23) Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
SSSTC CA6-8D1024 Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH Average of class Gaming
  (910 – 10330, n=176, last 2 years) Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VY-NM042X
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W
2x Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR (RAID 0) Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
SSSTC CA6-8D1024


3308 Points ∼100{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +110{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
  (1572 – 3399, n=23) Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH Average of class Gaming
  (389 – 3629, n=176, last 2 years) MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W
2x Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR (RAID 0) Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VY-NM042X
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
  (1081 – 3999, n=23) Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VY-NM042X
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH Average of class Gaming
  (338 – 5157, n=176, last 2 years) Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
SSSTC CA6-8D1024 MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W
2x Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR (RAID 0) MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W
2x Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR (RAID 0) Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
  (2591 – 9971, n=23) Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VY-NM042X
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
SSSTC CA6-8D1024 Average of class Gaming
  (925 – 9971, n=176, last 2 years) Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W
2x Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR (RAID 0) Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
  (1900 – 8590, n=23) Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR Average of class Gaming
  (308 – 8590, n=176, last 2 years) Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
SSSTC CA6-8D1024 Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VY-NM042X
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VY-NM042X
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
  (49.8 – 84.1, n=23) Average of class Gaming
  (20 – 108, n=176, last 2 years) Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W
2x Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR (RAID 0) Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
SSSTC CA6-8D1024 Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VY-NM042X
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
  (112.6 – 249, n=23) Average of class Gaming
  (18 – 364, n=176, last 2 years) MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
SSSTC CA6-8D1024 Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W
2x Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR (RAID 0) Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
SSSTC CA6-8D1024


2744.3 MB/s ∼100{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +186{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR


2558.72 MB/s ∼93{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +167{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
  (959 – 2811, n=23) Average of class Gaming
  (216 – 2963, n=176, last 2 years) MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W
2x Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR (RAID 0) Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VY-NM042X
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VY-NM042X
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
  (567 – 3414, n=23) Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH Average of class Gaming
  (243 – 4381, n=176, last 2 years) Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
SSSTC CA6-8D1024 Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W
2x Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR (RAID 0) MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB Average of class Gaming
  (0.02 – 0.23, n=171, last 2 years)





0.05665 ms * ∼100{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -183{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W
2x Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR (RAID 0) MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
  (0.018 – 0.078, n=23) Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
SSSTC CA6-8D1024 Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VY-NM042X
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
SSSTC CA6-8D1024 Average of class Gaming
  (0.012 – 0.425, n=176, last 2 years)





0.05613 ms * ∼68{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -181{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W
2x Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR (RAID 0) Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
  (0.017 – 0.076, n=23) MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VY-NM042X
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR

* … smaller is better

Marvel’s Spider-Man 2 PS5 Game Receives Unsurprising Release Date Update From Actor

Marvel’s Spider-Man 2 PS5 Game Receives Unsurprising Release Date Update From Actor

Marvel’s Spider-Gentleman 2 acquired a release date update from Tony Todd – the actor who will carry Venom to daily life in the approaching PS5 sport. 

Insomniac Video games has currently released two acclaimed PlayStation-special Spider-Gentleman video games above the final five years. The first starred Peter Parker in 2018, followed by Miles Morales-led spin-off together with the 2020 start of the PS5.

The two Spider-Gentlemen will converge with this year’s Spider-Person 2 as it capabilities both wall-crawlers in action, alongside with the introduction of Venom to the universe just after the symbiote anti-hero was teased in the two earlier video games.

The very long-awaited sequel was initially announced at PlayStation’s September 2021 showcase for a 2023 launch alongside the announcement of a PS5 Wolverine activity – interesting facts of which have just lately surfaced – to occur at a later date

PS5 Spider-Gentleman 2 Launch Window Seemingly Revealed

Miles Morales, Peter Parker, Spider-Man
Sony

In accordance to a latest tweet from Spider-Man 2‘s Venom actor Tony Todd, the PS5 activity “appears to be like” it will launch this September with “enormous publicity” coming in advance of the launch in August when followers can anticipate commercials to commence:

“Appears to be like September! Large publicity coming in august. Commercials start dropping in august so I’m explained to. Keep on to your … and maintain breath! Gonna be required”

This news does not come as a enormous surprise immediately after official statements from PlayStation and an early professional pointed towards a tumble launch, in addition to the 1st Spider-Guy video game also releasing in September when it came to PS4 back again in 2018.

