Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2 laptop review: MSI GT77 Titan performance without the size

Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2 laptop review: MSI GT77 Titan performance without the size
Schenker XMG SECTOR, i9 13900K, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-13900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU




191.1 (39.9min) fps ∼98{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
  (156 – 191.1, n=2) MSI Titan GT77 12UHS
Intel Core i9-12900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU




169.8 (31.6min) fps ∼87{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -11{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU




147.8 (73.8min) fps ∼76{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -23{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

HP Omen 16-n0033dx
AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, AMD Radeon RX 6650M




126.8 (56.9min) fps ∼65{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -34{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

MSI Pulse GL76 12UGK
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU




118.8 (57.2min) fps ∼61{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -38{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Schenker XMG SECTOR, i9 13900K, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-13900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU




178.6 (37.8min) fps ∼97{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
  (144 – 178.6, n=2) MSI Titan GT77 12UHS
Intel Core i9-12900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU




150.3 (46min) fps ∼81{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -16{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU




125.7 (28.9min) fps ∼68{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -30{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

HP Omen 16-n0033dx
AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, AMD Radeon RX 6650M




106.3 (58.3min) fps ∼57{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -40{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

MSI Pulse GL76 12UGK
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU




102.4 (45.2min) fps ∼55{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -43{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Schenker XMG SECTOR, i9 13900K, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-13900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU




166.9 (37.1min) fps ∼92{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
  (136 – 166.9, n=3) MSI Titan GT77 12UHS
Intel Core i9-12900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU




120.5 (53.2min) fps ∼66{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -28{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU




111.5 (25.4min) fps ∼61{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -33{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

MSI Pulse GL76 12UGK
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU




83.2 (41.6min) fps ∼46{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -50{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

HP Omen 16-n0033dx
AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, AMD Radeon RX 6650M




78.9 (54.2min) fps ∼43{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -53{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Schenker XMG SECTOR, i9 13900K, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-13900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
  (104.5 – 159.7, n=6) MSI Titan GT77 12UHS
Intel Core i9-12900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU




99.4 (40.7min) fps ∼55{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -38{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU




92.1 (17.3min) fps ∼51{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -42{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

MSI Katana 17 B13VFK
Intel Core i7-13620H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU




73.81 (36.7min) fps ∼41{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -54{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

MSI Pulse GL76 12UGK
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU




69.8 (41.8min) fps ∼39{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -56{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

HP Omen 16-n0033dx
AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, AMD Radeon RX 6650M




63.8 (42.9min) fps ∼35{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -60{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Schenker XMG SECTOR, i9 13900K, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-13900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
  (75.7 – 101.3, n=6) Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU




54 (35.6min) fps ∼32{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -47{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

MSI Katana 17 B13VFK
Intel Core i7-13620H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU




45.9 (34.7min) fps ∼27{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -55{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Schenker XMG SECTOR, i9 13900K, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-13900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
  (41.9 – 56, n=4) Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU




47.8 (24.6min) fps ∼60{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU




23.3 (15.6min) fps ∼29{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -51{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

MSI Katana 17 B13VFK
Intel Core i7-13620H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU




21.1 (17min) fps ∼26{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -56{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Schenker XMG SECTOR, i9 13900K, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-13900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU




717.7 (559min) fps ∼98{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Corsair One i300
Intel Core i9-12900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti




681 (29.2min, 290P0.1, 486P1) fps ∼93{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -5{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
  (586 – 718, n=3) Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU




617 (563min) fps ∼84{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -14{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

MSI Titan GT77 12UHS
Intel Core i9-12900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU




543 (483min, 483P1) fps ∼74{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -24{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

MSI Katana 17 B13VFK
Intel Core i7-13620H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU




435 (372min) fps ∼59{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -39{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Schenker XMG Neo 17 M22
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU




386 (65.3min, 192.6P0.1, 276P1) fps ∼53{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -46{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

MSI Pulse GL76 12UGK
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU




377.1 (364min) fps ∼52{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -47{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Schenker XMG Core 17 (Early 2021)
Intel Core i7-10870H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU




302 (11.9min, 37.1P0.1, 159P1) fps ∼41{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -58{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

HP Omen 16-n0033dx
AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, AMD Radeon RX 6650M




276.5 (260min) fps ∼38{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -61{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Schenker XMG SECTOR, i9 13900K, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-13900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU




617.3 (560min) fps ∼93{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
  (511 – 617, n=3) Corsair One i300
Intel Core i9-12900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti




554 (87.5min, 251P0.1, 376P1) fps ∼83{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -10{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

MSI Titan GT77 12UHS
Intel Core i9-12900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU




411 (335min, 342.98P1) fps ∼62{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -33{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU




405.9 (371min) fps ∼61{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -34{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Schenker XMG Neo 17 M22
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU




335 (19.8min, 152.7P0.1, 234P1) fps ∼50{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -46{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

MSI Katana 17 B13VFK
Intel Core i7-13620H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU




322 (271min) fps ∼48{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -48{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

MSI Pulse GL76 12UGK
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU




252.8 (224min) fps ∼38{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -59{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Schenker XMG Core 17 (Early 2021)
Intel Core i7-10870H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU




229 (68.3min, 99.8P0.1, 142P1) fps ∼34{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -63{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

HP Omen 16-n0033dx
AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, AMD Radeon RX 6650M




217.4 (196min) fps ∼33{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -65{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Schenker XMG SECTOR, i9 13900K, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-13900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
  (361 – 449, n=4) Corsair One i300
Intel Core i9-12900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti




365 (68.6min, 182P0.1, 288P1) fps ∼60{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -19{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

MSI Titan GT77 12UHS
Intel Core i9-12900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU




260 (213min, 216.3P1) fps ∼42{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -42{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU




240.9 (228min) fps ∼39{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -46{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Schenker XMG Neo 17 M22
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU




236 (30.3min, 70.5P0.1, 139.4P1) fps ∼38{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -47{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

MSI Katana 17 B13VFK
Intel Core i7-13620H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU




206 (166min) fps ∼34{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -54{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH
Intel Core i9-11900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU




174 (141min) fps ∼28{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -61{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

MSI Pulse GL76 12UGK
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU




170.5 (159min) fps ∼28{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -62{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

HP Omen 16-n0033dx
AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, AMD Radeon RX 6650M




167 (157min) fps ∼27{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -63{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Schenker XMG Core 17 (Early 2021)
Intel Core i7-10870H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU




144 (55.2min, 60.2P0.1, 99.7P1) fps ∼23{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -68{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Schenker XMG SECTOR, i9 13900K, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-13900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU




216.3 (204min) fps ∼69{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
  (178.6 – 216, n=6) Corsair One i300
Intel Core i9-12900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti




183 (62.1min, 107P0.1, 149P1) fps ∼58{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -15{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

MSI Titan GT77 12UHS
Intel Core i9-12900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU




129.3 (110min, 111.14P1) fps ∼41{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -40{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Schenker XMG Neo 17 M22
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU




121 (98min) fps ∼39{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -44{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU




113.9 (110min) fps ∼36{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -47{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

MSI Katana 17 B13VFK
Intel Core i7-13620H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU




104.7 (88min) fps ∼33{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -52{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH
Intel Core i9-11900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU




93.8 (75min) fps ∼30{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -57{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

MSI Pulse GL76 12UGK
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU




92.8 (88min) fps ∼30{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -57{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

HP Omen 16-n0033dx
AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, AMD Radeon RX 6650M




90.1 (84min) fps ∼29{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -58{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Schenker XMG Core 17 (Early 2021)
Intel Core i7-10870H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU




79.5 (30.1min, 37.6P0.1, 42.6P1) fps ∼25{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -63{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Schenker XMG SECTOR, i9 13900K, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-13900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU




167.6 (147min) fps ∼59{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
  (137.1 – 167.6, n=3) Corsair One i300
Intel Core i9-12900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti




149 (41.5min, 102P0.1, 127P1) fps ∼53{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -11{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Schenker XMG Neo 17 M22
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU




90.5 (49.5min, 57.8P0.1, 75.3P1) fps ∼32{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -46{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU




72.5 (66min) fps ∼26{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -57{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH
Intel Core i9-11900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU




66.7 (57min) fps ∼24{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -60{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

MSI Katana 17 B13VFK
Intel Core i7-13620H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU




62.6 (55min) fps ∼22{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -63{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Schenker XMG SECTOR, i9 13900K, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-13900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090




187.6 (4.6min, 200P1) fps ∼100{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} 0{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU




187.5 (3.95min, 200P1) fps ∼100{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
  (187.4 – 187.5, n=3) MSI Titan GT77 12UHS
Intel Core i9-12900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU




187.1 (1.532min, 200P1) fps ∼100{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} 0{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Corsair One i300
Intel Core i9-12900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti




187 (2.54min, 200P1) fps ∼100{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} 0{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU




186.1 (1.631min, 100P1) fps ∼99{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -1{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

MSI Katana 17 B13VFK
Intel Core i7-13620H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU




186.1 (1.899min, 100P1) fps ∼99{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -1{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

