April 2023 - Page 15 of 17 - Technology News

April 4, 2023

China seethes as US chip controls threaten tech ambitions

BEIJING — Furious at U.S. efforts that cut off access to technologies to make sophisticated laptop chips, China’s leaders look to be having difficulties to figure out how to retaliate without hurting their possess ambitions in telecoms, artificial intelligence and other industries.

President Xi Jinping’s governing administration sees the chips that are utilized in every little thing from phones to kitchen appliances to fighter jets as essential property in its strategic rivalry with Washington and attempts to obtain prosperity and global affect. Chips are the middle of a “technology war,” a Chinese scientist wrote in an formal journal in February.

China has its have chip foundries, but they supply only small-conclude processors applied in autos and appliances. The U.S. federal government, starting off below then-President Donald Trump, is slicing off access to a growing array of applications to make chips for pc servers, AI and other sophisticated programs. Japan and the Netherlands have joined in limiting access to technology they say may be applied to make weapons.

Xi, in unusually pointed language, accused Washington in March of attempting to block China’s enhancement with a marketing campaign of “containment and suppression.” He called on the community to “dare to combat.”

In spite of that, Beijing has been slow to retaliate in opposition to U.S. companies, perhaps to prevent disrupting Chinese industries that assemble most of the world’s smartphones, tablet computers and other shopper electronics. They import much more than $300 billion well worth of foreign chips each year.

The ruling Communist Occasion is throwing billions of dollars at making an attempt to accelerate chip advancement and lessen the will need for overseas technological know-how.

China’s loudest criticism: It is blocked from buying a device readily available only from a Dutch company, ASML, that utilizes ultraviolet light-weight to etch circuits into silicon chips on a scale calculated in nanometers, or billionths of a meter. Devoid of that, Chinese efforts to make transistors quicker and additional successful by packing them a lot more intently alongside one another on fingernail-measurement slivers of silicon are stalled.

Building processor chips demands some 1,500 actions and technologies owned by U.S., European, Japanese and other suppliers.

“China won’t swallow every little thing. If hurt occurs, we have to just take motion to protect ourselves,” the Chinese ambassador to the Netherlands, Tan Jian, instructed the Dutch newspaper Financieele Dagblad.

“I’m not likely to speculate on what that may be,” Tan stated. “It will not just be severe text.”

The conflict has prompted warnings the entire world may decouple, or split into independent spheres with incompatible technological innovation standards that indicate desktops, smartphones and other products and solutions from one particular area would not operate in other people. That would increase expenditures and may slow innovation.

“The bifurcation in technological and economic methods is deepening,” Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong of Singapore said at an financial discussion board in China very last month. “This will impose a large economic cost.”

U.S.-Chinese relations are at their cheapest degree in a long time because of to disputes above security, Beijing’s remedy of Hong Kong and Muslim ethnic minorities, territorial disputes and China’s multibillion-dollar trade surpluses.

Chinese industries will “hit a wall” in 2025 or 2026 if they cannot get subsequent era chips or the equipment to make their personal, explained Handel Jones, a tech sector consultant.

China “will get started falling behind considerably,” claimed Jones, CEO of Worldwide Business Methods.

Beijing could possibly have leverage, while, as the biggest source of batteries for electric powered cars, Jones claimed.

Chinese battery giant CATL supplies U.S. and Europe automakers. Ford Motor Co. ideas to use CATL know-how in a $3.5 billion battery manufacturing facility in Michigan.

“China will strike back again,” Jones mentioned. “What the community may see is China not offering the U.S. batteries for EVs.”

On Friday, Japan elevated strain on Beijing by joining Washington in imposing controls on exports of chipmaking machines. The announcement didn’t point out China, but the trade minister reported Tokyo doesn’t want its technological know-how employed for armed forces functions.

A Chinese foreign ministry spokeswoman, Mao Ning, warned Japan that “weaponizing sci-tech and trade issues” would “hurt others as well as oneself.”

Hrs later, the Chinese government declared an investigation of the most important U.S. memory chip maker, Micron Know-how Inc., a critical provider to Chinese factories. The Cyberspace Administration of China claimed it would look for national protection threats in Micron’s technological know-how and producing but gave no aspects.

The Chinese military also desires semiconductors for its advancement of stealth fighter jets, cruise missiles and other weapons.

Chinese alarm grew immediately after President Joe Biden in October expanded controls imposed by Trump on chip production engineering. Biden also barred Americans from aiding Chinese companies with some procedures.

To nurture Chinese suppliers, Xi’s governing administration is stepping up help that field industry experts say now amounts to as a lot as $30 billion a yr in investigate grants and other subsidies.

China’s major maker of memory chips, Yangtze Memory Technologies Corp., or YMTC, obtained a 49 billion yuan ($7 billion) infusion this year from two formal resources, in accordance to Tianyancha, a economical details company.

A single was the government’s key investment decision auto, the China Nationwide Built-in Circuit Business Expenditure Fund, identified as the Massive Fund. It was started in 2014 with 139 billion yuan ($21 billion) and has invested in hundreds of firms.

The Huge Fund released a second entity, known as the Large Fund II, in 2019 with 200 billion yuan ($30 billion).

In January, chip producer Hua Hong Semiconductor explained Big Fund II would add 1.2 billion yuan ($175 million) for a planned 6.7 billion yuan ($975 million) wafer fabrication facility in eastern China’s Wuxi.

In March, the Cabinet promised tax breaks and other assistance for the marketplace. It gave no selling price tag. The governing administration also has established up “integrated circuit talent schooling bases” at 23 universities and six at other educational facilities.

“Semiconductors are the ‘main battlefield’ of the present China-U.S. engineering war,” Junwei Luo, a scientist at the official Institute of Semiconductors, wrote in the February concern of the journal of the Chinese Academy of Sciences. Luo known as for “self-reliance and self-enhancement in semiconductors.”

The scale of spending needed is huge. The world business chief, Taiwan Semiconductor Producing Corp., or TSMC, is in the third yr of a a few-year, $100 billion strategy to extend study and manufacturing.

Builders together with Huawei Technologies Ltd. and VeriSilicon Holdings Co. can style and design logic chips for smartphones as strong as people from Intel Corp., Apple Inc., South Korea’s Samsung Electronics Co. or Britain’s Arm Ltd., in accordance to sector scientists. But they cannot be made without the need of the precision technology of TSMC and other international foundries.

Trump in 2019 crippled Huawei’s smartphone model by blocking it from buying U.S. chips or other technology. American officers say Huawei, China’s to start with worldwide tech brand, might facilitate Chinese spying, an accusation the corporation denies. In 2020, the White Property tightened controls, blocking TSMC and other people from applying U.S. technology to develop chips for Huawei.

Washington threw up new hurdles for Chinese chip designers in August by imposing limitations on computer software recognized as EDA, or digital layout automation, alongside with European, Asian and other governments to limit the distribute of “dual use” technologies that could be made use of to make weapons.

In December, Biden additional YMTC, the memory chip maker, and some other Chinese firms to a blacklist that restrictions entry to chips made any place working with U.S. applications or procedures.

China’s foundries can etch circuits as tiny as 28 nanometers apart. By distinction, TSMC and other world competition can etch circuits just three nanometers apart, 10 instances the Chinese industry’s precision. They are shifting towards two nanometers.

To make the hottest chips, “you will need EUV (intense ultraviolet lithography) applications, a really sophisticated procedure recipe and not just a couple of billion pounds but tens and tens of billions of dollars,” said Peter Hanbury, who follows the business for Bain & Co.

“They’re not going to be ready to create competitive server, Computer system and smartphone chips,” Hanbury explained. “You have to go to TSMC to do that.”

China’s ruling celebration is making an attempt to create its very own software suppliers, but scientists say it is considerably behind a world wide network spread throughout dozens of nations around the world.

Huawei claimed in a video on its site in December it was functioning on EUV technology. But making a machine equivalent to ASML’s may possibly cost $5 billion and involve a ten years of study, in accordance to sector specialists. Huawei did not respond to a request for comment.

The day when China can supply its personal EUV equipment is “very considerably absent,” reported Hanbury.

___

AP researcher Yu Bing in Beijing and AP Author Mike Corder in Amsterdam contributed.

April 3, 2023

Marvel’s Avengers fans mourn the “misunderstood” superhero game as its final update goes live

Marvel’s Avengers gamers are pouring one particular out for Crystal Dynamics’ ensemble superhero game as its remaining key update goes live on all platforms.

