5 mistakes to avoid with your gaming laptop

5 mistakes to avoid with your gaming laptop

Gaming laptops have been expanding in reputation for yrs now, and consumers commit important time, power, and revenue to receive a laptop that operates best for their demands. To give them the merchandise they are entitled to, laptop makers get crafting the excellent moveable gaming equipment quite severely. Loads of analysis, budget, and time goes into the development of a gaming laptop computer that balances electric power with portability and aesthetics.

But the do the job to be certain that you have the finest gaming laptop for the great gaming encounter doesn’t commence and conclusion when you section with your tricky-attained funds both. It’s crucial that you do all the things you can to optimize its overall performance in purchase to carry out the very best in your device. 

And in buy to best achieve that, there are a number of issues that you must in no way do with your gaming laptop. By preventing these 5 massive ‘don’ts’ and ‘nevers,’ you are going to be well on your way to getting a gaming laptop computer that reaches its complete likely.

a screenshot of the power and battery settings screen

(Image credit history: Upcoming)

1. Never settle for default configurations

Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI: Gaming laptop impresses in the test with the new Ryzen 9

Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI: Gaming laptop impresses in the test with the new Ryzen 9
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB





5568 (5541.55min – 5568.34max) MB/s ∼100{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +65{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00




4093 (4067.17min – 4092.59max) MB/s ∼74{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +21{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00




3650 (3626.52min – 3649.67max) MB/s ∼66{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +8{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
SSSTC CA6-8D1024




3889 (3873.65min – 3888.73max) MB/s ∼70{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +15{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Average WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
  (3377 – 4093, n=3) Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT)
SSSTC CA6-8D1024





3428 (3412.07min – 3428.49max) MB/s ∼62{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +2{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00





3377 (3319.03min – 3377.04max) MB/s ∼61{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Average of class Gaming
  (834 – 5676, n=187, last 2 years) Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W
SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N





2756 (2741.19min – 2756.29max) MB/s ∼49{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -18{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Asus ROG Strix G18 G814JI
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM




1870 (1827.25min – 1869.82max) MB/s ∼34{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -45{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB




7531 (7479min – 7530.7max) MB/s ∼100{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +175{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W
SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N




4250 (4204.35min – 4249.88max) MB/s ∼56{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +55{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
SSSTC CA6-8D1024





3798 (3750.39min – 3798.15max) MB/s ∼50{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +38{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00




3416 (3372.4min – 3415.84max) MB/s ∼45{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +25{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00





3366 (3313.08min – 3366.35max) MB/s ∼45{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +23{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Average of class Gaming
  (399 – 7889, n=186, last 2 years) Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT)
SSSTC CA6-8D1024





3243 (3188.93min – 3243.04max) MB/s ∼43{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +18{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Average WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
  (2743 – 3416, n=3) Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00




2743 (2563.98min – 2742.87max) MB/s ∼36{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Asus ROG Strix G18 G814JI
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM





2166 (2094.01min – 2166.15max) MB/s ∼29{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -21{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB





12556 (4870.54min – 12556.3max) MB/s ∼100{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +150{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W
SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N




7048 (6068.56min – 7047.9max) MB/s ∼56{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +40{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT)
SSSTC CA6-8D1024 Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
SSSTC CA6-8D1024




6810 (6260.27min – 6809.87max) MB/s ∼54{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +36{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Average of class Gaming
  (1620 – 13195, n=187, last 2 years) Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00 Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00





5017 (4534.25min – 5017.23max) MB/s ∼40{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} 0{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Average WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
  (5017 – 5023, n=3) Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00




5018 (4382.25min – 5017.89max) MB/s ∼40{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Asus ROG Strix G18 G814JI
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM





4239 (3584.87min – 4239.18max) MB/s ∼34{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -16{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB





10261 (10045.2min – 10261.4max) MB/s ∼100{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +228{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W
SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N





6004 (5933.65min – 6004.3max) MB/s ∼59{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +92{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT)
SSSTC CA6-8D1024




4831 (4610.18min – 4830.79max) MB/s ∼47{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +55{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
SSSTC CA6-8D1024





4426 (4263.58min – 4426.04max) MB/s ∼43{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +42{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Average of class Gaming
  (86.2 – 10261, n=187, last 2 years) Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00





3429 (3365.09min – 3429.47max) MB/s ∼33{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +10{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00




3387 (3363.41min – 3386.9max) MB/s ∼33{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +8{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Average WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
  (3125 – 3429, n=3) Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00




3125 (3099.17min – 3124.97max) MB/s ∼30{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Asus ROG Strix G18 G814JI
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM




2982 (2920.07min – 2981.52max) MB/s ∼29{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -5{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB





79 (77.42min – 79.03max) MB/s ∼100{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +47{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
SSSTC CA6-8D1024





74.5 (73.46min – 74.52max) MB/s ∼94{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +39{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Average of class Gaming
  (23.3 – 97.4, n=187, last 2 years) Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W
SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N