MSI Pulse GL76 12UGK
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU




185.7 (1.866min, 142.9P1) fps ∼99{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -1{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Schenker XMG Neo 17 M22
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU




181.2 (3.86min, 125P1) fps ∼97{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -3{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Schenker XMG Core 17 (Early 2021)
Intel Core i7-10870H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU




179 (4.7min, 143P1) fps ∼95{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -5{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Schenker XMG SECTOR, i9 13900K, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-13900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090




187.6 (10.7min, 200P1) fps ∼100{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} 0{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

MSI Titan GT77 12UHS
Intel Core i9-12900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU




187.5 (6.33min, 200P1) fps ∼100{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} 0{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU




187.4 (5.08min, 200P1) fps ∼100{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
  (187 – 187.4, n=3) Corsair One i300
Intel Core i9-12900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti




187 (2.54min, 200P1) fps ∼100{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} 0{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU




187 (1.607min, 142.9P1) fps ∼100{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} 0{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

MSI Katana 17 B13VFK
Intel Core i7-13620H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU




187 (2.12min, 125P1) fps ∼100{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} 0{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

MSI Pulse GL76 12UGK
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU




184.2 (2.2min, 142.9P1) fps ∼98{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -2{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Schenker XMG Neo 17 M22
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU




180.6 (3.65min, 142.9P1) fps ∼96{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -4{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Schenker XMG Core 17 (Early 2021)
Intel Core i7-10870H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU




175 (5.02min, 125P1) fps ∼93{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -7{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Schenker XMG SECTOR, i9 13900K, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-13900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090




187.6 (6.52min, 200P1) fps ∼100{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} 0{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU




187.2 (2.33min, 200P1) fps ∼100{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Corsair One i300
Intel Core i9-12900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti




187 (2.6min, 167P1) fps ∼100{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} 0{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

MSI Titan GT77 12UHS
Intel Core i9-12900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU




186.8 (1.467min, 166.7P1) fps ∼100{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} 0{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
  (184.1 – 187.2, n=5) Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU




184.7 (1.535min, 111.1P1) fps ∼98{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -1{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

MSI Katana 17 B13VFK
Intel Core i7-13620H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU




184.7 (1.738min, 100P1) fps ∼98{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -1{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

MSI Pulse GL76 12UGK
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU




182.3 (2.68min, 142.9P1) fps ∼97{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -3{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Schenker XMG Neo 17 M22
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU




176.1 (4.27min, 125P1) fps ∼94{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -6{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Schenker XMG Core 17 (Early 2021)
Intel Core i7-10870H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU




172 (5.75min, 125P1) fps ∼92{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -8{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Schenker XMG SECTOR, i9 13900K, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-13900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090




187.6 (5.3min, 200P1) fps ∼100{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} 0{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU




187.4 (3.97min, 200P1) fps ∼100{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Corsair One i300
Intel Core i9-12900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti




187 (10.6min, 200P1) fps ∼100{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} 0{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
  (185.5 – 187.4, n=3) MSI Titan GT77 12UHS
Intel Core i9-12900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU




185.9 (2.14min, 166.7P1) fps ∼99{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -1{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

MSI Katana 17 B13VFK
Intel Core i7-13620H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU




185.7 (1.958min, 125P1) fps ∼99{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -1{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU




185.5 (1.486min, 125P1) fps ∼99{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -1{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

MSI Pulse GL76 12UGK
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU




180 (3.5min, 142.9P1) fps ∼96{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -4{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Schenker XMG Neo 17 M22
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU




175.8 (3.84min, 111.1P1) fps ∼94{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -6{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Schenker XMG Core 17 (Early 2021)
Intel Core i7-10870H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU




168 (6.37min, 100P1) fps ∼90{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -10{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Corsair One i300
Intel Core i9-12900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti




187 (2.5min, 167P1) fps ∼100{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} 0{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Schenker XMG SECTOR, i9 13900K, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-13900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090




187 (1.83min, 200P1) fps ∼100{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} 0{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU




186.5 (1.93min, 166.7P1) fps ∼100{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
  (182.4 – 186.5, n=5) MSI Titan GT77 12UHS
Intel Core i9-12900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU




182.7 (8.3min, 142.9P1) fps ∼98{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -2{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU




181.6 (1.674min, 125P1) fps ∼97{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -3{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

MSI Katana 17 B13VFK
Intel Core i7-13620H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU




180.2 (2.58min, 111.1P1) fps ∼96{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -3{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

MSI Pulse GL76 12UGK
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU




175.5 (3.74min, 125P1) fps ∼94{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -6{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH
Intel Core i9-11900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU




164 (5.22min, 100P1) fps ∼88{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -12{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Schenker XMG Neo 17 M22
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU




163.8 (4.96min, 100P1) fps ∼88{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -12{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Schenker XMG Core 17 (Early 2021)
Intel Core i7-10870H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU




150 (6.08min, 100P1) fps ∼80{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -20{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Schenker XMG SECTOR, i9 13900K, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-13900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090




165.9 (13.4min, 125P1) fps ∼100{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +11{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU




149.8 (3.08min, 111.1P1) fps ∼90{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Corsair One i300
Intel Core i9-12900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti




149 (8.57min, 100P1) fps ∼90{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -1{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
  (134 – 151.3, n=7) MSI Titan GT77 12UHS
Intel Core i9-12900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU




131.8 (6.21min, 90.9P1) fps ∼79{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -12{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU




121.4 (3.6min, 76.9P1) fps ∼73{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -19{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

MSI Katana 17 B13VFK
Intel Core i7-13620H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU




112.1 (8min, 62.5P1) fps ∼68{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -25{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

MSI Pulse GL76 12UGK
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU




108.1 (4.6min, 76.9P1) fps ∼65{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -28{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Schenker XMG Neo 17 M22
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU




101.8 (18.4min, 71.4P1) fps ∼61{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -32{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH
Intel Core i9-11900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU




98.5 (17.3min, 62.5P1) fps ∼59{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -34{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Schenker XMG Core 17 (Early 2021)
Intel Core i7-10870H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU




86.9 (19.6min, 58.8P1) fps ∼52{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -42{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Schenker XMG SECTOR, i9 13900K, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-13900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090




166.3 (2.62min, 125P1) fps ∼100{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +14{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Corsair One i300
Intel Core i9-12900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti




147 (3.77min, 111P1) fps ∼88{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} 0{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU




146.3 (5.49min, 111.1P1) fps ∼88{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
  (123.8 – 146.3, n=6) Schenker XMG Neo 17 M22
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU




101.1 (9.21min, 71.4P1) fps ∼61{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -31{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU




87.6 (4.62min, 55.6P1) fps ∼53{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -40{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

MSI Katana 17 B13VFK
Intel Core i7-13620H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU




83 (5.89min, 45.5P1) fps ∼50{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -43{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH
Intel Core i9-11900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU




82.3 (16.3min, 58.8P1) fps ∼49{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -44{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Schenker XMG Core 17 (Early 2021)
Intel Core i7-10870H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU




74.3 (18.9min, 50P1) fps ∼45{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -49{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Schenker XMG SECTOR, i9 13900K, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-13900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090




137.7 (8.31min, 90.9P1) fps ∼100{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +53{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Corsair One i300
Intel Core i9-12900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti




93.9 (4.79min, 71.4P1) fps ∼68{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +4{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU




90 (3.39min, 58.8P1) fps ∼65{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
  (84.8 – 90, n=5) Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU




38.2 (3.33min, 26.3P1) fps ∼28{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -58{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

MSI Katana 17 B13VFK
Intel Core i7-13620H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU




37.5 (6.01min, 25.6P1) fps ∼27{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -58{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Schenker XMG SECTOR, i9 13900K, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-13900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU




180.2 (2.04min, 125P1) fps ∼96{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Corsair One i300
Intel Core i9-12900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti




180 (2.49min, 143P1) fps ∼96{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} 0{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
  (88.9 – 180.2, n=4) Schenker XMG Neo 17 M22
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU




121 (5.84min, 100P1) fps ∼65{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -33{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU




88.5 (5.15min, 58.8P1) fps ∼47{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -51{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH
Intel Core i9-11900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU




86.5 (25.9min, 62.5P1) fps ∼46{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -52{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

MSI Katana 17 B13VFK
Intel Core i7-13620H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU




82.1 (5.63min, 50P1) fps ∼44{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -54{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Schenker XMG SECTOR, i9 13900K, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-13900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090




287.9 (250.6min) fps ∼100{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +18{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU




243 (209.5min) fps ∼84{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Corsair One i300
Intel Core i9-12900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti




240.3 (211.7min) fps ∼83{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -1{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
  (192.9 – 243, n=9) Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU




225 (190.1min) fps ∼78{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -7{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

MSI Titan GT77 12UHS
Intel Core i9-12900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU




204.5 (180.6min) fps ∼71{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -16{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

MSI Katana 17 B13VFK
Intel Core i7-13620H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU




184.6 (158.4min) fps ∼64{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -24{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH
Intel Core i9-11900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU




175 (138.4min) fps ∼61{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -28{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

MSI Pulse GL76 12UGK
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU




168.1 (149.3min) fps ∼58{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -31{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Schenker XMG Neo 17 M22
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU




146.5 (129.8min) fps ∼51{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -40{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Schenker XMG Core 17 (Early 2021)
Intel Core i7-10870H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU




146 (127.7min) fps ∼51{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -40{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

HP Omen 16-n0033dx
AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, AMD Radeon RX 6650M




141 (120min) fps ∼49{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -42{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Schenker XMG SECTOR, i9 13900K, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-13900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090




258.5 (226.5min) fps ∼100{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +20{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU




216 (187.8min) fps ∼84{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Corsair One i300
Intel Core i9-12900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti




214.8 (188.8min) fps ∼83{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -1{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
  (177.3 – 216, n=9) Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU




200 (151.8min) fps ∼77{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -7{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

MSI Titan GT77 12UHS
Intel Core i9-12900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU




184.5 (162.7min) fps ∼71{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -15{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

MSI Katana 17 B13VFK
Intel Core i7-13620H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU




171 (146.9min) fps ∼66{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -21{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH
Intel Core i9-11900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU




155 (134.6min) fps ∼60{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -28{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

MSI Pulse GL76 12UGK
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU




152.1 (134.4min) fps ∼59{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -30{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Schenker XMG Core 17 (Early 2021)
Intel Core i7-10870H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU




136 (116.3min) fps ∼53{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -37{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Schenker XMG Neo 17 M22
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU




133.9 (118.9min) fps ∼52{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -38{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

HP Omen 16-n0033dx
AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, AMD Radeon RX 6650M




130.7 (107.5min) fps ∼51{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -39{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Schenker XMG SECTOR, i9 13900K, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-13900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090




256.3 (217.1min) fps ∼100{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +25{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Corsair One i300
Intel Core i9-12900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti




207.6 (181.1min) fps ∼81{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +1{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
  (169.9 – 205, n=9) Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU




191 (165.9min) fps ∼75{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -7{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

MSI Titan GT77 12UHS
Intel Core i9-12900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU




179.8 (156.7min) fps ∼70{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -12{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

MSI Katana 17 B13VFK
Intel Core i7-13620H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU




164.1 (140.2min) fps ∼64{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -20{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH
Intel Core i9-11900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU




146 (120.5min) fps ∼57{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -29{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

MSI Pulse GL76 12UGK
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU




141.2 (123.5min) fps ∼55{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -31{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Schenker XMG Neo 17 M22
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU




129.3 (113min) fps ∼50{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -37{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Schenker XMG Core 17 (Early 2021)
Intel Core i7-10870H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU




124 (108min) fps ∼48{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -40{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

HP Omen 16-n0033dx
AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, AMD Radeon RX 6650M




118 (102.7min) fps ∼46{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -42{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Schenker XMG SECTOR, i9 13900K, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-13900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090




219.7 (186.7min) fps ∼100{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +14{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Corsair One i300
Intel Core i9-12900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti




196.1 (169.6min) fps ∼89{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +2{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU




192.5 (164.4min) fps ∼88{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
  (160.7 – 192.5, n=9) Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU




178.6 (153.9min) fps ∼81{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -7{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

MSI Titan GT77 12UHS
Intel Core i9-12900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU




170.5 (148.2min) fps ∼78{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -11{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

MSI Katana 17 B13VFK
Intel Core i7-13620H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU




156.3 (132.3min) fps ∼71{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -19{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

MSI Pulse GL76 12UGK
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU




132.8 (116.8min) fps ∼60{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -31{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH
Intel Core i9-11900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU




131 (113.6min) fps ∼60{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -32{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Schenker XMG Neo 17 M22
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU




121.4 (106.8min) fps ∼55{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -37{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Schenker XMG Core 17 (Early 2021)
Intel Core i7-10870H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU




118 (102.7min) fps ∼54{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -39{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

HP Omen 16-n0033dx
AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, AMD Radeon RX 6650M




100 (82.7min) fps ∼46{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -48{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Schenker XMG SECTOR, i9 13900K, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-13900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090




226.8 (185.7min) fps ∼100{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +21{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Corsair One i300
Intel Core i9-12900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti




191.5 (161.9min) fps ∼84{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +3{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU




186.7 (156.9min) fps ∼82{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
  (161.9 – 186.7, n=6) Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU




145.5 (109.1min) fps ∼64{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -22{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

MSI Katana 17 B13VFK
Intel Core i7-13620H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU




126 (105.9min) fps ∼56{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -33{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Schenker XMG Neo 17 M22
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU




122.7 (106.5min) fps ∼54{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -34{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH
Intel Core i9-11900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU




110 (8.5min) fps ∼49{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -41{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Schenker XMG SECTOR, i9 13900K, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-13900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU Corsair One i300
Intel Core i9-12900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
  (224 – 233, n=4) MSI Titan GT77 12UHS
Intel Core i9-12900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU MSI Katana 17 B13VFK
Intel Core i7-13620H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU Schenker XMG Neo 17 M22
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU MSI Pulse GL76 12UGK
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU HP Omen 16-n0033dx
AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, AMD Radeon RX 6650M Schenker XMG Core 17 (Early 2021)
Intel Core i7-10870H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU Schenker XMG SECTOR, i9 13900K, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-13900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU Corsair One i300
Intel Core i9-12900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
  (207 – 230, n=5) MSI Titan GT77 12UHS
Intel Core i9-12900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU Schenker XMG Neo 17 M22
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU MSI Katana 17 B13VFK
Intel Core i7-13620H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU MSI Pulse GL76 12UGK
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU HP Omen 16-n0033dx
AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, AMD Radeon RX 6650M Schenker XMG Core 17 (Early 2021)
Intel Core i7-10870H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU Schenker XMG SECTOR, i9 13900K, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-13900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
  (167.5 – 194.9, n=7) Corsair One i300
Intel Core i9-12900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti MSI Titan GT77 12UHS
Intel Core i9-12900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU Schenker XMG Neo 17 M22
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU MSI Katana 17 B13VFK
Intel Core i7-13620H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU MSI Pulse GL76 12UGK
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH
Intel Core i9-11900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU




88 (56min) fps ∼39{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -55{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

HP Omen 16-n0033dx
AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, AMD Radeon RX 6650M Schenker XMG Core 17 (Early 2021)
Intel Core i7-10870H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU Schenker XMG SECTOR, i9 13900K, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-13900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
  (136.8 – 162.9, n=7) Corsair One i300
Intel Core i9-12900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Schenker XMG Neo 17 M22
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH
Intel Core i9-11900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU




71.2 (44min) fps ∼32{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -55{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

MSI Katana 17 B13VFK
Intel Core i7-13620H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU Schenker XMG Core 17 (Early 2021)
Intel Core i7-10870H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU Schenker XMG SECTOR, i9 13900K, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-13900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
  (90.1 – 94.7, n=4) Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU Corsair One i300
Intel Core i9-12900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Schenker XMG Neo 17 M22
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH
Intel Core i9-11900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU




42.9 (27min) fps ∼28{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -53{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

MSI Katana 17 B13VFK
Intel Core i7-13620H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
Schenker XMG SECTOR, i9 13900K, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-13900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU Corsair One i300
Intel Core i9-12900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
  (168 – 212, n=13) MSI Titan GT77 12UHS
Intel Core i9-12900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU MSI Katana 17 B13VFK
Intel Core i7-13620H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU MSI Pulse GL76 12UGK
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH
Intel Core i9-11900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU Schenker XMG Neo 17 M22
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU Schenker XMG Core 17 (Early 2021)
Intel Core i7-10870H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU HP Omen 16-n0033dx
AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, AMD Radeon RX 6650M Schenker XMG SECTOR, i9 13900K, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-13900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU Corsair One i300
Intel Core i9-12900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
  (154.7 – 188.8, n=13) MSI Titan GT77 12UHS
Intel Core i9-12900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU MSI Katana 17 B13VFK
Intel Core i7-13620H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU MSI Pulse GL76 12UGK
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH
Intel Core i9-11900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU Schenker XMG Neo 17 M22
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU Schenker XMG Core 17 (Early 2021)
Intel Core i7-10870H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU HP Omen 16-n0033dx
AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, AMD Radeon RX 6650M Schenker XMG SECTOR, i9 13900K, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-13900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU Corsair One i300
Intel Core i9-12900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
  (116.4 – 146.4, n=13) MSI Titan GT77 12UHS
Intel Core i9-12900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU MSI Katana 17 B13VFK
Intel Core i7-13620H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU MSI Pulse GL76 12UGK
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH
Intel Core i9-11900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU Schenker XMG Neo 17 M22
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU Schenker XMG Core 17 (Early 2021)
Intel Core i7-10870H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU HP Omen 16-n0033dx
AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, AMD Radeon RX 6650M Schenker XMG SECTOR, i9 13900K, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-13900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
  (114.1 – 124.7, n=5) Corsair One i300
Intel Core i9-12900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU MSI Katana 17 B13VFK
Intel Core i7-13620H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU Schenker XMG Neo 17 M22
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH
Intel Core i9-11900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
Schenker XMG SECTOR, i9 13900K, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-13900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090