Update 2.8, which is dwell now, is essentially a totally free-for-all for Marvel’s Avengers faithfuls who however system on actively playing now that the sport has primarily been relegated to upkeep-only position.

Crystal Dynamics suggests (opens in new tab) the update “unlocks nearly all Market goods for cost-free, in addition to introducing remaining buffs that will make Heroes sense additional powerful as you proceed to appreciate Marvel’s Avengers in the long term!”

Listed here (opens in new tab) you can read the studio’s thorough programs for Marvel’s Avengers’ “conclusion-of-aid” transition period of time, which will previous until September 30, at which place all official help will cease. In addition to all of the outfits, emotes, takedowns, and nameplates that’ll be mechanically additional to your Hero Card after you install variation 2.8, Crystal Dynamics is also offering all players who have at the very least one accomplishment by April 1 Iron Man’s Variable Threat Reaction struggle match.

The vibe in the local community in the wake of Marvel’s Avengers’ ultimate update is usually bittersweet. For all its flaws, the video game has its diehards, many of whom see Marvel’s Avengers as a missed prospect that when held a large amount of prospective.

This sort of a unfortunate working day 😞 😢 so significantly probable. @embracergroup you should truly locate the appropriate workforce and place this on Unreal Engine 5 with time passes. There is an prospect for this sport to excel with the right vision and leadership @PlayAvengersMarch 31, 2023

See much more

An underwhelming end to a match that experienced so considerably probable to be good. The graphics/art have been great, fight was great, campaign was excellent, yet these items were ruined by deficiency of suitable direction. I wish we could’ve gotten closure to the Kree Invasion, Ultron, Captain Marvel, and so forth. https://t.co/1qtTrLRDMgMarch 31, 2023

See a lot more

For all the ups and downs, this activity was a thing definitely distinctive and it was clear right from the start out that all those who worked on it actually cared, and as a player that intended the environment. Thank you 🫡March 31, 2023

See much more

Many others are simply just grateful for what they look at to be a “misunderstood” video game.

Farewell to this misunderstood match. I had heaps of enjoyment actively playing this and just as a lot entertaining photographing it. I hope extra persons get to appreciate it following this remaining update. ❤️ https://t.co/guqRcVClM5 pic.twitter.com/SPX72xSoT4March 31, 2023

See far more

THANK YOU, @PlayAvengers! 👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻This video game gave me so numerous excellent times. I designed new buddies, battles and had so a lot enjoyment. It is really been 3 decades of good adventures. 🥹💙✨THANK YOU Local community! 💜#AvengersGame pic.twitter.com/DiMAjo8xtDMarch 31, 2023

Other people still say that, with nearly every little thing getting no cost and people looking at important buffs, now may possibly be the time for Marvel’s Avengers naysayers to give it a shot at very long past.

The game’s dying patch went are living currently making anything free of charge and buffing characters.May unironically be semi really worth checking out now.Unhappy the dev cycle ended in advance of far more amazing figures ended up additional even though. https://t.co/GSVWuR5nMoMarch 31, 2023

See extra

In case y’all skipped it and are even now fascinated in playing #MarvelsAvengers I’m likely gonna check it out myself before it shuts down for fantastic in September. https://t.co/5x26HVQWekMarch 31, 2023

See additional

anyway now im heading to purchase marvel’s avengers https://t.co/L9nB92DWVEMarch 31, 2023

See extra

For all those in the latter camp thinking of checking out Marvel’s Avengers for the to start with time, it should not be too challenging to discover it at a discounted price tag via a reliable retailer, but if you’re a Activity Go subscriber, you really don’t have to pay out something further to participate in it there.

Seeking in advance, here are some forthcoming Marvel video games to be psyched for.

April 3, 2023

The ‘AI tax’ on AI-enabled applications in the cloud

Back again in 2019, I wrote about the “container tax.” In very simple terms, this is the added value to use containers properly in just a cloud-centered application. It involves growth, functions, and other fees that containers incur. The target of leveraging containers is to offset the extra costs with the positive aspects they provide.

Lots of other technologies appear with more fees, which may possibly or may perhaps not justify using that particular technological innovation. The most up-to-date instance is synthetic intelligence in cloud-dependent apps. Providers should take into account the extra expenses of AI versus its likely benefit.

AI is almost nothing new but is heading as a result of a renaissance thanks to the acceptance of generative AI platforms and the likely price of leveraging AI from inside applications. We have developed AI-enabled apps considering the fact that the 1960s. Their worth at times outweighs their expenses and from time to time not.

The largest difficulty with AI enablement is its overuse. For a time, AI was seldom utilized, largely for the reason that it was costly and did not deliver a lot value to offset the further expenditures and pitfalls.

Most AI engineers of the 1980s, together with myself, are energized to see the capabilities of today’s generative AI engines this sort of as ChatGPT. The cloud brought AI back onto platforms with lots of situations the capabilities of past AI methods at drastically reduced costs. So considerably, so superior, proper?

At challenge are the further charges that need to have to be viewed as when working with AI subsystems from inside of present or internet-new applications—in other terms, the AI tax. In a lot of scenarios, AI is getting tossed into purposes without thinking of its purpose or the price it can make. Sometimes the worth is easy to spot. Most situations, it does not deal with the further charges of AI-enabling a new or existing application. That is in which the hassle comes.

What are the additional expenditures of leveraging AI, and what wants to be comprehended right before applying it? Right here are some essential AI “taxes” to contemplate:

Infrastructure costs: Acquiring AI-based cloud options will need extra computing ability and storage abilities. The expected financial commitment in more powerful hardware and expected expert services from cloud suppliers will increase charges outright and ongoing.

Information acquisition and planning prices: You will need high-good quality data suitable to your use case to make efficient AI products. Buying and planning this facts can be time-consuming and highly-priced, in particular if you must gather information from several resources or thoroughly clean and preprocess it to ensure precision.

Training fees: AI styles demand instruction with big quantities of details to learn how to make accurate predictions or choices. Schooling AI versions is a computationally intense procedure that necessitates major methods and therefore, much more income.

Servicing prices: The moment AI products are deployed, they will have to be monitored and taken care of to make certain they proceed to run effectively. This requires ongoing updates, bug fixes, and effectiveness tuning that all increase to the in general prices of the option.

Expertise prices: Establishing AI-based mostly cloud answers involves specialised skills and experience, which could not be offered in-dwelling. Choosing or contracting AI authorities is an high-priced endeavor.

I really do not consider that any of these “taxes” arrive as a surprise to most cloud architects or cloud engineers. We’ve recognised about them for decades. The disconnect is usually amongst how they exist within just the context of specific programs and, most importantly, the opportunity price the software can return employing AI.

In some instances, the returned price justifies the use of AI. In quite a few a lot more instances, the selling price tag to AI-allow a new or current application does not make sense—at minimum, not but. Much like our discussions all around container taxes, we must have practical and justifiable enterprise explanations to leverage AI.

Nowadays, it seems everybody would like to insert “AI experience” to their CV. That’s not a great reason to introduce AI into an application or group. Trial and mistake at this amount hardly ever positive aspects an group or a profession. Prior to you go too crazy with this things, take a breath and justify your AI vision with ROI info and figures. You could be shocked by the results.