64.3 (63.09min – 64.34max) MB/s ∼81{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +20{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00




62.5 (61.85min – 62.46max) MB/s ∼79{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +16{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00




61.5 (60.59min – 61.49max) MB/s ∼78{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +15{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Average WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
  (53.7 – 62.5, n=3) Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00




53.7 (52.37min – 53.65max) MB/s ∼68{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT)
SSSTC CA6-8D1024




52.5 (50.71min – 52.46max) MB/s ∼66{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -2{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Asus ROG Strix G18 G814JI
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM





30.6 (30.29min – 30.64max) MB/s ∼39{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -43{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
SSSTC CA6-8D1024




280 (267.82min – 279.79max) MB/s ∼100{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +71{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00





239 (230.87min – 239.2max) MB/s ∼85{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +46{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00




236 (223.33min – 235.64max) MB/s ∼84{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +44{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB




221 (218.91min – 220.66max) MB/s ∼79{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +35{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Average WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
  (163.8 – 239, n=3) Average of class Gaming
  (66.6 – 421, n=186, last 2 years) Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W
SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N





164.3 (163.26min – 164.34max) MB/s ∼59{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} 0{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00




163.8 (162.54min – 163.76max) MB/s ∼59{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT)
SSSTC CA6-8D1024




126.7 (123.88min – 126.69max) MB/s ∼45{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -23{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Asus ROG Strix G18 G814JI
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM





116.3 (111.83min – 116.33max) MB/s ∼42{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -29{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
SSSTC CA6-8D1024





3203 (3180.36min – 3203.41max) MB/s ∼100{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +274{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Average of class Gaming
  (310 – 5829, n=186, last 2 years) Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB





2148 (1952.04min – 2148.3max) MB/s ∼67{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +151{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00




1533 (1526.72min – 1532.76max) MB/s ∼48{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +79{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00




1527 (1525.66min – 1526.54max) MB/s ∼48{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +78{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Average WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
  (857 – 1533, n=3) Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W
SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N




1158 (1132.18min – 1157.71max) MB/s ∼36{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +35{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00





857 (717.83min – 857.03max) MB/s ∼27{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT)
SSSTC CA6-8D1024





843 (833.55min – 843.1max) MB/s ∼26{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -2{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Asus ROG Strix G18 G814JI
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM





613 (588.72min – 613.33max) MB/s ∼19{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -28{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00





2783 (2698.54min – 2783.41max) MB/s ∼100{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +812{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00




2689 (2088.87min – 2688.7max) MB/s ∼97{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +782{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
SSSTC CA6-8D1024




2209 (1041.25min – 2208.74max) MB/s ∼79{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +624{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB





2101 (1969.73min – 2101.4max) MB/s ∼75{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +589{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Average of class Gaming
  (288 – 4383, n=186, last 2 years) Average WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
  (305 – 2783, n=3) Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W
SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N





481 (462.66min – 481.19max) MB/s ∼17{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +58{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Asus ROG Strix G18 G814JI
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM




441 (428.19min – 440.55max) MB/s ∼16{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +45{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00





305 (269.91min – 305.05max) MB/s ∼11{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT)
SSSTC CA6-8D1024




288 (123min – 287.76max) MB/s ∼10{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -6{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
SSSTC CA6-8D1024 Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W
SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N Average of class Gaming
  (910 – 10330, n=176, last 2 years) Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00 Average WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
  (4118 – 5610, n=2) Asus ROG Strix G18 G814JI
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00 Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT)
SSSTC CA6-8D1024 Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
SSSTC CA6-8D1024


3490 Points ∼100{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +190{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB Average of class Gaming
  (389 – 3629, n=176, last 2 years) Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00 Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W
SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N Average WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
  (1204 – 1761, n=2) Asus ROG Strix G18 G814JI
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT)
SSSTC CA6-8D1024 Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00 Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W
SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00 Average of class Gaming
  (338 – 5157, n=176, last 2 years) Average WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
  (2387 – 3010, n=2) Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
SSSTC CA6-8D1024 Asus ROG Strix G18 G814JI
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00 Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT)
SSSTC CA6-8D1024 Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
SSSTC CA6-8D1024 Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W
SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT)
SSSTC CA6-8D1024 Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00 Average of class Gaming
  (925 – 9971, n=176, last 2 years) Average WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
  (3846 – 4308, n=2) Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00 Asus ROG Strix G18 G814JI
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
SSSTC CA6-8D1024


3951.34 MB/s ∼46{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +117{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W
SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N Average of class Gaming
  (308 – 8590, n=176, last 2 years) Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00 Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT)
SSSTC CA6-8D1024 Average WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
  (1821 – 2891, n=2) Asus ROG Strix G18 G814JI
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00 Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
SSSTC CA6-8D1024 Average of class Gaming
  (20 – 108, n=176, last 2 years) Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W
SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00 Average WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
  (51.3 – 58.8, n=2) Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00 Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT)
SSSTC CA6-8D1024 Asus ROG Strix G18 G814JI
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
SSSTC CA6-8D1024 Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00 Average WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
  (196.8 – 221, n=2) Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00 Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W
SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N Average of class Gaming
  (18 – 364, n=176, last 2 years) Asus ROG Strix G18 G814JI
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT)
SSSTC CA6-8D1024 Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
SSSTC CA6-8D1024