260 (113.43min) fps ∼100{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +8{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Corsair One i300
Intel Core i9-12900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti




258 (138.39min) fps ∼99{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +7{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU




240.1 (124.4min) fps ∼92{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
  (204 – 240, n=2) Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU




208.9 (108.8min) fps ∼80{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -13{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Schenker XMG Neo 17 M22
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU




172.4 (94.53min) fps ∼66{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -28{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

HP Omen 16-n0033dx
AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, AMD Radeon RX 6650M




138.8 (103.8min) fps ∼53{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -42{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Schenker XMG SECTOR, i9 13900K, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-13900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090




235 (112.44min) fps ∼100{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +13{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Corsair One i300
Intel Core i9-12900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti




212 (90.52min) fps ∼90{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +2{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU




207.1 (106.2min) fps ∼88{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
  (183 – 207, n=2) Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU




139.8 (62.8min) fps ∼59{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -32{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Schenker XMG Neo 17 M22
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU




134.4 (54.39min) fps ∼57{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -35{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

HP Omen 16-n0033dx
AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, AMD Radeon RX 6650M




111.5 (56min) fps ∼47{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -46{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Schenker XMG SECTOR, i9 13900K, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-13900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090




191.9 (91.79min) fps ∼100{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +10{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU Corsair One i300
Intel Core i9-12900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti




169 (76.59min) fps ∼88{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -3{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
  (153 – 173.8, n=2) Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU




109.7 (54.8min) fps ∼57{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -37{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Schenker XMG Neo 17 M22
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU




108.6 (48.9min) fps ∼57{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -38{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

HP Omen 16-n0033dx
AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, AMD Radeon RX 6650M




81 (43min) fps ∼42{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -53{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Schenker XMG SECTOR, i9 13900K, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-13900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090




177.3 (82.92min) fps ∼100{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +21{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU




146.5 (72.2min) fps ∼83{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Corsair One i300
Intel Core i9-12900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti




137 (66.86min) fps ∼77{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -6{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
  (131.5 – 146.5, n=3) Schenker XMG Neo 17 M22
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU




88.1 (42.14min) fps ∼50{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -40{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU




86.8 (45.8min) fps ∼49{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -41{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

MSI Katana 17 B13VFK
Intel Core i7-13620H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU




74.3 (37.14min) fps ∼42{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -49{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

HP Omen 16-n0033dx
AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, AMD Radeon RX 6650M




65.8 (37.7min) fps ∼37{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -55{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Schenker XMG SECTOR, i9 13900K, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-13900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090




165 (77.05min) fps ∼100{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +29{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU




127.7 (63.9min) fps ∼77{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
  (116 – 127.7, n=3) Corsair One i300
Intel Core i9-12900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti




113 (60.76min) fps ∼68{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -12{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Schenker XMG Neo 17 M22
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU




73.2 (39.18min) fps ∼44{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -43{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU




69 (39.5min) fps ∼42{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -46{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

MSI Katana 17 B13VFK
Intel Core i7-13620H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU




59 (32.33min) fps ∼36{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -54{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Schenker XMG SECTOR, i9 13900K, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-13900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090




136.3 (72.34min) fps ∼100{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +66{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
  (81 – 84, n=3) Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU




82.1 (51.4min) fps ∼60{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Corsair One i300
Intel Core i9-12900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti




75 (46.62min) fps ∼55{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -9{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Schenker XMG Neo 17 M22
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU




47.6 (28.52min) fps ∼35{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -42{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU




44 (27.9min) fps ∼32{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -46{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

MSI Katana 17 B13VFK
Intel Core i7-13620H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU




36.8 (22.74min) fps ∼27{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -55{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Schenker XMG SECTOR, i9 13900K, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-13900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090




129.6 (73.7min) fps ∼100{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +9{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU




118.8 (61.4min) fps ∼92{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Corsair One i300
Intel Core i9-12900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti




116 (60.79min) fps ∼90{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -2{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
  (101.3 – 118.8, n=3) Schenker XMG Neo 17 M22
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU




77.9 (40.97min) fps ∼60{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -34{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU




74.4 (41.8min) fps ∼57{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -37{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

MSI Katana 17 B13VFK
Intel Core i7-13620H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU




63.2 (32.95min) fps ∼49{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -47{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU Schenker XMG SECTOR, i9 13900K, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-13900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
  (201 – 284, n=2) Corsair One i300
Intel Core i9-12900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Schenker XMG Neo 17 M22
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU HP Omen 16-n0033dx
AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, AMD Radeon RX 6650M Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
  Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU Schenker XMG SECTOR, i9 13900K, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-13900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Schenker XMG Neo 17 M22
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU HP Omen 16-n0033dx
AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, AMD Radeon RX 6650M Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
  (176 – 270, n=2) Schenker XMG SECTOR, i9 13900K, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-13900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU Corsair One i300
Intel Core i9-12900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Schenker XMG Neo 17 M22
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU HP Omen 16-n0033dx
AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, AMD Radeon RX 6650M Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
  (162 – 239, n=2) Schenker XMG SECTOR, i9 13900K, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-13900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Corsair One i300
Intel Core i9-12900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU Schenker XMG Neo 17 M22
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU HP Omen 16-n0033dx
AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, AMD Radeon RX 6650M Schenker XMG SECTOR, i9 13900K, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-13900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
  (151 – 179.7, n=3) Corsair One i300
Intel Core i9-12900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU Schenker XMG Neo 17 M22
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU HP Omen 16-n0033dx
AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, AMD Radeon RX 6650M Schenker XMG SECTOR, i9 13900K, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-13900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
  (129.4 – 132.3, n=3) Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU Corsair One i300
Intel Core i9-12900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Schenker XMG Neo 17 M22
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU Schenker XMG SECTOR, i9 13900K, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-13900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
  (70.5 – 76, n=3) Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU Corsair One i300
Intel Core i9-12900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Schenker XMG Neo 17 M22
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
Schenker XMG SECTOR, i9 13900K, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-13900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090




466 (351min, 294P1) fps ∼100{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +6{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU




440 (321min, 272P1) fps ∼94{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
  (393 – 440, n=2) MSI Katana 17 B13VFK
Intel Core i7-13620H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU




317 (235min, 194P1) fps ∼68{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -28{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

MSI Titan GT77 12UHS
Intel Core i9-12900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU




283 (233min, 46P1) fps ∼61{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -36{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

HP Omen 16-n0033dx
AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, AMD Radeon RX 6650M




264 (193min, 169P1) fps ∼57{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -40{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Schenker XMG Neo 17 M22
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU Schenker XMG SECTOR, i9 13900K, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-13900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090




415 (291min, 220P1) fps ∼100{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +11{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU




375 (257min, 207P1) fps ∼90{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
  (303 – 375, n=4) MSI Katana 17 B13VFK
Intel Core i7-13620H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU




247 (179min, 135P1) fps ∼60{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -34{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

MSI Titan GT77 12UHS
Intel Core i9-12900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU




226 (185min, 61P1) fps ∼54{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -40{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

HP Omen 16-n0033dx
AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, AMD Radeon RX 6650M




217 (166min, 135P1) fps ∼52{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -42{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Schenker XMG Neo 17 M22
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU Schenker XMG SECTOR, i9 13900K, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-13900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090




377 (273min, 214P1) fps ∼100{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +5{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU




358 (243min, 204P1) fps ∼95{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
  (286 – 358, n=4) MSI Katana 17 B13VFK
Intel Core i7-13620H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU




240 (188min, 131P1) fps ∼64{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -33{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

MSI Titan GT77 12UHS
Intel Core i9-12900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU




227 (151min, 57P1) fps ∼60{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -37{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

HP Omen 16-n0033dx
AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, AMD Radeon RX 6650M




215 (159min, 131P1) fps ∼57{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -40{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Schenker XMG Neo 17 M22
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU Schenker XMG SECTOR, i9 13900K, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-13900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090




364 (262min, 204P1) fps ∼100{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +13{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU




322 (217min, 181P1) fps ∼88{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
  (265 – 322, n=4) MSI Titan GT77 12UHS
Intel Core i9-12900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU




196.5 (145min, 38P1) fps ∼54{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -39{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

MSI Katana 17 B13VFK
Intel Core i7-13620H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU




179.2 (145min, 66P1) fps ∼49{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -44{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

HP Omen 16-n0033dx
AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, AMD Radeon RX 6650M




178.2 (151min, 121P1) fps ∼49{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -45{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Schenker XMG Neo 17 M22
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU Schenker XMG SECTOR, i9 13900K, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-13900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090




195.4 (165min, 131P1) fps ∼100{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +39{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU




140.6 (123min, 97P1) fps ∼72{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
  (114.3 – 140.6, n=5) Schenker XMG Neo 17 M22
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU MSI Titan GT77 12UHS
Intel Core i9-12900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU




79.8 (65min, 29P1) fps ∼41{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -43{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

