Gaming Laptop Archives - Page 6 of 15

March 15, 2023

Save $550 on ASUS’ ROG Zephyrus M16 RTX 3070 Ti Gaming Laptop in return to $1,600 low

Save 0 on ASUS’ ROG Zephyrus M16 RTX 3070 Ti Gaming Laptop in return to ,600 low

Ideal Get is at present presenting the 2022 ASUS ROG Zephyrus M16 i9/16GB/1TB/RTX 3070 Ti Gaming Notebook for $1,599.99 delivered. Usually likely for $2,150, this stable $550 discount marks a return to the all-time reduced rate we have witnessed for this laptop design. The ROG Zephyrus will occur functioning Microsoft’s flagship functioning procedure, Windows 11, and will be powered by its Intel i9-12900H 14-core processor and RTX 3070 Ti graphics. The 16-inch 2560×1600 165Hz IPS-level display is PANTONE-qualified with 100{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} coverage of the sRGB shade gamut for imaginative do the job with “incredible coloration precision and clarity.” Wi-Fi 6E, Dolby Atmos guidance, a solitary USB-C 3.2 Gen 2 port, two USB-A 3.2 Gen 2 ports, a Thunderbolt 4 port, and HDMI output spherical out this gaming machine. Head underneath for more.

On a tighter funds? Check out out the Acer Nitro 5 i7/8GB/512GB/RTX 3050 Ti Gaming Notebook for $834 instead. Right here you are going to be working with the 11th gen Intel i7 processor with RTX 3050 Ti graphics, which is a stage down from the 3070 Ti existing with the ASUS alternative above. The monitor is marginally smaller at 15.6-inches and ways down to a 1080p 144Hz resolution and refresh level. The complete sum of RAM obtainable right here is also slice in 50 {b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} to 8GB though that is however plenty for most modern-day online games to run nicely. Wi-Fi 6 help is also present below.

By now have a gaming desktop and want to enhance your present GPU? We’re now monitoring the GIGABYTE Gaming OC RX 6750 XT 12GB GPU marked down to $380, the new all-time lower price tag. Leveraging AMD’s very last-generation know-how, the RX 6750 XT is even now a solid graphics card for your gaming rig. Designed to tun titles at equally 1080p and 1440p at significant or extremely settings in quite a few online games, it can even take care of higher refresh charge gaming too. In addition, there’s HDMI 2.1 and DisplayPort 1.4a so you can run 4K144 and 8K60 monitors about a solitary cable.

ASUS ROG Zephyrus M16 i9/16GB/1TB/RTX 3070 Ti Gaming Laptop functions:

Dive headfirst into one of the best gaming notebook activities on Windows 11. The ROG Zephyrus M16 packs a 14-core Intel Main i9-12900H CPU and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti GPU into a tremendous skinny gaming laptop computer. Delight in a quickly 165Hz refresh charge, 16GB of RAM, and 1TB of PCIe 4. SSD storage all wrapped in a light 4.41 lbs chassis. The foreseeable future is slim and mild.

Subscribe to the 9to5Toys YouTube Channel for all of the hottest video clips, opinions, and more!

March 14, 2023

Acer Predator Triton 500 SE with Core i9-12900H and RTX 3080 Ti hits lowest price in 30 days on Amazon

Acer Predator Triton 500 SE gaming laptop (Source: Acer)

Advertised by Acer as a slim gaming laptop, the 0.8-inch thin Predator Triton 500 SE has been available since mid-2022 with Alder Lake processor options and GeForce RTX 3000 series GPUs. With a list price of US$2,999.99, the model with Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti, 32 GB LPDDR5 memory, and a 1 TB SSD is now down to US$2,499.99.

Back in June 2022, the Acer Predator Triton 500 SE (PT516-52s-70KX) visited our labs for an in-depth analysis. Now, the PT516-52s-99EL is below the US$2,500 threshold on Amazon, thanks to a 17{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} discount that pushed the US$2,999.99 to the lowest value in 30 days. While it shares the GeForce RTX 3080 Ti mobile GPU with the reviewed model mentioned above, this unit comes with a slightly faster processor and twice the amount of installed memory. However, most of our review’s findings obviously apply to this model as well.

In addition to the graphics adapter with 16 GB dedicated memory mentioned above, the Acer Predator Triton 500 SE (PT516-52s-99EL) features the Intel Core i9-12900H processor, a 16-inch WQXGA IPS 240 Hz G-Sync compatible display with 500 nits brightness, 32 GB of LPDDR5 memory, a 1 TB PCIe Gen 4×4 SSD, Intel Killer DoubleShot Pro with Ethernet E3100 and Wi-Fi 6E AX1675, and runs Windows 11 Home out of the box. The list of connectivity options includes HDMI 2.1 with HDCP support, two USB 3.2 Gen 2 Type-C ports with Thunderbolt 4 and USB charging, and two additional USB 3.2 ports (one Gen 1, and one Gen 2).

In our aforementioned review, the Acer Predator Triton 500 SE didn’t fail to impress, proving capable of offering premium performance. Also priced at a premium level, this laptop has shown some drawbacks in the upgradeability sector, since it comes with soldered-in memory and the SSD is inaccessible without removing the motherboard first. When subjected to heavy loads, the Acer Predator Triton 500 SE becomes pretty hot and very loud. However, for less than US$2,500, the PT516-52s-99EL model provides good value to those looking for a potent mobile gaming machine with a rather simple and slim design.

Buy the Acer Predator Triton 500 SE (PT516-52s-99EL) on Amazon

Disclaimer: Notebookcheck is not responsible for price changes carried out by retailers. The discounted price or deal mentioned in this item was available at the time of writing and may be subject to time restrictions and/or limited unit availability.

Amazon (see affiliate link at the end of the article)

Codrut Nistor – Senior Tech Writer – 5899 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2013

In my early school days, I hated writing and having to make up stories. A decade later, I started to enjoy it. Since then, I published a few offline articles and then I moved to the online space, where I contributed to major websites that are still present online as of 2021 such as Softpedia, Brothersoft, Download3000, but I also wrote for multiple blogs that have disappeared over the years. I’ve been riding with the Notebookcheck crew since 2013 and I am not planning to leave it anytime soon. In love with good mechanical keyboards, vinyl and tape sound, but also smartphones, streaming services, and digital art.

Please share our article, every link counts!

.170

Posted on March 13, 2023
ASUS ROG Strix G17 Gaming Laptop is at a 30{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} OFF

Seeking to invest in a gaming notebook?

The ASUS ROG Strix G17 gaming notebook can now be yours at an exciting offer you price. Verify out the deal down below.

About the ASUS ROG Strix G17

The ASUS ROG Strix G17 gaming laptop computer is run by AMD Ryzen 7 4800H Mobile Processor with a optimum clock speed of 4.2GHz and operates on the Windows 11 Dwelling-based functioning procedure. The device also has a RAM of 16GB (comprising of two 8GB DDR4 SO-DIMM RAM) and a PCIe 3. NVMe M.2 SSD of 1TB. It also involves two M.2 slots as perfectly for storage enlargement.

The gaming laptop computer also features a 17.3-inch show with a display screen resolution of 1920 x 1080 pixels and a brightness rate of 250 nits. The device also has a refresh amount of 144Hz and a distinction ratio of 1:1000 with Adaptive-Sync. It also has a backlit chiclet keyboard with 4-zone RGB.

Connectivity ports on the product include things like an RJ45 LAN port, a USB 3.2 Gen 2 sort-C port, and 3 USB 3.2 Gen 1 form-A ports. The gadget also supports Wi-Fi 6(802.11ax) with dual-band assist and Bluetooth connectivity assist of model 5.1. It also supports AI noise-canceling technological innovation and Dolby Atmos.

The gaming laptop is also equipped with a 4-mobile Li-ion battery which will be in a position to provide a battery everyday living 56WHrs.

The Offer on Amazon

The ASUS ROG Strix G17 gaming laptop computer on Amazon has had a 30{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} discount on its precise listing rate of Rs. 1,21,990. You can now purchase the gaming laptop computer at a rate of Rs. 85,990. An EMI facility is also accessible with the products together with a no-expense EMI possibility on selected playing cards. Common EMI starts off at Rs. 4,108 for each month and no-charge EMI on picked playing cards commences at a rate of Rs. 3,874.34 for every month.

There are also 8 lender offers available with the solution which features,

A 10{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} instantaneous discount of upto Rs. 1,500 on HDFC Lender credit history card transactions for a least buy of Rs. 5,000.

A flat 5{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} prompt unrestricted lower price on the Amazon Fork out ICICI credit score card transactions, solely for Amazon Primary shoppers.

A 7.5{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} immediate low cost of upto Rs. 1,500 on Sure Bank credit score card EMI transactions for orders of Rs. 10,000 and much more.

