Alienware m18 R1 laptop review: Bigger and heavier than the MSI Titan GT77

Alienware m18 R1 laptop review: Bigger and heavier than the MSI Titan GT77
KFA2 GeForce RTX 4090 SG
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU Alienware m18 R1
Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
  (194.5 – 233, n=7) Alienware x17 R2 P48E
Intel Core i9-12900HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU Alienware x17 RTX 3080 P48E
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU Razer Blade Pro 17 2021 (QHD Touch)
Intel Core i7-10875H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU HP Omen 16-n0033dx
AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, AMD Radeon RX 6650M Corsair Voyager a1600
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, AMD Radeon RX 6800M Razer Blade 17 (i7-12800H, RTX 3070 Ti)
Intel Core i7-12800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU KFA2 GeForce RTX 4090 SG
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Alienware m18 R1
Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
  (155.9 – 230, n=8) Alienware x17 R2 P48E
Intel Core i9-12900HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU Razer Blade Pro 17 2021 (QHD Touch)
Intel Core i7-10875H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU Razer Blade 17 (i7-12800H, RTX 3070 Ti)
Intel Core i7-12800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU Alienware x17 RTX 3080 P48E
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU Corsair Voyager a1600
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, AMD Radeon RX 6800M HP Omen 16-n0033dx
AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, AMD Radeon RX 6650M KFA2 GeForce RTX 4090 SG
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Alienware m18 R1
Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
  (122.2 – 194.9, n=14) Alienware x17 R2 P48E
Intel Core i9-12900HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT)
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, AMD Radeon RX 6850M XT Razer Blade Pro 17 2021 (QHD Touch)
Intel Core i7-10875H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU Alienware x17 RTX 3080 P48E
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU Razer Blade 17 (i7-12800H, RTX 3070 Ti)
Intel Core i7-12800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU Corsair Voyager a1600
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, AMD Radeon RX 6800M MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH
Intel Core i9-11900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU




88 (56min) fps ∼39{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -55{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

HP Omen 16-n0033dx
AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, AMD Radeon RX 6650M KFA2 GeForce RTX 4090 SG
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU Alienware m18 R1
Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
  (115.7 – 162.9, n=14) Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT)
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, AMD Radeon RX 6850M XT Razer Blade Pro 17 2021 (QHD Touch)
Intel Core i7-10875H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU Alienware x17 RTX 3080 P48E
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU Razer Blade 17 (i7-12800H, RTX 3070 Ti)
Intel Core i7-12800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH
Intel Core i9-11900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU




71.2 (44min) fps ∼33{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -55{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Corsair Voyager a1600
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, AMD Radeon RX 6800M KFA2 GeForce RTX 4090 SG
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU Alienware m18 R1
Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
  (83 – 94.7, n=7) Alienware x17 RTX 3080 P48E
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU Razer Blade Pro 17 2021 (QHD Touch)
Intel Core i7-10875H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT)
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, AMD Radeon RX 6850M XT Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH
Intel Core i9-11900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU




42.9 (27min) fps ∼27{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -54{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Corsair Voyager a1600
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, AMD Radeon RX 6800M
KFA2 GeForce RTX 4090 SG
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090




809 (30.7min, 374P0.1, 574P1) fps ∼100{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +25{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Alienware m18 R1
Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU




649.2 (630min) fps ∼80{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU




617 (563min) fps ∼76{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -5{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
  (444 – 718, n=6) Alienware x17 R2 P48E
Intel Core i9-12900HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU




500.9 (452min) fps ∼62{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -23{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Alienware x17 RTX 3080 P48E
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU




370.2 (327min) fps ∼46{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -43{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Razer Blade Pro 17 2021 (QHD Touch)
Intel Core i7-10875H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU




368 (320min) fps ∼45{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -43{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Razer Blade 17 (i7-12800H, RTX 3070 Ti)
Intel Core i7-12800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU Corsair Voyager a1600
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, AMD Radeon RX 6800M




309 (29.3min, 92.9P0.1, 225P1) fps ∼38{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -52{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

HP Omen 16-n0033dx
AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, AMD Radeon RX 6650M




276.5 (260min) fps ∼34{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -57{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT)
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, AMD Radeon RX 6850M XT KFA2 GeForce RTX 4090 SG
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090




730 (83.6min, 375P0.1, 541P1) fps ∼100{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +29{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Alienware m18 R1
Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU




563.8 (501min) fps ∼77{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
  (371 – 617, n=6) Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU




405.9 (371min) fps ∼56{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -28{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Alienware x17 R2 P48E
Intel Core i9-12900HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU




388.5 (358min) fps ∼53{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -31{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Razer Blade 17 (i7-12800H, RTX 3070 Ti)
Intel Core i7-12800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU Alienware x17 RTX 3080 P48E
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU




294 (277min) fps ∼40{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -48{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Razer Blade Pro 17 2021 (QHD Touch)
Intel Core i7-10875H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU




288.6 (275min) fps ∼40{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -49{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Corsair Voyager a1600
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, AMD Radeon RX 6800M




236 (13.7min, 152P0.1, 192P1) fps ∼32{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -58{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

HP Omen 16-n0033dx
AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, AMD Radeon RX 6650M




217.4 (196min) fps ∼30{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -61{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT)
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, AMD Radeon RX 6850M XT KFA2 GeForce RTX 4090 SG
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090




629 (95.8min, 317P0.1, 465P1) fps ∼100{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +42{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Alienware m18 R1
Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU




441.6 (406min) fps ∼70{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
  (305 – 449, n=8) Alienware x17 R2 P48E
Intel Core i9-12900HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU




267.7 (247min) fps ∼43{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -39{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU




240.9 (228min) fps ∼38{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -45{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Razer Blade Pro 17 2021 (QHD Touch)
Intel Core i7-10875H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU




208.1 (190min) fps ∼33{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -53{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Alienware x17 RTX 3080 P48E
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU




192 (183min) fps ∼31{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -57{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT)
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, AMD Radeon RX 6850M XT Corsair Voyager a1600
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, AMD Radeon RX 6800M




177.8 (43.6min, 105.5P0.1, 142.7P1) fps ∼28{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -60{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH
Intel Core i9-11900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU




174 (141min) fps ∼28{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -61{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Razer Blade 17 (i7-12800H, RTX 3070 Ti)
Intel Core i7-12800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU HP Omen 16-n0033dx
AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, AMD Radeon RX 6650M




167 (157min) fps ∼27{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -62{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

KFA2 GeForce RTX 4090 SG
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090




306 (93.3min, 156.1P0.1, 239P1) fps ∼100{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +43{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Alienware m18 R1
Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU




213.9 (205min) fps ∼70{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
  (174.8 – 216, n=13) MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU




198.9 (190min, 191P1) fps ∼65{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -7{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Alienware x17 R2 P48E
Intel Core i9-12900HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU




128 (124min) fps ∼42{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -40{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT)
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, AMD Radeon RX 6850M XT Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU




113.9 (110min) fps ∼37{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -47{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Razer Blade 17 (i7-12800H, RTX 3070 Ti)
Intel Core i7-12800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU Razer Blade Pro 17 2021 (QHD Touch)
Intel Core i7-10875H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU




108.3 (98min) fps ∼35{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -49{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Corsair Voyager a1600
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, AMD Radeon RX 6800M




108 (38min, 58.3P0.1, 88.2P1) fps ∼35{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -50{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Alienware x17 RTX 3080 P48E
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU




105.2 (98min) fps ∼34{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -51{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH
Intel Core i9-11900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU




93.8 (75min) fps ∼31{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -56{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

HP Omen 16-n0033dx
AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, AMD Radeon RX 6650M




90.1 (84min) fps ∼29{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -58{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

KFA2 GeForce RTX 4090 SG
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090




286 (92.1min, 181.2P0.1, 243P1) fps ∼100{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +73{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Alienware m18 R1
Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU




165.6 (152min) fps ∼58{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
  (130 – 167.6, n=6) Alienware x17 RTX 3080 P48E
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU




80.2 (75min) fps ∼28{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -52{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Razer Blade Pro 17 2021 (QHD Touch)
Intel Core i7-10875H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU




80 (74min) fps ∼28{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -52{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU




72.5 (66min) fps ∼25{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -56{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT)
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, AMD Radeon RX 6850M XT MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH
Intel Core i9-11900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU




66.7 (57min) fps ∼23{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -60{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Corsair Voyager a1600
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, AMD Radeon RX 6800M




59.5 (40.7min, 48.1P0.1, 51.6P1) fps ∼21{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -64{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

KFA2 GeForce RTX 4090 SG
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090




188.2 (5.08min, 200P1) fps ∼100{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +1{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Alienware x17 R2 P48E
Intel Core i9-12900HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU




187 (2.05min, 200P1) fps ∼99{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} 0{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
  (186 – 187.5, n=6) Alienware m18 R1
Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU




186.7 (1.455min, 142.9P1) fps ∼99{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU




186.1 (1.631min, 100P1) fps ∼99{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} 0{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Alienware x17 RTX 3080 P48E
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU




183 (3.7min, 143P1) fps ∼97{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -2{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Razer Blade 17 (i7-12800H, RTX 3070 Ti)
Intel Core i7-12800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU




182.6 (2.85min, 125P1) fps ∼97{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -2{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Razer Blade Pro 17 2021 (QHD Touch)
Intel Core i7-10875H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU




181 (3.66min, 143P1) fps ∼96{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -3{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Corsair Voyager a1600
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, AMD Radeon RX 6800M




177.1 (4.8min, 125P1) fps ∼94{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -5{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT)
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, AMD Radeon RX 6850M XT




173.2 (3.96min, 111.1P1) fps ∼92{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -7{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

KFA2 GeForce RTX 4090 SG
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090




188 (2.61min, 200P1) fps ∼100{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} 0{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Alienware m18 R1
Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU




187.3 (1.557min, 200P1) fps ∼100{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
  (186.8 – 187.6, n=7) Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU




187 (1.607min, 142.9P1) fps ∼99{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} 0{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Alienware x17 R2 P48E
Intel Core i9-12900HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU




186.7 (1.441min, 166.7P1) fps ∼99{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} 0{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Razer Blade Pro 17 2021 (QHD Touch)
Intel Core i7-10875H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU




182 (3.86min, 143P1) fps ∼97{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -3{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Alienware x17 RTX 3080 P48E
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU




180 (4.3min, 125P1) fps ∼96{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -4{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Corsair Voyager a1600
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, AMD Radeon RX 6800M




178.3 (4.09min, 142.9P1) fps ∼95{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -5{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Razer Blade 17 (i7-12800H, RTX 3070 Ti)
Intel Core i7-12800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU




178 (3.85min, 125P1) fps ∼95{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -5{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT)
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, AMD Radeon RX 6850M XT




173.7 (4.15min, 125P1) fps ∼92{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -7{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

KFA2 GeForce RTX 4090 SG
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090




188.4 (2.61min, 200P1) fps ∼100{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +2{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
  (183.1 – 187.3, n=8) Alienware m18 R1
Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU




185.3 (1.896min, 125P1) fps ∼98{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Alienware x17 R2 P48E
Intel Core i9-12900HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU




185.1 (2.11min, 142.9P1) fps ∼98{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} 0{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU




184.7 (1.535min, 111.1P1) fps ∼98{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} 0{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU




184.1 (1.758min, 111.1P1) fps ∼98{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -1{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Razer Blade 17 (i7-12800H, RTX 3070 Ti)
Intel Core i7-12800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU




176.8 (3.24min, 125P1) fps ∼94{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -5{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Alienware x17 RTX 3080 P48E
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU




176 (4.96min, 125P1) fps ∼93{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -5{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Razer Blade Pro 17 2021 (QHD Touch)
Intel Core i7-10875H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU




174 (3.14min, 125P1) fps ∼92{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -6{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Corsair Voyager a1600
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, AMD Radeon RX 6800M




172 (4.64min, 125P1) fps ∼91{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -7{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT)
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, AMD Radeon RX 6850M XT




168.3 (5.75min, 125P1) fps ∼89{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -9{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

KFA2 GeForce RTX 4090 SG
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090




187.9 (3.5min, 200P1) fps ∼100{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +1{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
  (184.1 – 187.4, n=7) Alienware m18 R1
Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU




186 (1.556min, 125P1) fps ∼99{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU




185.5 (1.486min, 125P1) fps ∼99{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} 0{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Alienware x17 R2 P48E
Intel Core i9-12900HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU




184.5 (2.01min, 142.9P1) fps ∼98{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -1{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Razer Blade 17 (i7-12800H, RTX 3070 Ti)
Intel Core i7-12800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU




173.1 (4.2min, 125P1) fps ∼92{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -7{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Razer Blade Pro 17 2021 (QHD Touch)
Intel Core i7-10875H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU




173 (3.66min, 125P1) fps ∼92{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -7{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Alienware x17 RTX 3080 P48E
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU




173 (27.1min, 111P1) fps ∼92{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -7{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Corsair Voyager a1600
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, AMD Radeon RX 6800M




171 (6.31min, 125P1) fps ∼91{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -8{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT)
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, AMD Radeon RX 6850M XT




168.2 (5.09min, 111.1P1) fps ∼90{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -10{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

KFA2 GeForce RTX 4090 SG
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090




187.1 (3.29min, 142.9P1) fps ∼100{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +1{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Alienware m18 R1
Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU




184.5 (1.946min, 142.9P1) fps ∼99{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
  (179.8 – 186.5, n=9) MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU




182.6 (1.92min, 111.1P1) fps ∼98{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -1{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU




181.6 (1.674min, 125P1) fps ∼97{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -2{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Alienware x17 R2 P48E
Intel Core i9-12900HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU




180.8 (3.24min, 142.9P1) fps ∼97{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -2{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Razer Blade 17 (i7-12800H, RTX 3070 Ti)
Intel Core i7-12800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU




164.2 (4.34min, 100P1) fps ∼88{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -11{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Razer Blade Pro 17 2021 (QHD Touch)
Intel Core i7-10875H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU




164 (6.29min, 111P1) fps ∼88{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -11{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH
Intel Core i9-11900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU




164 (5.22min, 100P1) fps ∼88{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -11{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Alienware x17 RTX 3080 P48E
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU




163 (16.4min, 111P1) fps ∼87{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -12{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Corsair Voyager a1600
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, AMD Radeon RX 6800M




156.2 (7.96min, 76.9P1) fps ∼83{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -15{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT)
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, AMD Radeon RX 6850M XT




152 (5.06min, 76.9P1) fps ∼81{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -18{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

KFA2 GeForce RTX 4090 SG
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090




163.3 (13min, 125P1) fps ∼100{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +10{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Alienware m18 R1
Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU




149 (3.13min, 111.1P1) fps ∼91{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU




140.9 (3.54min, 83.3P1) fps ∼86{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -5{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
  (107.8 – 151.6, n=14) Alienware x17 R2 P48E
Intel Core i9-12900HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU




126.3 (5.94min, 90.9P1) fps ∼77{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -15{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU




121.4 (3.6min, 76.9P1) fps ∼74{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -19{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Razer Blade 17 (i7-12800H, RTX 3070 Ti)
Intel Core i7-12800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU




103.8 (9.16min, 71.4P1) fps ∼64{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -30{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Razer Blade Pro 17 2021 (QHD Touch)
Intel Core i7-10875H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU




99.5 (5.74min, 71.4P1) fps ∼61{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -33{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH
Intel Core i9-11900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU




98.5 (17.3min, 62.5P1) fps ∼60{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -34{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Alienware x17 RTX 3080 P48E
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU




98.1 (9.21min, 71.4P1) fps ∼60{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -34{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Corsair Voyager a1600
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, AMD Radeon RX 6800M




92.8 (6.46min, 55.6P1) fps ∼57{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -38{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT)
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, AMD Radeon RX 6850M XT




92.6 (7.62min, 55.6P1) fps ∼57{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -38{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

KFA2 GeForce RTX 4090 SG
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090




166 (8.61min, 125P1) fps ∼100{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +14{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Alienware m18 R1
Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU




145.5 (2.46min, 111.1P1) fps ∼88{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU




138.5 (3.45min, 76.9P1) fps ∼83{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -5{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
  (105.6 – 146.3, n=13) Razer Blade Pro 17 2021 (QHD Touch)
Intel Core i7-10875H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU




92.5 (4.54min, 62.5P1) fps ∼56{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -36{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Alienware x17 RTX 3080 P48E
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU




89.2 (7.71min, 62.5P1) fps ∼54{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -39{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT)
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, AMD Radeon RX 6850M XT




88.7 (5.83min, 55.6P1) fps ∼53{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -39{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU




87.6 (4.62min, 55.6P1) fps ∼53{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -40{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Corsair Voyager a1600
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, AMD Radeon RX 6800M




84 (5.57min, 58.8P1) fps ∼51{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -42{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH
Intel Core i9-11900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU




82.3 (16.3min, 58.8P1) fps ∼50{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -43{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

KFA2 GeForce RTX 4090 SG
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090




135.5 (6.08min, 90.9P1) fps ∼100{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +56{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Alienware m18 R1
Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU




86.9 (3.27min, 58.8P1) fps ∼64{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU




86.2 (3.93min, 55.6P1) fps ∼64{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -1{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
  (60.1 – 90, n=8) Alienware x17 RTX 3080 P48E
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU




57.8 (8.03min, 41.7P1) fps ∼43{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -33{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Razer Blade Pro 17 2021 (QHD Touch)
Intel Core i7-10875H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU




53.8 (4.03min, 37P1) fps ∼40{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -38{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT)
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, AMD Radeon RX 6850M XT




50.5 (1.341min, 32.3P1) fps ∼37{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -42{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Corsair Voyager a1600
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, AMD Radeon RX 6800M




43.3 (23.3min, 30.3P1) fps ∼32{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -50{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU




38.2 (3.33min, 26.3P1) fps ∼28{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -56{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

KFA2 GeForce RTX 4090 SG
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090




187.8 (4.41min, 200P1) fps ∼100{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +6{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Alienware m18 R1
Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU




176.4 (1.959min, 111.1P1) fps ∼94{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU




175.7 (2.91min, 111.1P1) fps ∼94{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} 0{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
  (88.9 – 180.2, n=7) Razer Blade Pro 17 2021 (QHD Touch)
Intel Core i7-10875H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU




106 (9.14min, 76.9P1) fps ∼56{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -40{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT)
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, AMD Radeon RX 6850M XT




98.5 (4.4min, 71.4P1) fps ∼52{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -44{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Alienware x17 RTX 3080 P48E
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU




98.1 (29.8min, 71.4P1) fps ∼52{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -44{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU




88.5 (5.15min, 58.8P1) fps ∼47{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -50{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH
Intel Core i9-11900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU




86.5 (25.9min, 62.5P1) fps ∼46{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -51{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Corsair Voyager a1600
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, AMD Radeon RX 6800M




85.4 (7.85min, 66.7P1) fps ∼45{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -52{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

KFA2 GeForce RTX 4090 SG
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090




513 (364min, 323P1) fps ∼100{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +22{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Alienware m18 R1
Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU




420 (312min, 259P1) fps ∼82{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
  (298 – 440, n=5) Corsair Voyager a1600
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, AMD Radeon RX 6800M




286 (208min, 181P1) fps ∼56{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -32{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

HP Omen 16-n0033dx
AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, AMD Radeon RX 6650M




264 (193min, 169P1) fps ∼51{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -37{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

KFA2 GeForce RTX 4090 SG
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090




440 (297min, 246P1) fps ∼100{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +31{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Alienware m18 R1
Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU




336 (254min, 185P1) fps ∼76{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU




316 (221min, 136P1) fps ∼72{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -6{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
  (254 – 375, n=7) Corsair Voyager a1600
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, AMD Radeon RX 6800M




226 (178min, 142P1) fps ∼51{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -33{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

HP Omen 16-n0033dx
AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, AMD Radeon RX 6650M




217 (166min, 135P1) fps ∼49{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -35{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

KFA2 GeForce RTX 4090 SG
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090




418 (290min, 235P1) fps ∼100{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +31{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Alienware m18 R1
Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU




320 (249min, 161P1) fps ∼77{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
  (264 – 358, n=7) MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU




294 (222min, 116P1) fps ∼70{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -8{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Corsair Voyager a1600
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, AMD Radeon RX 6800M




226 (179min, 137P1) fps ∼54{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -29{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

HP Omen 16-n0033dx
AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, AMD Radeon RX 6650M




215 (159min, 131P1) fps ∼51{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -33{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

KFA2 GeForce RTX 4090 SG
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090




409 (282min, 227P1) fps ∼100{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +29{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Alienware m18 R1
Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU




318 (231min, 173P1) fps ∼78{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU




283 (209min, 116P1) fps ∼69{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -11{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
  (223 – 322, n=8) Corsair Voyager a1600
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, AMD Radeon RX 6800M




192.3 (149min, 122P1) fps ∼47{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -40{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

HP Omen 16-n0033dx
AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, AMD Radeon RX 6650M




178.2 (151min, 121P1) fps ∼44{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -44{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

KFA2 GeForce RTX 4090 SG
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090




207 (167min, 133P1) fps ∼100{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +43{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Alienware m18 R1
Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU




144.7 (124min, 94P1) fps ∼70{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU




138.2 (118min, 84P1) fps ∼67{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -4{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
  (70.3 – 144.7, n=12) Corsair Voyager a1600
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, AMD Radeon RX 6800M




49.7 (39min, 39P1) fps ∼24{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -66{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

HP Omen 16-n0033dx
AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, AMD Radeon RX 6650M




40.6 (31min, 31P1) fps ∼20{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -72{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

KFA2 GeForce RTX 4090 SG
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090




156.2 (136min, 113P1) fps ∼100{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +69{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Alienware m18 R1
Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU




92.2 (79min, 74P1) fps ∼59{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU




90.1 (78min, 71P1) fps ∼58{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -2{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
  (75 – 92.2, n=12) Corsair Voyager a1600
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, AMD Radeon RX 6800M




29.9 (23min, 23P1) fps ∼19{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -68{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

KFA2 GeForce RTX 4090 SG
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090




82.5 (70min, 71P1) fps ∼100{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +81{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Alienware m18 R1
Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU




45.5 (38min, 37P1) fps ∼55{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU




44.9 (38min, 37P1) fps ∼54{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -1{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
  (40.6 – 45.5, n=7) Corsair Voyager a1600
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, AMD Radeon RX 6800M




13.8 (11min, 11P1) fps ∼17{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -70{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

KFA2 GeForce RTX 4090 SG
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090




294 (249.5min) fps ∼100{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +17{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Alienware m18 R1
Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU




251 (208.4min) fps ∼85{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU




225 (187.6min) fps ∼77{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -10{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU




225 (190.1min) fps ∼77{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -10{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
  (164.8 – 251, n=14) Alienware x17 R2 P48E
Intel Core i9-12900HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU




186.1 (164.8min) fps ∼63{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -26{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH
Intel Core i9-11900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU




175 (138.4min) fps ∼60{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -30{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Razer Blade 17 (i7-12800H, RTX 3070 Ti)
Intel Core i7-12800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU




173.6 (152.7min) fps ∼59{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -31{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Alienware x17 RTX 3080 P48E
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU




164 (143.2min) fps ∼56{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -35{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Razer Blade Pro 17 2021 (QHD Touch)
Intel Core i7-10875H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU




158 (136.3min) fps ∼54{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -37{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Corsair Voyager a1600
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, AMD Radeon RX 6800M




146.1 (117.8min) fps ∼50{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -42{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

HP Omen 16-n0033dx
AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, AMD Radeon RX 6650M




141 (120min) fps ∼48{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -44{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT)
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, AMD Radeon RX 6850M XT




134.7 (115.7min) fps ∼46{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -46{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

KFA2 GeForce RTX 4090 SG
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090




260 (226.7min) fps ∼100{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +18{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Alienware m18 R1
Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU




220 (187.7min) fps ∼85{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU




206 (174.7min) fps ∼79{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -6{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
  (149.1 – 220, n=14) Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU




200 (151.8min) fps ∼77{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -9{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Alienware x17 R2 P48E
Intel Core i9-12900HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU




172.3 (152.2min) fps ∼66{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -22{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Razer Blade 17 (i7-12800H, RTX 3070 Ti)
Intel Core i7-12800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU




159.3 (141.6min) fps ∼61{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -28{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH
Intel Core i9-11900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU




155 (134.6min) fps ∼60{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -30{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Alienware x17 RTX 3080 P48E
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU




148 (127.1min) fps ∼57{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -33{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Razer Blade Pro 17 2021 (QHD Touch)
Intel Core i7-10875H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU




147 (127.4min) fps ∼57{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -33{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

HP Omen 16-n0033dx
AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, AMD Radeon RX 6650M




130.7 (107.5min) fps ∼50{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -41{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Corsair Voyager a1600
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, AMD Radeon RX 6800M




126.2 (107min) fps ∼49{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -43{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT)
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, AMD Radeon RX 6850M XT




116.5 (94.8min) fps ∼45{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -47{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

KFA2 GeForce RTX 4090 SG
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090




255 (214min) fps ∼100{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +21{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Alienware m18 R1
Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU




194.1 (163.4min) fps ∼76{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -8{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
  (143.2 – 210, n=15) Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU




191 (165.9min) fps ∼75{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -9{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Alienware x17 R2 P48E
Intel Core i9-12900HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU




166.6 (146.7min) fps ∼65{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -21{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Razer Blade 17 (i7-12800H, RTX 3070 Ti)
Intel Core i7-12800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU




150 (131.4min) fps ∼59{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -29{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH
Intel Core i9-11900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU




146 (120.5min) fps ∼57{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -30{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Alienware x17 RTX 3080 P48E
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU




143 (121.6min) fps ∼56{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -32{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Razer Blade Pro 17 2021 (QHD Touch)
Intel Core i7-10875H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU




139 (120.3min) fps ∼55{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -34{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Corsair Voyager a1600
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, AMD Radeon RX 6800M




125.5 (105.8min) fps ∼49{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -40{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

HP Omen 16-n0033dx
AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, AMD Radeon RX 6650M




118 (102.7min) fps ∼46{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -44{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT)
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, AMD Radeon RX 6850M XT




112.5 (94.7min) fps ∼44{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -46{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

KFA2 GeForce RTX 4090 SG
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090




233 (196.4min) fps ∼100{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +20{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Alienware m18 R1
Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU




194.2 (157.6min) fps ∼83{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU




185.9 (157.5min) fps ∼80{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -4{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
  (133.9 – 194.2, n=15) Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU




178.6 (153.9min) fps ∼77{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -8{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Alienware x17 R2 P48E
Intel Core i9-12900HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU




158.9 (139.1min) fps ∼68{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -18{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Razer Blade 17 (i7-12800H, RTX 3070 Ti)
Intel Core i7-12800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU




141.6 (124min) fps ∼61{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -27{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Alienware x17 RTX 3080 P48E
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU




135 (117.3min) fps ∼58{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -30{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Razer Blade Pro 17 2021 (QHD Touch)
Intel Core i7-10875H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU




134 (115.1min) fps ∼58{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -31{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH
Intel Core i9-11900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU




131 (113.6min) fps ∼56{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -33{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Corsair Voyager a1600
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, AMD Radeon RX 6800M




114.8 (94.7min) fps ∼49{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -41{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

HP Omen 16-n0033dx
AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, AMD Radeon RX 6650M




100 (82.7min) fps ∼43{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -49{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT)
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, AMD Radeon RX 6850M XT




94 (75.5min) fps ∼40{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -52{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

KFA2 GeForce RTX 4090 SG
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090




234 (189.7min) fps ∼100{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +23{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Alienware m18 R1
Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU




190.2 (152.2min) fps ∼81{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU




178.9 (144.9min) fps ∼76{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -6{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
  (134.1 – 190.2, n=9) Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU




145.5 (109.1min) fps ∼62{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -24{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Razer Blade Pro 17 2021 (QHD Touch)
Intel Core i7-10875H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU




128 (107.9min) fps ∼55{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -33{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Alienware x17 RTX 3080 P48E
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU




111 (96.7min) fps ∼47{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -42{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH
Intel Core i9-11900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU




110 (8.5min) fps ∼47{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -42{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Corsair Voyager a1600
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, AMD Radeon RX 6800M




95.2 (83.7min) fps ∼41{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -50{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT)
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, AMD Radeon RX 6850M XT




77.5 (62.8min) fps ∼33{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -59{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

KFA2 GeForce RTX 4090 SG
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Alienware m18 R1
Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
  (154.4 – 212, n=18) Alienware x17 R2 P48E
Intel Core i9-12900HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU Razer Blade 17 (i7-12800H, RTX 3070 Ti)
Intel Core i7-12800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH
Intel Core i9-11900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU Razer Blade Pro 17 2021 (QHD Touch)
Intel Core i7-10875H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU Alienware x17 RTX 3080 P48E
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT)
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, AMD Radeon RX 6850M XT HP Omen 16-n0033dx
AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, AMD Radeon RX 6650M Corsair Voyager a1600
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, AMD Radeon RX 6800M KFA2 GeForce RTX 4090 SG
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Alienware m18 R1
Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
  (126.5 – 188.8, n=18) Alienware x17 R2 P48E
Intel Core i9-12900HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU Razer Blade 17 (i7-12800H, RTX 3070 Ti)
Intel Core i7-12800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU Razer Blade Pro 17 2021 (QHD Touch)
Intel Core i7-10875H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH
Intel Core i9-11900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU Alienware x17 RTX 3080 P48E
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU HP Omen 16-n0033dx
AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, AMD Radeon RX 6650M Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT)
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, AMD Radeon RX 6850M XT Corsair Voyager a1600
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, AMD Radeon RX 6800M KFA2 GeForce RTX 4090 SG
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Alienware m18 R1
Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
  (100.7 – 146.4, n=19) Alienware x17 R2 P48E
Intel Core i9-12900HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU Razer Blade 17 (i7-12800H, RTX 3070 Ti)
Intel Core i7-12800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU Razer Blade Pro 17 2021 (QHD Touch)
Intel Core i7-10875H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH
Intel Core i9-11900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU Alienware x17 RTX 3080 P48E
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU HP Omen 16-n0033dx
AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, AMD Radeon RX 6650M Corsair Voyager a1600
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, AMD Radeon RX 6800M Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT)
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, AMD Radeon RX 6850M XT KFA2 GeForce RTX 4090 SG
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Alienware m18 R1
Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
  (89.9 – 124.7, n=8) MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU Razer Blade Pro 17 2021 (QHD Touch)
Intel Core i7-10875H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH
Intel Core i9-11900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU Alienware x17 RTX 3080 P48E
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU Corsair Voyager a1600
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, AMD Radeon RX 6800M Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT)
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, AMD Radeon RX 6850M XT
KFA2 GeForce RTX 4090 SG
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090