April 3, 2023

Alienware m18 R1 laptop review: Bigger and heavier than the MSI Titan GT77

KFA2 GeForce RTX 4090 SG
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU Alienware m18 R1
Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
(194.5 – 233, n=7) Alienware x17 R2 P48E
Intel Core i9-12900HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU Alienware x17 RTX 3080 P48E
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU Razer Blade Pro 17 2021 (QHD Touch)
Intel Core i7-10875H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU HP Omen 16-n0033dx
AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, AMD Radeon RX 6650M Corsair Voyager a1600
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, AMD Radeon RX 6800M Razer Blade 17 (i7-12800H, RTX 3070 Ti)
Intel Core i7-12800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU KFA2 GeForce RTX 4090 SG
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Alienware m18 R1
Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
(155.9 – 230, n=8) Alienware x17 R2 P48E
Intel Core i9-12900HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU Razer Blade Pro 17 2021 (QHD Touch)
Intel Core i7-10875H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU Razer Blade 17 (i7-12800H, RTX 3070 Ti)
Intel Core i7-12800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU Alienware x17 RTX 3080 P48E
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU Corsair Voyager a1600
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, AMD Radeon RX 6800M HP Omen 16-n0033dx
AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, AMD Radeon RX 6650M KFA2 GeForce RTX 4090 SG
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Alienware m18 R1
Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
(122.2 – 194.9, n=14) Alienware x17 R2 P48E
Intel Core i9-12900HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT)
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, AMD Radeon RX 6850M XT Razer Blade Pro 17 2021 (QHD Touch)
Intel Core i7-10875H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU Alienware x17 RTX 3080 P48E
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU Razer Blade 17 (i7-12800H, RTX 3070 Ti)
Intel Core i7-12800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU Corsair Voyager a1600
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, AMD Radeon RX 6800M MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH
Intel Core i9-11900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU

88 (56^min) fps ∼39{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -55{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

HP Omen 16-n0033dx
AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, AMD Radeon RX 6650M KFA2 GeForce RTX 4090 SG
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU Alienware m18 R1
Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
(115.7 – 162.9, n=14) Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT)
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, AMD Radeon RX 6850M XT Razer Blade Pro 17 2021 (QHD Touch)
Intel Core i7-10875H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU Alienware x17 RTX 3080 P48E
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU Razer Blade 17 (i7-12800H, RTX 3070 Ti)
Intel Core i7-12800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH
Intel Core i9-11900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU

71.2 (44^min) fps ∼33{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -55{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Corsair Voyager a1600
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, AMD Radeon RX 6800M KFA2 GeForce RTX 4090 SG
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU Alienware m18 R1
Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
(83 – 94.7, n=7) Alienware x17 RTX 3080 P48E
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU Razer Blade Pro 17 2021 (QHD Touch)
Intel Core i7-10875H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT)
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, AMD Radeon RX 6850M XT Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH
Intel Core i9-11900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU

42.9 (27^min) fps ∼27{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -54{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Corsair Voyager a1600
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, AMD Radeon RX 6800M

KFA2 GeForce RTX 4090 SG
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090

809 (30.7^min, 374^P0.1, 574^P1) fps ∼100{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +25{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Alienware m18 R1
Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU

649.2 (630^min) fps ∼80{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU

617 (563^min) fps ∼76{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -5{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
(444 – 718, n=6) Alienware x17 R2 P48E
Intel Core i9-12900HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU

500.9 (452^min) fps ∼62{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -23{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Alienware x17 RTX 3080 P48E
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU

370.2 (327^min) fps ∼46{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -43{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Razer Blade Pro 17 2021 (QHD Touch)
Intel Core i7-10875H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU

368 (320^min) fps ∼45{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -43{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Razer Blade 17 (i7-12800H, RTX 3070 Ti)
Intel Core i7-12800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU Corsair Voyager a1600
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, AMD Radeon RX 6800M

309 (29.3^min, 92.9^P0.1, 225^P1) fps ∼38{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -52{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

HP Omen 16-n0033dx
AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, AMD Radeon RX 6650M

276.5 (260^min) fps ∼34{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -57{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT)
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, AMD Radeon RX 6850M XT KFA2 GeForce RTX 4090 SG
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090

730 (83.6^min, 375^P0.1, 541^P1) fps ∼100{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +29{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Alienware m18 R1
Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU

563.8 (501^min) fps ∼77{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
(371 – 617, n=6) Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU

405.9 (371^min) fps ∼56{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -28{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Alienware x17 R2 P48E
Intel Core i9-12900HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU

388.5 (358^min) fps ∼53{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -31{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Razer Blade 17 (i7-12800H, RTX 3070 Ti)
Intel Core i7-12800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU Alienware x17 RTX 3080 P48E
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU

294 (277^min) fps ∼40{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -48{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Razer Blade Pro 17 2021 (QHD Touch)
Intel Core i7-10875H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU

288.6 (275^min) fps ∼40{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -49{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Corsair Voyager a1600
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, AMD Radeon RX 6800M

236 (13.7^min, 152^P0.1, 192^P1) fps ∼32{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -58{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

HP Omen 16-n0033dx
AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, AMD Radeon RX 6650M

217.4 (196^min) fps ∼30{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -61{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT)
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, AMD Radeon RX 6850M XT KFA2 GeForce RTX 4090 SG
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090

629 (95.8^min, 317^P0.1, 465^P1) fps ∼100{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +42{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Alienware m18 R1
Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU

441.6 (406^min) fps ∼70{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
(305 – 449, n=8) Alienware x17 R2 P48E
Intel Core i9-12900HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU

267.7 (247^min) fps ∼43{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -39{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU

240.9 (228^min) fps ∼38{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -45{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Razer Blade Pro 17 2021 (QHD Touch)
Intel Core i7-10875H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU

208.1 (190^min) fps ∼33{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -53{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Alienware x17 RTX 3080 P48E
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU

192 (183^min) fps ∼31{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -57{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT)
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, AMD Radeon RX 6850M XT Corsair Voyager a1600
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, AMD Radeon RX 6800M

177.8 (43.6^min, 105.5^P0.1, 142.7^P1) fps ∼28{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -60{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH
Intel Core i9-11900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU

174 (141^min) fps ∼28{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -61{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Razer Blade 17 (i7-12800H, RTX 3070 Ti)
Intel Core i7-12800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU HP Omen 16-n0033dx
AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, AMD Radeon RX 6650M

167 (157^min) fps ∼27{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -62{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

KFA2 GeForce RTX 4090 SG
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090

306 (93.3^min, 156.1^P0.1, 239^P1) fps ∼100{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +43{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Alienware m18 R1
Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU

213.9 (205^min) fps ∼70{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
(174.8 – 216, n=13) MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU

198.9 (190^min, 191^P1) fps ∼65{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -7{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Alienware x17 R2 P48E
Intel Core i9-12900HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU

128 (124^min) fps ∼42{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -40{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT)
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, AMD Radeon RX 6850M XT Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU

113.9 (110^min) fps ∼37{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -47{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Razer Blade 17 (i7-12800H, RTX 3070 Ti)
Intel Core i7-12800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU Razer Blade Pro 17 2021 (QHD Touch)
Intel Core i7-10875H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU

108.3 (98^min) fps ∼35{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -49{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Corsair Voyager a1600
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, AMD Radeon RX 6800M

108 (38^min, 58.3^P0.1, 88.2^P1) fps ∼35{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -50{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Alienware x17 RTX 3080 P48E
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU

105.2 (98^min) fps ∼34{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -51{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH
Intel Core i9-11900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU

93.8 (75^min) fps ∼31{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -56{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

HP Omen 16-n0033dx
AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, AMD Radeon RX 6650M

90.1 (84^min) fps ∼29{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -58{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

KFA2 GeForce RTX 4090 SG
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090

286 (92.1^min, 181.2^P0.1, 243^P1) fps ∼100{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +73{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Alienware m18 R1
Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU

165.6 (152^min) fps ∼58{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
(130 – 167.6, n=6) Alienware x17 RTX 3080 P48E
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU

80.2 (75^min) fps ∼28{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -52{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Razer Blade Pro 17 2021 (QHD Touch)
Intel Core i7-10875H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU

80 (74^min) fps ∼28{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -52{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU

72.5 (66^min) fps ∼25{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -56{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT)
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, AMD Radeon RX 6850M XT MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH
Intel Core i9-11900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU

66.7 (57^min) fps ∼23{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -60{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Corsair Voyager a1600
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, AMD Radeon RX 6800M

59.5 (40.7^min, 48.1^P0.1, 51.6^P1) fps ∼21{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -64{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

KFA2 GeForce RTX 4090 SG
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090

188.2 (5.08^min, 200^P1) fps ∼100{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +1{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Alienware x17 R2 P48E
Intel Core i9-12900HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU

187 (2.05^min, 200^P1) fps ∼99{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} 0{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
(186 – 187.5, n=6) Alienware m18 R1
Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU

186.7 (1.455^min, 142.9^P1) fps ∼99{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU

186.1 (1.631^min, 100^P1) fps ∼99{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} 0{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Alienware x17 RTX 3080 P48E
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU

183 (3.7^min, 143^P1) fps ∼97{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -2{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Razer Blade 17 (i7-12800H, RTX 3070 Ti)
Intel Core i7-12800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU

182.6 (2.85^min, 125^P1) fps ∼97{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -2{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Razer Blade Pro 17 2021 (QHD Touch)
Intel Core i7-10875H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU

181 (3.66^min, 143^P1) fps ∼96{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -3{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Corsair Voyager a1600
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, AMD Radeon RX 6800M

177.1 (4.8^min, 125^P1) fps ∼94{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -5{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT)
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, AMD Radeon RX 6850M XT

173.2 (3.96^min, 111.1^P1) fps ∼92{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -7{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

KFA2 GeForce RTX 4090 SG
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090

188 (2.61^min, 200^P1) fps ∼100{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} 0{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Alienware m18 R1
Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU

187.3 (1.557^min, 200^P1) fps ∼100{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
(186.8 – 187.6, n=7) Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU

187 (1.607^min, 142.9^P1) fps ∼99{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} 0{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Alienware x17 R2 P48E
Intel Core i9-12900HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU

186.7 (1.441^min, 166.7^P1) fps ∼99{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} 0{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Razer Blade Pro 17 2021 (QHD Touch)
Intel Core i7-10875H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU

182 (3.86^min, 143^P1) fps ∼97{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -3{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Alienware x17 RTX 3080 P48E
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU

180 (4.3^min, 125^P1) fps ∼96{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -4{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Corsair Voyager a1600
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, AMD Radeon RX 6800M

178.3 (4.09^min, 142.9^P1) fps ∼95{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -5{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Razer Blade 17 (i7-12800H, RTX 3070 Ti)
Intel Core i7-12800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU

178 (3.85^min, 125^P1) fps ∼95{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -5{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT)
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, AMD Radeon RX 6850M XT

173.7 (4.15^min, 125^P1) fps ∼92{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -7{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

KFA2 GeForce RTX 4090 SG
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090

188.4 (2.61^min, 200^P1) fps ∼100{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +2{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
(183.1 – 187.3, n=8) Alienware m18 R1
Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU

185.3 (1.896^min, 125^P1) fps ∼98{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Alienware x17 R2 P48E
Intel Core i9-12900HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU

185.1 (2.11^min, 142.9^P1) fps ∼98{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} 0{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU

184.7 (1.535^min, 111.1^P1) fps ∼98{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} 0{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU

184.1 (1.758^min, 111.1^P1) fps ∼98{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -1{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Razer Blade 17 (i7-12800H, RTX 3070 Ti)
Intel Core i7-12800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU

176.8 (3.24^min, 125^P1) fps ∼94{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -5{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Alienware x17 RTX 3080 P48E
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU

176 (4.96^min, 125^P1) fps ∼93{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -5{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Razer Blade Pro 17 2021 (QHD Touch)
Intel Core i7-10875H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU

174 (3.14^min, 125^P1) fps ∼92{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -6{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Corsair Voyager a1600
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, AMD Radeon RX 6800M

172 (4.64^min, 125^P1) fps ∼91{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -7{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT)
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, AMD Radeon RX 6850M XT

168.3 (5.75^min, 125^P1) fps ∼89{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -9{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

KFA2 GeForce RTX 4090 SG
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090

187.9 (3.5^min, 200^P1) fps ∼100{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +1{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
(184.1 – 187.4, n=7) Alienware m18 R1
Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU

186 (1.556^min, 125^P1) fps ∼99{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU

185.5 (1.486^min, 125^P1) fps ∼99{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} 0{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Alienware x17 R2 P48E
Intel Core i9-12900HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU

184.5 (2.01^min, 142.9^P1) fps ∼98{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -1{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Razer Blade 17 (i7-12800H, RTX 3070 Ti)
Intel Core i7-12800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU

173.1 (4.2^min, 125^P1) fps ∼92{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -7{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Razer Blade Pro 17 2021 (QHD Touch)
Intel Core i7-10875H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU

173 (3.66^min, 125^P1) fps ∼92{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -7{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Alienware x17 RTX 3080 P48E
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU

173 (27.1^min, 111^P1) fps ∼92{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -7{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Corsair Voyager a1600
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, AMD Radeon RX 6800M

171 (6.31^min, 125^P1) fps ∼91{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -8{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT)
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, AMD Radeon RX 6850M XT

168.2 (5.09^min, 111.1^P1) fps ∼90{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -10{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

KFA2 GeForce RTX 4090 SG
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090

187.1 (3.29^min, 142.9^P1) fps ∼100{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +1{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Alienware m18 R1
Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU

184.5 (1.946^min, 142.9^P1) fps ∼99{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
(179.8 – 186.5, n=9) MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU

182.6 (1.92^min, 111.1^P1) fps ∼98{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -1{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU

181.6 (1.674^min, 125^P1) fps ∼97{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -2{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Alienware x17 R2 P48E
Intel Core i9-12900HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU

180.8 (3.24^min, 142.9^P1) fps ∼97{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -2{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Razer Blade 17 (i7-12800H, RTX 3070 Ti)
Intel Core i7-12800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU

164.2 (4.34^min, 100^P1) fps ∼88{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -11{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Razer Blade Pro 17 2021 (QHD Touch)
Intel Core i7-10875H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU

164 (6.29^min, 111^P1) fps ∼88{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -11{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH
Intel Core i9-11900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU

164 (5.22^min, 100^P1) fps ∼88{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -11{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Alienware x17 RTX 3080 P48E
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU

163 (16.4^min, 111^P1) fps ∼87{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -12{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Corsair Voyager a1600
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, AMD Radeon RX 6800M

156.2 (7.96^min, 76.9^P1) fps ∼83{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -15{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT)
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, AMD Radeon RX 6850M XT

152 (5.06^min, 76.9^P1) fps ∼81{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -18{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

KFA2 GeForce RTX 4090 SG
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090

163.3 (13^min, 125^P1) fps ∼100{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +10{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Alienware m18 R1
Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU

149 (3.13^min, 111.1^P1) fps ∼91{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU

140.9 (3.54^min, 83.3^P1) fps ∼86{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -5{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
(107.8 – 151.6, n=14) Alienware x17 R2 P48E
Intel Core i9-12900HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU

126.3 (5.94^min, 90.9^P1) fps ∼77{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -15{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU

121.4 (3.6^min, 76.9^P1) fps ∼74{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -19{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Razer Blade 17 (i7-12800H, RTX 3070 Ti)
Intel Core i7-12800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU

103.8 (9.16^min, 71.4^P1) fps ∼64{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -30{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Razer Blade Pro 17 2021 (QHD Touch)
Intel Core i7-10875H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU

99.5 (5.74^min, 71.4^P1) fps ∼61{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -33{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH
Intel Core i9-11900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU

98.5 (17.3^min, 62.5^P1) fps ∼60{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -34{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Alienware x17 RTX 3080 P48E
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU

98.1 (9.21^min, 71.4^P1) fps ∼60{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -34{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Corsair Voyager a1600
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, AMD Radeon RX 6800M

92.8 (6.46^min, 55.6^P1) fps ∼57{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -38{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT)
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, AMD Radeon RX 6850M XT

92.6 (7.62^min, 55.6^P1) fps ∼57{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -38{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

KFA2 GeForce RTX 4090 SG
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090

166 (8.61^min, 125^P1) fps ∼100{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +14{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Alienware m18 R1
Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU

145.5 (2.46^min, 111.1^P1) fps ∼88{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU

138.5 (3.45^min, 76.9^P1) fps ∼83{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -5{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
(105.6 – 146.3, n=13) Razer Blade Pro 17 2021 (QHD Touch)
Intel Core i7-10875H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU

92.5 (4.54^min, 62.5^P1) fps ∼56{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -36{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Alienware x17 RTX 3080 P48E
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU

89.2 (7.71^min, 62.5^P1) fps ∼54{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -39{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT)
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, AMD Radeon RX 6850M XT

88.7 (5.83^min, 55.6^P1) fps ∼53{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -39{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU

87.6 (4.62^min, 55.6^P1) fps ∼53{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -40{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Corsair Voyager a1600
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, AMD Radeon RX 6800M

84 (5.57^min, 58.8^P1) fps ∼51{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -42{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH
Intel Core i9-11900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU

82.3 (16.3^min, 58.8^P1) fps ∼50{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -43{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

KFA2 GeForce RTX 4090 SG
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090

135.5 (6.08^min, 90.9^P1) fps ∼100{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +56{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Alienware m18 R1
Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU

86.9 (3.27^min, 58.8^P1) fps ∼64{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU

86.2 (3.93^min, 55.6^P1) fps ∼64{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -1{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
(60.1 – 90, n=8) Alienware x17 RTX 3080 P48E
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU

57.8 (8.03^min, 41.7^P1) fps ∼43{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -33{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Razer Blade Pro 17 2021 (QHD Touch)
Intel Core i7-10875H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU

53.8 (4.03^min, 37^P1) fps ∼40{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -38{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT)
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, AMD Radeon RX 6850M XT

50.5 (1.341^min, 32.3^P1) fps ∼37{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -42{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Corsair Voyager a1600
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, AMD Radeon RX 6800M

43.3 (23.3^min, 30.3^P1) fps ∼32{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -50{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU

38.2 (3.33^min, 26.3^P1) fps ∼28{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -56{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

KFA2 GeForce RTX 4090 SG
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090

187.8 (4.41^min, 200^P1) fps ∼100{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +6{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Alienware m18 R1
Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU

176.4 (1.959^min, 111.1^P1) fps ∼94{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU

175.7 (2.91^min, 111.1^P1) fps ∼94{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} 0{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
(88.9 – 180.2, n=7) Razer Blade Pro 17 2021 (QHD Touch)
Intel Core i7-10875H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU

106 (9.14^min, 76.9^P1) fps ∼56{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -40{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT)
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, AMD Radeon RX 6850M XT

98.5 (4.4^min, 71.4^P1) fps ∼52{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -44{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Alienware x17 RTX 3080 P48E
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU

98.1 (29.8^min, 71.4^P1) fps ∼52{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -44{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU

88.5 (5.15^min, 58.8^P1) fps ∼47{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -50{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH
Intel Core i9-11900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU

86.5 (25.9^min, 62.5^P1) fps ∼46{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -51{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Corsair Voyager a1600
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, AMD Radeon RX 6800M

85.4 (7.85^min, 66.7^P1) fps ∼45{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -52{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

KFA2 GeForce RTX 4090 SG
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090

513 (364^min, 323^P1) fps ∼100{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +22{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Alienware m18 R1
Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU

420 (312^min, 259^P1) fps ∼82{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
(298 – 440, n=5) Corsair Voyager a1600
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, AMD Radeon RX 6800M

286 (208^min, 181^P1) fps ∼56{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -32{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

HP Omen 16-n0033dx
AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, AMD Radeon RX 6650M

264 (193^min, 169^P1) fps ∼51{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -37{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

KFA2 GeForce RTX 4090 SG
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090

440 (297^min, 246^P1) fps ∼100{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +31{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Alienware m18 R1
Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU

336 (254^min, 185^P1) fps ∼76{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU

316 (221^min, 136^P1) fps ∼72{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -6{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
(254 – 375, n=7) Corsair Voyager a1600
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, AMD Radeon RX 6800M

226 (178^min, 142^P1) fps ∼51{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -33{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

HP Omen 16-n0033dx
AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, AMD Radeon RX 6650M

217 (166^min, 135^P1) fps ∼49{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -35{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

KFA2 GeForce RTX 4090 SG
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090

418 (290^min, 235^P1) fps ∼100{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +31{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Alienware m18 R1
Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU

320 (249^min, 161^P1) fps ∼77{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
(264 – 358, n=7) MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU

294 (222^min, 116^P1) fps ∼70{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -8{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Corsair Voyager a1600
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, AMD Radeon RX 6800M

226 (179^min, 137^P1) fps ∼54{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -29{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

HP Omen 16-n0033dx
AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, AMD Radeon RX 6650M

215 (159^min, 131^P1) fps ∼51{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -33{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

KFA2 GeForce RTX 4090 SG
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090

409 (282^min, 227^P1) fps ∼100{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +29{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Alienware m18 R1
Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU

318 (231^min, 173^P1) fps ∼78{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU

283 (209^min, 116^P1) fps ∼69{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -11{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
(223 – 322, n=8) Corsair Voyager a1600
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, AMD Radeon RX 6800M

192.3 (149^min, 122^P1) fps ∼47{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -40{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

HP Omen 16-n0033dx
AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, AMD Radeon RX 6650M

178.2 (151^min, 121^P1) fps ∼44{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -44{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

KFA2 GeForce RTX 4090 SG
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090

207 (167^min, 133^P1) fps ∼100{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +43{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Alienware m18 R1
Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU

144.7 (124^min, 94^P1) fps ∼70{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU

138.2 (118^min, 84^P1) fps ∼67{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -4{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
(70.3 – 144.7, n=12) Corsair Voyager a1600
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, AMD Radeon RX 6800M

49.7 (39^min, 39^P1) fps ∼24{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -66{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

HP Omen 16-n0033dx
AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, AMD Radeon RX 6650M

40.6 (31^min, 31^P1) fps ∼20{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -72{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

KFA2 GeForce RTX 4090 SG
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090

156.2 (136^min, 113^P1) fps ∼100{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +69{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Alienware m18 R1
Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU

92.2 (79^min, 74^P1) fps ∼59{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU

90.1 (78^min, 71^P1) fps ∼58{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -2{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
(75 – 92.2, n=12) Corsair Voyager a1600
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, AMD Radeon RX 6800M

29.9 (23^min, 23^P1) fps ∼19{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -68{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

KFA2 GeForce RTX 4090 SG
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090

82.5 (70^min, 71^P1) fps ∼100{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +81{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Alienware m18 R1
Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU

45.5 (38^min, 37^P1) fps ∼55{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU

44.9 (38^min, 37^P1) fps ∼54{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -1{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
(40.6 – 45.5, n=7) Corsair Voyager a1600
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, AMD Radeon RX 6800M

13.8 (11^min, 11^P1) fps ∼17{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -70{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

KFA2 GeForce RTX 4090 SG
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090

294 (249.5^min) fps ∼100{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +17{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Alienware m18 R1
Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU

251 (208.4^min) fps ∼85{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU

225 (187.6^min) fps ∼77{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -10{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU

225 (190.1^min) fps ∼77{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -10{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
(164.8 – 251, n=14) Alienware x17 R2 P48E
Intel Core i9-12900HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU

186.1 (164.8^min) fps ∼63{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -26{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH
Intel Core i9-11900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU

175 (138.4^min) fps ∼60{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -30{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Razer Blade 17 (i7-12800H, RTX 3070 Ti)
Intel Core i7-12800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU

173.6 (152.7^min) fps ∼59{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -31{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Alienware x17 RTX 3080 P48E
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU

164 (143.2^min) fps ∼56{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -35{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Razer Blade Pro 17 2021 (QHD Touch)
Intel Core i7-10875H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU

158 (136.3^min) fps ∼54{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -37{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Corsair Voyager a1600
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, AMD Radeon RX 6800M

146.1 (117.8^min) fps ∼50{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -42{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

HP Omen 16-n0033dx
AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, AMD Radeon RX 6650M

141 (120^min) fps ∼48{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -44{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT)
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, AMD Radeon RX 6850M XT

134.7 (115.7^min) fps ∼46{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -46{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

KFA2 GeForce RTX 4090 SG
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090

260 (226.7^min) fps ∼100{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +18{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Alienware m18 R1
Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU

220 (187.7^min) fps ∼85{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU

206 (174.7^min) fps ∼79{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -6{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
(149.1 – 220, n=14) Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU

200 (151.8^min) fps ∼77{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -9{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Alienware x17 R2 P48E
Intel Core i9-12900HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU

172.3 (152.2^min) fps ∼66{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -22{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Razer Blade 17 (i7-12800H, RTX 3070 Ti)
Intel Core i7-12800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU

159.3 (141.6^min) fps ∼61{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -28{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH
Intel Core i9-11900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU

155 (134.6^min) fps ∼60{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -30{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Alienware x17 RTX 3080 P48E
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU

148 (127.1^min) fps ∼57{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -33{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Razer Blade Pro 17 2021 (QHD Touch)
Intel Core i7-10875H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU

147 (127.4^min) fps ∼57{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -33{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

HP Omen 16-n0033dx
AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, AMD Radeon RX 6650M

130.7 (107.5^min) fps ∼50{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -41{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Corsair Voyager a1600
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, AMD Radeon RX 6800M

126.2 (107^min) fps ∼49{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -43{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT)
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, AMD Radeon RX 6850M XT

116.5 (94.8^min) fps ∼45{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -47{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

KFA2 GeForce RTX 4090 SG
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090