2843.31 MB/s ∼100{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +270{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB


1942.29 MB/s ∼68{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +153{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Average of class Gaming
  (216 – 2963, n=176, last 2 years) Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00 Average WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
  (768 – 1272, n=2) Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W
SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N Asus ROG Strix G18 G814JI
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00 Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT)
SSSTC CA6-8D1024 Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W
SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00 Average of class Gaming
  (243 – 4381, n=176, last 2 years) Average WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
  (2008 – 2500, n=2) Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00 Asus ROG Strix G18 G814JI
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
SSSTC CA6-8D1024 Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT)
SSSTC CA6-8D1024 Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00 Average WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
  (0.087 – 0.121, n=2) Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00 Average of class Gaming
  (0.02 – 0.23, n=171, last 2 years) Asus ROG Strix G18 G814JI
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT)
SSSTC CA6-8D1024 Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W
SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
SSSTC CA6-8D1024 Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB Asus ROG Strix G18 G814JI
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM Average of class Gaming
  (0.012 – 0.425, n=176, last 2 years)





0.05664 ms * ∼47{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -198{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
SSSTC CA6-8D1024 Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT)
SSSTC CA6-8D1024 Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W
SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00 Average WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
  (0.017 – 0.019, n=2) Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00

* … smaller is better

The Razer Blade 16 is The MacBook Pro of Gaming Laptops

The Razer Blade 16 is The MacBook Pro of Gaming Laptops

The Razer Blade 16 is finally here, following in the footsteps of Apple after the Cupertino company shifted its MacBook Pro design to a 16-inch model. This lets the high-end gaming laptop continue to claim the “MacBook of gaming laptops” title for another year, but even if Razer hadn’t upped the computer’s screen size, it would be a hard comparison to shake. Just like Apple’s high-end laptops, this is a gorgeous machine with an aluminum unibody design and a trackpad that’s way bigger than it needs to be.

But while Apple’s pro-level laptops are limited to what the M2 Pro and M2 Max can do, the Razer Blade 16 is equipped with the best processors and graphics cards from Intel and Nvidia, respectively. For the unit I got in for review, that means an Intel Core i9-13950HX and an Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090. But unlike something like the MSI Titan GT77 HX, the focus is on portability rather than raw power, so you’re not getting quite the same level of performance with the Razer Blade 16.

If you’re in the market for a portable gaming laptop that can easily handle most games at 4K without batting an eyelid, the Razer Blade 16 definitely gets the job done. And the bonus is that you won’t look like a gamer when you whip this laptop out at the coffee shop – aside from its copious RGB lighting, of course.

Razer still charges an Apple level premium

The Razer Blade 16 is an expensive gaming laptop. The Razer Blade in general has been one of the most expensive gaming laptops on the market for a long time, but the new model takes it to another level. This laptop starts at an eye-watering $2,699, and that model comes equipped with an Intel Core i9-13950HX and an Nvidia RTX 4060.

You can upgrade the laptop from there, though every single model comes with the same high-end processor. The price goes all the way up to $4,299, which will get you an RTX 4090, 32GB and two(!!) 1TB SSDs. That’s the model I got in for review, and I can confirm that it’s absolutely overkill for most people.

The happy middle-ground will probably be the model with 16GB of RAM and an RTX 4070, which clocks in at $2,999. That’s still an extremely expensive gaming laptop, but the display is really what you’re paying for here, and there’s nothing else on the market like it.

What’s funny is that even though Razer has had to put up with being compared with one of the most expensive laptops on the market for years now, its flagship Blade laptop is now more expensive to start than the MacBook Pro 16, which starts for $200 less at $2,499. So, maybe now the MacBook Pro is the Razer Blade of professional laptops.

Razer Blade 16 from back

Photo: Jackie Thomas / Gizmodo

The Razer Blade 16 is prettier than most gaming laptops

The Razer Blade 16 is gorgeous. There’s no other way around that. Every single year that Razer puts out a new laptop, it improves upon the already fantastic design to make an even more luxurious gaming laptop, and the Blade 16 does exactly that again.

You’re getting the same aluminum unibody chassis, punctuated by more ports than anyone would expect out of a laptop of this size. You get three USB-A ports, an HDMI connection, 2 USB-C ports with Thunderbolt 4, an SD card reader and a dedicated charging port. This isn’t the thinnest laptop out there, but it’s still way thinner than a gaming laptop with these specs has any right to be, making the port selection more impressive than it would be on other gaming laptops.

The Razer Blade 16 measures in at just 0.87 inches thick, and weighs in at 5.4 pounds. That’s not quite ultrabook-level dimensions, but even after carrying this thing around in my backpack for weeks, I can attest that it feels pretty similar to a specced-out MacBook in my backpack. The only difference is that this can capably run The Witcher 3 after its next-gen update without any issues.

