Asus ROG Flow Z13 ACRONYM review: it’s a lot

Asus ROG Flow Z13 ACRONYM review: it’s a lot

Every so often I receive one of these bizarre little computers that Asus has done in collaboration with someone or other, and my senses are ever so slightly overwhelmed. They made one with an animated exploding head on the lid. There was one that turned into a DJ deck. There was one covered in dogs.

But this latest release — the ROG Flow Z13 ACRNM — might be the wackiest one yet to cross my desk. There is no discernible theme, rhyme, or reason to it. It is pure chaos, top to bottom. Which, you know what, fine. It’s 2023. Fair enough.

The Flow Z13 is the second collaboration between ROG and ACRONYM, an apparel brand that sells pieces like this $1,800…dress, I think? It’s a 13.4-inch gaming tablet with a kickstand and detachable keyboard — a gaming Surface Pro, for lack of a better descriptor.

With a price of $2,499.99, our Core i9 13900H/RTX 4070/16GB RAM/1TB SSD/2560 x 1600 test unit targets a fairly niche audience — on-the-go gamers with deep pockets and a deeper desire to project an edgily chaotic aesthetic. Most people should not be spending this much. If it’s the convertible tablet you’re after, you can trick out a Surface Pro 9 for $500 less. If it’s gaming power and portability you’re after, a very comparable Zephyrus G14 is even cheaper. But the Z13 serves its particular, specific niche about as well as a laptop can.

How we rate and review products

Any idea which of these keys changes the volume? I sure don’t know.

The Form

Here are some phrases that Asus uses in its press materials to sum up the aesthetic it’s going for here:

  • “A redefinition of mobile computing”
  • “Beautifully refined yet raw”
  • “Truly unique machine”
  • “A hands-free dream machine”
  • “A functional yet striking work of art”

They are quite nice keys, though.

It’s avant garde, that’s for sure. Every time I look at this thing, I spot something else. The bottom is covered in logos and typography (and they’re not just stickers; they’re laser-etched into the metal). The dark leather cover sports a funky-looking shape as well. I can’t say I really know what any of them are. If any of you regularly take ayahuasca and expect that you’re aware of their deeper spiritual meaning, feel free to let me know in the comments.

The rear is dotted with rubber pads, which do look a little bit funny, but will also do a solid job of keeping the device in place if you’re trying to lie it down on a table. The corners have “drop-resistant crashworthy bumpers”. There’s also a strap that you can attach to the corners in order to sling the thing over your shoulder like a briefcase. Let’s just say I’m very glad this didn’t come out while I was in college, because I absolutely would’ve traipsed around campus with this dangling around my front like a fanny pack. The cool kids would’ve bullied me, and rightly so.

Don’t ask me what’s going on here; I haven’t the faintest.

But look, there’s a kickstand!

Eclectic design aside, this is a 13-inch tablet with an RTX 4070 and an H-Series Core i9 inside. That’s highly unusual — those are the types of chips you generally expect to see in much bigger gaming rigs. The keyboard is detachable; the kickstand is not. Said kickstand allows for both vertical and horizontal orientations, a feature Asus has long been convinced that people need. I have no use for a 16:10 Windows tablet in vertical orientation, but more power to you if you do.

A Surface Pro type of deal for gaming

Now, the Z13 is not particularly portable as tablets go. At 2.91 pounds and 0.61 inches thick, it’s hardly an iPad, and it’s not the type of thing I’d necessarily want to bring up for an hour-long presentation. Still, when choosing between carrying this thing in my backpack and carrying, say, a Titan GT77, I’d choose this one any day. I used this for some couch and cafe work, and could fit it onto those crowded surfaces with no problem.

One other thing to call out: the display. This model’s has a 165Hz refresh rate and 2560 x 1600 resolution. It’s quite vibrant. A number of different color modes were available for various different types of games, and I found that they improved the viewing experience. The 13.4-inch screen is a bit small for playing most games, and I had to squint at some windows here and there, but at least the QHD+ resolution delivers sharp details.

So those are the bells and whistles. Here’s what it’s like to use the thing.

That’s the power button there on the top.