255 (214^min) fps ∼100{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +21{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Alienware m18 R1
Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU

194.1 (163.4^min) fps ∼76{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -8{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
(143.2 – 210, n=15) Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU

191 (165.9^min) fps ∼75{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -9{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Alienware x17 R2 P48E
Intel Core i9-12900HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU

166.6 (146.7^min) fps ∼65{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -21{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Razer Blade 17 (i7-12800H, RTX 3070 Ti)
Intel Core i7-12800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU

150 (131.4^min) fps ∼59{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -29{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH
Intel Core i9-11900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU

146 (120.5^min) fps ∼57{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -30{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Alienware x17 RTX 3080 P48E
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU

143 (121.6^min) fps ∼56{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -32{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Razer Blade Pro 17 2021 (QHD Touch)
Intel Core i7-10875H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU

139 (120.3^min) fps ∼55{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -34{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Corsair Voyager a1600
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, AMD Radeon RX 6800M

125.5 (105.8^min) fps ∼49{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -40{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

HP Omen 16-n0033dx
AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, AMD Radeon RX 6650M

118 (102.7^min) fps ∼46{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -44{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT)
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, AMD Radeon RX 6850M XT

112.5 (94.7^min) fps ∼44{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -46{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

KFA2 GeForce RTX 4090 SG
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090

233 (196.4^min) fps ∼100{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +20{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Alienware m18 R1
Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU

194.2 (157.6^min) fps ∼83{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU

185.9 (157.5^min) fps ∼80{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -4{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
(133.9 – 194.2, n=15) Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU

178.6 (153.9^min) fps ∼77{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -8{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Alienware x17 R2 P48E
Intel Core i9-12900HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU

158.9 (139.1^min) fps ∼68{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -18{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Razer Blade 17 (i7-12800H, RTX 3070 Ti)
Intel Core i7-12800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU

141.6 (124^min) fps ∼61{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -27{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Alienware x17 RTX 3080 P48E
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU

135 (117.3^min) fps ∼58{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -30{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Razer Blade Pro 17 2021 (QHD Touch)
Intel Core i7-10875H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU

134 (115.1^min) fps ∼58{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -31{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH
Intel Core i9-11900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU

131 (113.6^min) fps ∼56{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -33{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Corsair Voyager a1600
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, AMD Radeon RX 6800M

114.8 (94.7^min) fps ∼49{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -41{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

HP Omen 16-n0033dx
AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, AMD Radeon RX 6650M

100 (82.7^min) fps ∼43{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -49{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT)
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, AMD Radeon RX 6850M XT

94 (75.5^min) fps ∼40{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -52{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

KFA2 GeForce RTX 4090 SG
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090

234 (189.7^min) fps ∼100{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +23{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Alienware m18 R1
Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU

190.2 (152.2^min) fps ∼81{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU

178.9 (144.9^min) fps ∼76{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -6{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
(134.1 – 190.2, n=9) Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU

145.5 (109.1^min) fps ∼62{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -24{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Razer Blade Pro 17 2021 (QHD Touch)
Intel Core i7-10875H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU

128 (107.9^min) fps ∼55{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -33{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Alienware x17 RTX 3080 P48E
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU

111 (96.7^min) fps ∼47{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -42{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH
Intel Core i9-11900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU

110 (8.5^min) fps ∼47{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -42{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Corsair Voyager a1600
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, AMD Radeon RX 6800M

95.2 (83.7^min) fps ∼41{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -50{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT)
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, AMD Radeon RX 6850M XT

77.5 (62.8^min) fps ∼33{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -59{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

KFA2 GeForce RTX 4090 SG
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Alienware m18 R1
Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
(154.4 – 212, n=18) Alienware x17 R2 P48E
Intel Core i9-12900HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU Razer Blade 17 (i7-12800H, RTX 3070 Ti)
Intel Core i7-12800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH
Intel Core i9-11900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU Razer Blade Pro 17 2021 (QHD Touch)
Intel Core i7-10875H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU Alienware x17 RTX 3080 P48E
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT)
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, AMD Radeon RX 6850M XT HP Omen 16-n0033dx
AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, AMD Radeon RX 6650M Corsair Voyager a1600
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, AMD Radeon RX 6800M KFA2 GeForce RTX 4090 SG
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Alienware m18 R1
Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
(126.5 – 188.8, n=18) Alienware x17 R2 P48E
Intel Core i9-12900HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU Razer Blade 17 (i7-12800H, RTX 3070 Ti)
Intel Core i7-12800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU Razer Blade Pro 17 2021 (QHD Touch)
Intel Core i7-10875H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH
Intel Core i9-11900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU Alienware x17 RTX 3080 P48E
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU HP Omen 16-n0033dx
AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, AMD Radeon RX 6650M Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT)
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, AMD Radeon RX 6850M XT Corsair Voyager a1600
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, AMD Radeon RX 6800M KFA2 GeForce RTX 4090 SG
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Alienware m18 R1
Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
(100.7 – 146.4, n=19) Alienware x17 R2 P48E
Intel Core i9-12900HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU Razer Blade 17 (i7-12800H, RTX 3070 Ti)
Intel Core i7-12800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU Razer Blade Pro 17 2021 (QHD Touch)
Intel Core i7-10875H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH
Intel Core i9-11900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU Alienware x17 RTX 3080 P48E
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU HP Omen 16-n0033dx
AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, AMD Radeon RX 6650M Corsair Voyager a1600
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, AMD Radeon RX 6800M Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT)
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, AMD Radeon RX 6850M XT KFA2 GeForce RTX 4090 SG
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Alienware m18 R1
Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
(89.9 – 124.7, n=8) MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU Razer Blade Pro 17 2021 (QHD Touch)
Intel Core i7-10875H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH
Intel Core i9-11900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU Alienware x17 RTX 3080 P48E
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU Corsair Voyager a1600
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, AMD Radeon RX 6800M Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT)
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, AMD Radeon RX 6850M XT

KFA2 GeForce RTX 4090 SG
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090

710 (60.2^min, 542^P1) fps ∼100{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +49{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
(432 – 656, n=9) MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU

490 (190.6^min, 374^P1) fps ∼69{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +3{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Alienware m18 R1
Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU

475 (108.5^min, 369^P1) fps ∼67{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Alienware x17 R2 P48E
Intel Core i9-12900HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU

474 (62.3^min, 339^P1) fps ∼67{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} 0{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU

464 (23.5^min, 346^P1) fps ∼65{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -2{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Alienware x17 RTX 3080 P48E
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU

456 (41.1^min, 323^P1) fps ∼64{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -4{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Razer Blade Pro 17 2021 (QHD Touch)
Intel Core i7-10875H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU

437 (91.5^min, 338^P1) fps ∼62{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -8{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Corsair Voyager a1600
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, AMD Radeon RX 6800M

394 (205^min, 288^P1) fps ∼55{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -17{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT)
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, AMD Radeon RX 6850M XT

375 (193.7^min, 270^P1) fps ∼53{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -21{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Razer Blade 17 (i7-12800H, RTX 3070 Ti)
Intel Core i7-12800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU

369 (161.3^min, 275^P1) fps ∼52{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -22{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

HP Omen 16-n0033dx
AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, AMD Radeon RX 6650M

337 (135.8^min, 247^P1) fps ∼47{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -29{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

KFA2 GeForce RTX 4090 SG
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090

582 (60^min, 428^P1) fps ∼100{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +50{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
(357 – 508, n=9) MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU

396 (105.4^min, 296^P1) fps ∼68{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +2{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Alienware m18 R1
Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU

388 (107.3^min, 288^P1) fps ∼67{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU

315 (22.4^min, 261^P1) fps ∼54{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -19{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Alienware x17 R2 P48E
Intel Core i9-12900HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU

300 (92.3^min, 235^P1) fps ∼52{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -23{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT)
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, AMD Radeon RX 6850M XT

291 (153.8^min, 207^P1) fps ∼50{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -25{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Razer Blade Pro 17 2021 (QHD Touch)
Intel Core i7-10875H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU

278 (83.8^min, 235^P1) fps ∼48{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -28{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Alienware x17 RTX 3080 P48E
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU

269 (40.7^min, 189^P1) fps ∼46{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -31{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Razer Blade 17 (i7-12800H, RTX 3070 Ti)
Intel Core i7-12800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU

258 (154^min, 193.7^P1) fps ∼44{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -34{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Corsair Voyager a1600
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, AMD Radeon RX 6800M