The only thing that really weighs it down from there (literally) is the huge power brick. That’s kind of a necessary evil with all the power-hungry components in this laptop, but if you’re carrying around the charger, it adds a few pounds to the weight. And, trust me, you’re going to be carrying around the charger if you’re going to be working on this thing for any extended period of time.

4K gaming at higher than 60 fps is no problem for the mobile RTX 4090

The mobile Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 is an absolute beast of a graphics card. It doesn’t quite reach the same levels as the desktop version, of course, but this level of GPU performance in a laptop is a big deal.

There are going to be gaming laptops out there that outperform the Razer Blade 16 with a similar graphics card. The MSI Titan GT77, for instance, has much more space for cooling and runs the RTX 4090 at a higher wattage than the Razer Blade 16 does. So, if you’re after raw performance, you’re probably better off getting a bulkier gaming laptop.

But if you’re looking for something that balances portability with gaming performance, you’re in for a treat here. There isn’t a single game in the Gizmodo test suite that the Razer Blade 16 wasn’t able to run way above 60 fps, usually while also running at 4K. The lowest performance was in Metro Exodus, but even that managed 68 fps at 4K, and even when I enabled ray tracing without DLSS, it was able to get around 49 fps. Enable DLSS, and that number goes all the way up to 79 fps.

Razer Blade 16 left side ports

Photo: Jackie Thomas / Gizmodo

Far Cry 5 shows just how much of a 4K powerhouse this gaming laptop is, with the laptop managing 94 fps at the native resolution of 3,840 x 2,400. Even in games that aren’t part of our usual test suite, this is one of the gaming laptops to beat. I took the Razer Blade 16 with me to MagicCon Philly, and basically spent an evening playing the Witcher 3 next-gen update at 1600p. At that resolution, and with all the eye candy turned way up, I was able to get a solid 80 fps.

That’s less than the 2400p native resolution, but the Witcher 3 next-gen update is notoriously hard to run and I notoriously don’t compromise on visual quality for nothing. The Razer Blade 16 enables my bullshit pickiness with PC game graphics, and I love it for that.

The Razer Blade is still one of the best gaming laptops for productivity

Even beyond gaming performance, the Razer Blade 16 is a beast of a laptop. The laptop manages a Geekbench 5 score of 19,820 in multi-core and 1,975 in single-core. That’s less than the fully unlocked MSI Titan, but again, the cooling allows the MSI laptop to push the CPU harder than the Razer Blade 16.

In Blender, the Razer Blade 16 is able to push through the BMW demo in just 1 minute and 27 seconds, which actually beats out the Titan in the same test. It does fall behind the Titan in Handbrake, but not by much, processing the same video file in 2 minutes and 50 seconds, just 6 seconds slower than MSI’s flagship.

The sleek design of the Razer Blade 16 makes it less obnoxious in the office, and if you need a high-power workstation as a creative professional, I’d be hard pressed to find something more fitting for your needs – at least without forking over the cash for an actual professional workstation like .

Razer Blade 16

Photo: Jackie Thomas / Gizmodo

The keyboard and trackpad are a weak link

The Razer Blade 16 has a fairly average chiclet keyboard, backed with some juicy RGB lighting. I was able to keep my unimpressive 89 WPM typing speed with no errors, so you don’t have to worry about repeat key presses or anything.

One thing that has come up in my time with the Razer Blade 15 is the large trackpad. It’s nice having a huge space for Windows 11 gestures as such, but the palm rejection really should be better for a trackpad that takes up so much of the chassis.

While working on this device, I’ve regularly accidentally triggered the touchpad, losing my place in documents or even clicking into an entirely different tab or window. You can get over this by using a gaming mouse and disabling the trackpad, but you really shouldn’t have to do that when you’re spending this much on a gaming laptop.

One of the Razer Blade 16’s biggest selling points, and probably a huge reason behind the high price, is the display. You’re getting a 16-inch mini-LED display with a ‘dual refresh rate.’ Basically what this means is that, at the native resolution of 3,840 x 2,400, you’re getting a 120Hz refresh rate. But if you lower the resolution to 1,920 x 1,200, you can up the refresh rate to 240Hz. This is great news for esports gamers that might want to use the laptop’s horsepower to drive high framerates in games like Valorant or Overwatch.

The only catch is that, to switch between these two modes, you can’t simply navigate to the Windows 11 Display Settings page and change the resolution there. Instead, you need to go into Razer Synapse, look under its display tab, and change the “Native Display Mode” to your desired resolution and refresh rate. Then, you need to restart the system.

It’s not the biggest deal in the world, but it would have been nice if you could have switched between the two resolutions on the fly when you’re playing different games. Maybe in a future release.