MSI Katana 17 B13VFK
Intel Core i7-13620H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU




65.4 (52min, 44P1) fps ∼33{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -53{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

HP Omen 16-n0033dx
AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, AMD Radeon RX 6650M




40.6 (31min, 31P1) fps ∼21{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -71{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Schenker XMG SECTOR, i9 13900K, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-13900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090




149.7 (129min, 104P1) fps ∼100{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +63{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU




91.8 (78min, 74P1) fps ∼61{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
  (75 – 91.8, n=5) Schenker XMG Neo 17 M22
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU MSI Katana 17 B13VFK
Intel Core i7-13620H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU




41 (35min, 33P1) fps ∼27{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -55{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Schenker XMG SECTOR, i9 13900K, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-13900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090




81.1 (71min, 70P1) fps ∼100{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +79{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU




45.3 (39min, 37P1) fps ∼56{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
  (42.4 – 45.3, n=4) Schenker XMG Neo 17 M22
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU MSI Katana 17 B13VFK
Intel Core i7-13620H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU




19.7 (17min, 16P1) fps ∼24{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -57{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Razer Blade 15 OLED (early 2022) review: A compact gaming laptop with an RTX 3070 Ti

Razer Blade 15 OLED (early 2022) review: A compact gaming laptop with an RTX 3070 Ti
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW





4199 (4194.93min – 4199.13max) MB/s ∼100{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +18{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Razer Blade 15 2022
SSSTC CA6-8D1024




4119 (4098.66min – 4118.81max) MB/s ∼98{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +16{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Aorus 15 XE5
Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10




4117 (3552.16min – 4116.81max) MB/s ∼98{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +16{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

HP Omen 16-b1090ng
WDC PC SN810 1TB




3928 (3889.8min – 3927.66max) MB/s ∼94{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +10{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH




3764 (3540.2min – 3763.76max) MB/s ∼90{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +6{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
  (1761 – 4634, n=49) Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR




3564 (3515.46min – 3563.69max) MB/s ∼85{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Average of class Gaming
  (834 – 5676, n=182, last 2 years) Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH




4767 (4365.51min – 4766.62max) MB/s ∼100{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +35{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Schenker XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW




4299 (4288.86min – 4298.95max) MB/s ∼90{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +22{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Aorus 15 XE5
Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10





4236 (3477.46min – 4236.46max) MB/s ∼89{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +20{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Razer Blade 15 2022
SSSTC CA6-8D1024




4167 (4120.63min – 4166.62max) MB/s ∼87{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +18{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

HP Omen 16-b1090ng
WDC PC SN810 1TB




4033 (3953.13min – 4032.82max) MB/s ∼85{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +14{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
  (2226 – 4516, n=49) Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR




3531 (3391.93min – 3530.77max) MB/s ∼74{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Average of class Gaming
  (399 – 7889, n=181, last 2 years) Aorus 15 XE5
Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10





7020 (5888.98min – 7020.02max) MB/s ∼100{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +5{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Razer Blade 15 2022
SSSTC CA6-8D1024





6921 (6631.14min – 6921.02max) MB/s ∼99{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +4{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

HP Omen 16-b1090ng
WDC PC SN810 1TB




6867 (6210.3min – 6866.91max) MB/s ∼98{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +3{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Schenker XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW




6847 (6590.72min – 6846.78max) MB/s ∼98{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +3{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR





6663 (6017.91min – 6663.07max) MB/s ∼95{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH




6550 (5497.59min – 6549.73max) MB/s ∼93{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -2{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
  (3421 – 7061, n=49) Average of class Gaming
  (1620 – 13195, n=182, last 2 years) HP Omen 16-b1090ng
WDC PC SN810 1TB




5412 (5265.32min – 5411.99max) MB/s ∼100{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +9{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Schenker XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW




4999 (4982.73min – 4998.98max) MB/s ∼92{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} 0{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR




4980 (4904.66min – 4979.58max) MB/s ∼92{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH





4876 (4374.87min – 4876.3max) MB/s ∼90{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -2{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
  (2226 – 5259, n=49) Razer Blade 15 2022
SSSTC CA6-8D1024





4740 (4542.15min – 4740.19max) MB/s ∼88{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -5{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Aorus 15 XE5
Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10




4421 (4173.33min – 4420.8max) MB/s ∼82{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -11{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Average of class Gaming
  (86.2 – 10261, n=182, last 2 years) Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR





81.2 (79.58min – 81.23max) MB/s ∼100{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Aorus 15 XE5
Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10





80.6 (67.84min – 80.61max) MB/s ∼99{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -1{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Razer Blade 15 2022
SSSTC CA6-8D1024





79.6 (78.85min – 79.63max) MB/s ∼98{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -2{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Schenker XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW




77.9 (77.66min – 77.9max) MB/s ∼96{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -4{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
  (48.7 – 97.4, n=49) HP Omen 16-b1090ng
WDC PC SN810 1TB





77.1 (76.91min – 77.11max) MB/s ∼95{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -5{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH





74.3 (71.59min – 74.33max) MB/s ∼92{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -8{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Average of class Gaming
  (23.3 – 97.4, n=182, last 2 years) Aorus 15 XE5
Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10





333 (331.94min – 333.25max) MB/s ∼100{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +57{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH





264 (263.57min – 264.44max) MB/s ∼79{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +25{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Razer Blade 15 2022
SSSTC CA6-8D1024





256 (23.49min – 256.28max) MB/s ∼77{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +21{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Schenker XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW




239 (238.19min – 238.82max) MB/s ∼72{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +13{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR




212 (209.62min – 211.78max) MB/s ∼64{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

HP Omen 16-b1090ng
WDC PC SN810 1TB




205 (195.73min – 204.56max) MB/s ∼62{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -3{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Average of class Gaming
  (66.6 – 421, n=181, last 2 years) Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
  (49.9 – 275, n=49) Schenker XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW





4309 (4179.96min – 4309.38max) MB/s ∼100{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +4{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR





4152 (4133.05min – 4152.1max) MB/s ∼96{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Aorus 15 XE5
Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10





3566 (3562.85min – 3566.11max) MB/s ∼83{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -14{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Razer Blade 15 2022
SSSTC CA6-8D1024




3184 (3180.75min – 3183.86max) MB/s ∼74{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -23{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH




2855 (2482.75min – 2854.87max) MB/s ∼66{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -31{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
  (376 – 4185, n=49) Average of class Gaming
  (310 – 5829, n=181, last 2 years) HP Omen 16-b1090ng
WDC PC SN810 1TB




1528 (1477.56min – 1527.59max) MB/s ∼35{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -63{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Aorus 15 XE5
Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10




3600 (3594.9min – 3599.81max) MB/s ∼100{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +3{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR




3512 (3421.77min – 3511.78max) MB/s ∼98{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Schenker XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW





3435 (2876.62min – 3435.27max) MB/s ∼95{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -2{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH




2694 (2561.51min – 2693.92max) MB/s ∼75{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -23{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Razer Blade 15 2022
SSSTC CA6-8D1024





2141 (2137.08min – 2141.26max) MB/s ∼59{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -39{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Average of class Gaming
  (288 – 4383, n=181, last 2 years) Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
  (291 – 3559, n=49) HP Omen 16-b1090ng
WDC PC SN810 1TB




585 (555.77min – 584.61max) MB/s ∼16{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -83{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Aorus 15 XE5
Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10 Schenker XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW Razer Blade 15 2022
SSSTC CA6-8D1024 Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
  (2577 – 9147, n=50) Average of class Gaming
  (910 – 10330, n=171, last 2 years) HP Omen 16-b1090ng
WDC PC SN810 1TB Aorus 15 XE5
Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10 Razer Blade 15 2022
SSSTC CA6-8D1024 Schenker XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
  (983 – 3469, n=50) Average of class Gaming
  (389 – 3629, n=171, last 2 years) HP Omen 16-b1090ng
WDC PC SN810 1TB Aorus 15 XE5
Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10 Schenker XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
  (921 – 4043, n=50) HP Omen 16-b1090ng
WDC PC SN810 1TB Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR Average of class Gaming
  (338 – 5157, n=171, last 2 years) Razer Blade 15 2022
SSSTC CA6-8D1024 Razer Blade 15 2022
SSSTC CA6-8D1024 Aorus 15 XE5
Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10 HP Omen 16-b1090ng
WDC PC SN810 1TB Schenker XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
  (2834 – 5588, n=50) Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR Average of class Gaming
  (925 – 9971, n=171, last 2 years) Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH Razer Blade 15 2022
SSSTC CA6-8D1024 Schenker XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR Aorus 15 XE5
Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10 Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
  (1617 – 4477, n=50) Average of class Gaming
  (308 – 8590, n=171, last 2 years) HP Omen 16-b1090ng
WDC PC SN810 1TB Aorus 15 XE5
Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10 HP Omen 16-b1090ng
WDC PC SN810 1TB Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
  (45.9 – 88.1, n=50) Razer Blade 15 2022
SSSTC CA6-8D1024 Schenker XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW Average of class Gaming
  (20 – 108, n=171, last 2 years) Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH Aorus 15 XE5
Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10 HP Omen 16-b1090ng
WDC PC SN810 1TB Razer Blade 15 2022
SSSTC CA6-8D1024 Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH Schenker XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
  (118.6 – 241, n=50) Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR Average of class Gaming
  (18 – 364, n=171, last 2 years) Aorus 15 XE5
Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10