258 (161.9^min, 196.1^P1) fps ∼44{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -34{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

HP Omen 16-n0033dx
AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, AMD Radeon RX 6650M

222 (135.5^min, 160.6^P1) fps ∼38{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -43{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

KFA2 GeForce RTX 4090 SG
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090

568 (59.5^min, 422^P1) fps ∼100{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +46{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU

391 (72.1^min, 298^P1) fps ∼69{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +1{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Alienware m18 R1
Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU

388 (97.1^min, 295^P1) fps ∼68{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
(343 – 465, n=10) Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT)
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, AMD Radeon RX 6850M XT

256 (112.2^min, 179.5^P1) fps ∼45{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -34{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Alienware x17 R2 P48E
Intel Core i9-12900HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU

243 (91.8^min, 171.1^P1) fps ∼43{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -37{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU

243 (24.9^min, 176.9^P1) fps ∼43{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -37{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Corsair Voyager a1600
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, AMD Radeon RX 6800M

229 (152.3^min, 169.8^P1) fps ∼40{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -41{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Alienware x17 RTX 3080 P48E
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU

225 (96.9^min, 169^P1) fps ∼40{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -42{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Razer Blade Pro 17 2021 (QHD Touch)
Intel Core i7-10875H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU

223 (77.9^min, 166^P1) fps ∼39{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -43{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Razer Blade 17 (i7-12800H, RTX 3070 Ti)
Intel Core i7-12800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU

217 (77^min, 153.8^P1) fps ∼38{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -44{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

HP Omen 16-n0033dx
AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, AMD Radeon RX 6650M

190 (123.2^min, 140.4^P1) fps ∼33{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -51{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH
Intel Core i9-11900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU

185 (31.9^min, 133^P1) fps ∼33{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -52{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

KFA2 GeForce RTX 4090 SG
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090

562 (60.1^min, 413^P1) fps ∼100{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +51{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU

373 (29.9^min, 272^P1) fps ∼66{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} 0{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Alienware m18 R1
Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU

373 (73.3^min, 273^P1) fps ∼66{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
(260 – 421, n=14) Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT)
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, AMD Radeon RX 6850M XT

230 (121.4^min, 165.6^P1) fps ∼41{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -38{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Alienware x17 R2 P48E
Intel Core i9-12900HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU

213 (71.8^min, 156.1^P1) fps ∼38{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -43{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU

208 (39.5^min, 154.8^P1) fps ∼37{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -44{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Corsair Voyager a1600
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, AMD Radeon RX 6800M

206 (116.9^min, 151.5^P1) fps ∼37{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -45{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Alienware x17 RTX 3080 P48E
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU

199 (44.5^min, 144^P1) fps ∼35{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -47{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Razer Blade Pro 17 2021 (QHD Touch)
Intel Core i7-10875H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU

197 (81.6^min, 149^P1) fps ∼35{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -47{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Razer Blade 17 (i7-12800H, RTX 3070 Ti)
Intel Core i7-12800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU

191.7 (101.9^min, 136.5^P1) fps ∼34{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -49{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

HP Omen 16-n0033dx
AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, AMD Radeon RX 6650M

167.2 (61.1^min, 120.8^P1) fps ∼30{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -55{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH
Intel Core i9-11900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU

165 (97.3^min, 123^P1) fps ∼29{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -56{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

KFA2 GeForce RTX 4090 SG
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090

504 (60.1^min, 360^P1) fps ∼100{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +64{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU

309 (143.5^min, 236^P1) fps ∼61{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} 0{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Alienware m18 R1
Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU

308 (67.2^min, 238^P1) fps ∼61{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
(255 – 315, n=13) Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT)
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, AMD Radeon RX 6850M XT

171 (127.1^min, 131.9^P1) fps ∼34{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -44{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Alienware x17 RTX 3080 P48E
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU

152 (81.4^min, 123^P1) fps ∼30{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -51{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Corsair Voyager a1600
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, AMD Radeon RX 6800M Razer Blade Pro 17 2021 (QHD Touch)
Intel Core i7-10875H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU

143 (80.5^min, 115^P1) fps ∼28{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -54{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU

136.7 (54.8^min, 112.1^P1) fps ∼27{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -56{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH
Intel Core i9-11900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU

123 (36.9^min, 94.8^P1) fps ∼24{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -60{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

KFA2 GeForce RTX 4090 SG
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090

277 (59.7^min, 234^P1) fps ∼100{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} +73{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Alienware m18 R1
Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU

159.8 (133.4^min, 139.2^P1) fps ∼58{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU

159.3 (50.2^min, 138.7^P1) fps ∼58{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} 0{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
(134.7 – 163.4, n=8) Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT)
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, AMD Radeon RX 6850M XT

92.1 (74.7^min, 78.7^P1) fps ∼33{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -42{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Alienware x17 RTX 3080 P48E
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU

91.6 (64.5^min, 78.7^P1) fps ∼33{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -43{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Razer Blade Pro 17 2021 (QHD Touch)
Intel Core i7-10875H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU

84.1 (69.5^min, 72.1^P1) fps ∼30{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -47{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Corsair Voyager a1600
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, AMD Radeon RX 6800M

77.2 (60.2^min, 64.1^P1) fps ∼28{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -52{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH
Intel Core i9-11900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU

72.1 (46.2^min, 60.4^P1) fps ∼26{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -55{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU

71.9 (29.8^min, 61.4^P1) fps ∼26{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1} -55{b7c9e2c88beb1a84f22d94ab877a147f4adc4b3519717f3f957a0f34e16918d1}

April 2, 2023

Epic Games Store’s Next Free Game Is One of Its Biggest Yet [UPDATE]

[UPDATE]: The leak has been verified by the Epic Games Retail store and the Dying Gentle Twitter account, Dying Gentle: Increased Version is established to be the subsequent totally free Epic Video games Retail store activity this coming thursday, exactly where it will be completely absolutely free to obtain for a entire 7 days.

Epic Games Store’s following no cost sport has seemingly leaked, and if the leak is precise, it really is a single of the biggest no cost video games to at any time be provided away by the electronic Laptop storefront. The leak comes the way of Twitter consumer billbil-kun, a nicely-identified leaker most effective recognised for leaking PS Furthermore free of charge game titles and Epic Games Store totally free games. In accordance to the leaker, the up coming no cost recreation set to be offered away by Epic Game titles amongst April 6 and April 13 is Dying Light, or extra specfically, Dying Gentle: Increased Editon, a unique version of the activity that comes with added written content, like Dying Mild: The Adhering to.

Dying Light-weight was unveiled on January 27, 2015 by Techland, who, up until finally that position, was predominately regarded for Dead Island, and to a lesser extent, Phone of Juarez. Now it can be ideal acknowledged for Dying Light-weight, it is most profitable match to date, acquiring bought about 20 millon copies through its 8 several years on the sector.

“From the creators of strike titles Useless Island and Call of Juarez. Winner of around 50 industry awards and nominations. The sport whose uncompromising method to gameplay set new specifications for initial-man or woman zombie game titles,” reads an official blurb about the activity. “Nevertheless supported with new material and no cost neighborhood gatherings many years just after the release. Survive in a city beset by a zombie virus! Find out the tough selection you will have to make on your top secret mission. Will loyalty to your superiors demonstrate much better than the will to help save the survivors? The selection is yours…”

For people that don’t know: Dying Gentle obtained a sequel in 2022, properly titled Dying Gentle 2. It marketed five million copies in its to start with month, but it appears to be the sequel has not realized the identical remaining power as the first activity, which marketed at a regular amount for a lot of yrs immediately after its launch. The online games reviewed simiarly, nonetheless the 1st match seems to be rememberd far more fondly of the two. However, the sequel expenditures $59.99 on Epic Video games Keep, nevertheless it is doable it will go on sale once and if the first match is manufactured free of charge next week.

All of that explained, take this leak with a grain of salt as it’s just a leak, not formal details. The source in query has established reliable and reliable in the earlier, but the earlier is the earlier and you can find no gurantee when it will come to leaks.

April 2, 2023

Supreme Court to hear Case of Web Designer Refusing to do Gay Wedding Sites

Lorie Smith, 38, of Littleton, Colo., could be the new experience of a countrywide discussion pitting homosexual legal rights in opposition to flexibility of speech in a circumstance some have referred to as a “free speech blockbuster.”