710 (60.2min, 542P1) fps ∼100{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +49{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
  (432 – 656, n=9) MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU




490 (190.6min, 374P1) fps ∼69{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +3{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Alienware m18 R1
Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU




475 (108.5min, 369P1) fps ∼67{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Alienware x17 R2 P48E
Intel Core i9-12900HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU




474 (62.3min, 339P1) fps ∼67{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} 0{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU




464 (23.5min, 346P1) fps ∼65{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -2{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Alienware x17 RTX 3080 P48E
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU




456 (41.1min, 323P1) fps ∼64{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -4{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Razer Blade Pro 17 2021 (QHD Touch)
Intel Core i7-10875H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU




437 (91.5min, 338P1) fps ∼62{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -8{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Corsair Voyager a1600
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, AMD Radeon RX 6800M




394 (205min, 288P1) fps ∼55{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -17{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT)
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, AMD Radeon RX 6850M XT




375 (193.7min, 270P1) fps ∼53{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -21{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Razer Blade 17 (i7-12800H, RTX 3070 Ti)
Intel Core i7-12800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU




369 (161.3min, 275P1) fps ∼52{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -22{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

HP Omen 16-n0033dx
AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, AMD Radeon RX 6650M




337 (135.8min, 247P1) fps ∼47{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -29{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

KFA2 GeForce RTX 4090 SG
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090




582 (60min, 428P1) fps ∼100{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +50{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
  (357 – 508, n=9) MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU




396 (105.4min, 296P1) fps ∼68{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +2{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Alienware m18 R1
Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU




388 (107.3min, 288P1) fps ∼67{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU




315 (22.4min, 261P1) fps ∼54{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -19{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Alienware x17 R2 P48E
Intel Core i9-12900HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU




300 (92.3min, 235P1) fps ∼52{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -23{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT)
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, AMD Radeon RX 6850M XT




291 (153.8min, 207P1) fps ∼50{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -25{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Razer Blade Pro 17 2021 (QHD Touch)
Intel Core i7-10875H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU




278 (83.8min, 235P1) fps ∼48{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -28{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Alienware x17 RTX 3080 P48E
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU




269 (40.7min, 189P1) fps ∼46{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -31{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Razer Blade 17 (i7-12800H, RTX 3070 Ti)
Intel Core i7-12800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU




258 (154min, 193.7P1) fps ∼44{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -34{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Corsair Voyager a1600
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, AMD Radeon RX 6800M




258 (161.9min, 196.1P1) fps ∼44{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -34{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

HP Omen 16-n0033dx
AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, AMD Radeon RX 6650M




222 (135.5min, 160.6P1) fps ∼38{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -43{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

KFA2 GeForce RTX 4090 SG
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090




568 (59.5min, 422P1) fps ∼100{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +46{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU




391 (72.1min, 298P1) fps ∼69{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +1{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Alienware m18 R1
Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU




388 (97.1min, 295P1) fps ∼68{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
  (343 – 465, n=10) Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT)
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, AMD Radeon RX 6850M XT




256 (112.2min, 179.5P1) fps ∼45{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -34{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Alienware x17 R2 P48E
Intel Core i9-12900HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU




243 (91.8min, 171.1P1) fps ∼43{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -37{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU




243 (24.9min, 176.9P1) fps ∼43{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -37{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Corsair Voyager a1600
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, AMD Radeon RX 6800M




229 (152.3min, 169.8P1) fps ∼40{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -41{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Alienware x17 RTX 3080 P48E
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU




225 (96.9min, 169P1) fps ∼40{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -42{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Razer Blade Pro 17 2021 (QHD Touch)
Intel Core i7-10875H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU




223 (77.9min, 166P1) fps ∼39{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -43{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Razer Blade 17 (i7-12800H, RTX 3070 Ti)
Intel Core i7-12800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU




217 (77min, 153.8P1) fps ∼38{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -44{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

HP Omen 16-n0033dx
AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, AMD Radeon RX 6650M




190 (123.2min, 140.4P1) fps ∼33{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -51{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH
Intel Core i9-11900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU




185 (31.9min, 133P1) fps ∼33{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -52{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

KFA2 GeForce RTX 4090 SG
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090




562 (60.1min, 413P1) fps ∼100{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +51{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU




373 (29.9min, 272P1) fps ∼66{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} 0{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Alienware m18 R1
Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU




373 (73.3min, 273P1) fps ∼66{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
  (260 – 421, n=14) Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT)
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, AMD Radeon RX 6850M XT




230 (121.4min, 165.6P1) fps ∼41{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -38{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Alienware x17 R2 P48E
Intel Core i9-12900HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU




213 (71.8min, 156.1P1) fps ∼38{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -43{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU




208 (39.5min, 154.8P1) fps ∼37{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -44{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Corsair Voyager a1600
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, AMD Radeon RX 6800M




206 (116.9min, 151.5P1) fps ∼37{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -45{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Alienware x17 RTX 3080 P48E
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU




199 (44.5min, 144P1) fps ∼35{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -47{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Razer Blade Pro 17 2021 (QHD Touch)
Intel Core i7-10875H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU




197 (81.6min, 149P1) fps ∼35{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -47{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Razer Blade 17 (i7-12800H, RTX 3070 Ti)
Intel Core i7-12800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU




191.7 (101.9min, 136.5P1) fps ∼34{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -49{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

HP Omen 16-n0033dx
AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, AMD Radeon RX 6650M




167.2 (61.1min, 120.8P1) fps ∼30{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -55{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH
Intel Core i9-11900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU




165 (97.3min, 123P1) fps ∼29{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -56{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

KFA2 GeForce RTX 4090 SG
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090




504 (60.1min, 360P1) fps ∼100{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +64{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU




309 (143.5min, 236P1) fps ∼61{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} 0{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Alienware m18 R1
Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU




308 (67.2min, 238P1) fps ∼61{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
  (255 – 315, n=13) Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT)
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, AMD Radeon RX 6850M XT




171 (127.1min, 131.9P1) fps ∼34{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -44{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Alienware x17 RTX 3080 P48E
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU




152 (81.4min, 123P1) fps ∼30{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -51{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Corsair Voyager a1600
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, AMD Radeon RX 6800M Razer Blade Pro 17 2021 (QHD Touch)
Intel Core i7-10875H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU




143 (80.5min, 115P1) fps ∼28{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -54{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU




136.7 (54.8min, 112.1P1) fps ∼27{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -56{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH
Intel Core i9-11900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU




123 (36.9min, 94.8P1) fps ∼24{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -60{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

KFA2 GeForce RTX 4090 SG
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090




277 (59.7min, 234P1) fps ∼100{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +73{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Alienware m18 R1
Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU




159.8 (133.4min, 139.2P1) fps ∼58{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU




159.3 (50.2min, 138.7P1) fps ∼58{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} 0{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
  (134.7 – 163.4, n=8) Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT)
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, AMD Radeon RX 6850M XT




92.1 (74.7min, 78.7P1) fps ∼33{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -42{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Alienware x17 RTX 3080 P48E
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU




91.6 (64.5min, 78.7P1) fps ∼33{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -43{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Razer Blade Pro 17 2021 (QHD Touch)
Intel Core i7-10875H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU




84.1 (69.5min, 72.1P1) fps ∼30{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -47{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Corsair Voyager a1600
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, AMD Radeon RX 6800M




77.2 (60.2min, 64.1P1) fps ∼28{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -52{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH
Intel Core i9-11900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU




72.1 (46.2min, 60.4P1) fps ∼26{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -55{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU




71.9 (29.8min, 61.4P1) fps ∼26{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -55{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Epic Games Store’s Next Free Game Is One of Its Biggest Yet [UPDATE]

Epic Games Store’s Next Free Game Is One of Its Biggest Yet [UPDATE]

[UPDATE]: The leak has been verified by the Epic Games Retail store and the Dying Gentle Twitter account, Dying Gentle: Increased Version is established to be the subsequent totally free Epic Video games Retail store activity this coming thursday, exactly where it will be completely absolutely free to obtain for a entire 7 days.

Epic Games Store’s following no cost sport has seemingly leaked, and if the leak is precise, it really is a single of the biggest no cost video games to at any time be provided away by the electronic Laptop storefront. The leak comes the way of Twitter consumer billbil-kun, a nicely-identified leaker most effective recognised for leaking PS Furthermore free of charge game titles and Epic Games Store totally free games. In accordance to the leaker, the up coming no cost recreation set to be offered away by Epic Game titles amongst April 6 and April 13 is Dying Light, or extra specfically, Dying Gentle: Increased Editon, a unique version of the activity that comes with added written content, like Dying Mild: The Adhering to.

Dying Light-weight was unveiled on January 27, 2015 by Techland, who, up until finally that position, was predominately regarded for Dead Island, and to a lesser extent, Phone of Juarez. Now it can be ideal acknowledged for Dying Light-weight, it is most profitable match to date, acquiring bought about 20 millon copies through its 8 several years on the sector.