The Function

The Z13, well, you know. It’s a 13.4-inch tablet. So, bearing that in mind, the frame rates were fine.

In particular, it had no problem running demanding titles at its native QHD resolution. I saw an average of 232fps on CS:GO and 55fps on Red Dead Redemption 2, with both titles at maximum settings. Those are both better results than we saw from last year’s Zephyrus G14 (which was a full-fledged traditional gaming laptop, not one of these tablet things). They’re not stunningly good to the point where they’re blowing other premium gaming laptops out of the water, and Asus has clearly had to kneecap the (it’s fed just 65W of power — yes, it can run that low) RTX 4070 to squeeze it into this chassis. It’s a bit like having packed an entire college dorm room into the trunk of a sedan. Sure, you did it, but at what cost?

But I digress. Throughout, I was pleasantly surprised by how well the device was able to keep its temperature down. I didn’t see many spikes above 70 degrees Celsius as I played. The nice thing about this form factor, too, is that regardless how hot the chassis gets, it’s generally not going to transfer to the keyboard or palm rests and impact your gaming experience.

For an additional fee, folks can also connect the device to the XG Mobile, a line of external GPUs that should deliver significantly higher frame rates. You can currently get one of these for around $1,000.

Oh, and the Z13 supports Nvidia’s Advanced Optimus. This essentially operates your MUX switch for you automatically — it will turn the integrated GPU off when you’re gaming and turn it back on (and turn the discrete GPU off) when you’re done gaming, which saves you from having to dig through your laptop’s settings to do that manually. Nice! Fun! Love to see it.

Ports include a combo audio jack, a Thunderbolt 4, a USB 3.2 Type-A, a USB 3.2 Gen 2 Type-C and a microSD card reader.

If you were expecting this device to have excellent battery life, bless your heart, but it has no such thing. I averaged four and a half hours of continuous work use, which involved bouncing around 20-ish Chrome tabs, streaming Spotify, Slacking, and such. I did get a better battery gaming result than I’d expected to, eking out about 48 minutes of Red Dead Redemption 2 play to one charge. The included 130W adapter can juice the device up to 50 percent in 30 minutes, per Asus’s estimates.

Regular readers of my reviews might expect a diatribe here about how excellent battery life should be a baseline expectation for a portable machine, but honestly, I don’t have it in me. I know that people aren’t buying this for excellent battery life or top-of-the-line frame rates; they’re buying this because it looks like it just fell down from outer space. As well they should.

It’s a sturdy, non-wobbly kickstand and keyboard.

I do need to complain about one thing

I’ve been an open-minded non-curmudgeon the whole way through this review, so I hope you’ll allow me to grump about one thing. I just can’t with the keyboard. It’s too much.

The keys contain what Asus refers to as “Acronym’s own custom alphabet”. I’m happy to learn that Acronym has an alphabet of its own. Unfortunately, it’s not the alphabet I need to type with for work.

I’m a very competent touch typist when it comes to words. But when I need to, for example, type a number on the Z13, it becomes a scavenger hunt. It’s not that the real numbers aren’t on the Z13’s keys, but they are buried in a dump of so many other symbols and colors and zany doodads that my eyes couldn’t find them instinctively. Other things just aren’t delineated. For example, the key that lowers the brightness is labeled “DARK” and has a little faint grid on it. I understand what you’re going for, Acronym, but I just want the regular brightness icon. You can jazz up the brightness icon. Just give me the brightness icon.

It looks like it fell down from outer space

Wacky designs are a wonderful thing until they begin to encroach on the everyday function of a device. Kooky laptops are laptops first. The Zephyrus G14 Acronym (which I raved about upon its release) labeled its keyboard keys in a storybook-esque font that made them easier, not harder, to read. It sprinkled other decorations around the keycaps, but they were clearly and obviously delineated from the keys’ real actual labels.

Eye-popping designs are great, and this device is a unique offering you won’t find anywhere else on the market. I admire products that are unapologetically themselves, whether movies or clothing or consumer technology. But the fundamentals cannot fall by the wayside. And I hope companies, as they continue to innovate, remember that.