The display itself is gorgeous, however. The mini-LED technology that drives it allows for incredible color accuracy with some of the deepest blacks I’ve ever seen in a laptop display. It gets pretty bright, too, measuring in with a peak brightness of 473 nits. That’s not quite as high as something like the MacBook Pro, but it’s more than you’ll find on most gaming laptops.

If the luxe chassis design isn’t enough to sell you on the high price tag, the display might just be the thing that convinces you to drop thousands of dollars on the Razer Blade 16. Especially for creative professionals that’ll want the power of the RTX 4090 behind a display that can keep up with their Adobe needs.

The Razer Blade 16‘s speakers make gaming headphones optional

To test the audio, I pulled up “Heart & Feather” by Twin Tribes, and the Razer Blade 16 passed with flying colors. Unlike a lot of Windows laptops, the Razer Blade 16 has two giant speaker grilles on either side of the keyboard, each of which is equipped with a tweeter and a woofer.

It’s not going to be the same as a dedicated set of computer speakers or anything, don’t get me wrong. But it’s still more than enough for room-filling sound with actually audible bass. This means that even though the fan can get extremely loud under heavy load, you don’t need to break out a gaming headset just to play some games.

Even at max volume, there’s no hint of cracking or shaking, even in bass-heavy tracks. This is yet another way the Razer Blade just exudes luxury out of every pore.

Razer Blade 16 right side ports

Photo: Jackie Thomas / Gizmodo

Less than 4 hours of battery life on video alone

The Razer Blade 16 is a gaming laptop, packed with the most powerful and power-hungry components on the market today, so from the get-go, the outlook for battery life isn’t great.

Don’t get me wrong, it’s not like the Razer Blade 16 is going to die after an hour of browsing Chrome. But at the same time, I wouldn’t trust it to get through a workday without packing the charger. In Gizmodo’s simple video playback battery test, where we stream a YouTube video at 200 nits, the Razer Blade 16 lasts just 3 hours and 43 minutes. That’s enough to get through most movies in one charge, so it’s not the end of the world.

But with so many laptops able to hit the 10 or 12 hour mark these days, the Razer Blade 16 simply isn’t the laptop to get if you’re looking for a device that will last through a long flight without having to break out a charger.

Unfortunately the charger is a bit of a chore to carry around, too. Because of the requirement for a 330W GAn charger, the power brick is huge and heavy. So, while the laptop itself weighs just over 5lb, if you’re going to be carrying it around with its power brick, the total weight comes in closer to 8lb. That’s not a deal breaker by any means, just something to be aware of if you plan on commuting with the thing.

Razer Blade 16 with lid closed

Photo: Jackie Thomas / Gizmodo

The Razer Blade 16 is gorgeous, luxurious and powerful. That’s enough to get a lot of people on its side, but all of that comes with a dark side: the price. This is one of the most expensive gaming laptops on the market, even with its base configuration. You can absolutely get the same level of performance for less money elsewhere, and you probably should if all you care about is your raw frame rate in PC games.

But, like the MacBook Pro, if you want a nice looking product that you can carry around everywhere you go and not get awkward stares, the Razer Blade 16 is hard to beat. It’s a quality machine that will last you years before it starts to have trouble running the latest PC games. And the dual display mode means that even if you do have to shift down to 1080p in the distant future, you’re at least going to be getting a better refresh rate out of the deal.

Save $550 on ASUS’ ROG Zephyrus M16 RTX 3070 Ti Gaming Laptop in return to $1,600 low

Save 0 on ASUS’ ROG Zephyrus M16 RTX 3070 Ti Gaming Laptop in return to ,600 low

Ideal Get is at present presenting the 2022 ASUS ROG Zephyrus M16 i9/16GB/1TB/RTX 3070 Ti Gaming Notebook for $1,599.99 delivered. Usually likely for $2,150, this stable $550 discount marks a return to the all-time reduced rate we have witnessed for this laptop design. The ROG Zephyrus will occur functioning Microsoft’s flagship functioning procedure, Windows 11, and will be powered by its Intel i9-12900H 14-core processor and RTX 3070 Ti graphics. The 16-inch 2560×1600 165Hz IPS-level display is PANTONE-qualified with 100{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} coverage of the sRGB shade gamut for imaginative do the job with “incredible coloration precision and clarity.” Wi-Fi 6E, Dolby Atmos guidance, a solitary USB-C 3.2 Gen 2 port, two USB-A 3.2 Gen 2 ports, a Thunderbolt 4 port, and HDMI output spherical out this gaming machine. Head underneath for more.

On a tighter funds? Check out out the Acer Nitro 5 i7/8GB/512GB/RTX 3050 Ti Gaming Notebook for $834 instead. Right here you are going to be working with the 11th gen Intel i7 processor with RTX 3050 Ti graphics, which is a stage down from the 3070 Ti existing with the ASUS alternative above. The monitor is marginally smaller at 15.6-inches and ways down to a 1080p 144Hz resolution and refresh level. The complete sum of RAM obtainable right here is also slice in 50 {b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} to 8GB though that is however plenty for most modern-day online games to run nicely. Wi-Fi 6 help is also present below.