The Colorado internet web-site designer, who has sued her point out for the suitable to not include gay couples in her wedding day structure enterprise, will see her case argued ahead of the Supreme Court on Monday.

Lorie Smith’s case, 303Inventive v Elenis, is in front of the Supreme Court docket on Dec. 5.
Alliance Defending Independence

Critics see it as undoing civil legal rights protections that bar enterprises from discriminating versus who can receive their companies. Legal scholars see it as a check case on whether or not the state could compel speech by means of the generation of an expressive products that falls beneath the class of “art.”

The situation is a preemptive transfer towards the Colorado’s general public lodging legislation, which mandates that organizations can’t refuse to serve folks centered on race, faith or sexual orientation. Smith, who does not believe that in homosexual marriages due to the fact of her religious convictions, states the latest regulation forces her to possibly design and style sites for similar-intercourse weddings – if she delivers them for reverse-sex partners – or deal with fines and jail time.

The substantial court granted critique of Smith’s scenario in February and will decide whether applying community lodging legal guidelines – important to civil rights enforcement – to force an artist to guidance a certain message violates the free speech clause of the First Amendment.

“I wanted to do artwork for points I was truly passionate about,” she advised Newsweek in an interview about her decision to commence building wedding day web-sites six decades back. “I have always loved weddings and I needed to style and produce sites for weddings.”

Her web page – 303innovative.com (named after the Denver place code) – appears like a regular website designer’s website, showcasing almost everything from infant showers to politics to people with disabilities.

The place it may possibly vary from other people is less than the “about” pull-down where the designer explains her operate. In close proximity to the finish of a paragraph placing out her Christian beliefs, it reads:

“Since of my religion, however, I am selective about the messages that I produce or market – while I will serve anybody, I am normally very careful to prevent communicating ideas or messages, or endorsing events, solutions, solutions, or organizations, that are inconsistent with my spiritual beliefs.”

When she resolved to incorporate weddings to her repertoire in 2016, Smith knew that gay marriage had been legalized the 12 months prior to thanks to the Supreme Court’s Obergefell v. Hodges ruling. Smith, a member of a non-denominational evangelical church, not only believed that relationship really should only be among a person and a female, but she also preferred to stipulate on her site individuals were being the only marriages she’d design and style websites for.

Jack Phillips, defendant in Masterpiece Cakeshop case

Jack Phillips, a Colorado baker who refused to generate a marriage cake for a homosexual few, was sued in 2012. His situation went to the Supreme Courtroom in 2018 exactly where the courtroom claimed the state civil legal rights fee experienced proven hostility to his religious views.
Alliance Defending Liberty

She was also aware of an ongoing lawsuit, Masterpiece Cakeshop v. Colorado Civil Rights Commission, involving a close by baker, Jack Phillips, who experienced been sued by a gay couple for refusing to bake a cake for their marriage ceremony. The fee ruled that Phillips had damaged state law by discriminating against the few. The case made its way to the US Supreme Courtroom, which ruled in 2018 that the commission dealt with Phillips with anti-spiritual bias, but it did not rule on whether Phillips could refuse services to homosexuals on religious or freedom of speech grounds. This was remaining for an additional situation to make a decision.

“I was worried if I continued with this desire and produced artwork steady with my religion, I could be punished,” Smith reported. She then turned to her church to get direction on guarding her religious independence.

Following her pastor referred her to Alliance Defending Independence, the exact same law organization representing Masterpiece, “I took some time to look at my alternatives and in the end resolved to stand for my correct to discuss freely.”

The result is 303Artistic LLC v. Elenis (Aubrey Elenis heads the Colorado Civil Legal rights Fee). Some authorized gurus hope that the justices will definitively rule on liberty of speech and compelled speech – that is, whether people can be compelled to articulate messages they do not individually guidance.

“It would be helpful if they would give us a definition of what constitutes speech,” stated Raymond Ku, a constitutional law scholar at Circumstance Western Reserve College. Citing court conditions involving evangelical Christians who have refused to set up bouquets, supply cakes or get pictures for gay weddings, “The significant concern is: How do we ascertain when a distinct inventive or imaginative action expresses a message?’ Is the generation of these factors by definition ‘speech?’

In that scenario, “If you are forced to express a concept, that is a First Modification problem,” he said.

Us citizens United for Separation of Church and Condition, which has submitted an amicus brief opposing Smith, released a assertion earlier this year declaring a ruling on the matter would bring about extra confusion.

“By limiting the circumstance to the free speech issue, the Supreme Court could hand down a slender ruling that leaves lots of issues unanswered,” it explained. “The court’s conservative the vast majority may well conclude that the firm are not able to be compelled to make web-sites that broadcast messages with which it disagrees, on the grounds that web sites are a variety of conversation.

“But it really is challenging to see how that very same logic would extend to a caterer, a florist or the proprietor of a mattress-and-breakfast who refuses to provide LGBTQ people today, as individuals functions are not types of conversation.”

Smith mentioned she does have homosexual purchasers who’ve requested sites with messages that never contradict her beliefs and that she is speaking for all artists – even those ideologically opposed to her – and their flexibility to refuse commissions they uncover objectionable.

“Absolutely everyone ought to be free to pick the material of their speech,” she claimed. “I have not been capable to create and style for weddings because the point out of Colorado has been clear that I should generate information versus who I am.”

Soon after she submitted a federal lawsuit in September 2016, reaction was swift.

Lorie Smith, the plaintiff in the U.S.Supreme Court circumstance 303Artistic v. Elenis, claims she has acquired death threats due to the fact of her part in the case.
Alliance Defending Independence

“I was not well prepared for the backlash the earth had in retailer for me,” she reported. “Within an hour of submitting go well with, I acquired death threats and threats of bodily hurt.” A neighbor posted Smith’s property deal with on Facebook, powerful the designer to put her daughter’s university on warn. Her spouse was absent and for the reason that Smith had no safety method yet set up at her house, she slept on the flooring that evening in situation a person shot at her through a window.

Threats to her lifetime and attacks on her web-site by hackers have continued about the many years and intensified as the day for the arguments draws in the vicinity of.

“It has been horrific,” she claimed.

Smith misplaced at the district and circuit court docket ranges, partly for the reason that the situation was hypothetical in that Smith hadn’t been sanctioned by any govt system still [although commission officials said during the district court hearing they would investigate her if a complaint was filed]. The ADF ongoing to charm and the Supreme Court’s decision to consider the circumstance indicators the justices’ willingness to deal with a lengthy-simmering difficulty involving artists and other individuals in the wedding day sector who draw the line at homosexual unions.

“If I ended up a betting individual, I might wager she’d gain on the free speech grounds,” claimed Charles Russo, who teaches education and law at the College of Dayton. “There are already 5 justices in her corner” referring to Justices Brett Kavanaugh, Neil Gorsuch, Clarence Thomas, Samuel Alito and Amy Coney Barrett.

“In gentle of what occurred in Masterpiece,” he additional, “she was having the bull by the horns in filing this.”

As for the preemptive nature of the circumstance, “Complicated unjust rules is a hallmark of civil legal rights litigation,” stated Kellie Fiedorek, a person of the attorneys representing Smith. “Lorie and some others should not have to wait around until eventually the governing administration goes soon after them.”

ADF’s gamble that 303Resourceful may well set new precedent may perhaps pay out off, claimed Alan Brownstein, a retired legislation professor at the College of California/Davis who specializes in constitutional regulation.

“The fact the courtroom took the situation certainly suggests they are likely to rule in her favor,” he mentioned. “The big situation is how slim the court’s feeling is.”

The court’s impression could encompass not only net designers but photographers, cake bakers, flower arrangers and all method of individuals linked with the marriage field, he explained, or it could be a slim impression that encompasses only world wide web designers.

Taken to an intense, anyone could say their business enterprise actions were “expressive,” that means that “you could tear aside civil rights regulation,” he claimed. “You could say: ‘I will not promote meals to a black human being in a restaurant since I never want to talk the concept that one particular need to serve African Us residents together with whites.’ “

Brownstein stated that although there is a physique of legislation on how to rule when the governing administration stops individuals from exercising flexibility of speech, the policies are much less clear when it will come to compelled speech.

“We have a maze of inconsistent conditions that have under no circumstances been put jointly – in doctrine – that supports that framework,” he reported. “That’s a single of the factors this is a really hard circumstance.”