“From the creators of strike titles Useless Island and Call of Juarez. Winner of around 50 industry awards and nominations. The sport whose uncompromising method to gameplay set new specifications for initial-man or woman zombie game titles,” reads an official blurb about the activity. “Nevertheless supported with new material and no cost neighborhood gatherings many years just after the release. Survive in a city beset by a zombie virus! Find out the tough selection you will have to make on your top secret mission. Will loyalty to your superiors demonstrate much better than the will to help save the survivors? The selection is yours…”

For people that don’t know: Dying Gentle obtained a sequel in 2022, properly titled Dying Gentle 2. It marketed five million copies in its to start with month, but it appears to be the sequel has not realized the identical remaining power as the first activity, which marketed at a regular amount for a lot of yrs immediately after its launch. The online games reviewed simiarly, nonetheless the 1st match seems to be rememberd far more fondly of the two. However, the sequel expenditures $59.99 on Epic Video games Keep, nevertheless it is doable it will go on sale once and if the first match is manufactured free of charge next week.

All of that explained, take this leak with a grain of salt as it’s just a leak, not formal details. The source in query has established reliable and reliable in the earlier, but the earlier is the earlier and you can find no gurantee when it will come to leaks.

Supreme Court to hear Case of Web Designer Refusing to do Gay Wedding Sites

Supreme Court to hear Case of Web Designer Refusing to do Gay Wedding Sites

Lorie Smith, 38, of Littleton, Colo., could be the new experience of a countrywide discussion pitting homosexual legal rights in opposition to flexibility of speech in a circumstance some have referred to as a “free speech blockbuster.”

The Colorado internet web-site designer, who has sued her point out for the suitable to not include gay couples in her wedding day structure enterprise, will see her case argued ahead of the Supreme Court on Monday.

Web designer Lorie Smith
Lorie Smith’s case, 303Inventive v Elenis, is in front of the Supreme Court docket on Dec. 5.
Alliance Defending Independence

Critics see it as undoing civil legal rights protections that bar enterprises from discriminating versus who can receive their companies. Legal scholars see it as a check case on whether or not the state could compel speech by means of the generation of an expressive products that falls beneath the class of “art.”

The situation is a preemptive transfer towards the Colorado’s general public lodging legislation, which mandates that organizations can’t refuse to serve folks centered on race, faith or sexual orientation. Smith, who does not believe that in homosexual marriages due to the fact of her religious convictions, states the latest regulation forces her to possibly design and style sites for similar-intercourse weddings – if she delivers them for reverse-sex partners – or deal with fines and jail time.

The substantial court granted critique of Smith’s scenario in February and will decide whether applying community lodging legal guidelines – important to civil rights enforcement – to force an artist to guidance a certain message violates the free speech clause of the First Amendment.

“I wanted to do artwork for points I was truly passionate about,” she advised Newsweek in an interview about her decision to commence building wedding day web-sites six decades back. “I have always loved weddings and I needed to style and produce sites for weddings.”

Her web page – 303innovative.com (named after the Denver place code) – appears like a regular website designer’s website, showcasing almost everything from infant showers to politics to people with disabilities.

The place it may possibly vary from other people is less than the “about” pull-down where the designer explains her operate. In close proximity to the finish of a paragraph placing out her Christian beliefs, it reads:

“Since of my religion, however, I am selective about the messages that I produce or market – while I will serve anybody, I am normally very careful to prevent communicating ideas or messages, or endorsing events, solutions, solutions, or organizations, that are inconsistent with my spiritual beliefs.”

When she resolved to incorporate weddings to her repertoire in 2016, Smith knew that gay marriage had been legalized the 12 months prior to thanks to the Supreme Court’s Obergefell v. Hodges ruling. Smith, a member of a non-denominational evangelical church, not only believed that relationship really should only be among a person and a female, but she also preferred to stipulate on her site individuals were being the only marriages she’d design and style websites for.

Jack Phillips, defendant in Masterpiece Cakeshop case
Jack Phillips, a Colorado baker who refused to generate a marriage cake for a homosexual few, was sued in 2012. His situation went to the Supreme Courtroom in 2018 exactly where the courtroom claimed the state civil legal rights fee experienced proven hostility to his religious views.
Alliance Defending Liberty

She was also aware of an ongoing lawsuit, Masterpiece Cakeshop v. Colorado Civil Rights Commission, involving a close by baker, Jack Phillips, who experienced been sued by a gay couple for refusing to bake a cake for their marriage ceremony. The fee ruled that Phillips had damaged state law by discriminating against the few. The case made its way to the US Supreme Courtroom, which ruled in 2018 that the commission dealt with Phillips with anti-spiritual bias, but it did not rule on whether Phillips could refuse services to homosexuals on religious or freedom of speech grounds. This was remaining for an additional situation to make a decision.

“I was worried if I continued with this desire and produced artwork steady with my religion, I could be punished,” Smith reported. She then turned to her church to get direction on guarding her religious independence.

Following her pastor referred her to Alliance Defending Independence, the exact same law organization representing Masterpiece, “I took some time to look at my alternatives and in the end resolved to stand for my correct to discuss freely.”

The result is 303Artistic LLC v. Elenis (Aubrey Elenis heads the Colorado Civil Legal rights Fee). Some authorized gurus hope that the justices will definitively rule on liberty of speech and compelled speech – that is, whether people can be compelled to articulate messages they do not individually guidance.

“It would be helpful if they would give us a definition of what constitutes speech,” stated Raymond Ku, a constitutional law scholar at Circumstance Western Reserve College. Citing court conditions involving evangelical Christians who have refused to set up bouquets, supply cakes or get pictures for gay weddings, “The significant concern is: How do we ascertain when a distinct inventive or imaginative action expresses a message?’ Is the generation of these factors by definition ‘speech?’

In that scenario, “If you are forced to express a concept, that is a First Modification problem,” he said.

Us citizens United for Separation of Church and Condition, which has submitted an amicus brief opposing Smith, released a assertion earlier this year declaring a ruling on the matter would bring about extra confusion.

“By limiting the circumstance to the free speech issue, the Supreme Court could hand down a slender ruling that leaves lots of issues unanswered,” it explained. “The court’s conservative the vast majority may well conclude that the firm are not able to be compelled to make web-sites that broadcast messages with which it disagrees, on the grounds that web sites are a variety of conversation.

“But it really is challenging to see how that very same logic would extend to a caterer, a florist or the proprietor of a mattress-and-breakfast who refuses to provide LGBTQ people today, as individuals functions are not types of conversation.”

Smith mentioned she does have homosexual purchasers who’ve requested sites with messages that never contradict her beliefs and that she is speaking for all artists – even those ideologically opposed to her – and their flexibility to refuse commissions they uncover objectionable.

“Absolutely everyone ought to be free to pick the material of their speech,” she claimed. “I have not been capable to create and style for weddings because the point out of Colorado has been clear that I should generate information versus who I am.”

Soon after she submitted a federal lawsuit in September 2016, reaction was swift.

Lorie Smith, Colorado web designer
Lorie Smith, the plaintiff in the U.S.Supreme Court circumstance 303Artistic v. Elenis, claims she has acquired death threats due to the fact of her part in the case.
Alliance Defending Independence

“I was not well prepared for the backlash the earth had in retailer for me,” she reported. “Within an hour of submitting go well with, I acquired death threats and threats of bodily hurt.” A neighbor posted Smith’s property deal with on Facebook, powerful the designer to put her daughter’s university on warn. Her spouse was absent and for the reason that Smith had no safety method yet set up at her house, she slept on the flooring that evening in situation a person shot at her through a window.

Threats to her lifetime and attacks on her web-site by hackers have continued about the many years and intensified as the day for the arguments draws in the vicinity of.

“It has been horrific,” she claimed.

Smith misplaced at the district and circuit court docket ranges, partly for the reason that the situation was hypothetical in that Smith hadn’t been sanctioned by any govt system still [although commission officials said during the district court hearing they would investigate her if a complaint was filed]. The ADF ongoing to charm and the Supreme Court’s decision to consider the circumstance indicators the justices’ willingness to deal with a lengthy-simmering difficulty involving artists and other individuals in the wedding day sector who draw the line at homosexual unions.

“If I ended up a betting individual, I might wager she’d gain on the free speech grounds,” claimed Charles Russo, who teaches education and law at the College of Dayton. “There are already 5 justices in her corner” referring to Justices Brett Kavanaugh, Neil Gorsuch, Clarence Thomas, Samuel Alito and Amy Coney Barrett.

“In gentle of what occurred in Masterpiece,” he additional, “she was having the bull by the horns in filing this.”

As for the preemptive nature of the circumstance, “Complicated unjust rules is a hallmark of civil legal rights litigation,” stated Kellie Fiedorek, a person of the attorneys representing Smith. “Lorie and some others should not have to wait around until eventually the governing administration goes soon after them.”

ADF’s gamble that 303Resourceful may well set new precedent may perhaps pay out off, claimed Alan Brownstein, a retired legislation professor at the College of California/Davis who specializes in constitutional regulation.

“The fact the courtroom took the situation certainly suggests they are likely to rule in her favor,” he mentioned. “The big situation is how slim the court’s feeling is.”

The court’s impression could encompass not only net designers but photographers, cake bakers, flower arrangers and all method of individuals linked with the marriage field, he explained, or it could be a slim impression that encompasses only world wide web designers.

Taken to an intense, anyone could say their business enterprise actions were “expressive,” that means that “you could tear aside civil rights regulation,” he claimed. “You could say: ‘I will not promote meals to a black human being in a restaurant since I never want to talk the concept that one particular need to serve African Us residents together with whites.’ “

Brownstein stated that although there is a physique of legislation on how to rule when the governing administration stops individuals from exercising flexibility of speech, the policies are much less clear when it will come to compelled speech.

“We have a maze of inconsistent conditions that have under no circumstances been put jointly – in doctrine – that supports that framework,” he reported. “That’s a single of the factors this is a really hard circumstance.”

The Top IT Services Companies In March, According To DesignRush

The Top IT Services Companies In March, According To DesignRush
The top IT services companies, according to DesignRush

More than 50{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} of companies will enhance their IT budgets in 2023

SWZD’s survey reveals that 51{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} of corporations are preparing to boost their IT price range in 2023. Some of the important motorists at the rear of this are the require to enhance out-of-date IT infrastructure (51{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}), the elevated precedence on IT initiatives (45{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}) and the heightened stability considerations (41{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}). It highlights that organizations significantly count on professional IT companies to satisfy ambitions and gain a competitive edge in the market.