2909.44 MB/s ∼100{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +25{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Razer Blade 15 2022
SSSTC CA6-8D1024 Schenker XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
  (421 – 2854, n=50) Average of class Gaming
  (216 – 2963, n=171, last 2 years) HP Omen 16-b1090ng
WDC PC SN810 1TB Aorus 15 XE5
Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10


3193.44 MB/s ∼100{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +34{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Schenker XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
  (367 – 3451, n=50) HP Omen 16-b1090ng
WDC PC SN810 1TB Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH Average of class Gaming
  (243 – 4381, n=171, last 2 years) Razer Blade 15 2022
SSSTC CA6-8D1024 Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR Schenker XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW Average of class Gaming
  (0.022 – 0.23, n=166, last 2 years) Aorus 15 XE5
Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10 Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH HP Omen 16-b1090ng
WDC PC SN810 1TB Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
  (0.02 – 0.083, n=50) Razer Blade 15 2022
SSSTC CA6-8D1024 Razer Blade 15 2022
SSSTC CA6-8D1024 Average of class Gaming
  (0.012 – 0.425, n=171, last 2 years)





0.05756 ms * ∼99{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -162{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
  (0.018 – 0.101, n=50) Schenker XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH HP Omen 16-b1090ng
WDC PC SN810 1TB Aorus 15 XE5
Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10

* … smaller is better

Asus ROG Strix G18 G814JI laptop review: Light and shade with the 18-inch gaming machine

Asus ROG Strix G18 G814JI laptop review: Light and shade with the 18-inch gaming machine
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 Ti
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR





4229 (4208.75min – 4229.47max) MB/s ∼100{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +126{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
SSSTC CA6-8D1024




3889 (3873.65min – 3888.73max) MB/s ∼92{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +108{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

MSI Raider GE77 HX 12UHS
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB





3713 (3643.38min – 3713.01max) MB/s ∼88{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +99{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Average of class Gaming
  (834 – 5676, n=182, last 2 years) Average Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
  (1870 – 2578, n=3) Alienware x17 RTX 3080 P48E
2x WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00 (RAID 0)




2161 (2137.42min – 2160.91max) MB/s ∼51{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +16{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Gigabyte A7 X1
ESR512GTLCG-EAC-4





1959 (1933.36min – 1959.16max) MB/s ∼46{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +5{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Asus ROG Strix G18 G814JI
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM




1870 (1827.25min – 1869.82max) MB/s ∼44{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 Ti
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR




4158 (4130.89min – 4157.81max) MB/s ∼100{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +92{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
SSSTC CA6-8D1024





3798 (3750.39min – 3798.15max) MB/s ∼91{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +75{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

MSI Raider GE77 HX 12UHS
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB





3706 (3661.84min – 3706.09max) MB/s ∼89{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +71{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Average of class Gaming
  (399 – 7889, n=181, last 2 years) Alienware x17 RTX 3080 P48E
2x WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00 (RAID 0)




2978 (2936.01min – 2977.75max) MB/s ∼72{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +37{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Average Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
  (2166 – 3115, n=3) Asus ROG Strix G18 G814JI
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM





2166 (2094.01min – 2166.15max) MB/s ∼52{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Gigabyte A7 X1
ESR512GTLCG-EAC-4




2124 (2090.44min – 2123.58max) MB/s ∼51{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -2{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
SSSTC CA6-8D1024




6810 (6260.27min – 6809.87max) MB/s ∼100{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +61{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

MSI Raider GE77 HX 12UHS
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB




6695 (6233.69min – 6694.56max) MB/s ∼98{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +58{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Alienware x17 RTX 3080 P48E
2x WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00 (RAID 0)





6684 (5510.27min – 6684.46max) MB/s ∼98{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +58{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 Ti
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR




6593 (6284.75min – 6592.61max) MB/s ∼97{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +56{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Average of class Gaming
  (1620 – 13195, n=182, last 2 years) Average Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
  (4239 – 4719, n=3) Asus ROG Strix G18 G814JI
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM





4239 (3584.87min – 4239.18max) MB/s ∼62{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Gigabyte A7 X1
ESR512GTLCG-EAC-4




3463 (3045.7min – 3462.82max) MB/s ∼51{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -18{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 Ti
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR





4969 (4945.26min – 4969.12max) MB/s ∼100{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +67{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

MSI Raider GE77 HX 12UHS
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB




4959 (4940min – 4958.51max) MB/s ∼100{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +66{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Alienware x17 RTX 3080 P48E
2x WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00 (RAID 0)





4917 (4616.04min – 4917.19max) MB/s ∼99{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +65{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
SSSTC CA6-8D1024





4426 (4263.58min – 4426.04max) MB/s ∼89{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +48{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Average of class Gaming
  (86.2 – 10261, n=182, last 2 years) Average Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
  (2982 – 3629, n=3) Asus ROG Strix G18 G814JI
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM




2982 (2920.07min – 2981.52max) MB/s ∼60{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Gigabyte A7 X1
ESR512GTLCG-EAC-4




2497 (2486.17min – 2496.87max) MB/s ∼50{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -16{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

MSI Raider GE77 HX 12UHS
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB





83 (80.23min – 83.02max) MB/s ∼100{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +171{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 Ti
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR




79.8 (79.31min – 79.75max) MB/s ∼96{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +161{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
SSSTC CA6-8D1024





74.5 (73.46min – 74.52max) MB/s ∼90{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +143{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Average of class Gaming
  (23.3 – 97.4, n=182, last 2 years) Alienware x17 RTX 3080 P48E
2x WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00 (RAID 0)





51.2 (51.08min – 51.21max) MB/s ∼62{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +67{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Gigabyte A7 X1
ESR512GTLCG-EAC-4




44.5 (44.06min – 44.46max) MB/s ∼54{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +45{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Average Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
  (30.6 – 37.7, n=3) Asus ROG Strix G18 G814JI
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM





30.6 (30.29min – 30.64max) MB/s ∼37{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

MSI Raider GE77 HX 12UHS
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB




286 (284.91min – 285.72max) MB/s ∼100{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +146{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
SSSTC CA6-8D1024




280 (267.82min – 279.79max) MB/s ∼98{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +141{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Average of class Gaming
  (66.6 – 421, n=181, last 2 years) Average Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
  (116.3 – 286, n=3) Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 Ti
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR




194.2 (193.1min – 194.16max) MB/s ∼68{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +67{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Alienware x17 RTX 3080 P48E
2x WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00 (RAID 0)




166 (164.47min – 165.73max) MB/s ∼58{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +43{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Gigabyte A7 X1
ESR512GTLCG-EAC-4




130 (127.46min – 129.84max) MB/s ∼45{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +12{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Asus ROG Strix G18 G814JI
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM





116.3 (111.83min – 116.33max) MB/s ∼41{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 Ti
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR





4178 (4170.63min – 4178.12max) MB/s ∼100{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +582{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

MSI Raider GE77 HX 12UHS
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB





4075 (4059.83min – 4075.02max) MB/s ∼98{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +565{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
SSSTC CA6-8D1024





3203 (3180.36min – 3203.41max) MB/s ∼77{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +423{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Average of class Gaming
  (310 – 5829, n=181, last 2 years) Average Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
  (613 – 2769, n=3) Gigabyte A7 X1
ESR512GTLCG-EAC-4





1331 (1303.48min – 1331.29max) MB/s ∼32{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +117{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Alienware x17 RTX 3080 P48E
2x WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00 (RAID 0)





724 (719.56min – 724.12max) MB/s ∼17{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +18{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Asus ROG Strix G18 G814JI
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM





613 (588.72min – 613.33max) MB/s ∼15{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 Ti
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR





3559 (3517.38min – 3559.2max) MB/s ∼100{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +707{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

MSI Raider GE77 HX 12UHS
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB





3503 (3468.77min – 3503.3max) MB/s ∼98{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +694{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
SSSTC CA6-8D1024




2209 (1041.25min – 2208.74max) MB/s ∼62{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +401{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Average of class Gaming
  (288 – 4383, n=181, last 2 years) Average Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
  (441 – 2635, n=3) Gigabyte A7 X1
ESR512GTLCG-EAC-4





549 (541.16min – 549.03max) MB/s ∼15{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +24{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Asus ROG Strix G18 G814JI
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM




441 (428.19min – 440.55max) MB/s ∼12{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Alienware x17 RTX 3080 P48E
2x WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00 (RAID 0)




376 (372.82min – 375.8max) MB/s ∼11{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -15{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

MSI Raider GE77 HX 12UHS
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB


8951 Points ∼100{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +110{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 Ti
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR


8923 Points ∼100{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +109{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
SSSTC CA6-8D1024 Average of class Gaming
  (910 – 10330, n=171, last 2 years) Average Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
  (4272 – 6311, n=3) Gigabyte A7 X1
ESR512GTLCG-EAC-4 Alienware x17 RTX 3080 P48E
2x WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00 (RAID 0) Asus ROG Strix G18 G814JI
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
SSSTC CA6-8D1024


3490 Points ∼100{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +170{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 Ti
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR MSI Raider GE77 HX 12UHS
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB Average of class Gaming
  (389 – 3629, n=171, last 2 years) Average Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
  (1294 – 2446, n=3) Alienware x17 RTX 3080 P48E
2x WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00 (RAID 0) Gigabyte A7 X1
ESR512GTLCG-EAC-4 Asus ROG Strix G18 G814JI
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM MSI Raider GE77 HX 12UHS
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 Ti
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR Average of class Gaming
  (338 – 5157, n=171, last 2 years) Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
SSSTC CA6-8D1024 Average Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
  (2387 – 2658, n=3) Gigabyte A7 X1
ESR512GTLCG-EAC-4 Asus ROG Strix G18 G814JI
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM Alienware x17 RTX 3080 P48E
2x WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00 (RAID 0) Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
SSSTC CA6-8D1024


5770.79 MB/s ∼100{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +51{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 Ti
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR MSI Raider GE77 HX 12UHS
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB Alienware x17 RTX 3080 P48E
2x WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00 (RAID 0) Average of class Gaming
  (925 – 9971, n=171, last 2 years) Average Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
  (3811 – 3977, n=3) Asus ROG Strix G18 G814JI
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM Gigabyte A7 X1
ESR512GTLCG-EAC-4 Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 Ti
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR


4007.79 MB/s ∼100{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +73{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
SSSTC CA6-8D1024 MSI Raider GE77 HX 12UHS
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB Average of class Gaming
  (308 – 8590, n=171, last 2 years) Average Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
  (2320 – 3021, n=3) Asus ROG Strix G18 G814JI
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM Alienware x17 RTX 3080 P48E
2x WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00 (RAID 0) Gigabyte A7 X1
ESR512GTLCG-EAC-4 MSI Raider GE77 HX 12UHS
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 Ti
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
SSSTC CA6-8D1024 Average of class Gaming
  (20 – 108, n=171, last 2 years) Average Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
  (37.9 – 58.8, n=3) Alienware x17 RTX 3080 P48E
2x WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00 (RAID 0) Gigabyte A7 X1
ESR512GTLCG-EAC-4 Asus ROG Strix G18 G814JI
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM MSI Raider GE77 HX 12UHS
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
SSSTC CA6-8D1024 Average Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
  (152.2 – 249, n=3) Average of class Gaming
  (18 – 364, n=171, last 2 years) Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 Ti
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR Asus ROG Strix G18 G814JI
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM Alienware x17 RTX 3080 P48E
2x WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00 (RAID 0) Gigabyte A7 X1
ESR512GTLCG-EAC-4 Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
SSSTC CA6-8D1024


2843.31 MB/s ∼100{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +225{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 Ti
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR


2817.67 MB/s ∼99{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +222{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

MSI Raider GE77 HX 12UHS
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB


2811.14 MB/s ∼99{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +221{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Average of class Gaming
  (216 – 2963, n=171, last 2 years) Average Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
  (875 – 1995, n=3) Alienware x17 RTX 3080 P48E
2x WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00 (RAID 0) Gigabyte A7 X1
ESR512GTLCG-EAC-4 Asus ROG Strix G18 G814JI
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM MSI Raider GE77 HX 12UHS
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB


3271.86 MB/s ∼100{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +63{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 Ti
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR Average of class Gaming
  (243 – 4381, n=171, last 2 years) Gigabyte A7 X1
ESR512GTLCG-EAC-4 Average Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
  (1949 – 2108, n=3) Asus ROG Strix G18 G814JI
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
SSSTC CA6-8D1024 Alienware x17 RTX 3080 P48E
2x WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00 (RAID 0) Gigabyte A7 X1
ESR512GTLCG-EAC-4 Average Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
  (0.04 – 0.094, n=3) Average of class Gaming
  (0.022 – 0.23, n=166, last 2 years) Asus ROG Strix G18 G814JI
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM Alienware x17 RTX 3080 P48E
2x WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00 (RAID 0) Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 Ti
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR MSI Raider GE77 HX 12UHS
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
SSSTC CA6-8D1024 Asus ROG Strix G18 G814JI
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM Average Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
  (0.096 – 0.12, n=3) Alienware x17 RTX 3080 P48E
2x WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00 (RAID 0) Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 Ti
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR Average of class Gaming
  (0.012 – 0.425, n=171, last 2 years) Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
SSSTC CA6-8D1024 Gigabyte A7 X1
ESR512GTLCG-EAC-4 MSI Raider GE77 HX 12UHS
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB

* … smaller is better

Daily Deals: Early Mario Day Sale Deals, Powerful RTX 4060 Gaming Laptop Finally Available, 20{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} Off Apple AirPods Pro, and More

Daily Deals: Early Mario Day Sale Deals, Powerful RTX 4060 Gaming Laptop Finally Available, 20{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} Off Apple AirPods Pro, and More

Today’s daily deals are the best we’ve seen this year. They include a newly released ASUS ROG STRIX G16 RTX 4060 gaming laptop at an excellent price, the newest generation Apple AirPods Pro earbuds, a massive 75″ 4K Roku TV, a true 4K webcam on clearance, and more. Of course, we also can’t forget the early Mario Day sale at Best Buy, with about a dozen games marked down by 33{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} ahead of March 10. These deals and more below.

New Release: ASUS ROG STRIX G16 16″ Intel Core i7-13650HX RTX 4060 Gaming Laptop for $1399.99

ASUS ROG STRIX G16 16" 1920x1200 Intel Core i7-13650HX RTX 4060 Gaming Laptop with 16GB RAM, 512GB SSD

ASUS ROG STRIX G16 16″ 1920×1200 Intel Core i7-13650HX RTX 4060 Gaming Laptop with 16GB RAM, 512GB SSD

The new generation of laptops is here! This ASUS ROG Strix G16 laptop comes equipped with the latest 13th gen Intel Core i7 Raptor Lake CPU and the GeForce RTX 4060 GPU. This is a very powerful gaming laptop for the price: the RTX 4060 has shown to be as powerful as the RTX 3070 Ti mobile GPU! Even getting an RTX 3070 Ti laptop at this price would be an excellent deal, but the 4060 also comes with newer features, noticeably DLSS 3.0.

2nd Gen Apple AirPods Pro for $199.99

Apple AirPods Pro (2nd Generation) Active Noise Cancelling Truly Wireless Earbuds

Verizon just dropped the price of the 2nd gen Apple AirPods Pro truly wireless noise cancelling earbuds back down to $199.99. This is the same price we saw during Black Friday and Cyber Monday. The Apple AirPods Pro is one of the best sounding “truly wireless” earbuds you’ll find, especially at this price point. The AirPods Pro is also the only AirPods earbuds with active noise cancelling technology.

Mar10 (Mario) Day Sale Starts Early

The Mario Day Sale technically starts March 10, but several Nintendo Switch games have been discounted early. Starting Sunday, Best Buy has discounted several AAA Nintendo games from $59.99 to $39.99. These include several must-have games like Super Mario 3D World + Bowser’s Fury, Mario Kart 8 Deluxe, Mario Odyssey, and more. Best Buy offers free shipping on all of these video games.

75″ TCL 4-Series 4K Roku TV for $538

TCL 4-Series 75" 4K Roku TV

Here’s a no-frills TCL 4-series 75″ 4K TV for only $538 shipped at Walmart. It displays a native 4K picture with good image quality, it features a great Roku smart TV interface, and it looks good with its near-frameless bezel.

Anker 737 PowerCore 24K 24,000mAh Power Bank with 140W USB Type-C Power Delivery Output for $99.99

Anker 737 PowerCore 24K 24,000mAh Power Bank with 140W USB Type-C Power Delivery Output (Designed for Apple MacBook Pro and Other Laptops)

Anker 737 PowerCore 24K 24,000mAh Power Bank with 140W USB Type-C Power Delivery Output (Designed for Apple MacBook Pro and Other Laptops)

The Anker 737 isn’t just any power bank that you use for small electronic devices like your Nintendo Switch or your smartphone. Although it’s certainly capable of that, you can find less expensive options. Instead, this power bank with its super high 140W output is designed for charging your USB Type-C compatible laptop. For example, it delivers enough juice to charge a MacBook Pro laptop even while you’re using it. That kind of power output is hard to find in a power bank and usually a lot more expensive.

AVerMedia Live Streamer 4K Webcam for $101

AVerMedia Live Streamer PW513 4K Webcam

The AVerMedia Live Streamer PW513 has one of the best picture quality of any webcam, mainly thanks to its sharp 4K sensor. It’s comparable to the Logitech BRIO, but at the current price of just over $100 this is way cheaper. Depending on your location, you may have to buy online and pick up in-store. If you’re looking for a high quality webcam for streaming at a great price, then this is worth the hassle.