A 10{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} immediate low cost of upto Rs. 500 on IDBI Financial institution card transactions for purchases of Rs. 2,000 and a lot more.

A 7.5{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} fast price cut of upto Rs. 2,000 on HSBC credit history card EMI transactions for a bare minimum purchase of Rs. 8,000.

A 5{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} fast price cut of upto Rs. 250 on HSBC Cashback credit score card transactions for orders of Rs. 1,000 and more.

A 5{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} fast price cut of upto Rs. 500 on Fi debit card transactions for a minimum amount of Rs. 2,500.

A 10{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} prompt lower price of upto Rs. 250 on City Union Bank Mastercard debit card transactions for orders of Rs. 500 and far more.

Amazon also provides three partner provides along with the system. Shoppers will get a totally free 2-week BYJU’S basis course worth Rs 999 alongside with the products. A cost-free Spotify Premium membership is also component of the deal. By acquiring the GST invoice, prospects will also be equipped to get a 28{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} off on their small business purchases.

So folks, why wait? Seize the offer now!

Disclaimer: This posting has been released dependent on the particulars given on the Amazon shopping web-site. The Tech Outlook will not be dependable for any difficulties relating to the obtain of the merchandise.

Posted on March 12, 2023
Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2 laptop review: MSI GT77 Titan performance without the size

Schenker XMG SECTOR, i9 13900K, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-13900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU

191.1 (39.9^min) fps ∼98{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
(156 – 191.1, n=2) MSI Titan GT77 12UHS
Intel Core i9-12900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU

169.8 (31.6^min) fps ∼87{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -11{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU

147.8 (73.8^min) fps ∼76{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -23{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

HP Omen 16-n0033dx
AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, AMD Radeon RX 6650M

126.8 (56.9^min) fps ∼65{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -34{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

MSI Pulse GL76 12UGK
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU

118.8 (57.2^min) fps ∼61{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -38{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Schenker XMG SECTOR, i9 13900K, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-13900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU

178.6 (37.8^min) fps ∼97{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
(144 – 178.6, n=2) MSI Titan GT77 12UHS
Intel Core i9-12900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU

150.3 (46^min) fps ∼81{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -16{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU

125.7 (28.9^min) fps ∼68{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -30{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

HP Omen 16-n0033dx
AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, AMD Radeon RX 6650M

106.3 (58.3^min) fps ∼57{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -40{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

MSI Pulse GL76 12UGK
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU

102.4 (45.2^min) fps ∼55{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -43{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Schenker XMG SECTOR, i9 13900K, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-13900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU

166.9 (37.1^min) fps ∼92{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
(136 – 166.9, n=3) MSI Titan GT77 12UHS
Intel Core i9-12900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU

120.5 (53.2^min) fps ∼66{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -28{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU

111.5 (25.4^min) fps ∼61{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -33{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

MSI Pulse GL76 12UGK
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU

83.2 (41.6^min) fps ∼46{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -50{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

HP Omen 16-n0033dx
AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, AMD Radeon RX 6650M

78.9 (54.2^min) fps ∼43{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -53{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Schenker XMG SECTOR, i9 13900K, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-13900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
(104.5 – 159.7, n=6) MSI Titan GT77 12UHS
Intel Core i9-12900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU

99.4 (40.7^min) fps ∼55{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -38{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU

92.1 (17.3^min) fps ∼51{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -42{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

MSI Katana 17 B13VFK
Intel Core i7-13620H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU

73.81 (36.7^min) fps ∼41{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -54{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

MSI Pulse GL76 12UGK
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU

69.8 (41.8^min) fps ∼39{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -56{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

HP Omen 16-n0033dx
AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, AMD Radeon RX 6650M

63.8 (42.9^min) fps ∼35{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -60{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Schenker XMG SECTOR, i9 13900K, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-13900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
(75.7 – 101.3, n=6) Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU

54 (35.6^min) fps ∼32{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -47{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

MSI Katana 17 B13VFK
Intel Core i7-13620H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU

45.9 (34.7^min) fps ∼27{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -55{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Schenker XMG SECTOR, i9 13900K, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-13900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
(41.9 – 56, n=4) Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU

47.8 (24.6^min) fps ∼60{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU

23.3 (15.6^min) fps ∼29{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -51{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

MSI Katana 17 B13VFK
Intel Core i7-13620H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU

21.1 (17^min) fps ∼26{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -56{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Schenker XMG SECTOR, i9 13900K, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-13900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU

717.7 (559^min) fps ∼98{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Corsair One i300
Intel Core i9-12900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti

681 (29.2^min, 290^P0.1, 486^P1) fps ∼93{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -5{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
(586 – 718, n=3) Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU

617 (563^min) fps ∼84{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -14{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

MSI Titan GT77 12UHS
Intel Core i9-12900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU

543 (483^min, 483^P1) fps ∼74{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -24{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

MSI Katana 17 B13VFK
Intel Core i7-13620H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU

435 (372^min) fps ∼59{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -39{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Schenker XMG Neo 17 M22
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU

386 (65.3^min, 192.6^P0.1, 276^P1) fps ∼53{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -46{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

MSI Pulse GL76 12UGK
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU

377.1 (364^min) fps ∼52{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -47{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Schenker XMG Core 17 (Early 2021)
Intel Core i7-10870H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU

302 (11.9^min, 37.1^P0.1, 159^P1) fps ∼41{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -58{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

HP Omen 16-n0033dx
AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, AMD Radeon RX 6650M

276.5 (260^min) fps ∼38{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -61{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Schenker XMG SECTOR, i9 13900K, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-13900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU

617.3 (560^min) fps ∼93{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
(511 – 617, n=3) Corsair One i300
Intel Core i9-12900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti

554 (87.5^min, 251^P0.1, 376^P1) fps ∼83{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -10{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

MSI Titan GT77 12UHS
Intel Core i9-12900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU

411 (335^min, 342.98^P1) fps ∼62{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -33{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU

405.9 (371^min) fps ∼61{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -34{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Schenker XMG Neo 17 M22
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU

335 (19.8^min, 152.7^P0.1, 234^P1) fps ∼50{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -46{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

MSI Katana 17 B13VFK
Intel Core i7-13620H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU

322 (271^min) fps ∼48{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -48{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

MSI Pulse GL76 12UGK
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU

252.8 (224^min) fps ∼38{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -59{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Schenker XMG Core 17 (Early 2021)
Intel Core i7-10870H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU

229 (68.3^min, 99.8^P0.1, 142^P1) fps ∼34{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -63{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

HP Omen 16-n0033dx
AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, AMD Radeon RX 6650M

217.4 (196^min) fps ∼33{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -65{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Schenker XMG SECTOR, i9 13900K, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-13900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
(361 – 449, n=4) Corsair One i300
Intel Core i9-12900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti

365 (68.6^min, 182^P0.1, 288^P1) fps ∼60{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -19{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

MSI Titan GT77 12UHS
Intel Core i9-12900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU

260 (213^min, 216.3^P1) fps ∼42{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -42{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU

240.9 (228^min) fps ∼39{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -46{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Schenker XMG Neo 17 M22
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU

236 (30.3^min, 70.5^P0.1, 139.4^P1) fps ∼38{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -47{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

MSI Katana 17 B13VFK
Intel Core i7-13620H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU

206 (166^min) fps ∼34{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -54{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH
Intel Core i9-11900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU

174 (141^min) fps ∼28{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -61{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

MSI Pulse GL76 12UGK
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU

170.5 (159^min) fps ∼28{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -62{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

HP Omen 16-n0033dx
AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, AMD Radeon RX 6650M

167 (157^min) fps ∼27{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -63{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Schenker XMG Core 17 (Early 2021)
Intel Core i7-10870H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU

144 (55.2^min, 60.2^P0.1, 99.7^P1) fps ∼23{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -68{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Schenker XMG SECTOR, i9 13900K, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-13900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU

216.3 (204^min) fps ∼69{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
(178.6 – 216, n=6) Corsair One i300
Intel Core i9-12900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti

183 (62.1^min, 107^P0.1, 149^P1) fps ∼58{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -15{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

MSI Titan GT77 12UHS
Intel Core i9-12900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU

129.3 (110^min, 111.14^P1) fps ∼41{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -40{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Schenker XMG Neo 17 M22
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU

121 (98^min) fps ∼39{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -44{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU

113.9 (110^min) fps ∼36{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -47{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

MSI Katana 17 B13VFK
Intel Core i7-13620H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU

104.7 (88^min) fps ∼33{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -52{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH
Intel Core i9-11900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU

93.8 (75^min) fps ∼30{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -57{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

MSI Pulse GL76 12UGK
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU

92.8 (88^min) fps ∼30{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -57{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