DesignRush, a B2B marketplace connecting organizations with organizations, determined the very best IT services providers that assistance corporations optimize their IT general performance and keep competitive.

The major IT services businesses in March are:

1. Buguard – buguard.io &#13

Skills: Penetration Testing, Managed Safety, Compliance Advisory and a lot more

2. Indi IT Remedies – indiit.com &#13

Abilities: Cloud Computing, Electronic Transformation, DevOps Consulting and far more

3. Actonic – actonic.de &#13

Expertise: Privacy Compliance, Salesforce Consulting, IT Aid and much more

4. ENCS Networks – encsnetworks.com &#13

Abilities: Cloud Computing, IT Infrastructure, Details Science and far more

5. Hooman – hooman.layout &#13

Skills: Cloud Administration, Electronic Transformation, Support Providers and more

6. oBookkeeping – obookkeeping.com &#13

Abilities: IT Consultancy, Accounting, Bookkeeping and more

7. RheinBrücke IT Consulting – rheincs.com &#13

Knowledge: Consulting & Advisory Expert services, Application Maintenance & Guidance, Screening Solutions and more

8. PAASE – paase.co.uk &#13

Experience: Internet marketing Automation, Digital Profits Development, E mail Advertising and additional

9. Electronic Socius – digitalsocius.co.uk &#13

Knowledge: Custom made Methods Implementation & Integration, Information Migration, Managed Companies and extra

10. Meta Guard Mobitech – metaguard.in &#13

Abilities: IT Companies, App Enhancement, Cybersecurity and a lot more

11. Veri Cloud – veri.cloud &#13

Know-how: Salesforce Consultancy, Salesforce Undertaking Advancement, Integration Providers and a lot more

12. Codincity – codincity.com &#13

Knowledge: Cloud Products and services, Cloud Economics, Cloud Native Advancement and additional

13. GS Providers – gsservices.pl &#13

Experience: IT Outsourcing, IT Recruitment, Managed Services and a lot more

14. Alambda – alambda.com &#13

Experience: Cloud Development, IT Instruction, Software package Advancement and more

15. Manu’s Informatics – manus.inf.br &#13

Skills: IT Consulting, Cloud Hosting, Net Progress and extra

16 Marketing and advertising Automation Italia – marketingautomationitalia.it &#13

Expertise: Promoting Automation, Product sales Automation, eCommerce Automation and additional

17. Pure Proposals – pureproposals.com &#13

Experience: Proposal Growth, PandaDoc Onboarding & Coaching, PandaDoc Document Migration and additional

18. 365 Coaching Hub – 365traininghub.co.nz &#13

Experience: Microsoft Groups, Microsoft 365, Cybersecurity and far more

19. Mogrify – mogrify.com &#13

Skills: Managed Expert services, Internet marketing Automation, Collaborative Technique Workshops and additional

20. EMPIRE Luxurious Global Corporation – empireluxury.intercontinental &#13

Knowledge: App Enhancement, World-wide-web Structure, Internet Improvement and a lot more

21. DATAMI – datami.us &#13

Know-how: Penetration Screening, Vulnerability Evaluation, Smart Contract Audits and much more

22. AllegianceTek – allegiancetek.com &#13

Experience: IT Audit, IT Assist, Infrastructure Administration and far more

23. KOTWEL – kotwel.com &#13

Abilities: AI and Equipment Mastering Alternatives, AI Instruction Facts Products and services, Linguistic Expert services and more

24. T&N – tn-ict.com &#13

Knowledge: IT Protection, Cloud Computing, IT Business Infrastructure and extra

Brand names can take a look at the top rated IT providers providers by area, measurement, normal hourly amount and portfolio on DesignRush.

About DesignRush:

DesignRush.com is a B2B market connecting corporations with businesses by way of pro reviews and company ranking lists, awards, knowledge sources and individualized company recommendations for vetted projects.

Bank customers, companies lose billions to Nigeria’s weak cybersecurity

Bank customers, companies lose billions to Nigeria’s weak cybersecurity

Godfrey George writes on how Nigerian institutions can strengthen their cybersecurity to safeguard themselves against illegal hackers

Students of Babcock University, Ilishan-Remo, Ogun State, a private Christian co-educational university owned and operated by the Seventh-Day Adventist Church, could not believe their eyes when they logged into their school’s website on Tuesday.

Some hackers had broken the site’s firewall, taken full control of the website and even posted pornographic materials.

An ex-student, who did not want to be named, said she almost dropped her phone when she opened the website to apply for her transcript that morning.

The 22-year-old, who recently graduated from the varsity’s engineering faculty, told Sunday PUNCH that she felt embarrassed and threatened, at the same time.

“I felt like I couldn’t breathe for a moment. We are talking about a university’s website overtaken by hackers who post pornographic pictures and videos,” she said.

Going online to chat with her friend in her class WhatsApp group, news of the intrusion had already spread to her utmost shock.

On Twitter, a user, Dami Adenuga, took a screenshot of the ‘porn-infested’ website interface and splashed it on his page.

He wrote, “Babcock University’s website was hacked and porn was uploaded there. You people no dey fear God?”

Hours after the cyberattack on the site, our correspondent, who monitored the situation, observed that more content was being uploaded hours after the first one went out.

The hackers requested visitors to the website to click on a link to chat live with pornstars.

For a faith-based institution, the cyberattack was a hit from a thunderbolt.

Reaching out to a source within the school information technology department on that day seemed impossible as the lines rang out.

Hours later, the source called back to say the lewd content had been brought down but declined to speak on the kind of attack it was and if a ransom was paid to the hackers.

“Bro, it was a terrible one. We worked with external hands to take back the website and we have improved website security,” he simply said with a cold tone.

Tech experts believe that it must have been a ransomware attack, where a hacker or a group of hackers, take over a site and the real owners are required to pay a ransom to retrieve the site.

A Lagos-based tech entrepreneur, Mba Mba, noted that the Babcock situation might not be that straightforward.

“It will be hard to know exactly who is responsible except if the school decides to engage other cybersecurity experts to look into the matter. This means employing legal hackers to fish out whoever is responsible would be the beginning.

“But, from this end, it could have been an internal breach just to demean the university, which prides itself as one of the best faith-based institutions in the country.

“It could have been a ransomware attack or a denial of service or session hijacking, also known as a man-in-the-middle attack. Only a proper assessment can prove that,” he added.

The day after the attack, the management of the varsity apologised for the glitches.

The university’s Director of Communication and Marketing, Joshua Suleiman, in a statement on Wednesday, confirmed that the school’s Information Management System Account was hacked

He said, “We never voluntarily, either by omission or commission, sent out such information to anyone, so we are sorry if it made a wrong impression. Rest assured, we have secured our network already.

“We have always recognised that constant vigilance is required to protect against intrusions because of our understanding that even the most diligent cybersecurity efforts have not been able to address all cyber risks that organisations face.

“This is why, unfortunately, malicious attacks and intrusion efforts are continuous and evolving, and in certain cases, they have been successful at the most robust institutions.”

The message by the school’s image maker highlighted a critical point – messages were sent out to users.

The ex-student who spoke to Sunday PUNCH noted that she got messages to click on some links but found out that they were fishy.

“I learnt some of my colleagues who clicked on the links had their data wiped out,” she added.

Schools as targets

In the past, cyberattacks like ransomware and data breaches happened in many schools and universities around the world, leading to the loss of sensitive information and damage to their reputations.

In 2015, the Federal University of Technology, Owerri, Imo State’s website was hacked by a syndicate identified as the Nigerian Cyber Army, known for its illicit acts of breaching cybersecurity

The hackers terrorised many websites with various attacks like malware – software that is specifically designed to disrupt, damage, or gain unauthorised access to a computer system – and SQL Injection Attacks – unauthorised access to sensitive data, such as passwords, credit card details and personal user information – for weeks on end.

A member of the group, Batch Fweak, was said to have made a post on Facebook, stating, “Nobody can stop me. FUTO on my mind.”

A few hours later, the university’s website was defaced as some students claimed that their data might have been tampered with.

Using what experts term a ‘noob trick’, which entails uploading a shell amidst other procedures to deface a website, NCA gained access to the site.

The university retrieved the website later that day.

An Oyo State-based school administrator, Mr Olu Francis, said hackers took over his secondary school’s website, got the personal information of some parents and sent them text messages.

“We (school management) didn’t notice it because we were still developing the site. But we had uploaded all the information of our students and parents/guardians there to get a feel of what it would look like,” he said.

To his surprise, some parents called to tell him that they got text messages to pay certain fees into a specified account with a strange name so they called to confirm.

“The annoying thing is that some parents already transferred the money and called me to ask if I got the alert. When I checked my other line, I found out that I was also sent that text message. It was like a nightmare. I was running helter-skelter in search of a solution.

“I asked the developer to shut down the site but it was already too late; the damage was massive. We are talking about over 800 students in a section of the school and another 1400 or so in another section,” he added.

Francis stated that he had to personally call every parent/guardian to tell them what happened after sending counter-text messages to them.

“I visited the bank to trace the account, but the bank said the person was not their customer and that the account that was used had been dormant for years and may have just been used as a pathway to siphon the money.

“It was amazing how a bank official would tell me that nonsense. I got a court injunction for the account to be frozen but, to my greatest surprise, the account truly had been dormant for more than five years. The owner had died years before that,” he added.

Frustrated, Francis said he got tired of the matter and dropped it but moved all the school’s funds from that bank to another one that promised better cyber safety.

Attacks on NPC, INEC servers

Barely months after the National Population Commission opened up its portal for recruitment and other needs, and weeks before a national census, scheduled to hold from May 3 to 5, hackers invaded the NPC server.

This, according to experts, may be a way to frustrate the project aimed at obtaining accurate figures for economic planning and other related matters.

A Manager at the NPC, Dr Inuwa Jalingo, at a meeting in Abuja, however, stated that the situation had been put under control through “specialised workforce, Information and Communication Technologies classes and mop-up phase.”

In early January, the Chairman of the Independent National Electoral Commission, Prof. Mahmood Yakubu, noted that there were attempts to hack into the commission’s system ahead of the general elections.