Concern of a possible delay to 2024 recently unfold owing to a absence of promoting or phrase from Insomniac Game titles, but Peter Parker actor Yuri Lowenthal lately reassured followers the game is continue to on monitor for 2023.

PS5 Spider-Male 2 Information Likely Coming Quickly

This information will occur as hugely enjoyable to many presented September is only 6 months absent, so it could not be very long just before Spider-Male 2 is in gamers’ fingers. And even in advance of then, fans should to be discovering a large amount additional about the sequel before long as the workforce drops an formal date, new trailer, and particulars about the PS5 title.

With Spider-Man’s Yuri Lowenthal giving the initially reassurance that a delay was not on the cards and now Venom’s Tony Todd seemingly revealing the release and internet marketing plans, Insomniac Video games is evidently producing a stage of trying to keep its cast in the loop on the street to Spider-Male 2‘s launch.

Todd’s determination to ensure this important information and facts in this way is unquestionably a strange a person, as release aspects this substantial would normally occur by way of a official announcement as opposed to a tweet from 1 of the actors. But probably this was just a slip-up and Todd essentially considered the cat was by now out of the bag.

Marvel’s Spider-Gentleman 2 has however to set an formal release day.

Virtusa Advances to an Elite Partner in the ServiceNow Partner Program, Showcasing Dynamic IT Service Management Solutions

Virtusa Advances to an Elite Partner in the ServiceNow Partner Program, Showcasing Dynamic IT Service Management Solutions

SOUTHBOROUGH, Mass., March 21, 2023 /PRNewswire/ — Virtusa Company, a international supplier of electronic method, digital engineering, and IT services and remedies, currently announced its development to an Elite Partner in the ServiceNow Spouse Method. Virtusa supports ServiceNow shoppers with streamlined and automated IT services administration procedures, resulting in a lot quicker problem resolution and improved consumer satisfaction, like shopper value.

The partnership will empower Virtusa to leverage ServiceNow’s impressive platform to deliver innovative alternatives that increase operational performance, streamline workflows, and generate small business expansion. These alternatives involve a array of abilities across IT support administration, worker workflows, buyer service, and far more.

“Virtusa is delighted to take our partnership with ServiceNow to the upcoming amount, a testament to our determination to providing remarkable success and value to our shoppers,” reported Rajesh Khanna, World-wide Head, Alliances and Strategic Deals, Virtusa. “We are exceptionally very pleased to deepen our romantic relationship with ServiceNow by obtaining Elite partnership standing. We are now superior positioned to enable enterprises change their functions, unlock new efficiencies, and obtain their ambitions faster than ever.”

As an Elite ServiceNow husband or wife, Virtusa underwent arduous schooling and certification procedures, demonstrating their deep comprehending of the platform and its capabilities. By their operate with consumers in the economic products and services business, Virtusa was able to showcase their skills in leveraging ServiceNow to travel price tag price savings, increase effectiveness, improve purchaser satisfaction, consistently deliver fantastic results, and demonstrate their determination to driving innovation through the system. Virtusa was regarded as an Elite Husband or wife by ServiceNow, granting them entry to innovative instruction, assistance, and methods to increase their IT service management abilities even more.

“ServiceNow is thrilled to have Virtusa as an Elite Partner in our ecosystem,” reported Anthony Torsiello, Vice President, Americas alliance and channel ecosystem at ServiceNow. “With Virtusa’s progressive and foremost business initiatives throughout several vital industries, like Monetary Solutions and Healthcare, there is no restrict to where they can go.”