By now have a gaming desktop and want to enhance your present GPU? We’re now monitoring the GIGABYTE Gaming OC RX 6750 XT 12GB GPU marked down to $380, the new all-time lower price tag. Leveraging AMD’s very last-generation know-how, the RX 6750 XT is even now a solid graphics card for your gaming rig. Designed to tun titles at equally 1080p and 1440p at significant or extremely settings in quite a few online games, it can even take care of higher refresh charge gaming too. In addition, there’s HDMI 2.1 and DisplayPort 1.4a so you can run 4K144 and 8K60 monitors about a solitary cable.

ASUS ROG Zephyrus M16 i9/16GB/1TB/RTX 3070 Ti Gaming Laptop functions:

Dive headfirst into one of the best gaming notebook activities on Windows 11. The ROG Zephyrus M16 packs a 14-core Intel Main i9-12900H CPU and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti GPU into a tremendous skinny gaming laptop computer. Delight in a quickly 165Hz refresh charge, 16GB of RAM, and 1TB of PCIe 4. SSD storage all wrapped in a light 4.41 lbs chassis. The foreseeable future is slim and mild.


Subscribe to the 9to5Toys YouTube Channel for all of the hottest video clips, opinions, and more!

ASUS ROG Strix G17 Gaming Laptop is at a 30{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} OFF

ASUS ROG Strix G17 Gaming Laptop is at a 30{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} OFF

Seeking to invest in a gaming notebook?

The ASUS ROG Strix G17 gaming notebook can now be yours at an exciting offer you price. Verify out the deal down below.

About the ASUS ROG Strix G17

The ASUS ROG Strix G17 gaming laptop computer is run by AMD Ryzen 7 4800H Mobile Processor with a optimum clock speed of 4.2GHz and operates on the Windows 11 Dwelling-based functioning procedure. The device also has a RAM of 16GB (comprising of two 8GB DDR4 SO-DIMM RAM) and a PCIe 3. NVMe M.2 SSD of 1TB. It also involves two M.2 slots as perfectly for storage enlargement.

The gaming laptop computer also features a 17.3-inch show with a display screen resolution of 1920 x 1080 pixels and a brightness rate of 250 nits. The device also has a refresh amount of 144Hz and a distinction ratio of 1:1000 with Adaptive-Sync. It also has a backlit chiclet keyboard with 4-zone RGB.

Connectivity ports on the product include things like an RJ45 LAN port, a USB 3.2 Gen 2 sort-C port, and 3 USB 3.2 Gen 1 form-A ports. The gadget also supports Wi-Fi 6(802.11ax) with dual-band assist and Bluetooth connectivity assist of model 5.1. It also supports AI noise-canceling technological innovation and Dolby Atmos.

The gaming laptop is also equipped with a 4-mobile Li-ion battery which will be in a position to provide a battery everyday living 56WHrs.

The Offer on Amazon

The ASUS ROG Strix G17 gaming laptop computer on Amazon has had a 30{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} discount on its precise listing rate of Rs. 1,21,990. You can now purchase the gaming laptop computer at a rate of Rs. 85,990. An EMI facility is also accessible with the products together with a no-expense EMI possibility on selected playing cards. Common EMI starts off at Rs. 4,108 for each month and no-charge EMI on picked playing cards commences at a rate of Rs. 3,874.34 for every month.

There are also 8 lender offers available with the solution which features,

  • A 10{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} instantaneous discount of upto Rs. 1,500 on HDFC Lender credit history card transactions for a least buy of Rs. 5,000.
  • A flat 5{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} prompt unrestricted lower price on the Amazon Fork out ICICI credit score card transactions, solely for Amazon Primary shoppers.
  • A 7.5{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} immediate low cost of upto Rs. 1,500 on Sure Bank credit score card EMI transactions for orders of Rs. 10,000 and much more.
  • A 10{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} immediate low cost of upto Rs. 500 on IDBI Financial institution card transactions for purchases of Rs. 2,000 and a lot more.
  • A 7.5{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} fast price cut of upto Rs. 2,000 on HSBC credit history card EMI transactions for a bare minimum purchase of Rs. 8,000.
  • A 5{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} fast price cut of upto Rs. 250 on HSBC Cashback credit score card transactions for orders of Rs.  1,000 and more.
  • A 5{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} fast price cut of upto Rs. 500 on Fi debit card transactions for a minimum amount of Rs. 2,500.
  • A 10{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} prompt lower price of upto Rs. 250 on City Union Bank Mastercard debit card transactions for orders of Rs. 500 and far more.

Amazon also provides three partner provides along with the system. Shoppers will get a totally free 2-week BYJU’S basis course worth Rs 999 alongside with the products. A cost-free Spotify Premium membership is also component of the deal. By acquiring the GST invoice, prospects will also be equipped to get a 28{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} off on their small business purchases.

So folks, why wait? Seize the offer now!