Asus ROG Strix G16 Gaming Laptop Review: Beauty and Brawn

Asus ROG Strix G16 Gaming Laptop Review: Beauty and Brawn

Among Asus’ esports-branded Strix laptop, the 16-inch ROG Strix G16 is the option for those who prefer something smaller. (The Strix G17 and Strix G18 sit above it in size). The ROG Strix G16 features a top-of-the-line Intel Core i9-13980HX Raptor Lake processor and Nvidia’s new GeForce RTX 4070. This marks the second laptop we’ve tested with Nvidia’s Ada Lovelace-based mainstream laptop GPU.

The ROG Strix G16 also represents the latest laptop transitioning from a 16:9 to 16:10 aspect ratio, with a 16-inch 1920 x 1200 (WUXGA) 165 Hz IPS display. This laptop has the goods to contend with some of the best gaming laptops on the market and includes 16GB of DDR5-4800 memory, a 1TB SSD, and a high-quality chassis that we’ve come to expect from Asus ROG.

Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 (2023) laptop review: RTX 4090 with a super bright, Mini-LED display

Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 (2023) laptop review: RTX 4090 with a super bright, Mini-LED display
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB




5598 (5462.22min – 5597.85max) MB/s ∼100{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +43{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W
2x Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR (RAID 0)





4842 (4719.64min – 4842.11max) MB/s ∼86{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +24{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR





4525 (4498.41min – 4525.41max) MB/s ∼81{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +16{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
  (2376 – 5676, n=23) Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VY-NM042X
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB




3917 (3883.93min – 3916.78max) MB/s ∼70{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
SSSTC CA6-8D1024




3844 (3257.93min – 3843.87max) MB/s ∼69{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -2{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH




3764 (3540.2min – 3763.76max) MB/s ∼67{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -4{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Average of class Gaming
  (834 – 5676, n=187, last 2 years) MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB




7533 (7482.85min – 7532.79max) MB/s ∼100{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +124{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH




4767 (4365.51min – 4766.62max) MB/s ∼63{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +42{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR





4378 (4355.78min – 4378.43max) MB/s ∼58{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +30{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
  (2461 – 7628, n=23) Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W
2x Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR (RAID 0)





4199 (3998.61min – 4199.12max) MB/s ∼56{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +25{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VY-NM042X
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB





3365 (3321.68min – 3365.3max) MB/s ∼45{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Average of class Gaming
  (399 – 7889, n=186, last 2 years) Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
SSSTC CA6-8D1024




3242 (1498min – 3241.78max) MB/s ∼43{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -4{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB





11242 (10740.3min – 11242.2max) MB/s ∼100{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +61{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W
2x Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR (RAID 0)




10774 (9137.92min – 10774max) MB/s ∼96{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +54{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
  (3471 – 12556, n=23) Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VY-NM042X
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB




6988 (5851.89min – 6987.92max) MB/s ∼62{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
SSSTC CA6-8D1024





6872 (4963.33min – 6872.25max) MB/s ∼61{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -2{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR




6682 (5778.28min – 6681.95max) MB/s ∼59{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -4{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH




6550 (5497.59min – 6549.73max) MB/s ∼58{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -6{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Average of class Gaming
  (1620 – 13195, n=187, last 2 years) MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB




9942 (9912.92min – 9941.76max) MB/s ∼100{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +93{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W
2x Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR (RAID 0)




8404 (8165.05min – 8403.71max) MB/s ∼85{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +63{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
  (3537 – 10261, n=23) Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VY-NM042X
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB




5151 (5119.78min – 5150.82max) MB/s ∼52{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR





4943 (4923.06min – 4943.2max) MB/s ∼50{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -4{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH





4876 (4374.87min – 4876.3max) MB/s ∼49{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -5{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
SSSTC CA6-8D1024





4244 (427.59min – 4244.22max) MB/s ∼43{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -18{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Average of class Gaming
  (86.2 – 10261, n=187, last 2 years) Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR




95.3 (93.25min – 95.25max) MB/s ∼100{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +29{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB




83.1 (79.37min – 83.07max) MB/s ∼87{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +12{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
  (56.2 – 91.2, n=23) Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH





74.3 (71.59min – 74.33max) MB/s ∼78{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} 0{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VY-NM042X
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB




74.1 (72.59min – 74.06max) MB/s ∼78{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Average of class Gaming
  (23.3 – 97.4, n=187, last 2 years) Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W
2x Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR (RAID 0)





57.5 (57.09min – 57.53max) MB/s ∼60{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -22{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
SSSTC CA6-8D1024




56.5 (49.8min – 56.49max) MB/s ∼59{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -24{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH





264 (263.57min – 264.44max) MB/s ∼100{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +70{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR





255 (243.79min – 255.25max) MB/s ∼97{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +64{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
  (134 – 295, n=23) Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
SSSTC CA6-8D1024




220 (56.84min – 219.56max) MB/s ∼83{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +41{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB




213 (205.52min – 212.72max) MB/s ∼81{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +37{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Average of class Gaming
  (66.6 – 421, n=186, last 2 years) Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VY-NM042X
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB




155.5 (148.87min – 155.46max) MB/s ∼59{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W
2x Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR (RAID 0)





103.7 (103.17min – 103.74max) MB/s ∼39{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -33{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR





4100 (4085.58min – 4100.1max) MB/s ∼100{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +475{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
SSSTC CA6-8D1024





3111 (2388.54min – 3111.42max) MB/s ∼76{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +336{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
  (713 – 4075, n=23) Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH




2855 (2482.75min – 2854.87max) MB/s ∼70{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +300{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Average of class Gaming
  (310 – 5829, n=186, last 2 years) MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB





1469 (1266.81min – 1469.47max) MB/s ∼36{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +106{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VY-NM042X
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB




713 (705.93min – 712.59max) MB/s ∼17{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W
2x Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR (RAID 0)




711 (692.26min – 710.64max) MB/s ∼17{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} 0{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR




3537 (3519.01min – 3536.66max) MB/s ∼100{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +656{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH




2694 (2561.51min – 2693.92max) MB/s ∼76{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +476{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
  (422 – 3531, n=23) Average of class Gaming
  (288 – 4383, n=186, last 2 years) MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB




1424 (1251.47min – 1423.75max) MB/s ∼40{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +204{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
SSSTC CA6-8D1024




1282 (960.6min – 1281.78max) MB/s ∼36{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +174{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VY-NM042X
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB




468 (459.96min – 467.77max) MB/s ∼13{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W
2x Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR (RAID 0)





350 (343.49min – 350.45max) MB/s ∼10{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -25{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
  (4850 – 9031, n=23) Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
SSSTC CA6-8D1024 Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH Average of class Gaming
  (910 – 10330, n=176, last 2 years) Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VY-NM042X
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W
2x Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR (RAID 0) Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
SSSTC CA6-8D1024


3308 Points ∼100{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +110{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
  (1572 – 3399, n=23) Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH Average of class Gaming
  (389 – 3629, n=176, last 2 years) MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W
2x Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR (RAID 0) Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VY-NM042X
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
  (1081 – 3999, n=23) Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VY-NM042X
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH Average of class Gaming
  (338 – 5157, n=176, last 2 years) Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
SSSTC CA6-8D1024 MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W
2x Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR (RAID 0) MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W
2x Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR (RAID 0) Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
  (2591 – 9971, n=23) Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VY-NM042X
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
SSSTC CA6-8D1024 Average of class Gaming
  (925 – 9971, n=176, last 2 years) Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W
2x Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR (RAID 0) Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
  (1900 – 8590, n=23) Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR Average of class Gaming
  (308 – 8590, n=176, last 2 years) Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
SSSTC CA6-8D1024 Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VY-NM042X
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VY-NM042X
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
  (49.8 – 84.1, n=23) Average of class Gaming
  (20 – 108, n=176, last 2 years) Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W
2x Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR (RAID 0) Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
SSSTC CA6-8D1024 Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VY-NM042X
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
  (112.6 – 249, n=23) Average of class Gaming
  (18 – 364, n=176, last 2 years) MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
SSSTC CA6-8D1024 Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W
2x Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR (RAID 0) Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
SSSTC CA6-8D1024


2744.3 MB/s ∼100{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +186{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR


2558.72 MB/s ∼93{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +167{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
  (959 – 2811, n=23) Average of class Gaming
  (216 – 2963, n=176, last 2 years) MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W
2x Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR (RAID 0) Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VY-NM042X
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VY-NM042X
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
  (567 – 3414, n=23) Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH Average of class Gaming
  (243 – 4381, n=176, last 2 years) Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
SSSTC CA6-8D1024 Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W
2x Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR (RAID 0) MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB Average of class Gaming
  (0.02 – 0.23, n=171, last 2 years)





0.05665 ms * ∼100{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -183{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W
2x Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR (RAID 0) MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
  (0.018 – 0.078, n=23) Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
SSSTC CA6-8D1024 Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VY-NM042X
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
SSSTC CA6-8D1024 Average of class Gaming
  (0.012 – 0.425, n=176, last 2 years)





0.05613 ms * ∼68{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -181{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W
2x Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR (RAID 0) Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
  (0.017 – 0.076, n=23) MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VY-NM042X
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR

* … smaller is better

Finally, quiet gaming with the Asus ROG Strix G16

Finally, quiet gaming with the Asus ROG Strix G16
Finally, quiet gaming with the Asus ROG Strix G16
Finally, quiet gaming with the Asus ROG Strix G16

The Asus ROG Stirx G16 is able to extract a lot of performance from its strong hardware. An Intel Core i9 and a Nvidia GeForce RTX 4080 ensure high FPS on a 240 Hz panel in many games. But things get really interesting when it comes to the volume.

The Nvidia GeForce RTX 4080 is powered by up to 170 watts in the Asus ROG Strix G16. In Turbo mode, the gaming notebook achieves a level of performance that brings it close to devices equipped with the more powerful RTX 4090. While the laptop can be annoyingly loud at 52 dB(A), the ROG Strix G16 can also do things differently: thanks to a massive cooling system consisting of three fans and liquid metal, the laptop is also able to run without much noise. For our review, we took the opportunity to analyze the gaming laptop’s other operating modes and came to an interesting conclusion: gaming with ray tracing is possible with current titles as long as you are willing to forego a few FPS.

Frame rates remain above 60 frames per second in many games, even in UHD resolution at ultra settings. F1 22 is one such example: at just under 40 dB(A) in Silent mode, the ROG Strix G16 manages 72 FPS in the racing game with activated ray tracing. So the Asus ROG Strix G16 can certainly be used for gaming without noise pollution or ANC headphones. Unfortunately, one of the laptop’s problems also becomes apparent in this operating mode. Instead of fan noise, you then hear the laptop’s power supply struggling. Coil whine comes to the fore as soon as the laptop makes use of the boost performance of the Intel Core i9-13980HX and Nvidia GeForce RTX 4080.

We also found a few problems with the chassis in our review of the Asus ROG Strix G16. Nevertheless, the laptop ultimately manages to perform well overall.

ROG Strix G16
ROG Strix G16
ROG Strix G16
ROG Strix G16
ROG Strix G16 - cooling system
ROG Strix G16 – cooling system

Please share our article, every link counts!

.170

Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI: Gaming laptop impresses in the test with the new Ryzen 9

Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI: Gaming laptop impresses in the test with the new Ryzen 9
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB





5568 (5541.55min – 5568.34max) MB/s ∼100{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +65{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00




4093 (4067.17min – 4092.59max) MB/s ∼74{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +21{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00




3650 (3626.52min – 3649.67max) MB/s ∼66{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +8{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
SSSTC CA6-8D1024




3889 (3873.65min – 3888.73max) MB/s ∼70{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +15{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Average WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
  (3377 – 4093, n=3) Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT)
SSSTC CA6-8D1024





3428 (3412.07min – 3428.49max) MB/s ∼62{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +2{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00





3377 (3319.03min – 3377.04max) MB/s ∼61{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Average of class Gaming
  (834 – 5676, n=187, last 2 years) Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W
SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N





2756 (2741.19min – 2756.29max) MB/s ∼49{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -18{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Asus ROG Strix G18 G814JI
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM




1870 (1827.25min – 1869.82max) MB/s ∼34{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -45{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB




7531 (7479min – 7530.7max) MB/s ∼100{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +175{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W
SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N