Virtusa and ServiceNow have currently collaborated on several successful assignments, assisting company shoppers across a assortment of industries to obtain their digital transformation plans. A single instance is a job for a huge world wide money providers organization. Virtusa leveraged the Now Platform to streamline and automate IT assistance administration processes, ensuing in quicker issue resolution and enhanced client pleasure. In yet another challenge, Virtusa helped a big health care company enrich their individual encounter by deploying ServiceNow’s shopper company management alternative, which enabled them to swiftly and efficiently solve individual inquiries and problems. These are just a couple examples of how Virtusa and ServiceNow’s partnership drives innovation and delivers benefit for company shoppers.

About Virtusa

Virtusa Corporation is a world-wide company of electronic company tactic, electronic engineering, and information and facts technology (IT) products and services and remedies that enable shoppers change, disrupt, and unlock new value by way of progressive engineering. Virtusa serves Global 2000 businesses in banking, economic providers, coverage, health care, communications, media, enjoyment, vacation, producing, and technologies industries.

Virtusa allows consumers improve their business with revolutionary merchandise and providers that make operational performance making use of electronic labor, foreseeable future-proof operational and IT platforms, and rationalization and modernization of IT applications infrastructure. This is accomplished through a distinctive method blending deep contextual knowledge, empowered agile groups, and measurably greater engineering to build holistic answers that drive the small business ahead at unparalleled velocity enabled by a lifestyle of cooperative disruption.

Virtusa is a registered trademark of Virtusa Corporation. All other firm and brand name names may perhaps be trademarks or support marks of their respective holders.

About ServiceNow

ServiceNow, the ServiceNow symbol, Now, Now system, and other ServiceNow marks are emblems and/or registered trademarks of ServiceNow, Inc. in the United States and/or other nations.  

Discover much more in this article:
https://www.virtusa.com/companions/servicenow 

Media Get in touch with:
Alex Nickols
Edelman
+1 (415) 430-8056
[email protected]

Resource Virtusa Corporation

Credit ratings increasingly looking at cybersecurity

Credit ratings increasingly looking at cybersecurity

Comment

Good morning! This is David, Tim’s researcher for The Cybersecurity 202. I’m anchoring today’s newsletter. (Yes, I am nervous). I also research The Technology 202 with Cristiano Lima. Send tips, scoops, exclusives and nut-free banana bread recipes to david.dimolfetta@washpost.com.

Reading this online? Sign up for The Cybersecurity 202 to get scoops and sharp analysis in your inbox each morning.

Below: A pair of senators re-up civilian cyber workforce legislation, and the number of zero-day exploits in 2022 reportedly drops. First:

Credit ratings increasingly looking at cybersecurity

U.S. companies face a wide array of issues potentially impacting their ability to borrow money. In recent months, a banking crisis and high interest rates have stretched some companies thin, leading to layoffs and decreases in spending.

At the same time, credit rating agencies, which assess companies’ ability to pay back borrowed money, are increasingly factoring in cybersecurity as part of their credit assessment criteria as they try to get a handle on the risks companies face. 

Companies are dedicating more resources to protecting their assets because the potential risk that cyberattacks have against their credit is “real and significant,” said Scott Kessler, the global sector lead for technology, media and telecommunications at Third Bridge, an investment research firm. 

Despite an uncertain global economic backdrop, Kessler consistently sees companies devoting resources toward cybersecurity. 

  • “It’s almost a requirement now to have certain protections in place to ensure your valuable assets are safeguarded,” he said.

To be sure, cybersecurity is still a small piece of the puzzle for credit rating agencies, and boosting cyber defenses is not always the top issue on many corporate executives’ minds. But experts say that companies need to be focused on cybersecurity as they try to mitigate risks — and assure lenders that they’re doing so.