PS5 Digital Edition on Amazon Without Invitation

PS5 God of War Digital Edition Console In Stock

No Invite Needed

PS5 God of War Digital Edition Console In Stock

PS5 God of War Disc Edition Console In Stock

No Invite Needed

PS5 God of War Disc Edition Console In Stock

We’ve seen the PS5 Disc Edition God of War: Ragnarok console bundle in stock at Amazon for a little while now, but the PS5 Digital Edition just came back in stock (without invite) today.. Unlike the gimped Xbox Series S, it has the same power and performance as its more expensive sibling. The only thing missing is the Blu-ray drive. You lose the ability to use physical game media and play 4K Blu-ray movie discs, and that’s it.

The GeForce RTX 4090 GPU Is Finally Down to MSRP

The GeForce RTX 4090 GPU is still a difficult card to find without a price markup. There’s a good reason for it, though. Despite the considerably higher price tag, the RTX 4090 is a beast of a card that dominates every other GPU out there, including the 4080. Amazon has steadily lowered the price of certain 4090 models over the past month and today, finally, there’s an RTX 4080 as the base stock price of $1599.99.

Crucial P5 Plus 2TB PS5 SSD for PS5 for $131.99

Constantly going in and out of stock

Crucial P5 Plus 2TB PCIe Gen4 x4 M.2 SSD (up to 6600Mbps)

Crucial P5 Plus 2TB PCIe Gen4 x4 M.2 SSD (up to 6600Mbps)

Crucial P5 Plus 2TB PCIe Gen4 x4 M.2 SSD (up to 6600Mbps) with Heatsink

Crucial P5 Plus 2TB PCIe Gen4 x4 M.2 SSD (up to 6600Mbps) with Heatsink

Crucial’s newest M.2 SSD meets all the requirements for your PS5 SSD upgrade. It supports transfer speeds of up to 6,660MB/s which is well above the 5,500MB/s minimum threshold. Yes there are faster SSDs out there, but if your intention is to put this in your PS5, then that extra speed is worthless because you’re bottlenecked by the original PS5 SSD. If you’re worried about opening up your PS5 case, don’t worry it’s very easy. Crucial has an official YouTube PS5 SSD install guide to see you through the process.

SteelSeries Arctis Nova Pro Wireless Gaming Headset with ANC and Dual Swappable Batteries for $290

SteelSeries Arctis Nova Pro Wireless Gaming Headset with Active Noise Cancellation and Dual Swappable Batteries

SteelSeries Arctis Nova Pro Wireless Gaming Headset with Active Noise Cancellation and Dual Swappable Batteries

Update: The price has gone up from $280 to $290.

The SteelSeries Arctis Nova Pro is, in our opinion, the best gaming headset of 2023 so far. It combines excellent sound quality with comfortable ergonomics, a high-performance mic, and unique yet extremely practical features. One of the biggest standout features of the SteelSeries Nova Pro wireless headset is the incredible hot-swappable battery system. SteelSeries was generous enough to even includes two batteries; one that’s in use in your headset and the other that’s charging in the included DAC controller. This way you’ll get the best of both worlds: glorious wireless freedom and no waiting to recharge.

Alienware Aurora R14 RTX 3080 PC for $1518.99

Alienware Aurora R14 Liquid Cooled AMD Ryzen 7 5800X RTX 3080 Gaming PC with 16GB RAM, 1TB SSD

Use codes: SAVE150 and ARMMPPS

Alienware Aurora R14 Liquid Cooled AMD Ryzen 7 5800X RTX 3080 Gaming PC with 16GB RAM, 1TB SSD

Use promo code “SAVE150 and ARMMPPS”

38{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} off $2,449.99

Do you want a rig that can handle any game out there at 4K but don’t want to spend on a $2500-$4000 PC? This might be a good pick for you. Dell is offering an Alienware Aurora R14 RTX 3080 equipped gaming PC for $1518.99 after $780 in instant discounts and stackable coupon codes: “SAVE150” and “ARMMPPS“. This PC is equipped with a liquid-cooled AMD Ryzen 7 5800X 8-core processor, RTX 3080 GPU, 16GB of DDR4-3200MHz RAM, and a 1TB SSD. The RTX 3080 is a solid GPU for 4K gaming and will completely dominate in 1440p gaming. It’s significantly more powerful than the RTX 3070 or the RTX 2080 Ti. It’s also a lot more reasonable priced than the RTX 4080. Other features include an 80PLUS Platinum 1000W power supply and a clear side panel to show off your interior.

$50 Nintendo eShop Gift Card for $39.99

$50 Nintendo eShop Gift Card

You’ll need to be a Costco member to get this deal. A 20{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} discount on a Nintendo eShop gift card is extremely rare. This is an outstanding deal because it comes ahead of Nintendo’s upcoming Mar10 day eShop Sale. Several high-profile Switch titles will drop to $39.99 at the eShop at that time (as well as other games on sale), and you can stack your discounts to maximize your savings.

The Best Deals of the Week

These deals are definitely worth your attention.

This Alienware gaming laptop with an RTX 3060 is $600 off

This Alienware gaming laptop with an RTX 3060 is 0 off
A person types on an Alienware M15 at a desk.

Gaming laptops have appear a lengthy way from just a few a long time ago when they ended up cumbersome and generally underpowered, but thankfully, there are some excellent modern gaming laptop computer offers you can get, like the Alienware M15 R7 from Dell. Of training course, gaming laptops are nevertheless very costly, but this deal from Dell provides the M15 R7 down to $1,100 from $1,700 if you use the code “SAVE100” in mix with the $500 deal it by now has, so be confident to use that for the duration of checkout!

Why you should obtain the Alienware m15 R7

If you don’t know how to select a gaming laptop computer, a single of the initial issues you’ll want to know about is the GPU, and luckily for us the M15 R7 consists of a 6GB RTX 3060, which is a mid-selection gaming GPU and very superior for the selling price tag. What is improved is it’s powering a 15.6-inch screen that is operating a 1080p resolution, which will not tax the RTX 3060 considerably, and will permit you to hit the 165Hz refresh rate the keep track of can take care of far more conveniently. That reported, you are going to however probably have to compromise with graphical configurations to get that refresh price, but for the most aspect, you’ll have a great deal of leeway to get it suitable for your desires.

Besides the good GPU, you also get a 12th Gen Main i7-12700H, which is a mid-to-superior tier CPU so that you will not be bottlenecked there, furthermore you can probably get a little bit of modifying and streaming to Twitch and Youtube if that’s a little something you are fascinated in. You also get an fantastic 16GB of DDR5 Ram, the swiftest on the market place, and it is even established up in twin-channel, so you get a tiny bit of more general performance far too. The only true draw back is the 500GB SSD, which will likely have you achieving for one of these external tricky travel bargains, and the mediocre battery everyday living, which, admittedly, is normally a problem with gaming laptops.

That claimed, the total building of the Dell M15 R7 is reliable, and there’s little to no flex on the keyboard, producing it a great notebook to just take close to with you, particularly specified this offer from Dell, bringing it down to $1,200, or $1,100 if you use the code “SAVE100” so really do not ignore! That said if you want a thing a bit additional adaptable or that isn’t gaming-precise, be confident to test out these other good laptop deals for choices.

Editors’ Recommendations






Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3 laptop with RTX 4050 and Ryzen 7 7735HS gets first notable discount

Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3 laptop with RTX 4050 and Ryzen 7 7735HS gets first notable discount
The RTX 4050-powered Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3 has received a modest 14{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} discount (Image: Lenovo)
The RTX 4050-powered Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3 has received a modest 14{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} discount (Image: Lenovo)

The just recently released Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3 sports Nvidia’s latest entry level gaming GPU in the form of the RTX 4050, but the 15-inch gaming laptop also comes with a rather cheap 120Hz display that may not be the ideal choice for some prospective buyers.

After their official announcement at CES 2023 back in January, Ada Lovelace-powered gaming laptops are finally hitting the market. Although the majority of these machines are launching at rather inflated prices, one of the more affordable RTX 4050 options from the Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3 series has now received a noteworthy discount.

In this case, the reputable retailer antonline is selling the Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3 configuration with the AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS octa-core processor and the aforementioned Nvidia GeForce RTX 4050 dGPU with 6GB of GDDR6 VRAM and an efficient TGP of 85 watts for US$1,099 including free shipping. This deal offers US$177 or 14 percent in savings, which certainly isn’t much in comparison to other recent gaming laptop offers, but it constitutes one of the very first decent discounts for the brand-new Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3.

In addition to the specs mentioned above, this Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3 configuration sports 16GB of DDR5-4800 memory as well as a 512GB PCIe 4.0 NVMe SSD. As expected, gaming laptops in this price range still feature rather basic displays, in this case it’s a 120Hz 1080p IPS display with a peak brightness of 250 nits and just 45{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} of NTSC color space coverage. Therefore, this deal is best suited for gamers who definitely want  to try out one of the latest CPU and GPU combinations, but can live with a rather dim and colorless screen due to the primary usage of an external monitor.

Order the Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3 with an RTX 4050 on sale for US$1,099 at eBay

Please share our article, every link counts!

.170