The INEC chairman, who was represented by the Deputy Director of ICT, Dr Lawrence Bayode, noted that the attacks came in from different parts of the world.

He said, “We were looking at the system yesterday and we were seeing that people were trying to come into the system from France; but we are also putting some infrastructure in place (to make sure they don’t)”.

Days after the election, the Managing Director, Galaxy Backbone, the Federal Government’s information technology and shared services provider, Muhammad Abubakar, said the company blocked over 200 cyberattacks during the presidential and National Assembly elections on February 25.

According to him, the result viewing portal of INEC suffered a system collapse that forced it offline for several hours on election day, “spawning a severe backlog in the transmission of presidential election results over the high throughput infrastructure.”

On March 15, Mr Isa Pantami, the country’s communication and digital economy minister, acknowledged that the INEC server recorded more than 12 attacks both within and outside the country’s cyberspace.

He said in the run-up to the 2023 general elections, threat intelligence revealed an astronomical increase in cyber threats to Nigerian cyberspace, adding that generally, threats to public websites and portals averaged 1.55 million daily.

Banks worst hit

A January report by Financial Institutions Training Centre revealed that Nigerian bank customers lost a total of N2.72bn to fraud in the first and second quarters of 2022.

Between July and September 2020, banks, according to the Nigeria Inter-Bank Settlement System Plc, lost N3.5bn to fraud-related incidents, representing a 534 per cent increase from the same period in 2019, when it was N552m.

In 2018, commercial banks in Nigeria lost a cumulative N15bn ($32.36m) to electronic fraud and cybercrime.

This was a 537 per cent increase on the N2.37bn loss recorded in 2017.

In the same period in 2018, over 25,043 bank customers and depositors lost N1.9bn to cyber fraud, with fraud incidents rising by 55 per cent from the previous year’s 17,600.

Nigeria’s Consumer Awareness and Financial Enlightenment Initiative had projected a $6tn loss by 2030 to cybercrime within and outside Nigeria. These crimes are committed mostly through phishing and identity theft.

In September 2022, suspected fraudsters, during a three-day cyber-attack, hacked a customer’s account domiciled in an old-generation bank and transferred N523.337m from the account to 18 different accounts in the same bank.

The spokesperson for the Police Special Fraud Unit in Ikoyi, Lagos State, SP Eyitayo Johnson, said the suspects subsequently transferred the money from the 18 accounts into 225 accounts domiciled in 22 other banks and financial institutions.

 He added that the coordinated cyber-attack was carried out on Saturday, April 23, till the early hours of Monday, April 25, 2022, adding that two suspects had been arrested in connection to the crime.

In January 2023, a bank customer with one of the top banks, Chiamaka Agim, lamented how over N4m was debited from her account without her authorisation.

Speaking to Sunday PUNCH, Agim said between 8.43pm and 9pm, she lost over N4m from her account.

“I was first debited N3.7m to another bank, N222,900 to another bank and N102,000 to another account.

“What was left in my account was about N12,900.

“I couldn’t even breathe well. I couldn’t think. In a space of five minutes, my entire life’s savings were wiped off. I don’t know who did this and I don’t know how it happened,” she said.

She further stated that she visited the bank the next day but was told to get some documents, which she did.

In the end, the bank said it retrieved about N800,500, which she blatantly rejected.

It took days for the bank to finally get some substantial sum back to the lady although it kept insisting that the victim bought a token for some online transactions, a claim she continuously opposed.

In March 2023, the Lagos State Police Command arraigned a fraud syndicate comprising eight men before the Federal High Court in Lagos for allegedly hacking the server of an electronic platform, ITEX Integrated Services Limited, and stealing N435.3m.

The defendants, including Aderuku Adedayo, Adigun Benjamin, Awopetu Tosin, Ajibade Ayomide, Ojo Olwaseun, Miller Oluwafemi, Olaleye Samuel and Ajibade Ayodeyi, are facing charges bordering on conspiracy, hacking, stealing and fraud preferred against them by the police.

The prosecutor, Morufu Animashaun, told the court that the defendants conspired among themselves and others now at large to commit the offences on September 7, 2022, at 1E, Sinari Daranijo Street, Victoria Island, Lagos.

According to the prosecutor, the offences contravened sections 8(a), 1(1)(a), 2(a) and 7(2)(b)of the Advance Fee Fraud and other Fraud Related Offences Act 2006, and punishable under Section 1(3) of the same Act.

All the defendants pleaded not guilty to the charges.

In another related case, a man, Salau Femi, was arrested by detectives from the Special Fraud Unit of the Nigeria Police Force for allegedly hacking into the server of a Nigerian bank to steal N1.87bn.

The suspect, police said, was the kingpin of a syndicate that specialised in hacking into the servers of banks and corporate agencies.

He was arrested after he hacked the Flex-Cube Universal Banking System of a first-generation bank.

The SFU spokesman, Johnson, in a statement, said the suspect created fictitious credits totalling N1.87bn on the accounts of three of the bank’s customers.

A leading fintech company recently denied being hacked after reports emerged that hackers had stolen over $4m from its accounts in Nigeria.

The company stated that it identified an unusual trend of transactions on some users’ profiles during a routine check of its transaction monitoring system.

However, according to the company, no user lost any funds, adding that the fintech’s security measures addressed the issue before any harm could be done.

The recent developments in the hack highlight the increasing threat of cybercrime and the need for companies to invest in robust security measures to protect themselves and their customers.

A growing menace

A January 19 Forbes report stated that over 800,000 passwords and 50,000 individuals were targets of a Nigerian fraud operation cybercriminal gang, known as SilverTerrier.

According to the report, 11 individuals were arrested in December by Interpol.

The international policing agency said the suspects appeared to have targeted as many as 50,000 individuals and companies via Business Email Compromise (BEC).

“These so-called BEC scams help criminals find a way to intercept emails, either via hacking into accounts or spoofing email addresses, and trick companies into sending funds to the fraudsters rather than business partners with whom they believed they were interacting.

“BEC remains the most costly kind of fraud to Americans. According to the FBI’s most recent annual cybercrime report, losses totalled $1.8bn in 2020 alone, with global losses estimated to be close to $5bn in the years between 2018 and 2020. That makes it a far more financially damaging crime than ransomware, one of the better-known cyberattacks,” part of the report read.

The SilverTerrier gang is known as one of the more successful BEC fraud groups, and Interpol said initial analysis of one of the 11 suspects’ computers indicated they had more than 800,000 usernames and passwords, which could potentially have been used to hack into company email accounts.

Another suspect was found to be monitoring conversations between 16 companies and their clients to divert legitimate transactions just as they were about to be made, Interpol said.

An Assistant Inspector-General of Police, Garba Umar, said while working with Interpol, he was able to “give the order to hunt down these globally active criminals nationwide, flushing them out no matter where they tried to hide in my country.”

The report revealed how a cybersecurity company, Palo Alto Network,  tracked all BEC fraud coming out of Nigeria under the name SilverTerrier and found that among the nearly 500 different “actors” involved, they were “often connected through only a few degrees of separation on social media platforms,” showing links between over 120 actors.

The company also claimed that one of those arrested had previously been apprehended by the FBI in 2018.

“His recent arrest marks one of the first known instances of a Nigerian actor being arrested twice for BEC,” it added.

This will not be the first large-scale cyber fraud Nigeria would witness.

In November 2022, a gang of hackers known as OPERA1ER, stole at least $11m from companies in Nigeria, Benin, Cameroon, 11 other African countries, and Argentina.

This is according to a new report from Group-IB, a cybersecurity firm, titled, ‘OPERA1ER: Playing God without permission,’ in collaboration with researchers from Orange CERT Coordination Centre.

The firm disclosed that digital forensic artefacts analysed by it and Orange followed more than 30 successful intrusions of the gang between 2018 and 2022.

The company’s data revealed that companies in Ivory Coast were the most targeted.

It said this helped it to trace affected organisations in Ivory Coast, Mali, Burkina Faso, Benin, Cameroon, Bangladesh, Gabon, Niger, Nigeria, Paraguay, Senegal, Sierra Leone, Uganda, Togo, and Argentina.

In April 2022, some suspected Russian hackers attacked some Nigerian websites, including the popular betting platform, Bet9ja.

This is coming after the United States said it secretly removed malware from computer networks around the world in its bid to pre-empt Russian cyberattacks.

Bet9ja first announced that it was having issues with its website on a Wednesday on its verified Twitter handle.

According to the company, its customers were not able to log in to their accounts.

It said, “We are currently experiencing an issue with our website. This means you may not be able to log in.

“We take this matter very seriously and our IT team is working on it as their number one priority right now.”

However, the next day, Thursday, the firm announced that it had become a victim of a cyberattack.

Bet9ja said, “The Bet9ja betting platform, just like many market-leading global organisations, has recently become a victim of a sophisticated criminal cyber-attack, which is restricting our customers from having access to the platform.

“We are working tirelessly with our IT team, independent forensics, and cybercrime experts to resolve this; we take this matter extremely seriously. Our priority is protecting our customers and you have our assurances that your accounts will not be compromised, and all your funds are safe.”

In a previous post, the firm added that its customer’s funds were secured.

Bank, insurance firms targets – IBM

The International Business Machines Corporation in its most recent report published in March stated that the financial and insurance sectors of Middle Eastern and African countries were faced with more cyberattacks in 2022 than other sectors in the region.

The firm stated that the two sectors accounted for 44 per cent of incidents in 2022, which was four percentage points lower than the 48 per cent recorded in 2021.

Hackers also prioritised attacks on professional, business and consumer services sectors during this period, with the sectors accounting for 22 per cent of attacks.

Security Leader at IBM MEA, Kleimert Knibbs, said, “Proactively managing security risks and evolving cybercrime tactics is a critical priority for organisations across MEA.

“The X-Force Threat Intelligence Index findings demonstrate the continued threat of ransomware and the increasing use of thread hijacking tactics.

“To safeguard against these threats, companies must remain vigilant and focus on effective incident response planning. As the security landscape evolves, it is crucial to prioritise threat intelligence and strengthen defences.”