For companies that deal with any type of risk in their business model, what they do from a cyber policy and staffing standpoint is crucial to how attractive they are for investments and doing business, said Colby Stilson, a partner, portfolio manager and co-head of the global taxable fixed income team at Brown Advisory.

“If you have a breach, but you don’t have the right governance in place to avoid risk like that, there are very real monetary damages associated with that kind of event,” Stilson said. If an event is catastrophic enough, that may facilitate the downgrade of a company’s credit rating, he added. That has massive implications for the company’s cost of capital and investors in its bonds.

Despite a recent emphasis on cybersecurity by credit rating agencies, there’s no one-size-fits-all approach for an organization to earn a good rating through their cyber posture, experts told The Cybersecurity 202. That makes it difficult for ratings agencies and analysts to predict the credit outlook for organizations and governments as they brace for potentially destructive cyberattacks in a tense geopolitical situation, especially if they have smaller budgets.

Smaller entities are not investing as much in cybersecurity as their larger counterparts, said Lesley Ritter, a vice president and senior credit officer leading cyber risk for Moody’s Investors Service, a major credit ratings agency.

  • “Company size seems to be a very detailed driver to the level of investment in cybersecurity and the sophistication of the overall cyber governance structure,” she said.
  • Credit rating agencies also look at organizational issues and priorities, like whether a company has a chief information security officer who has a seat at the table during important discussions.

Complicating matters, the most significant sources of risk for cyber incidents are humans, said Gerry Glombicki, a senior director at Fitch Ratings’s insurance group.

  • To prevent a hack, a company can enable multi-factor authentication, give staff awareness training or buy anti-virus software, “but if you have the wrong person click on the wrong link, all of that stuff doesn’t matter,” he said.

Some companies’ credit ratings have suffered after major cyberattacks. But recent victims say that they’ve been able to bounce back by focusing on cybersecurity investments.

Equifax, whose credit outlook was downgraded by Moody’s in 2019 following its 2017 data breach, said the incident was a “catalyst for change” at the company. (U.S. prosecutors have accused Chinese military hackers of stealing the company’s data.) 

And SolarWinds, which was hit by Russian hackers, rebounded in 2022 with a stable credit outlook. The investments in cyber after the incident “have enabled us to retain the vast majority of our customers while also returning to our historically high customer retention rates and strong public sector business,” a spokesperson said.

Staying ahead of geopolitics

The war in Ukraine isn’t significantly factoring into cyber-related credit ratings — for now, said Jon Bateman, a senior fellow in the Technology and International Affairs Program at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.

So far, cyber risks from Russia and Ukraine have not significantly materialized in the United States. That could change if the United States enters into a direct conflict with a country with significant cyber capabilities, like Russia or China.

Even then, there might be bigger problems at hand for U.S. businesses besides wanting a good credit rating, he said.

Rosen, Blackburn introduce cybersecurity workforce legislation package

Sens. Jacky Rosen (D-Nev.) and Marsha Blackburn (R-Tenn.) introduced a pair of bills today that would create civilian cyber reserve pilot programs in the Defense Department and Department of Homeland Security, according to a release shared exclusively with The Cybersecurity 202.

The Civilian Cybersecurity Reserve Act would allow the agencies to recruit civilian cybersecurity personnel to serve in reserve capacities in the event that the United States needs to respond to large-scale malicious cyber incidents.

Participation in the programs would be voluntary and would not include Selected Reserve military members, the release notes.

A similar bill that passed in the Senate last Congress was introduced by Rosen with the support of Blackburn, but only directed the creation of a cyber reserve program in the Defense Department. The release for the new pair of bills does not mention any new cosponsors.

The news comes amid continued concerns over a growing gap in the U.S. cyber workforce. The Government Accountability Office in January said the federal government should work to address the shortage, calling it a risk to national security.