HP Omen 16-n0033dx
AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, AMD Radeon RX 6650M

90.1 (84^min) fps ∼29{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -58{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Schenker XMG Core 17 (Early 2021)
Intel Core i7-10870H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU

79.5 (30.1^min, 37.6^P0.1, 42.6^P1) fps ∼25{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -63{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Schenker XMG SECTOR, i9 13900K, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-13900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU

167.6 (147^min) fps ∼59{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
(137.1 – 167.6, n=3) Corsair One i300
Intel Core i9-12900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti

149 (41.5^min, 102^P0.1, 127^P1) fps ∼53{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -11{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Schenker XMG Neo 17 M22
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU

90.5 (49.5^min, 57.8^P0.1, 75.3^P1) fps ∼32{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -46{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU

72.5 (66^min) fps ∼26{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -57{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH
Intel Core i9-11900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU

66.7 (57^min) fps ∼24{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -60{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

MSI Katana 17 B13VFK
Intel Core i7-13620H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU

62.6 (55^min) fps ∼22{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -63{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Schenker XMG SECTOR, i9 13900K, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-13900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090

187.6 (4.6^min, 200^P1) fps ∼100{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} 0{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU

187.5 (3.95^min, 200^P1) fps ∼100{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
(187.4 – 187.5, n=3) MSI Titan GT77 12UHS
Intel Core i9-12900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU

187.1 (1.532^min, 200^P1) fps ∼100{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} 0{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Corsair One i300
Intel Core i9-12900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti

187 (2.54^min, 200^P1) fps ∼100{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} 0{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU

186.1 (1.631^min, 100^P1) fps ∼99{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -1{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

MSI Katana 17 B13VFK
Intel Core i7-13620H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU

186.1 (1.899^min, 100^P1) fps ∼99{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -1{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

MSI Pulse GL76 12UGK
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU

185.7 (1.866^min, 142.9^P1) fps ∼99{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -1{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Schenker XMG Neo 17 M22
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU

181.2 (3.86^min, 125^P1) fps ∼97{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -3{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Schenker XMG Core 17 (Early 2021)
Intel Core i7-10870H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU

179 (4.7^min, 143^P1) fps ∼95{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -5{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Schenker XMG SECTOR, i9 13900K, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-13900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090

187.6 (10.7^min, 200^P1) fps ∼100{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} 0{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

MSI Titan GT77 12UHS
Intel Core i9-12900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU

187.5 (6.33^min, 200^P1) fps ∼100{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} 0{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU

187.4 (5.08^min, 200^P1) fps ∼100{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
(187 – 187.4, n=3) Corsair One i300
Intel Core i9-12900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti

187 (2.54^min, 200^P1) fps ∼100{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} 0{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU

187 (1.607^min, 142.9^P1) fps ∼100{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} 0{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

MSI Katana 17 B13VFK
Intel Core i7-13620H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU

187 (2.12^min, 125^P1) fps ∼100{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} 0{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

MSI Pulse GL76 12UGK
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU

184.2 (2.2^min, 142.9^P1) fps ∼98{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -2{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Schenker XMG Neo 17 M22
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU

180.6 (3.65^min, 142.9^P1) fps ∼96{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -4{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Schenker XMG Core 17 (Early 2021)
Intel Core i7-10870H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU

175 (5.02^min, 125^P1) fps ∼93{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -7{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Schenker XMG SECTOR, i9 13900K, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-13900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090

187.6 (6.52^min, 200^P1) fps ∼100{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} 0{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU

187.2 (2.33^min, 200^P1) fps ∼100{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Corsair One i300
Intel Core i9-12900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti

187 (2.6^min, 167^P1) fps ∼100{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} 0{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

MSI Titan GT77 12UHS
Intel Core i9-12900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU

186.8 (1.467^min, 166.7^P1) fps ∼100{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} 0{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
(184.1 – 187.2, n=5) Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU

184.7 (1.535^min, 111.1^P1) fps ∼98{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -1{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

MSI Katana 17 B13VFK
Intel Core i7-13620H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU

184.7 (1.738^min, 100^P1) fps ∼98{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -1{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

MSI Pulse GL76 12UGK
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU

182.3 (2.68^min, 142.9^P1) fps ∼97{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -3{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Schenker XMG Neo 17 M22
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU

176.1 (4.27^min, 125^P1) fps ∼94{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -6{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Schenker XMG Core 17 (Early 2021)
Intel Core i7-10870H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU

172 (5.75^min, 125^P1) fps ∼92{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -8{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Schenker XMG SECTOR, i9 13900K, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-13900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090

187.6 (5.3^min, 200^P1) fps ∼100{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} 0{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU

187.4 (3.97^min, 200^P1) fps ∼100{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Corsair One i300
Intel Core i9-12900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti

187 (10.6^min, 200^P1) fps ∼100{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} 0{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
(185.5 – 187.4, n=3) MSI Titan GT77 12UHS
Intel Core i9-12900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU

185.9 (2.14^min, 166.7^P1) fps ∼99{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -1{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

MSI Katana 17 B13VFK
Intel Core i7-13620H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU

185.7 (1.958^min, 125^P1) fps ∼99{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -1{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU

185.5 (1.486^min, 125^P1) fps ∼99{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -1{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

MSI Pulse GL76 12UGK
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU

180 (3.5^min, 142.9^P1) fps ∼96{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -4{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Schenker XMG Neo 17 M22
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU

175.8 (3.84^min, 111.1^P1) fps ∼94{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -6{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Schenker XMG Core 17 (Early 2021)
Intel Core i7-10870H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU

168 (6.37^min, 100^P1) fps ∼90{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -10{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Corsair One i300
Intel Core i9-12900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti

187 (2.5^min, 167^P1) fps ∼100{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} 0{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Schenker XMG SECTOR, i9 13900K, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-13900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090

187 (1.83^min, 200^P1) fps ∼100{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} 0{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU

186.5 (1.93^min, 166.7^P1) fps ∼100{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
(182.4 – 186.5, n=5) MSI Titan GT77 12UHS
Intel Core i9-12900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU

182.7 (8.3^min, 142.9^P1) fps ∼98{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -2{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU

181.6 (1.674^min, 125^P1) fps ∼97{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -3{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

MSI Katana 17 B13VFK
Intel Core i7-13620H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU

180.2 (2.58^min, 111.1^P1) fps ∼96{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -3{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

MSI Pulse GL76 12UGK
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU

175.5 (3.74^min, 125^P1) fps ∼94{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -6{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH
Intel Core i9-11900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU

164 (5.22^min, 100^P1) fps ∼88{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -12{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Schenker XMG Neo 17 M22
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU

163.8 (4.96^min, 100^P1) fps ∼88{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -12{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Schenker XMG Core 17 (Early 2021)
Intel Core i7-10870H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU

150 (6.08^min, 100^P1) fps ∼80{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -20{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Schenker XMG SECTOR, i9 13900K, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-13900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090

165.9 (13.4^min, 125^P1) fps ∼100{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +11{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU

149.8 (3.08^min, 111.1^P1) fps ∼90{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Corsair One i300
Intel Core i9-12900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti

149 (8.57^min, 100^P1) fps ∼90{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -1{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
(134 – 151.3, n=7) MSI Titan GT77 12UHS
Intel Core i9-12900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU

131.8 (6.21^min, 90.9^P1) fps ∼79{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -12{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU

121.4 (3.6^min, 76.9^P1) fps ∼73{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -19{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

MSI Katana 17 B13VFK
Intel Core i7-13620H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU

112.1 (8^min, 62.5^P1) fps ∼68{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -25{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

MSI Pulse GL76 12UGK
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU

108.1 (4.6^min, 76.9^P1) fps ∼65{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -28{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Schenker XMG Neo 17 M22
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU

101.8 (18.4^min, 71.4^P1) fps ∼61{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -32{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH
Intel Core i9-11900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU

98.5 (17.3^min, 62.5^P1) fps ∼59{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -34{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Schenker XMG Core 17 (Early 2021)
Intel Core i7-10870H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU

86.9 (19.6^min, 58.8^P1) fps ∼52{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -42{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Schenker XMG SECTOR, i9 13900K, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-13900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090

166.3 (2.62^min, 125^P1) fps ∼100{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +14{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Corsair One i300
Intel Core i9-12900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti

147 (3.77^min, 111^P1) fps ∼88{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} 0{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU

146.3 (5.49^min, 111.1^P1) fps ∼88{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
(123.8 – 146.3, n=6) Schenker XMG Neo 17 M22
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU

101.1 (9.21^min, 71.4^P1) fps ∼61{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -31{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU

87.6 (4.62^min, 55.6^P1) fps ∼53{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -40{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

MSI Katana 17 B13VFK
Intel Core i7-13620H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU

83 (5.89^min, 45.5^P1) fps ∼50{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -43{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH
Intel Core i9-11900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU

82.3 (16.3^min, 58.8^P1) fps ∼49{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -44{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Schenker XMG Core 17 (Early 2021)
Intel Core i7-10870H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU

74.3 (18.9^min, 50^P1) fps ∼45{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -49{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Schenker XMG SECTOR, i9 13900K, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-13900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090

137.7 (8.31^min, 90.9^P1) fps ∼100{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +53{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Corsair One i300
Intel Core i9-12900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti

93.9 (4.79^min, 71.4^P1) fps ∼68{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +4{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU

90 (3.39^min, 58.8^P1) fps ∼65{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
(84.8 – 90, n=5) Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU

38.2 (3.33^min, 26.3^P1) fps ∼28{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -58{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

MSI Katana 17 B13VFK
Intel Core i7-13620H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU

37.5 (6.01^min, 25.6^P1) fps ∼27{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -58{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Schenker XMG SECTOR, i9 13900K, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-13900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU

180.2 (2.04^min, 125^P1) fps ∼96{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Corsair One i300
Intel Core i9-12900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti

180 (2.49^min, 143^P1) fps ∼96{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} 0{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
(88.9 – 180.2, n=4) Schenker XMG Neo 17 M22
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU

121 (5.84^min, 100^P1) fps ∼65{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -33{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU

88.5 (5.15^min, 58.8^P1) fps ∼47{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -51{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH
Intel Core i9-11900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU

86.5 (25.9^min, 62.5^P1) fps ∼46{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -52{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

MSI Katana 17 B13VFK
Intel Core i7-13620H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU

82.1 (5.63^min, 50^P1) fps ∼44{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -54{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Schenker XMG SECTOR, i9 13900K, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-13900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090

287.9 (250.6^min) fps ∼100{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +18{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU

243 (209.5^min) fps ∼84{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Corsair One i300
Intel Core i9-12900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti

240.3 (211.7^min) fps ∼83{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -1{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
(192.9 – 243, n=9) Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU

225 (190.1^min) fps ∼78{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -7{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

MSI Titan GT77 12UHS
Intel Core i9-12900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU

204.5 (180.6^min) fps ∼71{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -16{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

MSI Katana 17 B13VFK
Intel Core i7-13620H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU

184.6 (158.4^min) fps ∼64{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -24{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH
Intel Core i9-11900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU

175 (138.4^min) fps ∼61{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -28{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

MSI Pulse GL76 12UGK
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU

168.1 (149.3^min) fps ∼58{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -31{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Schenker XMG Neo 17 M22
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU

146.5 (129.8^min) fps ∼51{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -40{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Schenker XMG Core 17 (Early 2021)
Intel Core i7-10870H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU

146 (127.7^min) fps ∼51{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -40{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

HP Omen 16-n0033dx
AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, AMD Radeon RX 6650M

141 (120^min) fps ∼49{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -42{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Schenker XMG SECTOR, i9 13900K, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-13900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090

258.5 (226.5^min) fps ∼100{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +20{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU

216 (187.8^min) fps ∼84{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Corsair One i300
Intel Core i9-12900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti

214.8 (188.8^min) fps ∼83{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -1{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
(177.3 – 216, n=9) Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU

200 (151.8^min) fps ∼77{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -7{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

MSI Titan GT77 12UHS
Intel Core i9-12900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU

184.5 (162.7^min) fps ∼71{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -15{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

MSI Katana 17 B13VFK
Intel Core i7-13620H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU

171 (146.9^min) fps ∼66{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -21{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH
Intel Core i9-11900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU

155 (134.6^min) fps ∼60{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -28{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

MSI Pulse GL76 12UGK
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU

152.1 (134.4^min) fps ∼59{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -30{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Schenker XMG Core 17 (Early 2021)
Intel Core i7-10870H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU

136 (116.3^min) fps ∼53{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -37{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Schenker XMG Neo 17 M22
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU

133.9 (118.9^min) fps ∼52{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -38{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

HP Omen 16-n0033dx
AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, AMD Radeon RX 6650M

130.7 (107.5^min) fps ∼51{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -39{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Schenker XMG SECTOR, i9 13900K, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-13900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090

256.3 (217.1^min) fps ∼100{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +25{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Corsair One i300
Intel Core i9-12900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti

207.6 (181.1^min) fps ∼81{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +1{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
(169.9 – 205, n=9) Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU

191 (165.9^min) fps ∼75{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -7{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

MSI Titan GT77 12UHS
Intel Core i9-12900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU

179.8 (156.7^min) fps ∼70{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -12{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

MSI Katana 17 B13VFK
Intel Core i7-13620H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU

164.1 (140.2^min) fps ∼64{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -20{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH
Intel Core i9-11900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU

146 (120.5^min) fps ∼57{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -29{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

MSI Pulse GL76 12UGK
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU

141.2 (123.5^min) fps ∼55{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -31{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Schenker XMG Neo 17 M22
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU

129.3 (113^min) fps ∼50{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -37{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Schenker XMG Core 17 (Early 2021)
Intel Core i7-10870H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU

124 (108^min) fps ∼48{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -40{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

HP Omen 16-n0033dx
AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, AMD Radeon RX 6650M

118 (102.7^min) fps ∼46{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -42{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Schenker XMG SECTOR, i9 13900K, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-13900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090

219.7 (186.7^min) fps ∼100{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +14{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Corsair One i300
Intel Core i9-12900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti

196.1 (169.6^min) fps ∼89{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +2{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU

192.5 (164.4^min) fps ∼88{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
(160.7 – 192.5, n=9) Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU

178.6 (153.9^min) fps ∼81{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -7{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

MSI Titan GT77 12UHS
Intel Core i9-12900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU

170.5 (148.2^min) fps ∼78{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -11{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

MSI Katana 17 B13VFK
Intel Core i7-13620H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU

156.3 (132.3^min) fps ∼71{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -19{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

MSI Pulse GL76 12UGK
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU

132.8 (116.8^min) fps ∼60{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -31{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH
Intel Core i9-11900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU

131 (113.6^min) fps ∼60{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -32{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Schenker XMG Neo 17 M22
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU

121.4 (106.8^min) fps ∼55{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -37{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Schenker XMG Core 17 (Early 2021)
Intel Core i7-10870H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU

118 (102.7^min) fps ∼54{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -39{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

HP Omen 16-n0033dx
AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, AMD Radeon RX 6650M

100 (82.7^min) fps ∼46{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -48{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Schenker XMG SECTOR, i9 13900K, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-13900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090

226.8 (185.7^min) fps ∼100{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +21{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Corsair One i300
Intel Core i9-12900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti

191.5 (161.9^min) fps ∼84{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +3{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU

186.7 (156.9^min) fps ∼82{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
(161.9 – 186.7, n=6) Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU

145.5 (109.1^min) fps ∼64{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -22{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

MSI Katana 17 B13VFK
Intel Core i7-13620H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU

126 (105.9^min) fps ∼56{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -33{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Schenker XMG Neo 17 M22
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU

122.7 (106.5^min) fps ∼54{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -34{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH
Intel Core i9-11900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU

110 (8.5^min) fps ∼49{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -41{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Schenker XMG SECTOR, i9 13900K, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-13900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU Corsair One i300
Intel Core i9-12900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
(224 – 233, n=4) MSI Titan GT77 12UHS
Intel Core i9-12900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU MSI Katana 17 B13VFK
Intel Core i7-13620H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU Schenker XMG Neo 17 M22
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU MSI Pulse GL76 12UGK
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU HP Omen 16-n0033dx
AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, AMD Radeon RX 6650M Schenker XMG Core 17 (Early 2021)
Intel Core i7-10870H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU Schenker XMG SECTOR, i9 13900K, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-13900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU Corsair One i300
Intel Core i9-12900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
(207 – 230, n=5) MSI Titan GT77 12UHS
Intel Core i9-12900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU Schenker XMG Neo 17 M22
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU MSI Katana 17 B13VFK
Intel Core i7-13620H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU MSI Pulse GL76 12UGK
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU HP Omen 16-n0033dx
AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, AMD Radeon RX 6650M Schenker XMG Core 17 (Early 2021)
Intel Core i7-10870H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU Schenker XMG SECTOR, i9 13900K, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-13900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
(167.5 – 194.9, n=7) Corsair One i300
Intel Core i9-12900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti MSI Titan GT77 12UHS
Intel Core i9-12900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU Schenker XMG Neo 17 M22
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU MSI Katana 17 B13VFK
Intel Core i7-13620H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU MSI Pulse GL76 12UGK
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH
Intel Core i9-11900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU

88 (56^min) fps ∼39{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -55{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