4250 (4204.35min – 4249.88max) MB/s ∼56{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +55{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
SSSTC CA6-8D1024





3798 (3750.39min – 3798.15max) MB/s ∼50{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +38{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00




3416 (3372.4min – 3415.84max) MB/s ∼45{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +25{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00





3366 (3313.08min – 3366.35max) MB/s ∼45{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +23{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Average of class Gaming
  (399 – 7889, n=186, last 2 years) Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT)
SSSTC CA6-8D1024





3243 (3188.93min – 3243.04max) MB/s ∼43{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +18{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Average WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
  (2743 – 3416, n=3) Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00




2743 (2563.98min – 2742.87max) MB/s ∼36{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Asus ROG Strix G18 G814JI
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM





2166 (2094.01min – 2166.15max) MB/s ∼29{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -21{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB





12556 (4870.54min – 12556.3max) MB/s ∼100{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +150{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W
SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N




7048 (6068.56min – 7047.9max) MB/s ∼56{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +40{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT)
SSSTC CA6-8D1024 Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
SSSTC CA6-8D1024




6810 (6260.27min – 6809.87max) MB/s ∼54{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +36{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Average of class Gaming
  (1620 – 13195, n=187, last 2 years) Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00 Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00





5017 (4534.25min – 5017.23max) MB/s ∼40{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} 0{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Average WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
  (5017 – 5023, n=3) Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00




5018 (4382.25min – 5017.89max) MB/s ∼40{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Asus ROG Strix G18 G814JI
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM





4239 (3584.87min – 4239.18max) MB/s ∼34{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -16{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB





10261 (10045.2min – 10261.4max) MB/s ∼100{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +228{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W
SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N





6004 (5933.65min – 6004.3max) MB/s ∼59{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +92{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT)
SSSTC CA6-8D1024




4831 (4610.18min – 4830.79max) MB/s ∼47{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +55{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
SSSTC CA6-8D1024





4426 (4263.58min – 4426.04max) MB/s ∼43{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +42{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Average of class Gaming
  (86.2 – 10261, n=187, last 2 years) Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00





3429 (3365.09min – 3429.47max) MB/s ∼33{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +10{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00




3387 (3363.41min – 3386.9max) MB/s ∼33{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +8{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Average WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
  (3125 – 3429, n=3) Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00




3125 (3099.17min – 3124.97max) MB/s ∼30{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Asus ROG Strix G18 G814JI
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM




2982 (2920.07min – 2981.52max) MB/s ∼29{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -5{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB





79 (77.42min – 79.03max) MB/s ∼100{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +47{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
SSSTC CA6-8D1024





74.5 (73.46min – 74.52max) MB/s ∼94{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +39{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Average of class Gaming
  (23.3 – 97.4, n=187, last 2 years) Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W
SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N





64.3 (63.09min – 64.34max) MB/s ∼81{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +20{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00




62.5 (61.85min – 62.46max) MB/s ∼79{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +16{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00




61.5 (60.59min – 61.49max) MB/s ∼78{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +15{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Average WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
  (53.7 – 62.5, n=3) Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00




53.7 (52.37min – 53.65max) MB/s ∼68{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT)
SSSTC CA6-8D1024




52.5 (50.71min – 52.46max) MB/s ∼66{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -2{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Asus ROG Strix G18 G814JI
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM





30.6 (30.29min – 30.64max) MB/s ∼39{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -43{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
SSSTC CA6-8D1024




280 (267.82min – 279.79max) MB/s ∼100{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +71{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00





239 (230.87min – 239.2max) MB/s ∼85{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +46{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00




236 (223.33min – 235.64max) MB/s ∼84{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +44{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB




221 (218.91min – 220.66max) MB/s ∼79{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +35{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Average WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
  (163.8 – 239, n=3) Average of class Gaming
  (66.6 – 421, n=186, last 2 years) Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W
SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N





164.3 (163.26min – 164.34max) MB/s ∼59{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} 0{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00




163.8 (162.54min – 163.76max) MB/s ∼59{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT)
SSSTC CA6-8D1024