Greek authorities reportedly spied on and wiretapped Meta manager

The Greek national intelligence service placed an American and Greek national who worked for Meta under year-long wiretap surveillance, Matina Stevis-Gridneff reports for the New York Times.

The report, citing documents and people familiar with the matter, is “the first known case of an American citizen being targeted in a European Union country” with advanced surveillance technology, Stevis-Gridneff writes.

Artemis Seaford from 2020 to 2022 worked as a trust and safety manager at Meta and lived part-time in Greece. Her phone was hacked by Predator spyware for at least 2 months beginning in September 2021.

The spyware was manufactured in Athens, though the story notes the Greek government denied its use and had previously banned it.

“The Greek authorities and security services have at no time acquired or used the Predator surveillance software. To suggest otherwise is wrong,” government spokesman Giannis Oikonomou told the New York Times in an email. “The alleged use of this software by nongovernmental parties is under ongoing judicial investigation.”

Zero-day vulnerability exploits dipped in 2022, but were most linked to China

Researchers spotted fewer previously-unknown software vulnerabilities known as “zero-days” being exploited in 2022 than in 2021, though hackers linked to China continued to carry out the majority of the exploits, according to reports citing Google-owned Mandiant data.

Last year “was largely a story of consistency,” Mandiant principal analyst James Sadowski told CyberScoop’s Elias Groll.

Last year, zero-days were used against the three largest software vendors by market size: Apple, Microsoft and Alphabet, the parent company of Google, Matt Kapko from Cybersecurity Dive reports.

OPM gives agencies guidance for a new program to rotate cybersecurity employees across agencies (Federal Computer Week)

CISA: Election security still under threat at cyber and physical level (Nextgov)

Insurer spots cybersecurity weakness with model simulating catastrophic attacks (Bloomberg News)

BBC advises staff to delete TikTok from work phones (BBC News)

Millions in Punjab still without mobile internet as shutdown extended to fourth day (The Record)

Google flags apps made by popular Chinese e-commerce giant as malware (TechCrunch)

Clop ransomware claims Saks Fifth Avenue, retailer says mock data stolen (Bleeping Computer)

Ferrari discloses data breach after receiving ransom demand (Bleeping Computer)

Why you should opt out of sharing data with your mobile provider (Krebs on Security)

Thanks for reading. See you tomorrow.

7 real-world cloud computing examples to know

7 real-world cloud computing examples to know

Cloud computing has turn out to be an important element of our lives, whether or not we understand it or not. Many of the companies and apps we use on a everyday foundation, these as messaging and streaming new music and online video, are driven by cloud computing. 

In this article are authentic-planet cloud computing illustrations to know.

Netflix

Netflix works by using cloud computing to give streaming products and services to tens of millions of buyers throughout the world. By hosting its content on cloud servers, it can assure responsible and scalable shipping to a world-wide audience.

Netflix utilizes a selection of cloud computing solutions and technologies, together with Amazon Web Solutions (AWS) and content supply networks (CDNs). The bulk of Netflix’s cloud computing prerequisites, including storage, processing energy and data management, are achieved by AWS. Netflix will make use of CDNs to promise that its end users receive its content rapidly and persistently. To permit consumers to obtain the content material from the closest locale, CDNs continue to keep copies of the content in many places around the world.

Slack

Slack is a cloud-based mostly messaging and collaboration system that enables teams to converse and collaborate in genuine time. It utilizes cloud computing to deliver scalability, trustworthiness and accessibility to its users. Slack’s cloud infrastructure makes it possible for it to help a huge quantity of users and messages, and to present seamless entry to its platform from several devices and destinations.

Slack runs on cloud-based architecture that is created to be highly obtainable and fault-tolerant. It takes advantage of numerous information facilities to guarantee that its services are often accessible, even in the event of a failure in one particular facts middle.

Salesforce

Salesforce delivers purchaser romance administration (CRM) products and services by means of cloud computing. This enables corporations to deal with purchaser data, automate workflows and streamline gross sales procedures.