Disclaimer: This posting has been released dependent on the particulars given on the Amazon shopping web-site. The Tech Outlook will not be dependable for any difficulties relating to the obtain of the merchandise.

Razer Blade 15 OLED (early 2022) review: A compact gaming laptop with an RTX 3070 Ti

Razer Blade 15 OLED (early 2022) review: A compact gaming laptop with an RTX 3070 Ti
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW





4199 (4194.93min – 4199.13max) MB/s ∼100{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +18{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Razer Blade 15 2022
SSSTC CA6-8D1024




4119 (4098.66min – 4118.81max) MB/s ∼98{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +16{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Aorus 15 XE5
Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10




4117 (3552.16min – 4116.81max) MB/s ∼98{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +16{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

HP Omen 16-b1090ng
WDC PC SN810 1TB




3928 (3889.8min – 3927.66max) MB/s ∼94{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +10{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH




3764 (3540.2min – 3763.76max) MB/s ∼90{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +6{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
  (1761 – 4634, n=49) Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR




3564 (3515.46min – 3563.69max) MB/s ∼85{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Average of class Gaming
  (834 – 5676, n=182, last 2 years) Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH




4767 (4365.51min – 4766.62max) MB/s ∼100{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +35{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Schenker XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW




4299 (4288.86min – 4298.95max) MB/s ∼90{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +22{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Aorus 15 XE5
Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10





4236 (3477.46min – 4236.46max) MB/s ∼89{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +20{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Razer Blade 15 2022
SSSTC CA6-8D1024




4167 (4120.63min – 4166.62max) MB/s ∼87{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +18{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

HP Omen 16-b1090ng
WDC PC SN810 1TB




4033 (3953.13min – 4032.82max) MB/s ∼85{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +14{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
  (2226 – 4516, n=49) Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR




3531 (3391.93min – 3530.77max) MB/s ∼74{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Average of class Gaming
  (399 – 7889, n=181, last 2 years) Aorus 15 XE5
Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10





7020 (5888.98min – 7020.02max) MB/s ∼100{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +5{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Razer Blade 15 2022
SSSTC CA6-8D1024





6921 (6631.14min – 6921.02max) MB/s ∼99{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +4{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

HP Omen 16-b1090ng
WDC PC SN810 1TB




6867 (6210.3min – 6866.91max) MB/s ∼98{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +3{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Schenker XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW




6847 (6590.72min – 6846.78max) MB/s ∼98{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +3{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR





6663 (6017.91min – 6663.07max) MB/s ∼95{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH




6550 (5497.59min – 6549.73max) MB/s ∼93{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -2{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
  (3421 – 7061, n=49) Average of class Gaming
  (1620 – 13195, n=182, last 2 years) HP Omen 16-b1090ng
WDC PC SN810 1TB




5412 (5265.32min – 5411.99max) MB/s ∼100{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +9{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Schenker XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW




4999 (4982.73min – 4998.98max) MB/s ∼92{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} 0{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR




4980 (4904.66min – 4979.58max) MB/s ∼92{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH





4876 (4374.87min – 4876.3max) MB/s ∼90{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -2{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
  (2226 – 5259, n=49) Razer Blade 15 2022
SSSTC CA6-8D1024





4740 (4542.15min – 4740.19max) MB/s ∼88{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -5{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Aorus 15 XE5
Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10




4421 (4173.33min – 4420.8max) MB/s ∼82{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -11{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Average of class Gaming
  (86.2 – 10261, n=182, last 2 years) Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR





81.2 (79.58min – 81.23max) MB/s ∼100{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Aorus 15 XE5
Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10





80.6 (67.84min – 80.61max) MB/s ∼99{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -1{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Razer Blade 15 2022
SSSTC CA6-8D1024





79.6 (78.85min – 79.63max) MB/s ∼98{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -2{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Schenker XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW




77.9 (77.66min – 77.9max) MB/s ∼96{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -4{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
  (48.7 – 97.4, n=49) HP Omen 16-b1090ng
WDC PC SN810 1TB





77.1 (76.91min – 77.11max) MB/s ∼95{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -5{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH





74.3 (71.59min – 74.33max) MB/s ∼92{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -8{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Average of class Gaming
  (23.3 – 97.4, n=182, last 2 years) Aorus 15 XE5
Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10





333 (331.94min – 333.25max) MB/s ∼100{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +57{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH





264 (263.57min – 264.44max) MB/s ∼79{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +25{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Razer Blade 15 2022
SSSTC CA6-8D1024





256 (23.49min – 256.28max) MB/s ∼77{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +21{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Schenker XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW




239 (238.19min – 238.82max) MB/s ∼72{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +13{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR




212 (209.62min – 211.78max) MB/s ∼64{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

HP Omen 16-b1090ng
WDC PC SN810 1TB




205 (195.73min – 204.56max) MB/s ∼62{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -3{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Average of class Gaming
  (66.6 – 421, n=181, last 2 years) Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
  (49.9 – 275, n=49) Schenker XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW





4309 (4179.96min – 4309.38max) MB/s ∼100{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +4{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR





4152 (4133.05min – 4152.1max) MB/s ∼96{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Aorus 15 XE5
Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10





3566 (3562.85min – 3566.11max) MB/s ∼83{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -14{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Razer Blade 15 2022
SSSTC CA6-8D1024




3184 (3180.75min – 3183.86max) MB/s ∼74{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -23{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH




2855 (2482.75min – 2854.87max) MB/s ∼66{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -31{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
  (376 – 4185, n=49) Average of class Gaming
  (310 – 5829, n=181, last 2 years) HP Omen 16-b1090ng
WDC PC SN810 1TB




1528 (1477.56min – 1527.59max) MB/s ∼35{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -63{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Aorus 15 XE5
Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10




3600 (3594.9min – 3599.81max) MB/s ∼100{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +3{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR




3512 (3421.77min – 3511.78max) MB/s ∼98{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Schenker XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW





3435 (2876.62min – 3435.27max) MB/s ∼95{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -2{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH




2694 (2561.51min – 2693.92max) MB/s ∼75{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -23{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Razer Blade 15 2022
SSSTC CA6-8D1024





2141 (2137.08min – 2141.26max) MB/s ∼59{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -39{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Average of class Gaming
  (288 – 4383, n=181, last 2 years) Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
  (291 – 3559, n=49) HP Omen 16-b1090ng
WDC PC SN810 1TB




585 (555.77min – 584.61max) MB/s ∼16{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -83{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Aorus 15 XE5
Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10 Schenker XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW Razer Blade 15 2022
SSSTC CA6-8D1024 Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
  (2577 – 9147, n=50) Average of class Gaming
  (910 – 10330, n=171, last 2 years) HP Omen 16-b1090ng
WDC PC SN810 1TB Aorus 15 XE5
Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10 Razer Blade 15 2022
SSSTC CA6-8D1024 Schenker XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
  (983 – 3469, n=50) Average of class Gaming
  (389 – 3629, n=171, last 2 years) HP Omen 16-b1090ng
WDC PC SN810 1TB Aorus 15 XE5
Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10 Schenker XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
  (921 – 4043, n=50) HP Omen 16-b1090ng
WDC PC SN810 1TB Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR Average of class Gaming
  (338 – 5157, n=171, last 2 years) Razer Blade 15 2022
SSSTC CA6-8D1024 Razer Blade 15 2022
SSSTC CA6-8D1024 Aorus 15 XE5
Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10 HP Omen 16-b1090ng
WDC PC SN810 1TB Schenker XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
  (2834 – 5588, n=50) Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR Average of class Gaming
  (925 – 9971, n=171, last 2 years) Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH Razer Blade 15 2022
SSSTC CA6-8D1024 Schenker XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR Aorus 15 XE5
Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10 Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
  (1617 – 4477, n=50) Average of class Gaming
  (308 – 8590, n=171, last 2 years) HP Omen 16-b1090ng
WDC PC SN810 1TB Aorus 15 XE5
Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10 HP Omen 16-b1090ng
WDC PC SN810 1TB Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
  (45.9 – 88.1, n=50) Razer Blade 15 2022
SSSTC CA6-8D1024 Schenker XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW Average of class Gaming
  (20 – 108, n=171, last 2 years) Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH Aorus 15 XE5
Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10 HP Omen 16-b1090ng
WDC PC SN810 1TB Razer Blade 15 2022
SSSTC CA6-8D1024 Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH Schenker XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
  (118.6 – 241, n=50) Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR Average of class Gaming
  (18 – 364, n=171, last 2 years) Aorus 15 XE5
Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10


2909.44 MB/s ∼100{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +25{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Razer Blade 15 2022
SSSTC CA6-8D1024 Schenker XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
  (421 – 2854, n=50) Average of class Gaming
  (216 – 2963, n=171, last 2 years) HP Omen 16-b1090ng
WDC PC SN810 1TB Aorus 15 XE5
Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10


3193.44 MB/s ∼100{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +34{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Schenker XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
  (367 – 3451, n=50) HP Omen 16-b1090ng
WDC PC SN810 1TB Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH Average of class Gaming
  (243 – 4381, n=171, last 2 years) Razer Blade 15 2022
SSSTC CA6-8D1024 Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR Schenker XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW Average of class Gaming
  (0.022 – 0.23, n=166, last 2 years) Aorus 15 XE5
Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10 Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH HP Omen 16-b1090ng
WDC PC SN810 1TB Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
  (0.02 – 0.083, n=50) Razer Blade 15 2022
SSSTC CA6-8D1024 Razer Blade 15 2022
SSSTC CA6-8D1024 Average of class Gaming
  (0.012 – 0.425, n=171, last 2 years)





0.05756 ms * ∼99{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -162{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
  (0.018 – 0.101, n=50) Schenker XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH HP Omen 16-b1090ng
WDC PC SN810 1TB Aorus 15 XE5
Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10

* … smaller is better