126.7 (123.88min – 126.69max) MB/s ∼45{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -23{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Asus ROG Strix G18 G814JI
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM





116.3 (111.83min – 116.33max) MB/s ∼42{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -29{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
SSSTC CA6-8D1024





3203 (3180.36min – 3203.41max) MB/s ∼100{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +274{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Average of class Gaming
  (310 – 5829, n=186, last 2 years) Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB





2148 (1952.04min – 2148.3max) MB/s ∼67{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +151{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00




1533 (1526.72min – 1532.76max) MB/s ∼48{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +79{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00




1527 (1525.66min – 1526.54max) MB/s ∼48{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +78{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Average WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
  (857 – 1533, n=3) Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W
SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N




1158 (1132.18min – 1157.71max) MB/s ∼36{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +35{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00





857 (717.83min – 857.03max) MB/s ∼27{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT)
SSSTC CA6-8D1024





843 (833.55min – 843.1max) MB/s ∼26{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -2{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Asus ROG Strix G18 G814JI
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM





613 (588.72min – 613.33max) MB/s ∼19{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -28{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00





2783 (2698.54min – 2783.41max) MB/s ∼100{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +812{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00




2689 (2088.87min – 2688.7max) MB/s ∼97{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +782{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
SSSTC CA6-8D1024




2209 (1041.25min – 2208.74max) MB/s ∼79{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +624{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB





2101 (1969.73min – 2101.4max) MB/s ∼75{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +589{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Average of class Gaming
  (288 – 4383, n=186, last 2 years) Average WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
  (305 – 2783, n=3) Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W
SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N





481 (462.66min – 481.19max) MB/s ∼17{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +58{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Asus ROG Strix G18 G814JI
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM




441 (428.19min – 440.55max) MB/s ∼16{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +45{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00





305 (269.91min – 305.05max) MB/s ∼11{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT)
SSSTC CA6-8D1024




288 (123min – 287.76max) MB/s ∼10{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -6{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
SSSTC CA6-8D1024 Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W
SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N Average of class Gaming
  (910 – 10330, n=176, last 2 years) Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00 Average WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
  (4118 – 5610, n=2) Asus ROG Strix G18 G814JI
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00 Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT)
SSSTC CA6-8D1024 Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
SSSTC CA6-8D1024


3490 Points ∼100{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +190{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB Average of class Gaming
  (389 – 3629, n=176, last 2 years) Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00 Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W
SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N Average WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
  (1204 – 1761, n=2) Asus ROG Strix G18 G814JI
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT)
SSSTC CA6-8D1024 Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00 Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W
SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00 Average of class Gaming
  (338 – 5157, n=176, last 2 years) Average WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
  (2387 – 3010, n=2) Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
SSSTC CA6-8D1024 Asus ROG Strix G18 G814JI
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00 Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT)
SSSTC CA6-8D1024 Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
SSSTC CA6-8D1024 Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W
SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT)
SSSTC CA6-8D1024 Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00 Average of class Gaming
  (925 – 9971, n=176, last 2 years) Average WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
  (3846 – 4308, n=2) Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00 Asus ROG Strix G18 G814JI
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
SSSTC CA6-8D1024


3951.34 MB/s ∼46{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +117{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W
SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N Average of class Gaming
  (308 – 8590, n=176, last 2 years) Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00 Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT)
SSSTC CA6-8D1024 Average WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
  (1821 – 2891, n=2) Asus ROG Strix G18 G814JI
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00 Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
SSSTC CA6-8D1024 Average of class Gaming
  (20 – 108, n=176, last 2 years) Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W
SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00 Average WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
  (51.3 – 58.8, n=2) Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00 Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT)
SSSTC CA6-8D1024 Asus ROG Strix G18 G814JI
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
SSSTC CA6-8D1024 Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00 Average WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
  (196.8 – 221, n=2) Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00 Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W
SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N Average of class Gaming
  (18 – 364, n=176, last 2 years) Asus ROG Strix G18 G814JI
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT)
SSSTC CA6-8D1024 Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
SSSTC CA6-8D1024


2843.31 MB/s ∼100{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +270{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB


1942.29 MB/s ∼68{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +153{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Average of class Gaming
  (216 – 2963, n=176, last 2 years) Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00 Average WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
  (768 – 1272, n=2) Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W
SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N Asus ROG Strix G18 G814JI
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00 Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT)
SSSTC CA6-8D1024 Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W
SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00 Average of class Gaming
  (243 – 4381, n=176, last 2 years) Average WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
  (2008 – 2500, n=2) Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00 Asus ROG Strix G18 G814JI
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
SSSTC CA6-8D1024 Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT)
SSSTC CA6-8D1024 Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00 Average WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
  (0.087 – 0.121, n=2) Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00 Average of class Gaming
  (0.02 – 0.23, n=171, last 2 years) Asus ROG Strix G18 G814JI
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT)
SSSTC CA6-8D1024 Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W
SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
SSSTC CA6-8D1024 Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB Asus ROG Strix G18 G814JI
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM Average of class Gaming
  (0.012 – 0.425, n=176, last 2 years)





0.05664 ms * ∼47{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -198{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
SSSTC CA6-8D1024 Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT)
SSSTC CA6-8D1024 Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W
SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00 Average WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
  (0.017 – 0.019, n=2) Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00

* … smaller is better

Save $550 on ASUS’ ROG Zephyrus M16 RTX 3070 Ti Gaming Laptop in return to $1,600 low

Save 0 on ASUS’ ROG Zephyrus M16 RTX 3070 Ti Gaming Laptop in return to ,600 low

Ideal Get is at present presenting the 2022 ASUS ROG Zephyrus M16 i9/16GB/1TB/RTX 3070 Ti Gaming Notebook for $1,599.99 delivered. Usually likely for $2,150, this stable $550 discount marks a return to the all-time reduced rate we have witnessed for this laptop design. The ROG Zephyrus will occur functioning Microsoft’s flagship functioning procedure, Windows 11, and will be powered by its Intel i9-12900H 14-core processor and RTX 3070 Ti graphics. The 16-inch 2560×1600 165Hz IPS-level display is PANTONE-qualified with 100{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} coverage of the sRGB shade gamut for imaginative do the job with “incredible coloration precision and clarity.” Wi-Fi 6E, Dolby Atmos guidance, a solitary USB-C 3.2 Gen 2 port, two USB-A 3.2 Gen 2 ports, a Thunderbolt 4 port, and HDMI output spherical out this gaming machine. Head underneath for more.

On a tighter funds? Check out out the Acer Nitro 5 i7/8GB/512GB/RTX 3050 Ti Gaming Notebook for $834 instead. Right here you are going to be working with the 11th gen Intel i7 processor with RTX 3050 Ti graphics, which is a stage down from the 3070 Ti existing with the ASUS alternative above. The monitor is marginally smaller at 15.6-inches and ways down to a 1080p 144Hz resolution and refresh level. The complete sum of RAM obtainable right here is also slice in 50 {b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} to 8GB though that is however plenty for most modern-day online games to run nicely. Wi-Fi 6 help is also present below.

By now have a gaming desktop and want to enhance your present GPU? We’re now monitoring the GIGABYTE Gaming OC RX 6750 XT 12GB GPU marked down to $380, the new all-time lower price tag. Leveraging AMD’s very last-generation know-how, the RX 6750 XT is even now a solid graphics card for your gaming rig. Designed to tun titles at equally 1080p and 1440p at significant or extremely settings in quite a few online games, it can even take care of higher refresh charge gaming too. In addition, there’s HDMI 2.1 and DisplayPort 1.4a so you can run 4K144 and 8K60 monitors about a solitary cable.

ASUS ROG Zephyrus M16 i9/16GB/1TB/RTX 3070 Ti Gaming Laptop functions:

Dive headfirst into one of the best gaming notebook activities on Windows 11. The ROG Zephyrus M16 packs a 14-core Intel Main i9-12900H CPU and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti GPU into a tremendous skinny gaming laptop computer. Delight in a quickly 165Hz refresh charge, 16GB of RAM, and 1TB of PCIe 4. SSD storage all wrapped in a light 4.41 lbs chassis. The foreseeable future is slim and mild.


Subscribe to the 9to5Toys YouTube Channel for all of the hottest video clips, opinions, and more!