Salesforce cloud computing consists of the use of a wide range of cloud providers and technologies, which includes:

  • Infrastructure as a provider (IaaS): Salesforce employs IaaS organizations like Microsoft Azure and AWS to provide the fundamental infrastructure for its cloud-dependent system.
  • Software program as a services (SaaS): Salesforce provides its program solutions as an SaaS platform alternatively than as standard software that must be installed on community units.
  • System as a service (PaaS): To empower builders to produce and distribute special apps on the Salesforce system, Salesforce also makes use of PaaS systems like Drive.com and Heroku.
  • Cell computing: Salesforce also provides its consumers cellular apps that give them access to their shopper and product sales info any time and wherever they are.

Airbnb

Airbnb is a cloud-primarily based system for the sharing economy. Utilizing Airbnb’s website or cell app, hosts may possibly present their properties for hire, and readers can guide these rentals. Significant amounts of data, which includes assets listings, scheduling details and purchaser tastes, are saved and managed by Airbnb utilizing cloud computing.

As a result, the system can offer functions like real-time availability and pricing, protected payment processing, and customized recommendations that make the experience simple for the two visitors and hosts.

Uber

Uber makes use of cloud computing to manage its experience-hailing platform, which include authentic-time spot tracking, excursion routing and fare calculation. This makes it possible for the system to deliver speedy and responsible transportation providers, with options these kinds of as authentic-time payment processing and personalized trip selections. Cloud computing also enables Uber to scale its products and services to satisfy demand, supply 24/7 assist, and make certain the security and security of riders and drivers.

Associated: An overview of peer-to-peer ridesharing applying blockchain

GitHub

GitHub is a cloud-based mostly system that supplies internet hosting for software program improvement and model regulate employing Git. It permits builders to store and collaborate on code with their staff members, control challenge duties and observe adjustments to code more than time.

Even though GitHub alone is not a cloud computing platform for each se, it is typically utilised in conjunction with cloud computing expert services these types of as AWS, Google Cloud Platform and Microsoft Azure. Builders can use GitHub to host their code and then deploy it to the cloud applying companies such as AWS Elastic Beanstalk or Microsoft Azure Application Service.

Google Cloud System

Google Cloud System is a cloud computing system delivered by Google that permits buyers to make, deploy, and scale apps and expert services working with a vast range of computing methods. It is an case in point of cloud computing mainly because it supplies access to a broad assortment of computing resources on desire, including virtual devices, storage, networking, databases and other products and services, all shipped as a result of the net.

A person illustration of how Google Cloud can be applied is for making and deploying website apps. Developers can use Google Cloud’s compute assets to host their application code and information, and use solutions these as load balancing, autoscaling and container orchestration to deal with the application’s overall performance and availability. They can also use Google Cloud’s equipment discovering products and services to increase intelligent characteristics to their purposes, this sort of as graphic recognition or normal language processing.

Is blockchain a component of cloud computing?

No, blockchain is not a aspect of cloud computing. While both blockchain and cloud computing are employed in the context of contemporary computing, they are distinct systems with unique properties and use scenarios.

Cloud computing is a shipping model for computing means this kind of as servers, storage and software apps over the world wide web. Consumers who use cloud computing can use these providers whenever they will need to without the need of getting to buy and manage their individual physical IT infrastructure.

Similar: 7 modern-day know-how illustrations that really do not want electricity

Blockchain, on the other hand, is a distributed digital ledger technological know-how that documents transactions in a harmless, open up and unchangeable way. Blockchain is commonly utilized to build relationships of rely on among parties who do not already know or trust one yet another. In purchase to protect against any a single human being or entity from tampering with the details, it accomplishes this by using a decentralized community of personal computers to confirm and file transactions.

Whilst it is attainable to use cloud computing to host blockchain-based mostly programs, blockchain is not inherently a portion of cloud computing.