According to the report, the deployment of backdoors, which allow remote access to systems, emerged as the top action by attackers in the region last year.

It stated that ransomware and worms tied for the second-most common attack type in the region at 18 per cent each.

The firm explained that the IBM Security X-Force Threat Intelligence Index tracks new and existing trends and attack patterns — pulling from billions of data points from network and endpoint devices, incident response engagements and other sources.

ABU, UNN vulnerable

Three years ago, a Pakistani Penetration Tester,  Touseef Gul, discovered some bugs (weaknesses or vulnerabilities that hackers can exploit) in three Nigerian universities — Nnamdi Azikiwe University, Akwa; Ahmadu Bello University, Zaria, and Salem University, Lokoja — and Mount Kenya University, a private university in Thika, Kenya.

Bug hunters and penetration testers are cybersecurity professionals that test for loopholes that hackers can exploit in websites or apps of reputable organisations and report them with insights on how to fix them and prevent any intrusion or abuse before it becomes public knowledge.

According to Gul, all he did was a surface search on the main domain of the websites (URL), and he found the bugs without having to go deep into their systems.

“With ABU, Zaria, for example, all I needed to do was type in portal.abu.edu.ng on my browser along with a few other characters, and I discovered the bugs,” he stated.

Gul reported his findings to the universities in 2017, and the developers from UNIZIK reportedly responded by saying the issue could not be resolved due to a crisis in the region.

In the University of Uyo, Akwa Ibom, in 2014, there was pandemonium when some students claimed to have a copy of the General Studies exam question before the exam time.

With hacking, some students access and manipulate results from their school server, input scores for exams they never sat for;  register for courses without having to pay for them, and even get onto a school’s admission list to add or take out names.

A few months ago, a government agency’s website was cloned by hackers and many users unknowingly inputted their data, thinking they were applying for a job.

Victims lost money as the agency continued to turn a blind eye.

Cyber laws in Nigeria

As more and more spaces open up in the digital world, so has cybercrime grown in leaps and bounds.

To combat these issues, the government came up with the Cybercrimes (Prohibition and Prevention) Act (2015).

“Cyberlaw acts as a shield over cyberspace, preventing cybercrime from occurring. The government is committed to developing and enforcing regulations to combat illicit online activities,” a publication on legal luminary, Olisa Agbakoba (SAN)’s website stated.

 The CPPA (2015) has a significant impact on cyber law in Nigeria as it creates a comprehensive legal, regulatory, and institutional framework in Nigeria to prohibit, prevent, detect, prosecute, and punish cybercrime.

The Act encourages cybersecurity and protection of computer systems and networks, electronic communications, data and computer programmes, intellectual property, and privacy rights, as well as the protection of important national information infrastructure.

Highlighting the categories of the law, the publication stated that cybercrimes against people included cyber harassment and stalking, e-mail phishing, various sorts of spoofing, credit card fraud, and identity theft.

Cybercrime against property includes distributed denial of service attacks, hacking, virus transmission, cyber and typosquatting, computer vandalism, copyright infringement, and intellectual property rights breaches.

“The expansion of the Internet has revealed that the channel of cyberspace is being used by people and groups to threaten foreign governments as well as intimidate a country’s citizens.

“When an individual hacks into a government or military-run website, the offence becomes terrorism,” the report added.

The law also established a Cybercrime Advisory Council in charge of handling issues relating to the prevention and combating of cybercrimes, cyber threats, computer-related cases and the promotion of cybersecurity in the country.

Cyberattacks in Africa increased by 300{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} —  Pantami

Pantami, on Tuesday, disclosed that Africa’s digital economy is facing a major challenge as cyberattacks continue to rise at an alarming rate.

According to Pantami, a recent report by the Africa Cybersecurity Report noted that cyberattacks in Africa increased by 300 per cent over the last year alone, adding that this trend is worrisome given that Africa’s digital economy is on the rise and has been projected to be worth $180bn by 2025 by the World Bank.

The minister, who spoke at the opening ceremony of a two-day cybersecurity stakeholder workshop in Abuja, however, said the growth could be severely impeded if businesses and organisations did not take the necessary steps to protect themselves against cyber threats.

Strengthen cyber infrastructure – NCS

The President, National Computer Society, Prof. Adesina Sodiya, in an interview with our correspondent, said Nigerian digital spaces had been experiencing cyberattacks for quite some time.

According to him, some of the tertiary institutions in the country, last year, experienced denial of service and man-in-the-middle attacks, among others.

“As a nation, we have been talking about it for quite some time that we need to continue to prepare and update our cyber infrastructure because these attacks are going to be there forever.

“It is just like the physical armed robbers. We now have a situation where many corporate organisations are moving to e-governance and embarking on digital infrastructure.

“Of course, this digital community that we have all found ourselves in makes it easy for us all to access resources that are available remotely.

“In cybersecurity, the major concern is that these websites must guarantee legitimate access and legitimate use of resources. The truth is that these cybercriminals will continue to develop their threats to whatever barrier we put in place but we must continue to update our systems as we go on to counter the attacks if they come,” he noted.

Another cybersecurity expert and founder, IDot Creations, Chukwuemeka Orjiani, said the Federal Government should give regular updates to individuals and organisations on cybersecurity.

On how to avoid attacks, he said, “People should be told how to get firewalls, VPNs and other ways to mitigate attacks. It is not healthy to put your information online. Learn to change your passwords and PIN and not click on any link you see.”

Another expert, Enoch Ibidapo, said the goal of an attack is to steal personal information, such as login credentials, account details and credit card numbers.

“Targets are typically the users of financial applications, SaaS (software as a service) businesses, e-commerce sites and other websites where logging in is required.

“Information obtained during an attack could be used for many purposes, including identity theft, unapproved fund transfers, or an illicit password change,” he added.

According to him, employing more cybersecurity programmers and enlightening the public on what they should and should not do on the Internet would go a long way to mitigate the attacks.

Analysis-Alibaba overhaul leaves fate of prized cloud unit up in the air

Analysis-Alibaba overhaul leaves fate of prized cloud unit up in the air

By Josh Horwitz

SHANGHAI (Reuters) – Alibaba’s 6-way separation approach has raised questions about the very long-term condition of its financially rewarding cloud unit, offered that it will have to deal with major regulatory scrutiny at a time when competitiveness is intensifying each in China and overseas.

Although a split into a standalone unit will give investors a probability to make focused bets on a business enterprise believed by analysts to be worth amongst $41 billion and $60 billion, the move could put Alibaba’s cloud unit even extra in the cross-hairs of Chinese and abroad regulators, very likely slowing its progress.

Some analysts claimed external investment and separation from Alibaba’s core ecommerce small business could assist it increase abroad, exactly where it is considerably driving rivals these types of as Amazon Website Services. But other folks see the Chinese condition investing in the cloud device or it even likely non-public, given its dominance in the domestic cloud computing sector.

Alibaba’s planned Cloud Intelligence Group, which will house the cloud company AliCloud as perfectly as the tech giant’s synthetic intelligence and semiconductor investigation, has a 36{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} market share in China’s domestic cloud computing sector.

Its servers host reams of data from firms ranging from tech friends to merchants, the handling and sharing of which has in modern decades drawn escalating scrutiny from Beijing.

“Alibaba’s business strains have various levels and types of regulatory sensitivity,” stated Gavekal Dragonomics analyst Thomas Gatley in a take note this 7 days.

“For cloud computing, details stability is paramount.”

Alibaba and China’s commerce ministry did not quickly reply to queries sent on Friday.

Altering Sector DYNAMICS

Getting condition investment and drawing closer to the Chinese government could fulfill regulators in Beijing, who have rolled out new regulations regulating the dealing with of info in China and set up a facts bureau to underline their concentrate on the location.

It could also assistance AliCloud to compete much more correctly in China, in which all round need for cloud computing from world wide web companies is slowing and progress is mainly coming from governments and state-owned enterprises which have not migrated to the cloud as swiftly.

Although federal government entities “will not fully reject” corporations like Alibaba, Baidu, and Tencent Holdings for their initiatives, “they will have a tendency to opt for firms with a govt funding and backgrounds,” claimed Zhang Yi, who tracks China’s cloud computing sector at exploration organization Canalys.

In the to start with 50 percent of previous yr, China’s top three telcos – China Cellular, China Unicom, and China Telecom – collectively surpassed Alibaba’s share in the domestic cloud market for the 1st time, according to brokerage Jefferies, underscoring Beijing’s growing reliance on point out-backed carriers for data management.

But rising nearer to Beijing has a downside, claimed Michael Tan, a Shanghai-primarily based associate of legislation organization Taylor Wessing.

“It could backfire at the global stage, as it could possibly then confront even a lot more focus from the U.S.,” he explained.

In January, Reuters reported that the Biden administration is examining Alibaba’s cloud business to identify irrespective of whether it poses a hazard to U.S. national security.

OTHER Problems

The cloud device has its possess domestic troubles to take care of.

In 2021, China’s Ministry of Industry and Facts Technologies suspended an details-sharing partnership with AliCloud on the grounds that Alibaba did not report a security vulnerability linked to the open up-resource logging framework Apache Log4j2.

And in December 2022, Alibaba Cloud professional what it termed its “longest significant-scale failure” for much more than a ten years soon after its Hong Kong and Macau servers endured a really serious outage that affected lots of providers in the area together with ones belonging to crypto exchange OKX.

Weeks following the outage, Alibaba team Chairman and CEO Daniel Zhang took more than as head of the cloud unit, a part he will proceed to maintain concurrently even soon after the split-up.

Another risk from the planned break up of the cloud unit, which had profits of about $11.5 billion previous calendar year, is that previously captive in-household Alibaba consumers start courting rivals, hurting its profits.

But splitting the cloud device absent could also be a beneficial for the other Alibaba firms, some analysts reported.

“When all data was set in 1 basket at Alibaba, there could usually be issue about misuse of information in just the organization to maximise profit,” stated Tan at Taylor Wessing.

“The restructuring will assistance stay away from this.”

($1 = 6.8902 Chinese yuan renminbi)

(Reporting by Josh Horwitz Enhancing by Brenda Goh and Muralikumar Anantharaman)