HP Omen 16-n0033dx
AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, AMD Radeon RX 6650M Schenker XMG Core 17 (Early 2021)
Intel Core i7-10870H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU Schenker XMG SECTOR, i9 13900K, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-13900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
(136.8 – 162.9, n=7) Corsair One i300
Intel Core i9-12900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Schenker XMG Neo 17 M22
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH
Intel Core i9-11900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU

71.2 (44^min) fps ∼32{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -55{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

MSI Katana 17 B13VFK
Intel Core i7-13620H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU Schenker XMG Core 17 (Early 2021)
Intel Core i7-10870H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU Schenker XMG SECTOR, i9 13900K, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-13900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
(90.1 – 94.7, n=4) Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU Corsair One i300
Intel Core i9-12900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Schenker XMG Neo 17 M22
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH
Intel Core i9-11900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU

42.9 (27^min) fps ∼28{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -53{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

MSI Katana 17 B13VFK
Intel Core i7-13620H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU

Schenker XMG SECTOR, i9 13900K, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-13900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU Corsair One i300
Intel Core i9-12900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
(168 – 212, n=13) MSI Titan GT77 12UHS
Intel Core i9-12900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU MSI Katana 17 B13VFK
Intel Core i7-13620H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU MSI Pulse GL76 12UGK
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH
Intel Core i9-11900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU Schenker XMG Neo 17 M22
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU Schenker XMG Core 17 (Early 2021)
Intel Core i7-10870H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU HP Omen 16-n0033dx
AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, AMD Radeon RX 6650M Schenker XMG SECTOR, i9 13900K, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-13900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU Corsair One i300
Intel Core i9-12900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
(154.7 – 188.8, n=13) MSI Titan GT77 12UHS
Intel Core i9-12900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU MSI Katana 17 B13VFK
Intel Core i7-13620H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU MSI Pulse GL76 12UGK
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH
Intel Core i9-11900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU Schenker XMG Neo 17 M22
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU Schenker XMG Core 17 (Early 2021)
Intel Core i7-10870H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU HP Omen 16-n0033dx
AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, AMD Radeon RX 6650M Schenker XMG SECTOR, i9 13900K, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-13900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU Corsair One i300
Intel Core i9-12900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
(116.4 – 146.4, n=13) MSI Titan GT77 12UHS
Intel Core i9-12900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU MSI Katana 17 B13VFK
Intel Core i7-13620H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU MSI Pulse GL76 12UGK
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH
Intel Core i9-11900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU Schenker XMG Neo 17 M22
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU Schenker XMG Core 17 (Early 2021)
Intel Core i7-10870H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU HP Omen 16-n0033dx
AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, AMD Radeon RX 6650M Schenker XMG SECTOR, i9 13900K, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-13900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
(114.1 – 124.7, n=5) Corsair One i300
Intel Core i9-12900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU MSI Katana 17 B13VFK
Intel Core i7-13620H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU Schenker XMG Neo 17 M22
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH
Intel Core i9-11900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU

Schenker XMG SECTOR, i9 13900K, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-13900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090

260 (113.43^min) fps ∼100{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +8{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Corsair One i300
Intel Core i9-12900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti

258 (138.39^min) fps ∼99{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +7{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU

240.1 (124.4^min) fps ∼92{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
(204 – 240, n=2) Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU

208.9 (108.8^min) fps ∼80{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -13{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Schenker XMG Neo 17 M22
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU

172.4 (94.53^min) fps ∼66{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -28{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

HP Omen 16-n0033dx
AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, AMD Radeon RX 6650M

138.8 (103.8^min) fps ∼53{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -42{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Schenker XMG SECTOR, i9 13900K, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-13900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090

235 (112.44^min) fps ∼100{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +13{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Corsair One i300
Intel Core i9-12900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti

212 (90.52^min) fps ∼90{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +2{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU

207.1 (106.2^min) fps ∼88{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
(183 – 207, n=2) Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU

139.8 (62.8^min) fps ∼59{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -32{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Schenker XMG Neo 17 M22
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU

134.4 (54.39^min) fps ∼57{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -35{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

HP Omen 16-n0033dx
AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, AMD Radeon RX 6650M

111.5 (56^min) fps ∼47{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -46{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Schenker XMG SECTOR, i9 13900K, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-13900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090

191.9 (91.79^min) fps ∼100{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +10{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU Corsair One i300
Intel Core i9-12900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti

169 (76.59^min) fps ∼88{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -3{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
(153 – 173.8, n=2) Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU

109.7 (54.8^min) fps ∼57{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -37{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Schenker XMG Neo 17 M22
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU

108.6 (48.9^min) fps ∼57{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -38{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

HP Omen 16-n0033dx
AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, AMD Radeon RX 6650M

81 (43^min) fps ∼42{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -53{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Schenker XMG SECTOR, i9 13900K, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-13900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090

177.3 (82.92^min) fps ∼100{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +21{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU

146.5 (72.2^min) fps ∼83{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Corsair One i300
Intel Core i9-12900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti

137 (66.86^min) fps ∼77{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -6{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
(131.5 – 146.5, n=3) Schenker XMG Neo 17 M22
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU

88.1 (42.14^min) fps ∼50{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -40{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU

86.8 (45.8^min) fps ∼49{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -41{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

MSI Katana 17 B13VFK
Intel Core i7-13620H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU

74.3 (37.14^min) fps ∼42{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -49{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

HP Omen 16-n0033dx
AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, AMD Radeon RX 6650M

65.8 (37.7^min) fps ∼37{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -55{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Schenker XMG SECTOR, i9 13900K, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-13900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090

165 (77.05^min) fps ∼100{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +29{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU

127.7 (63.9^min) fps ∼77{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
(116 – 127.7, n=3) Corsair One i300
Intel Core i9-12900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti

113 (60.76^min) fps ∼68{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -12{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Schenker XMG Neo 17 M22
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU

73.2 (39.18^min) fps ∼44{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -43{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU

69 (39.5^min) fps ∼42{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -46{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

MSI Katana 17 B13VFK
Intel Core i7-13620H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU

59 (32.33^min) fps ∼36{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -54{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Schenker XMG SECTOR, i9 13900K, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-13900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090

136.3 (72.34^min) fps ∼100{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +66{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
(81 – 84, n=3) Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU

82.1 (51.4^min) fps ∼60{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Corsair One i300
Intel Core i9-12900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti

75 (46.62^min) fps ∼55{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -9{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Schenker XMG Neo 17 M22
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU

47.6 (28.52^min) fps ∼35{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -42{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU

44 (27.9^min) fps ∼32{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -46{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

MSI Katana 17 B13VFK
Intel Core i7-13620H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU

36.8 (22.74^min) fps ∼27{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -55{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Schenker XMG SECTOR, i9 13900K, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-13900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090

129.6 (73.7^min) fps ∼100{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +9{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU

118.8 (61.4^min) fps ∼92{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Corsair One i300
Intel Core i9-12900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti

116 (60.79^min) fps ∼90{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -2{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
(101.3 – 118.8, n=3) Schenker XMG Neo 17 M22
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU

77.9 (40.97^min) fps ∼60{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -34{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU

74.4 (41.8^min) fps ∼57{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -37{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

MSI Katana 17 B13VFK
Intel Core i7-13620H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU

63.2 (32.95^min) fps ∼49{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -47{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU Schenker XMG SECTOR, i9 13900K, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-13900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
(201 – 284, n=2) Corsair One i300
Intel Core i9-12900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Schenker XMG Neo 17 M22
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU HP Omen 16-n0033dx
AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, AMD Radeon RX 6650M Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU Schenker XMG SECTOR, i9 13900K, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-13900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Schenker XMG Neo 17 M22
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU HP Omen 16-n0033dx
AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, AMD Radeon RX 6650M Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
(176 – 270, n=2) Schenker XMG SECTOR, i9 13900K, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-13900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU Corsair One i300
Intel Core i9-12900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Schenker XMG Neo 17 M22
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU HP Omen 16-n0033dx
AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, AMD Radeon RX 6650M Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
(162 – 239, n=2) Schenker XMG SECTOR, i9 13900K, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-13900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Corsair One i300
Intel Core i9-12900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU Schenker XMG Neo 17 M22
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU HP Omen 16-n0033dx
AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, AMD Radeon RX 6650M Schenker XMG SECTOR, i9 13900K, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-13900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
(151 – 179.7, n=3) Corsair One i300
Intel Core i9-12900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU Schenker XMG Neo 17 M22
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU HP Omen 16-n0033dx
AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, AMD Radeon RX 6650M Schenker XMG SECTOR, i9 13900K, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-13900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
(129.4 – 132.3, n=3) Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU Corsair One i300
Intel Core i9-12900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Schenker XMG Neo 17 M22
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU Schenker XMG SECTOR, i9 13900K, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-13900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
(70.5 – 76, n=3) Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU Corsair One i300
Intel Core i9-12900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Schenker XMG Neo 17 M22
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU

Schenker XMG SECTOR, i9 13900K, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-13900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090

466 (351^min, 294^P1) fps ∼100{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +6{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU

440 (321^min, 272^P1) fps ∼94{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
(393 – 440, n=2) MSI Katana 17 B13VFK
Intel Core i7-13620H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU

317 (235^min, 194^P1) fps ∼68{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -28{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

MSI Titan GT77 12UHS
Intel Core i9-12900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU

283 (233^min, 46^P1) fps ∼61{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -36{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

HP Omen 16-n0033dx
AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, AMD Radeon RX 6650M

264 (193^min, 169^P1) fps ∼57{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -40{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Schenker XMG Neo 17 M22
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU Schenker XMG SECTOR, i9 13900K, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-13900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090

415 (291^min, 220^P1) fps ∼100{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +11{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU

375 (257^min, 207^P1) fps ∼90{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
(303 – 375, n=4) MSI Katana 17 B13VFK
Intel Core i7-13620H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU

247 (179^min, 135^P1) fps ∼60{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -34{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

MSI Titan GT77 12UHS
Intel Core i9-12900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU

226 (185^min, 61^P1) fps ∼54{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -40{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

HP Omen 16-n0033dx
AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, AMD Radeon RX 6650M

217 (166^min, 135^P1) fps ∼52{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -42{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Schenker XMG Neo 17 M22
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU Schenker XMG SECTOR, i9 13900K, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-13900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090

377 (273^min, 214^P1) fps ∼100{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +5{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU

358 (243^min, 204^P1) fps ∼95{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
(286 – 358, n=4) MSI Katana 17 B13VFK
Intel Core i7-13620H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU

240 (188^min, 131^P1) fps ∼64{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -33{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

MSI Titan GT77 12UHS
Intel Core i9-12900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU

227 (151^min, 57^P1) fps ∼60{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -37{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

HP Omen 16-n0033dx
AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, AMD Radeon RX 6650M

215 (159^min, 131^P1) fps ∼57{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -40{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Schenker XMG Neo 17 M22
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU Schenker XMG SECTOR, i9 13900K, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-13900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090

364 (262^min, 204^P1) fps ∼100{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +13{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU

322 (217^min, 181^P1) fps ∼88{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
(265 – 322, n=4) MSI Titan GT77 12UHS
Intel Core i9-12900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU

196.5 (145^min, 38^P1) fps ∼54{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -39{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

MSI Katana 17 B13VFK
Intel Core i7-13620H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU

179.2 (145^min, 66^P1) fps ∼49{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -44{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

HP Omen 16-n0033dx
AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, AMD Radeon RX 6650M

178.2 (151^min, 121^P1) fps ∼49{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -45{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Schenker XMG Neo 17 M22
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU Schenker XMG SECTOR, i9 13900K, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-13900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090

195.4 (165^min, 131^P1) fps ∼100{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +39{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU

140.6 (123^min, 97^P1) fps ∼72{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
(114.3 – 140.6, n=5) Schenker XMG Neo 17 M22
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU MSI Titan GT77 12UHS
Intel Core i9-12900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU

79.8 (65^min, 29^P1) fps ∼41{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -43{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

MSI Katana 17 B13VFK
Intel Core i7-13620H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU

65.4 (52^min, 44^P1) fps ∼33{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -53{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

HP Omen 16-n0033dx
AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, AMD Radeon RX 6650M

40.6 (31^min, 31^P1) fps ∼21{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -71{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Schenker XMG SECTOR, i9 13900K, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-13900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090

149.7 (129^min, 104^P1) fps ∼100{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +63{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU

91.8 (78^min, 74^P1) fps ∼61{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
(75 – 91.8, n=5) Schenker XMG Neo 17 M22
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU MSI Katana 17 B13VFK
Intel Core i7-13620H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU

41 (35^min, 33^P1) fps ∼27{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -55{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Schenker XMG SECTOR, i9 13900K, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-13900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090

81.1 (71^min, 70^P1) fps ∼100{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +79{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU

45.3 (39^min, 37^P1) fps ∼56{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
(42.4 – 45.3, n=4) Schenker XMG Neo 17 M22
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU MSI Katana 17 B13VFK
Intel Core i7-13620H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU

19.7 (17^min, 16^P1) fps ∼24{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -57{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Posted on March 11, 2023
Razer Blade 15 OLED (early 2022) review: A compact gaming laptop with an RTX 3070 Ti

Schenker XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW

4199 (4194.93^min – 4199.13^max) MB/s ∼100{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +18{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Razer Blade 15 2022
SSSTC CA6-8D1024

4119 (4098.66^min – 4118.81^max) MB/s ∼98{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +16{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Aorus 15 XE5
Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10

4117 (3552.16^min – 4116.81^max) MB/s ∼98{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +16{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

HP Omen 16-b1090ng
WDC PC SN810 1TB

3928 (3889.8^min – 3927.66^max) MB/s ∼94{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +10{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH

3764 (3540.2^min – 3763.76^max) MB/s ∼90{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +6{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
(1761 – 4634, n=49) Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR

3564 (3515.46^min – 3563.69^max) MB/s ∼85{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Average of class Gaming
(834 – 5676, n=182, last 2 years) Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH

4767 (4365.51^min – 4766.62^max) MB/s ∼100{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +35{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Schenker XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW

4299 (4288.86^min – 4298.95^max) MB/s ∼90{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +22{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Aorus 15 XE5
Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10

4236 (3477.46^min – 4236.46^max) MB/s ∼89{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +20{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Razer Blade 15 2022
SSSTC CA6-8D1024

4167 (4120.63^min – 4166.62^max) MB/s ∼87{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +18{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

HP Omen 16-b1090ng
WDC PC SN810 1TB

4033 (3953.13^min – 4032.82^max) MB/s ∼85{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +14{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
(2226 – 4516, n=49) Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR

3531 (3391.93^min – 3530.77^max) MB/s ∼74{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Average of class Gaming
(399 – 7889, n=181, last 2 years) Aorus 15 XE5
Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10

7020 (5888.98^min – 7020.02^max) MB/s ∼100{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +5{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Razer Blade 15 2022
SSSTC CA6-8D1024

6921 (6631.14^min – 6921.02^max) MB/s ∼99{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +4{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

HP Omen 16-b1090ng
WDC PC SN810 1TB

6867 (6210.3^min – 6866.91^max) MB/s ∼98{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +3{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Schenker XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW

6847 (6590.72^min – 6846.78^max) MB/s ∼98{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +3{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR

6663 (6017.91^min – 6663.07^max) MB/s ∼95{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH

6550 (5497.59^min – 6549.73^max) MB/s ∼93{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -2{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
(3421 – 7061, n=49) Average of class Gaming
(1620 – 13195, n=182, last 2 years) HP Omen 16-b1090ng
WDC PC SN810 1TB

5412 (5265.32^min – 5411.99^max) MB/s ∼100{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +9{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Schenker XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW

4999 (4982.73^min – 4998.98^max) MB/s ∼92{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} 0{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR

4980 (4904.66^min – 4979.58^max) MB/s ∼92{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH

4876 (4374.87^min – 4876.3^max) MB/s ∼90{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -2{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
(2226 – 5259, n=49) Razer Blade 15 2022
SSSTC CA6-8D1024

4740 (4542.15^min – 4740.19^max) MB/s ∼88{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -5{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Aorus 15 XE5
Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10

4421 (4173.33^min – 4420.8^max) MB/s ∼82{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -11{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Average of class Gaming
(86.2 – 10261, n=182, last 2 years) Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR

81.2 (79.58^min – 81.23^max) MB/s ∼100{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Aorus 15 XE5
Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10

80.6 (67.84^min – 80.61^max) MB/s ∼99{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -1{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Razer Blade 15 2022
SSSTC CA6-8D1024

79.6 (78.85^min – 79.63^max) MB/s ∼98{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -2{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Schenker XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW

77.9 (77.66^min – 77.9^max) MB/s ∼96{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -4{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
(48.7 – 97.4, n=49) HP Omen 16-b1090ng
WDC PC SN810 1TB

77.1 (76.91^min – 77.11^max) MB/s ∼95{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -5{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH

74.3 (71.59^min – 74.33^max) MB/s ∼92{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -8{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Average of class Gaming
(23.3 – 97.4, n=182, last 2 years) Aorus 15 XE5
Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10

333 (331.94^min – 333.25^max) MB/s ∼100{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +57{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH

264 (263.57^min – 264.44^max) MB/s ∼79{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +25{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Razer Blade 15 2022
SSSTC CA6-8D1024

256 (23.49^min – 256.28^max) MB/s ∼77{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +21{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Schenker XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW

239 (238.19^min – 238.82^max) MB/s ∼72{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +13{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR

212 (209.62^min – 211.78^max) MB/s ∼64{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

HP Omen 16-b1090ng
WDC PC SN810 1TB

205 (195.73^min – 204.56^max) MB/s ∼62{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -3{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Average of class Gaming
(66.6 – 421, n=181, last 2 years) Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
(49.9 – 275, n=49) Schenker XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW

4309 (4179.96^min – 4309.38^max) MB/s ∼100{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +4{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR

4152 (4133.05^min – 4152.1^max) MB/s ∼96{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Aorus 15 XE5
Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10

3566 (3562.85^min – 3566.11^max) MB/s ∼83{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -14{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Razer Blade 15 2022
SSSTC CA6-8D1024

3184 (3180.75^min – 3183.86^max) MB/s ∼74{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -23{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH

2855 (2482.75^min – 2854.87^max) MB/s ∼66{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -31{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
(376 – 4185, n=49) Average of class Gaming
(310 – 5829, n=181, last 2 years) HP Omen 16-b1090ng
WDC PC SN810 1TB

1528 (1477.56^min – 1527.59^max) MB/s ∼35{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -63{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Aorus 15 XE5
Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10

3600 (3594.9^min – 3599.81^max) MB/s ∼100{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +3{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR

3512 (3421.77^min – 3511.78^max) MB/s ∼98{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Schenker XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW

3435 (2876.62^min – 3435.27^max) MB/s ∼95{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -2{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH

2694 (2561.51^min – 2693.92^max) MB/s ∼75{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -23{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Razer Blade 15 2022
SSSTC CA6-8D1024

2141 (2137.08^min – 2141.26^max) MB/s ∼59{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -39{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Average of class Gaming
(288 – 4383, n=181, last 2 years) Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
(291 – 3559, n=49) HP Omen 16-b1090ng
WDC PC SN810 1TB

585 (555.77^min – 584.61^max) MB/s ∼16{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -83{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Aorus 15 XE5
Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10 Schenker XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW Razer Blade 15 2022
SSSTC CA6-8D1024 Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
(2577 – 9147, n=50) Average of class Gaming
(910 – 10330, n=171, last 2 years) HP Omen 16-b1090ng
WDC PC SN810 1TB Aorus 15 XE5
Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10 Razer Blade 15 2022
SSSTC CA6-8D1024 Schenker XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
(983 – 3469, n=50) Average of class Gaming
(389 – 3629, n=171, last 2 years) HP Omen 16-b1090ng
WDC PC SN810 1TB Aorus 15 XE5
Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10 Schenker XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
(921 – 4043, n=50) HP Omen 16-b1090ng
WDC PC SN810 1TB Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR Average of class Gaming
(338 – 5157, n=171, last 2 years) Razer Blade 15 2022
SSSTC CA6-8D1024 Razer Blade 15 2022
SSSTC CA6-8D1024 Aorus 15 XE5
Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10 HP Omen 16-b1090ng
WDC PC SN810 1TB Schenker XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
(2834 – 5588, n=50) Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR Average of class Gaming
(925 – 9971, n=171, last 2 years) Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH Razer Blade 15 2022
SSSTC CA6-8D1024 Schenker XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR Aorus 15 XE5
Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10 Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
(1617 – 4477, n=50) Average of class Gaming
(308 – 8590, n=171, last 2 years) HP Omen 16-b1090ng
WDC PC SN810 1TB Aorus 15 XE5
Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10 HP Omen 16-b1090ng
WDC PC SN810 1TB Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
(45.9 – 88.1, n=50) Razer Blade 15 2022
SSSTC CA6-8D1024 Schenker XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW Average of class Gaming
(20 – 108, n=171, last 2 years) Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH Aorus 15 XE5
Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10 HP Omen 16-b1090ng
WDC PC SN810 1TB Razer Blade 15 2022
SSSTC CA6-8D1024 Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH Schenker XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
(118.6 – 241, n=50) Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR Average of class Gaming
(18 – 364, n=171, last 2 years) Aorus 15 XE5
Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10

2909.44 MB/s ∼100{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +25{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Razer Blade 15 2022
SSSTC CA6-8D1024 Schenker XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
(421 – 2854, n=50) Average of class Gaming
(216 – 2963, n=171, last 2 years) HP Omen 16-b1090ng
WDC PC SN810 1TB Aorus 15 XE5
Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10

3193.44 MB/s ∼100{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +34{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Schenker XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
(367 – 3451, n=50) HP Omen 16-b1090ng
WDC PC SN810 1TB Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH Average of class Gaming
(243 – 4381, n=171, last 2 years) Razer Blade 15 2022
SSSTC CA6-8D1024 Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR Schenker XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW Average of class Gaming
(0.022 – 0.23, n=166, last 2 years) Aorus 15 XE5
Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10 Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH HP Omen 16-b1090ng
WDC PC SN810 1TB Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
(0.02 – 0.083, n=50) Razer Blade 15 2022
SSSTC CA6-8D1024 Razer Blade 15 2022
SSSTC CA6-8D1024 Average of class Gaming
(0.012 – 0.425, n=171, last 2 years)

0.05756 ms * ∼99{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -162{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
(0.018 – 0.101, n=50) Schenker XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH HP Omen 16-b1090ng
WDC PC SN810 1TB Aorus 15 XE5
Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10

* … smaller is better

Posted on March 9, 2023
Asus ROG Strix G18 G814JI laptop review: Light and shade with the 18-inch gaming machine

Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 Ti
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR

4229 (4208.75^min – 4229.47^max) MB/s ∼100{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +126{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
SSSTC CA6-8D1024

3889 (3873.65^min – 3888.73^max) MB/s ∼92{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +108{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

MSI Raider GE77 HX 12UHS
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB

3713 (3643.38^min – 3713.01^max) MB/s ∼88{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +99{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Average of class Gaming
(834 – 5676, n=182, last 2 years) Average Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
(1870 – 2578, n=3) Alienware x17 RTX 3080 P48E
2x WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00 (RAID 0)

2161 (2137.42^min – 2160.91^max) MB/s ∼51{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +16{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Gigabyte A7 X1
ESR512GTLCG-EAC-4

1959 (1933.36^min – 1959.16^max) MB/s ∼46{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +5{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Asus ROG Strix G18 G814JI
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM

1870 (1827.25^min – 1869.82^max) MB/s ∼44{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 Ti
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR

4158 (4130.89^min – 4157.81^max) MB/s ∼100{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +92{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
SSSTC CA6-8D1024

3798 (3750.39^min – 3798.15^max) MB/s ∼91{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +75{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

MSI Raider GE77 HX 12UHS
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB

3706 (3661.84^min – 3706.09^max) MB/s ∼89{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +71{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Average of class Gaming
(399 – 7889, n=181, last 2 years) Alienware x17 RTX 3080 P48E
2x WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00 (RAID 0)

2978 (2936.01^min – 2977.75^max) MB/s ∼72{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +37{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Average Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
(2166 – 3115, n=3) Asus ROG Strix G18 G814JI
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM

2166 (2094.01^min – 2166.15^max) MB/s ∼52{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Gigabyte A7 X1
ESR512GTLCG-EAC-4

2124 (2090.44^min – 2123.58^max) MB/s ∼51{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -2{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
SSSTC CA6-8D1024

6810 (6260.27^min – 6809.87^max) MB/s ∼100{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +61{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

MSI Raider GE77 HX 12UHS
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB

6695 (6233.69^min – 6694.56^max) MB/s ∼98{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +58{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Alienware x17 RTX 3080 P48E
2x WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00 (RAID 0)

6684 (5510.27^min – 6684.46^max) MB/s ∼98{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +58{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 Ti
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR

6593 (6284.75^min – 6592.61^max) MB/s ∼97{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +56{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Average of class Gaming
(1620 – 13195, n=182, last 2 years) Average Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
(4239 – 4719, n=3) Asus ROG Strix G18 G814JI
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM

4239 (3584.87^min – 4239.18^max) MB/s ∼62{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Gigabyte A7 X1
ESR512GTLCG-EAC-4

3463 (3045.7^min – 3462.82^max) MB/s ∼51{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -18{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 Ti
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR

4969 (4945.26^min – 4969.12^max) MB/s ∼100{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +67{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

MSI Raider GE77 HX 12UHS
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB

4959 (4940^min – 4958.51^max) MB/s ∼100{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +66{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Alienware x17 RTX 3080 P48E
2x WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00 (RAID 0)

4917 (4616.04^min – 4917.19^max) MB/s ∼99{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +65{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
SSSTC CA6-8D1024

4426 (4263.58^min – 4426.04^max) MB/s ∼89{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +48{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Average of class Gaming
(86.2 – 10261, n=182, last 2 years) Average Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
(2982 – 3629, n=3) Asus ROG Strix G18 G814JI
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM

2982 (2920.07^min – 2981.52^max) MB/s ∼60{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Gigabyte A7 X1
ESR512GTLCG-EAC-4

2497 (2486.17^min – 2496.87^max) MB/s ∼50{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -16{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

MSI Raider GE77 HX 12UHS
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB

83 (80.23^min – 83.02^max) MB/s ∼100{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +171{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 Ti
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR

79.8 (79.31^min – 79.75^max) MB/s ∼96{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +161{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
SSSTC CA6-8D1024

74.5 (73.46^min – 74.52^max) MB/s ∼90{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +143{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Average of class Gaming
(23.3 – 97.4, n=182, last 2 years) Alienware x17 RTX 3080 P48E
2x WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00 (RAID 0)

51.2 (51.08^min – 51.21^max) MB/s ∼62{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +67{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Gigabyte A7 X1
ESR512GTLCG-EAC-4

44.5 (44.06^min – 44.46^max) MB/s ∼54{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +45{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Average Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
(30.6 – 37.7, n=3) Asus ROG Strix G18 G814JI
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM

30.6 (30.29^min – 30.64^max) MB/s ∼37{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

MSI Raider GE77 HX 12UHS
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB

286 (284.91^min – 285.72^max) MB/s ∼100{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +146{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
SSSTC CA6-8D1024

280 (267.82^min – 279.79^max) MB/s ∼98{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +141{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Average of class Gaming
(66.6 – 421, n=181, last 2 years) Average Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
(116.3 – 286, n=3) Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 Ti
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR

194.2 (193.1^min – 194.16^max) MB/s ∼68{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +67{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Alienware x17 RTX 3080 P48E
2x WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00 (RAID 0)

166 (164.47^min – 165.73^max) MB/s ∼58{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +43{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Gigabyte A7 X1
ESR512GTLCG-EAC-4

130 (127.46^min – 129.84^max) MB/s ∼45{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +12{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Asus ROG Strix G18 G814JI
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM

116.3 (111.83^min – 116.33^max) MB/s ∼41{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 Ti
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR

4178 (4170.63^min – 4178.12^max) MB/s ∼100{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +582{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

MSI Raider GE77 HX 12UHS
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB

4075 (4059.83^min – 4075.02^max) MB/s ∼98{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +565{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
SSSTC CA6-8D1024

3203 (3180.36^min – 3203.41^max) MB/s ∼77{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +423{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Average of class Gaming
(310 – 5829, n=181, last 2 years) Average Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
(613 – 2769, n=3) Gigabyte A7 X1
ESR512GTLCG-EAC-4

1331 (1303.48^min – 1331.29^max) MB/s ∼32{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +117{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Alienware x17 RTX 3080 P48E
2x WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00 (RAID 0)

724 (719.56^min – 724.12^max) MB/s ∼17{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +18{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Asus ROG Strix G18 G814JI
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM

613 (588.72^min – 613.33^max) MB/s ∼15{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 Ti
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR

3559 (3517.38^min – 3559.2^max) MB/s ∼100{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +707{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

MSI Raider GE77 HX 12UHS
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB

3503 (3468.77^min – 3503.3^max) MB/s ∼98{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +694{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
SSSTC CA6-8D1024

2209 (1041.25^min – 2208.74^max) MB/s ∼62{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +401{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Average of class Gaming
(288 – 4383, n=181, last 2 years) Average Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
(441 – 2635, n=3) Gigabyte A7 X1
ESR512GTLCG-EAC-4

549 (541.16^min – 549.03^max) MB/s ∼15{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +24{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Asus ROG Strix G18 G814JI
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM

441 (428.19^min – 440.55^max) MB/s ∼12{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Alienware x17 RTX 3080 P48E
2x WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00 (RAID 0)

376 (372.82^min – 375.8^max) MB/s ∼11{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -15{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

MSI Raider GE77 HX 12UHS
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB

8951 Points ∼100{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +110{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 Ti
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR

8923 Points ∼100{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +109{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
SSSTC CA6-8D1024 Average of class Gaming
(910 – 10330, n=171, last 2 years) Average Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
(4272 – 6311, n=3) Gigabyte A7 X1
ESR512GTLCG-EAC-4 Alienware x17 RTX 3080 P48E
2x WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00 (RAID 0) Asus ROG Strix G18 G814JI
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
SSSTC CA6-8D1024

3490 Points ∼100{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +170{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 Ti
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR MSI Raider GE77 HX 12UHS
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB Average of class Gaming
(389 – 3629, n=171, last 2 years) Average Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
(1294 – 2446, n=3) Alienware x17 RTX 3080 P48E
2x WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00 (RAID 0) Gigabyte A7 X1
ESR512GTLCG-EAC-4 Asus ROG Strix G18 G814JI
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM MSI Raider GE77 HX 12UHS
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 Ti
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR Average of class Gaming
(338 – 5157, n=171, last 2 years) Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
SSSTC CA6-8D1024 Average Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
(2387 – 2658, n=3) Gigabyte A7 X1
ESR512GTLCG-EAC-4 Asus ROG Strix G18 G814JI
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM Alienware x17 RTX 3080 P48E
2x WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00 (RAID 0) Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
SSSTC CA6-8D1024

5770.79 MB/s ∼100{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +51{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 Ti
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR MSI Raider GE77 HX 12UHS
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB Alienware x17 RTX 3080 P48E
2x WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00 (RAID 0) Average of class Gaming
(925 – 9971, n=171, last 2 years) Average Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
(3811 – 3977, n=3) Asus ROG Strix G18 G814JI
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM Gigabyte A7 X1
ESR512GTLCG-EAC-4 Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 Ti
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR

4007.79 MB/s ∼100{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +73{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
SSSTC CA6-8D1024 MSI Raider GE77 HX 12UHS
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB Average of class Gaming
(308 – 8590, n=171, last 2 years) Average Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
(2320 – 3021, n=3) Asus ROG Strix G18 G814JI
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM Alienware x17 RTX 3080 P48E
2x WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00 (RAID 0) Gigabyte A7 X1
ESR512GTLCG-EAC-4 MSI Raider GE77 HX 12UHS
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 Ti
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
SSSTC CA6-8D1024 Average of class Gaming
(20 – 108, n=171, last 2 years) Average Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
(37.9 – 58.8, n=3) Alienware x17 RTX 3080 P48E
2x WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00 (RAID 0) Gigabyte A7 X1
ESR512GTLCG-EAC-4 Asus ROG Strix G18 G814JI
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM MSI Raider GE77 HX 12UHS
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
SSSTC CA6-8D1024 Average Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
(152.2 – 249, n=3) Average of class Gaming
(18 – 364, n=171, last 2 years) Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 Ti
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR Asus ROG Strix G18 G814JI
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM Alienware x17 RTX 3080 P48E
2x WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00 (RAID 0) Gigabyte A7 X1
ESR512GTLCG-EAC-4 Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
SSSTC CA6-8D1024

2843.31 MB/s ∼100{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +225{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 Ti
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR

2817.67 MB/s ∼99{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +222{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

MSI Raider GE77 HX 12UHS
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB

2811.14 MB/s ∼99{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +221{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Average of class Gaming
(216 – 2963, n=171, last 2 years) Average Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
(875 – 1995, n=3) Alienware x17 RTX 3080 P48E
2x WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00 (RAID 0) Gigabyte A7 X1
ESR512GTLCG-EAC-4 Asus ROG Strix G18 G814JI
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM MSI Raider GE77 HX 12UHS
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB

3271.86 MB/s ∼100{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +63{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 Ti
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR Average of class Gaming
(243 – 4381, n=171, last 2 years) Gigabyte A7 X1
ESR512GTLCG-EAC-4 Average Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
(1949 – 2108, n=3) Asus ROG Strix G18 G814JI
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
SSSTC CA6-8D1024 Alienware x17 RTX 3080 P48E
2x WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00 (RAID 0) Gigabyte A7 X1
ESR512GTLCG-EAC-4 Average Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
(0.04 – 0.094, n=3) Average of class Gaming
(0.022 – 0.23, n=166, last 2 years) Asus ROG Strix G18 G814JI
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM Alienware x17 RTX 3080 P48E
2x WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00 (RAID 0) Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 Ti
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR MSI Raider GE77 HX 12UHS
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
SSSTC CA6-8D1024 Asus ROG Strix G18 G814JI
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM Average Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
(0.096 – 0.12, n=3) Alienware x17 RTX 3080 P48E
2x WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00 (RAID 0) Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 Ti
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR Average of class Gaming
(0.012 – 0.425, n=171, last 2 years) Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
SSSTC CA6-8D1024 Gigabyte A7 X1
ESR512GTLCG-EAC-4 MSI Raider GE77 HX 12UHS
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB

* … smaller is better

Posts pagination

Previous page Page 1 … Page 5 Page 6 Page 7 … Page 15 Next page